Alcohol Rehab Centers: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend alcohol rehab centers. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Increase: Caron Treatment Centers
- 08Largest Decline: American Addiction Centers
- 09Category Leader: Hazelden Betty Ford
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
September 2026 was a stable month for the Alcohol Rehab Centers benchmark. No tracked brand crossed the threshold for a significant single-month move, though three brands broke their prior-month directional pattern: Hazelden Betty Ford, Gateway Foundation, and Recovery Centers of America each turned upward after declining or holding flat in August 2026.
Hazelden Betty Ford leads the index with valid recommendation coverage of 10.0% in September 2026, holding the top position it has held since the July 2026 baseline. The next closest brand, Caron Treatment Centers, reached 5.0%, a gap of 5.0 points.
Since the July 2026 baseline, Caron Treatment Centers has posted the largest cumulative coverage increase, rising from 1.5% to 5.0% across two consecutive months of gains. American Addiction Centers has posted the largest cumulative coverage decline, falling from 3.0% to 1.2%, though its coverage held flat between August and September 2026.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Sep 2026
- Hazelden Betty Ford10.0%
- Caron Treatment Centers5.0%
- Recovery Centers of America2.5%
- American Addiction Centers1.2%
- Gateway Foundation1.2%
- Banyan Treatment Centers0.0%
- Footprints to Recovery0.0%
- Monument0.0%
- Ria Health0.0%
- The Recovery Village0.0%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 66 | 80 | Up 14 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 4 | 5 | Up 1 |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 10.6% | 18.8% | Up 8.2 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 9.1% | 10.0% | Up 0.9 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Hazelden Betty Ford | Hazelden Betty Ford | No change |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation. The six families tested are ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. In September 2026, the benchmark captured qualified observations across five of these six families. Copilot first appeared in August 2026 and remained present in September 2026.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Alcohol Rehab Centers
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. The funnel below shows how observations were qualified.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompts collected across AI surfaces |
Unique questions | 602 | 629 | Distinct questions after deduplication |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts mentioning a tracked brand or competitor |
Relevant observations | 159 | 159 | Prompts relevant to the vertical |
Irrelevant observations | 641 | 641 | Prompts not relevant to the vertical |
Qualified benchmark observations | 66 | 80 | Public denominator for brand metrics |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Market Discovery Methodology for full details.
Current Brand Standings
The table below shows the current-month benchmark view for all tracked brands, sorted by valid recommendation coverage.
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hazelden Betty Ford | 57.5% | 10.0% | 10.0% | 8.8% | 0.4 |
Caron Treatment Centers | 11.2% | 5.0% | 5.0% | 0.0% | 0.4 |
Recovery Centers of America | 23.8% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 0.0% | 0.2 |
American Addiction Centers | 76.2% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1 |
Gateway Foundation | 7.5% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.2 |
Banyan Treatment Centers | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Footprints to Recovery | 3.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Monument | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Ria Health | 2.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5 |
The Recovery Village | 41.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned at all, in any context.
- Valid recommendation coverage: Share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a genuine recommendation shortlist.
- Top-three rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand appears among the top three recommended options.
- Rank-one rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand is the single top recommendation.
- Net sentiment: Average sentiment score across mentions, ranging from negative to positive, with neutral at zero.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
The table below shows baseline-to-current movement for all tracked brands. All movement in September 2026 was within normal month-to-month variation.
Brand | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
American Addiction Centers | 3.0% | 1.2% | Down 1.8 points |
Banyan Treatment Centers | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Caron Treatment Centers | 1.5% | 5.0% | Up 3.5 points |
Footprints to Recovery | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Gateway Foundation | 1.5% | 1.2% | Down 0.3 points |
Hazelden Betty Ford | 7.6% | 10.0% | Up 2.4 points |
Monument | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Recovery Centers of America | 3.0% | 2.5% | Down 0.5 points |
Ria Health | 1.5% | 0.0% | Down 1.5 points |
The Recovery Village | 1.5% | 0.0% | Down 1.5 points |
Between August 2026 and September 2026, Hazelden Betty Ford rose 2.9 points from 7.1% to 10.0%, Caron Treatment Centers rose 1.4 points from 3.6% to 5.0%, Gateway Foundation rose 1.2 points from 0.0% to 1.2%, and Recovery Centers of America rose 2.5 points from 0.0% to 2.5%. Ria Health declined 1.2 points from 1.2% to 0.0%.
Largest Increase: Caron Treatment Centers
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Caron Treatment Centers rose to 5.0% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026 from 1.5% in July 2026, an increase of 3.5 points. The brand has posted a valid recommendation coverage increase in each of the two months since the July 2026 baseline, making it the only tracked brand with a two-month upward streak. It moved from one valid recommendation to four, all within the top three and none yet at rank one.
Largest Decline: American Addiction Centers
American Addiction Centers fell to 1.2% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026 from 3.0% in July 2026, a decline of 1.8 points. The brand went from two valid recommendations in July 2026 to one valid recommendation in September 2026. Presence also declined, from 84.8% in July 2026 to 76.2% in September 2026. Coverage held flat between August and September 2026.
Category Leader: Hazelden Betty Ford
Hazelden Betty Ford remains the category leader with 10.0% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026, up from 7.6% in July 2026. The brand's top-three rate increased to 10.0% from 6.1%, and its rank-one rate increased to 8.8% from 6.1%. Net sentiment improved from 0.1 to 0.4. Hazelden Betty Ford reached 8 valid recommendations in September 2026.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The placement rates below show where leading brands appear within recommendation lists.
Brand | Sep 2026 top-three rate | Sep 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hazelden Betty Ford | 10.0% | 8.8% | 6.1% | 6.1% |
Caron Treatment Centers | 5.0% | 0.0% | 1.5% | 0.0% |
Recovery Centers of America | 2.5% | 0.0% | 3.0% | 1.5% |
Hazelden Betty Ford leads both coverage and placement, with 7 of its 8 top-three appearances also at rank one. Similar coverage rates can still hide different first-position rates, as seen with Caron Treatment Centers, which reached 5.0% coverage in September 2026 but never appeared at rank one, while Hazelden Betty Ford converted most of its top-three appearances into first position.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in July, August, and September 2026 fell into the brand recommendation class of buyer-intent discovery.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 66 | 80 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 66 | 80 |
The current public series measures brand-recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the pricing or comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 66 | Hazelden Betty Ford | 7.6% | N/A (baseline month) |
Aug 2026 | 84 | Hazelden Betty Ford | 7.1% | 3.0 points down (Recovery Centers of America) |
Sep 2026 | 80 | Hazelden Betty Ford | 10.0% | 3.5 points up (Caron Treatment Centers) |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, private or sponsored channels, or causality from a metric movement alone.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how brands appear across major AI and search surfaces in response to real consumer prompts. It measures presence, recommendation coverage, placement, and sentiment as distinct signals.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can explain what the public percentage cannot, the prompts, competitors, or sources driving the result.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Drug Rehab Centers: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Addiction Treatment Centers: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Mental Health Treatment Centers: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read