DUI Lawyers AI Visibility Ranking Trends - November 2026

Answer capsule

The November 2026 DUI Lawyers benchmark compares 10 companies across 102 AI answers that met its inclusion rules. Manshoory Law Group leads with 17 recommendations (16.67% of answers). At least one tracked company was recommended in 39 answers; some answers recommended several companies.

The rankings distinguish being mentioned from receiving an affirmative recommendation, then examine placement and the wording used about each company. Earlier monthly results show how counts and rates changed, with each month using its own answer total. These results describe the answers reviewed, not product quality or customer satisfaction. Differences between monthly samples limit comparisons and do not establish why a result changed.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending DUI Lawyers

Industry leaderboard

Questions This Section Answers

• How do DUI Lawyers rank by recorded AI recommendations in November 2026?

The leaderboard orders companies by how many recorded answers affirmatively recommended them. A recommendation is stronger than a mention: a company can appear in an answer without being endorsed. Ties reflect equal recommendation counts, so shared ranks do not imply identical reach, placement or framing.

Mentions, recommendations, shortlist placements and first-place placements answer different questions. Placements are nested within recommendations rather than separate wins, and recommendation rates describe the recorded answers, not customers or sales.

Key findings

Tracked-company answer coverage

Questions This Section Answers

• How often did the November 2026 DUI Lawyers answer sample recommend any tracked company?

39 distinct answers recommended at least one tracked company. Counting each company recommendation separately gives 41, because an answer can recommend several companies. Answers with no tracked recommendation may still have recommended companies outside this comparison.

Every qualified answer mentioned at least one tracked company, but only a minority recommended one. That gap shows that appearing in an answer and being endorsed are distinct outcomes, and coverage of mentions should not be read as market dominance.

Most answers recommended no tracked company, and few recommended several. Because one answer can name multiple firms, company totals exceed the number of answers with a recommendation. Answers without a tracked recommendation may still have named firms outside this comparison.

Reach and affirmative recommendation

Manshoory Law Group ranks 1 by recommendation count. Mentions: 18 (17.65%); recommendations: 17 (16.67%). Top 3 placements: 17 (16.67%); first-place placements: 13 (12.75%).

Wording about the company: 17 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative mentions. The proportion of mentions that also included a recommendation was 94.4%. The net framing score was 0.94 (defined in Methodology).

1 mentions had no recorded recommendation. Of recorded recommendations, 100.00% were Top 3 and 76.47% were first-place.

Manshoory Law Group leads on recommendation count, yet its mentions slightly exceed its recommendations, so one appearance carried no affirmative endorsement. Its placement counts sit inside its recommendations rather than adding to them, and first-place placements are a subset of shortlist placements.

Reach and endorsement therefore answer different questions. A firm can appear in answers without being recommended, and the recorded wording for Manshoory Law Group was largely positive with one neutral mention. These are counts from the recorded answers, not evidence about customers or outcomes.

Recommendation order and placement

Placement describes where a recommended company appeared in an answer's ordering. Top 3 and first-place counts are subsets of recommendations, so they should not be summed with recommendations or read as extra wins.

Manshoory Law Group and Wallin & Klarich account for most first-place placements, while Chambers Law Firm's recommendations were all shortlist placements without a first-place result. Esfandi Law Group's smaller base yields a mixed placement pattern. These are recorded positions, not consumer conversion.

Classified framing in context

Framing describes the wording used around a company in the selected answers. Positive, neutral and negative labels classify that wording; they are not customer sentiment, reputation or a measure of company quality.

Most tracked firms with mentions drew only positive wording, while DUI Defense Lawyers appeared in neutral wording throughout. Neutral or positive wording does not establish why a recommendation was or was not recorded, and framing should be read alongside counts rather than instead of them.

Company results in detail

Manshoory Law Group

Questions This Section Answers

• What do the November 2026 AI answer results show about Manshoory Law Group mentions, recommendations and placement?

Manshoory Law Group ranks 1 by recommendation count. Mentions: 18 (17.65%); recommendations: 17 (16.67%). Top 3 placements: 17 (16.67%); first-place placements: 13 (12.75%).

Wording about the company: 17 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative mentions. The proportion of mentions that also included a recommendation was 94.4%. The net framing score was 0.94 (defined in Methodology).

1 mentions had no recorded recommendation. Of recorded recommendations, 100.00% were Top 3 and 76.47% were first-place.

From October 2026 to November 2026, Manshoory Law Group's mention count fell from 20 to 18, while its recommendation count fell from 19 to 17. The recommendation rate was 22.62% and 16.67% respectively.

Manshoory Law Group holds the top recommendation count, with nearly all of its mentions also carrying an endorsement. Its placements are concentrated near the front of answers, and its wording was overwhelmingly positive with a single neutral mention.

Compared with the prior month, both its mention and recommendation counts were lower, and its recommendation rate also declined. That is a recorded comparison across separate monthly samples; it does not establish why the change occurred.

Wallin & Klarich

Questions This Section Answers

• What do the November 2026 AI answer results show about Wallin & Klarich mentions, recommendations and placement?

Wallin & Klarich ranks 2 by recommendation count. Mentions: 13 (12.75%); recommendations: 13 (12.75%). Top 3 placements: 8 (7.84%); first-place placements: 4 (3.92%).

Wording about the company: 13 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative mentions. The proportion of mentions that also included a recommendation was 100.0%. The net framing score was 1.00 (defined in Methodology).

0 mentions had no recorded recommendation. Of recorded recommendations, 61.54% were Top 3 and 30.77% were first-place.

From October 2026 to November 2026, Wallin & Klarich's mention count fell from 19 to 13, while its recommendation count stayed at 13. The recommendation rate was 15.48% and 12.75% respectively. The count was unchanged: the rate difference comes from dividing it by 84 answers in October 2026 and 102 in November.

Wallin & Klarich ranks second on recommendations, and every recorded mention also included an endorsement. Its placements are more often shortlist than first-place, so its recommendation strength is broader than its front-position presence.

Its mention count fell from the prior month while its recommendation count was unchanged, and the rate difference follows from a larger answer total. The unchanged count and the changed rate should be read separately.

Chambers Law Firm

Questions This Section Answers

• What do the November 2026 AI answer results show about Chambers Law Firm mentions, recommendations and placement?

Chambers Law Firm ranks 3 by recommendation count. Mentions: 7 (6.86%); recommendations: 7 (6.86%). Top 3 placements: 7 (6.86%); first-place placements: 0 (0.00%).

Wording about the company: 7 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative mentions. The proportion of mentions that also included a recommendation was 100.0%. The net framing score was 1.00 (defined in Methodology).

0 mentions had no recorded recommendation. Of recorded recommendations, 100.00% were Top 3 and 0.00% were first-place.

From October 2026 to November 2026, Chambers Law Firm's mention count rose from 2 to 7, while its recommendation count rose from 2 to 7. The recommendation rate was 2.38% and 6.86% respectively.

Chambers Law Firm ranks third, with each of its mentions also recorded as a recommendation. All of its placements were shortlist positions and none were first-place, so its profile is consistent endorsement without front placement.

Both its mention and recommendation counts rose from the prior month, and its recommendation rate increased alongside them. The comparison covers separate monthly samples and does not explain the movement.

Esfandi Law Group

Questions This Section Answers

• What do the November 2026 AI answer results show about Esfandi Law Group mentions, recommendations and placement?

Esfandi Law Group ranks 4 by recommendation count. Mentions: 4 (3.92%); recommendations: 4 (3.92%). Top 3 placements: 2 (1.96%); first-place placements: 0 (0.00%).

Wording about the company: 4 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative mentions. The proportion of mentions that also included a recommendation was 100.0%. The net framing score was 1.00 (defined in Methodology).

0 mentions had no recorded recommendation. Of recorded recommendations, 50.00% were Top 3 and 0.00% were first-place.

From October 2026 to November 2026, Esfandi Law Group's mention count stayed at 4, while its recommendation count rose from 3 to 4. The recommendation rate was 3.57% and 3.92% respectively.

Esfandi Law Group ranks fourth, with every mention also recorded as a recommendation. Only part of its recommendations were shortlist placements, and none were first-place, so its placement profile is thinner than its endorsement profile.

Its mention count was unchanged from the prior month while its recommendation count rose slightly. With a small base, ratios and placement shares should be read with caution rather than treated as stable patterns.

Bruno Nalu

Questions This Section Answers

• What do the November 2026 AI answer results show about Bruno Nalu mentions, recommendations and placement?

Bruno Nalu ranks 5 by recommendation count. Mentions: 0 (0.00%); recommendations: 0 (0.00%). Top 3 placements: 0 (0.00%); first-place placements: 0 (0.00%).

Wording about the company: 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative mentions. The proportion of mentions that also included a recommendation was Unavailable. The net framing score was Unavailable (defined in Methodology).

0 mentions had no recorded recommendation. Of recorded recommendations, Unavailable were Top 3 and Unavailable were first-place.

From October 2026 to November 2026, Bruno Nalu's mention count stayed at 0, while its recommendation count stayed at 0. The recommendation rate was 0.00% and 0.00% respectively.

Bruno Nalu recorded no mentions and no recommendations in the selected answers, so its placement counts are also zero. These are measured zeros, not missing observations.

Ratios that require a nonzero mention base are undefined for this profile, and its framing score is unavailable for the same reason. Its counts were also zero in the prior month, a recorded comparison that does not explain the absence.

DUI Defense Lawyers

Questions This Section Answers

• What do the November 2026 AI answer results show about DUI Defense Lawyers mentions, recommendations and placement?

DUI Defense Lawyers ranks 5 by recommendation count. Mentions: 63 (61.76%); recommendations: 0 (0.00%). Top 3 placements: 0 (0.00%); first-place placements: 0 (0.00%).

Wording about the company: 0 positive, 63 neutral, 0 negative mentions. The proportion of mentions that also included a recommendation was 0.0%. The net framing score was 0.00 (defined in Methodology).

63 mentions had no recorded recommendation. Of recorded recommendations, Unavailable were Top 3 and Unavailable were first-place.

From October 2026 to November 2026, DUI Defense Lawyers' mention count rose from 3 to 63, while its recommendation count stayed at 0. The recommendation rate was 0.00% and 0.00% respectively.

DUI Defense Lawyers is distinctive: it appeared in a large share of answers but received no recorded recommendations. Every mention was classified as neutral wording, and no shortlist or first-place placements were recorded.

Its mention count rose sharply from the prior month while its recommendation count stayed at zero. The recommendation-to-mention ratio is therefore zero on a substantial base, and the change in mentions does not explain the absence of endorsements.

Greg Hill & Associates

Questions This Section Answers

• What do the November 2026 AI answer results show about Greg Hill & Associates mentions, recommendations and placement?

Greg Hill & Associates ranks 5 by recommendation count. Mentions: 0 (0.00%); recommendations: 0 (0.00%). Top 3 placements: 0 (0.00%); first-place placements: 0 (0.00%).

Wording about the company: 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative mentions. The proportion of mentions that also included a recommendation was Unavailable. The net framing score was Unavailable (defined in Methodology).

0 mentions had no recorded recommendation. Of recorded recommendations, Unavailable were Top 3 and Unavailable were first-place.

From October 2026 to November 2026, Greg Hill & Associates' mention count fell from 2 to 0, while its recommendation count fell from 1 to 0. The recommendation rate was 1.19% and 0.00% respectively.

Greg Hill & Associates recorded no mentions and no recommendations this month, so its placement counts are zero and ratios requiring a mention base are undefined. These are measured zeros rather than missing data.

In the prior month it had a small number of mentions and one recommendation. That earlier result came from a separate sample and does not establish why the current counts are zero.

Hawk Law Group

Questions This Section Answers

• What do the November 2026 AI answer results show about Hawk Law Group mentions, recommendations and placement?

Hawk Law Group ranks 5 by recommendation count. Mentions: 0 (0.00%); recommendations: 0 (0.00%). Top 3 placements: 0 (0.00%); first-place placements: 0 (0.00%).

Wording about the company: 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative mentions. The proportion of mentions that also included a recommendation was Unavailable. The net framing score was Unavailable (defined in Methodology).

0 mentions had no recorded recommendation. Of recorded recommendations, Unavailable were Top 3 and Unavailable were first-place.

From October 2026 to November 2026, Hawk Law Group's mention count fell from 1 to 0, while its recommendation count stayed at 0. The recommendation rate was 0.00% and 0.00% respectively.

Hawk Law Group recorded no mentions and no recommendations in the selected answers, leaving its placement counts at zero and its ratios undefined. The zeros are valid measured results.

Its prior-month mention count was minimal and its recommendation count was already zero. The comparison spans separate monthly samples and does not explain the current absence of appearances.

The Kavinoky Law Firm

Questions This Section Answers

• What do the November 2026 AI answer results show about The Kavinoky Law Firm mentions, recommendations and placement?

The Kavinoky Law Firm ranks 5 by recommendation count. Mentions: 0 (0.00%); recommendations: 0 (0.00%). Top 3 placements: 0 (0.00%); first-place placements: 0 (0.00%).

Wording about the company: 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative mentions. The proportion of mentions that also included a recommendation was Unavailable. The net framing score was Unavailable (defined in Methodology).

0 mentions had no recorded recommendation. Of recorded recommendations, Unavailable were Top 3 and Unavailable were first-place.

From October 2026 to November 2026, The Kavinoky Law Firm's mention count stayed at 0, while its recommendation count stayed at 0. The recommendation rate was 0.00% and 0.00% respectively.

The Kavinoky Law Firm recorded no mentions and no recommendations, so its placement counts are zero and ratios requiring a mention base are undefined. These zeros are measured outcomes, not gaps in the record.

Its counts were also zero in the prior month. That consistency is a recorded comparison across separate samples and does not establish a cause for the absence.

The Nieves Law Firm

Questions This Section Answers

• What do the November 2026 AI answer results show about The Nieves Law Firm mentions, recommendations and placement?

The Nieves Law Firm ranks 5 by recommendation count. Mentions: 0 (0.00%); recommendations: 0 (0.00%). Top 3 placements: 0 (0.00%); first-place placements: 0 (0.00%).

Wording about the company: 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative mentions. The proportion of mentions that also included a recommendation was Unavailable. The net framing score was Unavailable (defined in Methodology).

0 mentions had no recorded recommendation. Of recorded recommendations, Unavailable were Top 3 and Unavailable were first-place.

From October 2026 to November 2026, The Nieves Law Firm's mention count fell from 3 to 0, while its recommendation count fell from 1 to 0. The recommendation rate was 1.19% and 0.00% respectively.

The Nieves Law Firm recorded no mentions and no recommendations this month, so its placement counts are zero and its ratios are undefined. The zeros are valid measured results.

In the prior month it had a small number of mentions and one recommendation. That earlier result came from a separate sample and does not explain the current zero counts.

Earlier ranking snapshot context

Questions This Section Answers

• How do the available DUI Lawyers snapshots from July 2026 to November 2026 differ in recommendation coverage and measurement scope?

Only months with verified results are shown. Monthly sample coverage is listed in Methodology.

The monthly snapshots come from separate selected answer samples, so counts and rates are not directly comparable across months. A smaller answer total does not by itself explain why a company's counts or rates moved.

Ranks in earlier months reflect the recommendation counts recorded then, and ties can shift as counts change. Reading counts alongside rates and coverage shows how the recorded results differed without establishing rank stability or equivalent sampling.

What the November Rankings Show

The November results show that reach, recommendation, placement and framing answer different questions. Appearing in an answer is not the same as being affirmatively endorsed, and a recommendation is not the same as a favorable position within the answer.

Placement adds ordering information within recommendations, while framing describes wording rather than company quality or customer sentiment. Reading these measures together gives a fuller picture than the recommendation ranking alone, but none of them establishes why a company was or was not recommended.

Methodology

Questions This Section Answers

• How were the November 2026 DUI Lawyers AI visibility measures counted, and what do they not establish?

This benchmark has partial coverage: 3 of 3 planned question categories contributed usable observations; 0 contributed none. This describes question-category coverage, not demonstrated platform outages. Findings apply to the available answer set.

The month in the title is the reporting period. The exact dates when the original AI answers were collected have not been verified.

Each company is counted at most once in each answer that meets the benchmark rules. A recommendation requires both an affirmative endorsement and positive wording. Mention, recommendation, Top 3 and first-place rates use the full benchmark answer total. Top 3 and first-place results are included within recommendations, not added to them.

The recommendation-to-mention ratio divides recommendations by mentions. It describes AI answer wording, not customer conversion. Net framing is positive minus negative mentions, divided by all mentions, on a scale from -1 to +1. It does not measure customer satisfaction or company quality.

Market: US; 10 tracked companies. AI services represented: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews.

Research screening totals (answer observations can include repeated questions):

The source does not provide a reader-facing definition of “reserved”; that screening label is reported without inferring a reason for exclusion. Only the included benchmark answers form the rate denominator.

One answer can mention or recommend several companies. Adding company totals would therefore count some answers more than once. The results describe the AI answers reviewed, not independently verified facts about the companies or their products.

Monthly sample coverage:

The answer samples differ between months. These comparisons show how the recorded results changed; they do not establish why they changed.

These findings cover the available answer set, not every possible AI response. The reporting month labels the period, but exact collection dates were not verified, and question-category coverage describes the included answers rather than platform outages.

Each company is counted at most once per qualifying answer, and a recommendation requires both affirmative endorsement and positive wording. Rates use the full benchmark answer total, and placements are nested within recommendations. Monthly samples differ, so comparisons show recorded change without establishing its cause.