Digital Marketing Agency: AI Market Discovery Index

Tracking how AI platforms recommend digital marketing. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

Mark Huntley, J.D.
By Mark Huntley, J.D.Growth Strategist & AI Discovery Analyst
5 minutes read

Benchmark Summary

SmartSites remained the category leader in the Digital Marketing benchmark in August 2026, holding valid recommendation coverage of 58.7%. That figure was essentially unchanged from 62.1% in July 2026 — a difference within normal month-to-month variation. The gap to the second-place brand, LYFE Marketing, stood at 31.1 percentage points, with LYFE Marketing at 27.6% coverage.

Cardinal Digital Marketing was the only tracked brand whose valid recommendation coverage moved beyond normal month-to-month variation this month, falling from 8.0% in July 2026 to 5.1% in August 2026, a decline of 2.9 percentage points. AIS Media posted the largest increase among tracked brands, rising from 1.6% to 2.1%, though that change remained within normal variation. The remaining tracked brands were stable on this measure.

The qualification funnel produced 584 qualified benchmark observations in August 2026, up from 573 in July 2026.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026

  • SmartSites-3.4%
    Jul 202662.1%
    Aug 202658.7%
  • LYFE Marketing-4.5%
    Jul 202632.1%
    Aug 202627.6%
  • M16 Marketing-2.1%
    Jul 20268.4%
    Aug 20266.3%
  • Cardinal Digital Marketing-2.9% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 20268.0%
    Aug 20265.1%
  • AIS Media+0.5%
    Jul 20261.6%
    Aug 20262.1%
  • Joseph Studios+0.2%
    Jul 20261.2%
    Aug 20261.4%
  • Grater Digitalno change
    Jul 20260.0%
    Aug 20260.0%

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Measure

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Movement

Qualified benchmark observations

573

584

Up 11

Tracked brands

7

7

No change

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

38.9%

46.2%

Up 7.3 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

77.3%

74.0%

Down 3.3 points

Leader by valid recommendation coverage

SmartSites

SmartSites

No change

Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All six families were represented in both months.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Digital Marketing Agency

Research Scope and Qualification

The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.

Research stage

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

What it represents

Source prompt-surface observations

763

800

Raw collection across all AI/search surfaces

Unique questions

541

604

Distinct questions asked

Brand / competitor mentions

606

694

Prompts mentioning tracked brands

Relevant observations

581

634

On-topic for the vertical

Irrelevant observations

25

60

Off-topic or unusable

Qualified benchmark observations

573

584

Public denominator for all metrics

Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Market Discovery Methodology for full details.

Current Brand Standings

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Brand

Presence rate

Valid recommendation coverage

Top-three rate

Rank-one rate

Net sentiment

SmartSites

71.8%

58.7%

43.3%

22.1%

0.9

LYFE Marketing

44.0%

27.6%

19.0%

7.4%

0.7

M16 Marketing

6.5%

6.3%

4.6%

2.7%

1.0

Cardinal Digital Marketing

5.5%

5.1%

3.6%

0.9%

0.9

AIS Media

2.1%

2.1%

1.4%

0.2%

1.0

Joseph Studios

1.4%

1.4%

0.5%

0.2%

1.0

Grater Digital

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0

How to Read the Standings

  • Presence rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in any form.
  • Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations where the brand receives a valid recommendation.
  • Top-three rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the top three recommended positions.
  • Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is the top-ranked recommendation.
  • Net sentiment: positive mentions minus negative mentions divided by total mentions, scored from -1 to 1.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Grater Digital: Current Position

Grater Digital holds 0.0% presence rate, 0.0% valid recommendation coverage, 0.0% top-three rate, 0.0% rank-one rate, and 0.0 net sentiment in the August 2026 benchmark. Per the Recommendation Coverage Movement data below, this is unchanged from the July 2026 baseline, meaning Grater Digital has not yet registered a single qualified appearance, recommendation, or ranked placement across the 584 qualified observations measured this month.

SmartSites records 58.7% valid recommendation coverage, while Grater Digital stands at 0.0%. The more important issue is what that gap means for Grater Digital's recommendation position: across the two months measured, the category leader has been recommended in well over half of qualified observations, while Grater Digital has not been recommended, placed in a top-three position, or measured with any sentiment in a single one. This is a material gap on the benchmark's primary commercial metric, and it has shown no movement in either direction since the baseline period.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Why does Grater Digital have zero qualified presence, recommendation, or placement across all tracked AI/search surfaces in both measured months, and what would be required to establish even initial, measurable visibility on this benchmark?

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Brand

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Movement since baseline

AIS Media

1.6%

2.1%

Up 0.5 points

Cardinal Digital Marketing

8.0%

5.1%

Down 2.9 points

Grater Digital

0.0%

0.0%

No change

Joseph Studios

1.2%

1.4%

Up 0.2 points

LYFE Marketing

32.1%

27.6%

Down 4.5 points

M16 Marketing

8.4%

6.3%

Down 2.1 points

SmartSites

62.1%

58.7%

Down 3.4 points

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Largest Decline: Cardinal Digital Marketing

Cardinal Digital Marketing fell from 8.0% valid recommendation coverage in July 2026 to 5.1% in August 2026, a drop of 2.9 percentage points that moved beyond normal month-to-month variation. The decline was accompanied by a fall in presence rate from 8.2% to 5.5%, while the rank-one rate also slipped from 1.8% to 0.9%. The top-three rate moved slightly higher, from 3.1% to 3.6%.

Category Leader: SmartSites

SmartSites remained the category leader in August 2026 at 58.7% valid recommendation coverage, down from 62.1% in July 2026. The decline was within normal month-to-month variation. Presence rate rose from 70.7% to 71.8%, and top-three rate edged up from 43.1% to 43.3%, while rank-one rate dipped from 22.3% to 22.1%.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Among the two leading brands, SmartSites held a top-three rate of 43.3% in August 2026, essentially level with 43.1% in July 2026. LYFE Marketing's top-three rate was 19.0% in August 2026, down from 20.4% in July 2026.

Brand

Aug 2026 top-three rate

Aug 2026 rank-one rate

Jul 2026 top-three rate

Jul 2026 rank-one rate

SmartSites

43.3%

22.1%

43.1%

22.3%

LYFE Marketing

19.0%

7.4%

20.4%

10.1%

Even where coverage is similar, first-position rates can differ meaningfully, so placement matters alongside raw coverage.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class.

Buyer-intent class

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Brand Recommendation

573

584

Pricing & Value

0

0

Multi-Brand Comparison

0

0

Total qualified observations

573

584

The current public series measures Brand Recommendation discovery only and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.

Historical Measurement Record

Measurement

Qualified observations

Coverage leader

Leader coverage

Largest coverage movement

Jul 2026

573

SmartSites

62.1%

Baseline

Aug 2026

584

SmartSites

58.7%

Cardinal Digital Marketing, down 2.9 points

Evidence and Source Layer

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure:

  • Market share or sales attribution
  • Every possible AI response to every possible query
  • Organic-search ranking positions
  • Social media mention volume
  • Private or sponsored channel performance
  • Causality from a metric movement alone

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index is a neutral, industry-level measurement of how AI/search surfaces recommend brands within a vertical. It tracks presence, recommendation coverage, placement, and sentiment across the six canonical AI surface families.

Research links:

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.

Get my free AI Company Index

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.