Chatbots: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend chatbots. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Increase: Zendesk Chat
- 08Largest Decline: Zendesk
- 09Category Leader: Tidio
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
Tidio leads the Chatbots benchmark with valid recommendation coverage of 59.5% in September 2026, up from 43.9% in July 2026 — a rise of 15.6 points that the benchmark classifies as movement beyond normal month-to-month variation. Intercom holds second place at 58.4%, up from 50.8% in July 2026 (up 7.6 points), putting it 1.1 points behind the leader.
The category also recorded two brand-label transitions this month. Zendesk Chat entered the tracked-brand list with 43.5% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026 — the largest single-month rise in the benchmark — while Zendesk, which held 50.8% coverage in July 2026, recorded 0.0% in September 2026, the benchmark's largest decline, as it was tracked under the new Zendesk Chat label in the same month. A similar transition occurred with LiveChat: LiveChat (Text S.A. (formerly LiveChat Software S.A.) entered with 19.7% coverage while LiveChat, at 17.2% in July 2026, recorded 0.0% in September 2026.
Among brands tracked continuously across the series, Tidio and Intercom were the two significant risers on valid recommendation coverage, while the benchmark produced 437 qualified observations in September 2026, down from 476 in July 2026.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Sep 2026
- Tidio59.5%
- Intercom58.4%
- Zendesk Chat43.5%
- LiveChat (Text S.A. (formerly LiveChat Software S.A.)19.7%
- Freshdesk18.8%
- ManyChat17.6%
- Drift9.4%
- Ada8.2%
- Landbot3.4%
- Chatfuel3.2%
- LiveChat0.0%
- Zendesk0.0%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | July 2026 | September 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 476 | 437 | Down 39 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 12 | Up 2 |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 32.6% | 43.7% | Up 11.1 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 59.9% | 67.0% | Up 7.2 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Zendesk (50.8%) | Tidio (59.5%) | Up 8.7 points |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All six families were represented in all three months. August 2026 recorded 500 qualified observations, the highest in the series to date.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Chatbots
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark denominator is the qualified benchmark observation count for each month, not a raw collection total.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Research stage | July 2026 | September 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 476 | 437 |
Every percentage in the standings that follow is calculated against the qualified benchmark observation count for its own month, so readers comparing this category against others with a different qualified-observation count should keep that scope in mind.
AI Market Discovery Methodology
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tidio | 79.0% | 59.5% | 31.1% | 8.7% | 0.83 |
Intercom | 83.5% | 58.4% | 39.6% | 11.2% | 0.78 |
Zendesk Chat | 62.9% | 43.5% | 23.6% | 9.4% | 0.77 |
LiveChat (Text S.A. (formerly LiveChat Software S.A.) | 26.8% | 19.7% | 14.2% | 9.2% | 0.74 |
Freshdesk | 30.2% | 18.8% | 8.2% | 0.9% | 0.73 |
ManyChat | 23.8% | 17.6% | 9.2% | 3.7% | 0.80 |
Drift | 17.6% | 9.4% | 3.9% | 1.1% | 0.62 |
Ada | 9.8% | 8.2% | 1.6% | 0.7% | 0.88 |
Landbot | 5.7% | 3.4% | 2.3% | 0.2% | 0.72 |
Chatfuel | 4.8% | 3.2% | 1.4% | 0.5% | 0.67 |
LiveChat | - | 0.0% | - | - | - |
Zendesk | - | 0.0% | - | - | - |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned at all.
- Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist.
- Top-three rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the top three recommended options.
- Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is the first recommended option.
- Net sentiment: positive mentions minus negative mentions, divided by total mentions, on a scale from -1 to 1.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | July 2026 | September 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Ada | 9.2% | 8.2% | Down 1.0 points |
Chatfuel | 2.9% | 3.2% | Up 0.3 points |
Drift | 10.1% | 9.4% | Down 0.7 points |
Freshdesk | 23.7% | 18.8% | Down 4.9 points |
Intercom | 50.8% | 58.4% | Up 7.6 points |
Landbot | 2.9% | 3.4% | Up 0.5 points |
LiveChat | 17.2% | 0.0% | Down 17.2 points |
LiveChat (Text S.A. (formerly LiveChat Software S.A.) | 0.0% | 19.7% | Up 19.7 points |
ManyChat | 15.3% | 17.6% | Up 2.3 points |
Tidio | 43.9% | 59.5% | Up 15.6 points |
Zendesk | 50.8% | 0.0% | Down 50.8 points |
Zendesk Chat | 0.0% | 43.5% | Up 43.5 points |
Largest Increase: Zendesk Chat
Zendesk Chat appeared in the benchmark for the first time in September 2026 with 43.5% valid recommendation coverage, a gain of 43.5 points from 0.0% in July 2026 that moved beyond normal month-to-month variation. Its presence rate reached 62.9%, with a top-three rate of 23.6% and a rank-one rate of 9.4% in September 2026.
Largest Decline: Zendesk
Zendesk fell to 0.0% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026 from 50.8% in July 2026, a drop of 50.8 points that moved beyond normal month-to-month variation. This decline corresponds with the introduction of Zendesk Chat as a separately tracked brand label in the same month.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Category Leader: Tidio
Tidio moved to the top of the benchmark with 59.5% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026, up from 43.9% in July 2026, a gain of 15.6 points beyond normal month-to-month variation. Its presence rate reached 79.0% in September 2026, up from 55.9% in July 2026. Tidio has risen in each of the two months since July 2026.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Intercom's top-three rate of 39.6% in September 2026 was the highest in the benchmark, while its rank-one rate of 11.2% showed it led with the first-position recommendation most often. Tidio's 59.5% coverage carried a 31.1% top-three rate, showing frequent placement within the top three.
Brand | September 2026 top-three rate | September 2026 rank-one rate | July 2026 top-three rate | July 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intercom | 39.6% | 11.2% | 29.8% | 8.6% |
Tidio | 31.1% | 8.7% | 22.5% | 5.9% |
Zendesk Chat | 23.6% | 9.4% | - | - |
Close coverage rates can still hide different first-position rates, as seen with Tidio's 59.5% coverage carrying an 8.7% rank-one rate compared with Intercom's 58.4% coverage carrying an 11.2% rank-one rate.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in both reported months fell into the Brand Recommendation class, which measures discovery and consideration.
Buyer-intent class | July 2026 | September 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 476 | 437 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 476 | 437 |
The current public series measures brand-recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
July 2026 | 476 | Zendesk | 50.8% |
August 2026 | 500 | Zendesk | 53.8% |
September 2026 | 437 | Tidio | 59.5% |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, or private and sponsored channels. A movement in a single metric does not by itself establish causality.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how often brands appear in AI-generated recommendations across major AI and search surfaces, using recommendation coverage as the primary metric. The benchmark is built from qualified public observations and updated monthly.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
AI Chatbots: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Vitamins and Dietary Supplements: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
VA Loans Lenders: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read