Chatbots: AI Market Discovery Index

Tracking how AI platforms recommend chatbots. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

Mark Huntley, J.D.
By Mark Huntley, J.D.Growth Strategist & AI Discovery Analyst
5 minutes read

Benchmark Summary

Tidio leads the Chatbots benchmark with valid recommendation coverage of 59.5% in September 2026, up from 43.9% in July 2026 — a rise of 15.6 points that the benchmark classifies as movement beyond normal month-to-month variation. Intercom holds second place at 58.4%, up from 50.8% in July 2026 (up 7.6 points), putting it 1.1 points behind the leader.

The category also recorded two brand-label transitions this month. Zendesk Chat entered the tracked-brand list with 43.5% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026 — the largest single-month rise in the benchmark — while Zendesk, which held 50.8% coverage in July 2026, recorded 0.0% in September 2026, the benchmark's largest decline, as it was tracked under the new Zendesk Chat label in the same month. A similar transition occurred with LiveChat: LiveChat (Text S.A. (formerly LiveChat Software S.A.) entered with 19.7% coverage while LiveChat, at 17.2% in July 2026, recorded 0.0% in September 2026.

Among brands tracked continuously across the series, Tidio and Intercom were the two significant risers on valid recommendation coverage, while the benchmark produced 437 qualified observations in September 2026, down from 476 in July 2026.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Sep 2026

0%15%30%45%60%Jul 2026Aug 2026Sep 2026
  • Tidio59.5%
  • Intercom58.4%
  • Zendesk Chat43.5%
  • LiveChat (Text S.A. (formerly LiveChat Software S.A.)19.7%
  • Freshdesk18.8%
  • ManyChat17.6%
  • Drift9.4%
  • Ada8.2%
  • Landbot3.4%
  • Chatfuel3.2%
  • LiveChat0.0%
  • Zendesk0.0%

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Measure

July 2026

September 2026

Movement

Qualified benchmark observations

476

437

Down 39

Tracked brands

10

12

Up 2

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

32.6%

43.7%

Up 11.1 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

59.9%

67.0%

Up 7.2 points

Leader by valid recommendation coverage

Zendesk (50.8%)

Tidio (59.5%)

Up 8.7 points

Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All six families were represented in all three months. August 2026 recorded 500 qualified observations, the highest in the series to date.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Chatbots

Research Scope and Qualification

The public benchmark denominator is the qualified benchmark observation count for each month, not a raw collection total.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Research stage

July 2026

September 2026

Qualified benchmark observations

476

437

Every percentage in the standings that follow is calculated against the qualified benchmark observation count for its own month, so readers comparing this category against others with a different qualified-observation count should keep that scope in mind.

AI Market Discovery Methodology

Current Brand Standings

Brand

Presence rate

Valid recommendation coverage

Top-three rate

Rank-one rate

Net sentiment

Tidio

79.0%

59.5%

31.1%

8.7%

0.83

Intercom

83.5%

58.4%

39.6%

11.2%

0.78

Zendesk Chat

62.9%

43.5%

23.6%

9.4%

0.77

LiveChat (Text S.A. (formerly LiveChat Software S.A.)

26.8%

19.7%

14.2%

9.2%

0.74

Freshdesk

30.2%

18.8%

8.2%

0.9%

0.73

ManyChat

23.8%

17.6%

9.2%

3.7%

0.80

Drift

17.6%

9.4%

3.9%

1.1%

0.62

Ada

9.8%

8.2%

1.6%

0.7%

0.88

Landbot

5.7%

3.4%

2.3%

0.2%

0.72

Chatfuel

4.8%

3.2%

1.4%

0.5%

0.67

LiveChat

-

0.0%

-

-

-

Zendesk

-

0.0%

-

-

-

How to Read the Standings

  • Presence rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned at all.
  • Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist.
  • Top-three rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the top three recommended options.
  • Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is the first recommended option.
  • Net sentiment: positive mentions minus negative mentions, divided by total mentions, on a scale from -1 to 1.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Brand

July 2026

September 2026

Movement since baseline

Ada

9.2%

8.2%

Down 1.0 points

Chatfuel

2.9%

3.2%

Up 0.3 points

Drift

10.1%

9.4%

Down 0.7 points

Freshdesk

23.7%

18.8%

Down 4.9 points

Intercom

50.8%

58.4%

Up 7.6 points

Landbot

2.9%

3.4%

Up 0.5 points

LiveChat

17.2%

0.0%

Down 17.2 points

LiveChat (Text S.A. (formerly LiveChat Software S.A.)

0.0%

19.7%

Up 19.7 points

ManyChat

15.3%

17.6%

Up 2.3 points

Tidio

43.9%

59.5%

Up 15.6 points

Zendesk

50.8%

0.0%

Down 50.8 points

Zendesk Chat

0.0%

43.5%

Up 43.5 points

Largest Increase: Zendesk Chat

Zendesk Chat appeared in the benchmark for the first time in September 2026 with 43.5% valid recommendation coverage, a gain of 43.5 points from 0.0% in July 2026 that moved beyond normal month-to-month variation. Its presence rate reached 62.9%, with a top-three rate of 23.6% and a rank-one rate of 9.4% in September 2026.

Largest Decline: Zendesk

Zendesk fell to 0.0% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026 from 50.8% in July 2026, a drop of 50.8 points that moved beyond normal month-to-month variation. This decline corresponds with the introduction of Zendesk Chat as a separately tracked brand label in the same month.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Category Leader: Tidio

Tidio moved to the top of the benchmark with 59.5% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026, up from 43.9% in July 2026, a gain of 15.6 points beyond normal month-to-month variation. Its presence rate reached 79.0% in September 2026, up from 55.9% in July 2026. Tidio has risen in each of the two months since July 2026.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Intercom's top-three rate of 39.6% in September 2026 was the highest in the benchmark, while its rank-one rate of 11.2% showed it led with the first-position recommendation most often. Tidio's 59.5% coverage carried a 31.1% top-three rate, showing frequent placement within the top three.

Brand

September 2026 top-three rate

September 2026 rank-one rate

July 2026 top-three rate

July 2026 rank-one rate

Intercom

39.6%

11.2%

29.8%

8.6%

Tidio

31.1%

8.7%

22.5%

5.9%

Zendesk Chat

23.6%

9.4%

-

-

Close coverage rates can still hide different first-position rates, as seen with Tidio's 59.5% coverage carrying an 8.7% rank-one rate compared with Intercom's 58.4% coverage carrying an 11.2% rank-one rate.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

All qualified observations in both reported months fell into the Brand Recommendation class, which measures discovery and consideration.

Buyer-intent class

July 2026

September 2026

Brand Recommendation

476

437

Pricing & Value

0

0

Multi-Brand Comparison

0

0

Total qualified observations

476

437

The current public series measures brand-recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.

Historical Measurement Record

Measurement

Qualified observations

Coverage leader

Leader coverage

July 2026

476

Zendesk

50.8%

August 2026

500

Zendesk

53.8%

September 2026

437

Tidio

59.5%

Evidence and Source Layer

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, or private and sponsored channels. A movement in a single metric does not by itself establish causality.

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how often brands appear in AI-generated recommendations across major AI and search surfaces, using recommendation coverage as the primary metric. The benchmark is built from qualified public observations and updated monthly.

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.

Get my free AI Company Index

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.