Medical Alert Systems: AI Market Discovery Index

Tracking how AI platforms recommend medical alert systems. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since August 2026.

Mark Huntley, J.D.
By Mark Huntley, J.D.Growth Strategist & AI Discovery Analyst
5 minutes read

Benchmark Summary

Medical Guardian led the Medical Alert Systems benchmark in September 2026 with valid recommendation coverage of 82.8%, up from 81.6% in August 2026. The gap to the next brand, Bay Alarm Medical, was 0.3 points, with Bay Alarm Medical at 82.5% in September 2026, up from 81.8% in August 2026.

The largest coverage increase was LifeStation, rising to 13.7% in September 2026 from 10.3% in August 2026. The largest coverage decline was Lively, falling to 19.0% in September 2026 from 25.3% in August 2026, a move beyond normal month-to-month variation.

The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 553 qualified observations in September 2026 after qualification.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Aug 2026 to Sep 2026

  • Medical Guardian+1.2%
    Aug 202681.6%
    Sep 202682.8%
  • Bay Alarm Medical+0.7%
    Aug 202681.8%
    Sep 202682.5%
  • MobileHelp-1.0%
    Aug 202658.5%
    Sep 202657.5%
  • LifeFone-1.9%
    Aug 202631.6%
    Sep 202629.7%
  • Lively-6.3% · beyond normal variation
    Aug 202625.3%
    Sep 202619.0%
  • ADT Medical Alert-1.7%
    Aug 202616.2%
    Sep 202614.5%
  • LifeStation+3.4%
    Aug 202610.3%
    Sep 202613.7%
  • Medical Alert+0.7%
    Aug 20267.1%
    Sep 20267.8%
  • Aloe Care Health-1.5%
    Aug 20267.7%
    Sep 20266.2%
  • GetSafe-0.6%
    Aug 20261.0%
    Sep 20260.4%

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Measure

Aug 2026

Sep 2026

Movement

Qualified benchmark observations

506

553

Up 47

Tracked brands

10

10

No change

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

38.9%

33.3%

Down 5.6 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

82.0%

81.7%

Down 0.3 points

Leader by valid recommendation coverage

Medical Guardian

Medical Guardian

No change

Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All six families were represented in both months.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Medical Alert Systems

Research Scope and Qualification

The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.

Research stage

Aug 2026

Sep 2026

What it represents

Source prompt-surface observations

800

800

Total prompts collected across AI surfaces

Unique questions

487

476

Distinct questions after de-duplication

Brand / competitor mentions

800

800

Prompts mentioning a brand or competitor

Relevant observations

762

772

On-topic for the Medical Alert Systems vertical

Irrelevant observations

38

28

Off-topic or unusable

Qualified benchmark observations

506

553

Public denominator for brand metrics

Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. Link AI Market Discovery Methodology.

Current Brand Standings

Brand

Presence rate

Valid recommendation coverage

Top-three rate

Rank-one rate

Net sentiment

Medical Guardian

95.8%

82.8%

78.8%

49.9%

0.9

Bay Alarm Medical

96.6%

82.5%

77.8%

26.2%

0.9

MobileHelp

64.9%

57.5%

48.6%

2.5%

0.9

LifeFone

32.2%

29.7%

5.4%

0.4%

0.9

Lively

23.3%

19.0%

8.1%

0.9%

0.8

ADT Medical Alert

19.7%

14.5%

4.5%

0.2%

0.8

LifeStation

19.7%

13.7%

4.2%

0.4%

0.8

Medical Alert

10.8%

7.8%

2.2%

0.0%

0.8

Aloe Care Health

7.4%

6.2%

1.3%

0.0%

0.9

GetSafe

0.5%

0.4%

0.0%

0.0%

0.7

How to Read the Standings

  • Presence rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the AI answer.
  • Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations where the brand receives a qualified recommendation, not just a mention.
  • Top-three rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears among the top three recommended options.
  • Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is the first or primary recommendation.
  • Net sentiment: positive-minus-negative mention tone scaled by total mentions.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Brand

Aug 2026

Sep 2026

Movement since baseline

ADT Medical Alert

16.2%

14.5%

Down 1.7 points

Aloe Care Health

7.7%

6.2%

Down 1.5 points

Bay Alarm Medical

81.8%

82.5%

Up 0.7 points

GetSafe

1.0%

0.4%

Down 0.6 points

LifeFone

31.6%

29.7%

Down 1.9 points

LifeStation

10.3%

13.7%

Up 3.4 points

Lively

25.3%

19.0%

Down 6.3 points

Medical Alert

7.1%

7.8%

Up 0.7 points

Medical Guardian

81.6%

82.8%

Up 1.2 points

MobileHelp

58.5%

57.5%

Down 1.0 point

Largest Increase: LifeStation

LifeStation recorded the largest coverage increase this month, rising to 13.7% in September 2026 from 10.3% in August 2026, a gain of 3.4 points that remained within normal month-to-month variation. Presence rate rose to 19.7% in September 2026 from 14.6% in August 2026, an increase of 5.1 points. Top-three rate rose to 4.2% in September 2026 from 1.6% in August 2026, an increase of 2.6 points. This has not yet been classified as a trend.

Largest Decline: Lively

Lively's valid recommendation coverage fell to 19.0% in September 2026 from 25.3% in August 2026, a decline of 6.3 points that exceeded normal month-to-month variation. Presence rate also fell to 23.3% in September 2026 from 30.8% in August 2026, a drop of 7.5 points. Top-three rate declined to 8.1% in September 2026 from 11.1% in August 2026. Net sentiment held steady at 0.8 across both months.

Category Leader: Medical Guardian

Medical Guardian held the top valid recommendation coverage position for the second consecutive month at 82.8% in September 2026, up from 81.6% in August 2026. The rise remained within normal month-to-month variation. Medical Guardian's top-three rate reached 78.8% and its rank-one rate was 49.9% in September 2026. Bay Alarm Medical remained close behind at 82.5% valid recommendation coverage.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Among the leading brands, first-position rates varied substantially despite high coverage.

Brand

Sep 2026 top-three rate

Sep 2026 rank-one rate

Aug 2026 top-three rate

Aug 2026 rank-one rate

Medical Guardian

78.8%

49.9%

78.1%

51.6%

Bay Alarm Medical

77.8%

26.2%

77.1%

26.7%

MobileHelp

48.6%

2.5%

45.9%

1.4%

Close coverage can still hide different first-position rates: Medical Guardian and Bay Alarm Medical had nearly identical valid recommendation coverage in September 2026, yet Medical Guardian led Bay Alarm Medical by 23.7 points on rank-one rate.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class of discovery.

Buyer-intent class

Aug 2026

Sep 2026

Brand Recommendation

506

553

Pricing & Value

0

0

Multi-Brand Comparison

0

0

Total qualified observations

506

553

The current public series measures brand-recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in pricing, value, or multi-brand comparison classes.

Historical Measurement Record

This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.

Measurement

Qualified observations

Coverage leader

Leader coverage

Largest coverage movement

Aug 2026

506

Medical Guardian

81.6%

MobileHelp at 58.5%

Sep 2026

553

Medical Guardian

82.8%

Lively down 6.3 points

Evidence and Source Layer

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, or private/sponsored channels. A metric movement alone does not establish causality.

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how AI and search surfaces present brands across defined verticals, based on a repeatable prompt methodology with transparent qualification rules.

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper. The public percentage cannot identify the prompts, competitors, or sources causing the result.

Get my free AI Company Index

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.