Long Distance Moving Carriers AI Visibility Ranking Trends - November 2026
Tracking how AI platforms recommend long distance moving carriers ai visibility ranking trends. Updated monthly since April 2026.

On this page
- 01Answer capsule
- 02Industry leaderboard
- 03Key findings
- 04Tracked-company answer coverage
- 05Reach and affirmative recommendation
- 06Recommendation order and placement
- 07Classified framing in context
- 08Company results in detail
- 09International Van Lines
- 10American Van Lines
- 11JK Moving Services
- 12Colonial Van Lines
Answer capsule
The November 2026 Long Distance Moving Carriers benchmark compares 6 companies across 511 AI answers that met its inclusion rules. International Van Lines leads with 269 recommendations (52.64% of answers). At least one tracked company was recommended in 425 answers; some answers recommended several companies.
The rankings distinguish being mentioned from receiving an affirmative recommendation, then examine placement and the wording used about each company. Earlier monthly results show how counts and rates changed, with each month using its own answer total. These results describe the answers reviewed, not product quality or customer satisfaction. Differences between monthly samples limit comparisons and do not establish why a result changed.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Long Distance Moving Carriers
Industry leaderboard
Questions This Section Answers
- How do Long Distance Moving Carriers rank by recorded AI recommendations in November 2026?
Rank | Company | Recommendations | Recommendation rate | Mention rate | Top 3 rate | #1 rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | International Van Lines | 269 | 52.64% | 60.47% | 51.66% | 26.22% | 0.94 |
2 | American Van Lines | 192 | 37.57% | 77.30% | 36.59% | 13.50% | 0.74 |
3 | JK Moving Services | 187 | 36.59% | 40.51% | 36.20% | 23.68% | 0.97 |
4 | Colonial Van Lines | 146 | 28.57% | 38.94% | 27.20% | 9.20% | 0.88 |
5 | Safeway Moving | 85 | 16.63% | 21.14% | 16.44% | 9.20% | 0.90 |
6 | Wheaton World Wide Moving | 1 | 0.20% | 0.59% | 0.20% | 0.20% | 0.33 |
The leaderboard orders companies by recommendation count, meaning the number of reviewed AI answers that affirmatively endorsed each carrier. This is a different question from how often a company appeared at all. A company can be mentioned frequently yet recommended less often, so mention counts and recommendation counts should be read side by side rather than merged.
Placements sit inside recommendations: a first-place result is also a shortlist result, and both are subsets of recommendations rather than separate wins. Ties reflect equal recommendation counts, not shared wording. Because one answer may name several carriers, company totals overlap and should not be summed into a market-wide figure.
Key findings
Tracked-company answer coverage
Questions This Section Answers
- How often did the November 2026 Long Distance Moving Carriers answer sample recommend any tracked company?
Answer-level result | Qualified answers | Share of qualified answers |
|---|---|---|
At least one tracked company mentioned | 511 | 100.00% |
At least one tracked company recommended | 425 | 83.17% |
No tracked company recommended | 86 | 16.83% |
Multiple tracked companies recommended | 323 | 63.21% |
425 distinct answers recommended at least one tracked company. Counting each company recommendation separately gives 880, because an answer can recommend several companies. Answers with no tracked recommendation may still have recommended companies outside this comparison.
Coverage describes how often the reviewed answers engaged with any tracked carrier. Every qualified answer mentioned at least one tracked company, while a smaller majority recommended one. A substantial share recommended more than one, which is why company-level totals exceed the number of answers.
Answers without a tracked recommendation are not empty of recommendations; they may have endorsed carriers outside this comparison. Overlapping coverage therefore shows presence across answers, not overall market dominance, and the shares describe the reviewed answer set rather than the wider moving market.
Reach and affirmative recommendation
International Van Lines ranks 1 by recommendation count. Mentions: 309 (60.47%); recommendations: 269 (52.64%). Top 3 placements: 264 (51.66%); first-place placements: 134 (26.22%).
Wording about the company: 291 positive, 17 neutral, 1 negative mentions. The proportion of mentions that also included a recommendation was 87.1%. The net framing score was 0.94 (defined in Methodology).
40 mentions had no recorded recommendation. Of recorded recommendations, 98.14% were Top 3 and 49.81% were first-place.
Reach and recommendation answer different questions. International Van Lines appeared in a majority of answers and was recommended in most of those appearances, leaving a modest number of mentions without endorsement. Its shortlist placements account for nearly all of its recommendations, while first-place placements are a smaller subset of those shortlist results.
A high recommendation-to-mention ratio means the recorded wording usually paired the mention with an affirmative endorsement. It does not show why that pairing occurred, nor does it measure customer preference or conversion.
Recommendation order and placement
Company | Mentions | Recommendation-to-mention ratio | Top 3 / #1 counts | Positive / neutral / negative mentions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
International Van Lines | 309 | 87.1% | 264 / 134 | 291 / 17 / 1 |
American Van Lines | 395 | 48.6% | 187 / 69 | 292 / 102 / 1 |
JK Moving Services | 207 | 90.3% | 185 / 121 | 201 / 6 / 0 |
Colonial Van Lines | 199 | 73.4% | 139 / 47 | 178 / 19 / 2 |
Safeway Moving | 108 | 78.7% | 84 / 47 | 99 / 7 / 2 |
Wheaton World Wide Moving | 3 | 33.3% | 1 / 1 | 1 / 2 / 0 |
Placement describes where a recommended company sat within an answer's ordering. Shortlist placements are nested inside recommendations, and first-place placements are nested inside shortlist placements, so these counts should not be added together or read as extra endorsements.
Ratios vary widely across carriers: some recommendations almost always land on the shortlist, while others appear there less consistently. A strong ratio on a small base needs caution, since a handful of answers can move it sharply. Placement reflects answer wording, not consumer choice.
Classified framing in context
Company | Positive | Neutral | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|
International Van Lines | 291 | 17 | 1 |
American Van Lines | 292 | 102 | 1 |
JK Moving Services | 201 | 6 | 0 |
Colonial Van Lines | 178 | 19 | 2 |
Safeway Moving | 99 | 7 | 2 |
Wheaton World Wide Moving | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Framing classifies the wording surrounding each mention as positive, neutral or negative. Most mentions across carriers carried positive wording, with neutral wording forming the second group and negative wording rare. This describes how the reviewed answers phrased their references, not how customers feel about the companies.
Neutral or positive wording does not establish why a recommendation was or was not recorded. Framing is a separate lens from recommendation counts, and the two need not move together.
Company results in detail
International Van Lines
Questions This Section Answers
- What do the November 2026 AI answer results show about International Van Lines mentions, recommendations and placement?
International Van Lines ranks 1 by recommendation count. Mentions: 309 (60.47%); recommendations: 269 (52.64%). Top 3 placements: 264 (51.66%); first-place placements: 134 (26.22%).
Wording about the company: 291 positive, 17 neutral, 1 negative mentions. The proportion of mentions that also included a recommendation was 87.1%. The net framing score was 0.94 (defined in Methodology).
40 mentions had no recorded recommendation. Of recorded recommendations, 98.14% were Top 3 and 49.81% were first-place.
From October 2026 to November 2026, International Van Lines' mention count fell from 320 to 309, while its recommendation count fell from 304 to 269. The recommendation rate was 56.09% and 52.64% respectively.
International Van Lines leads on recommendation count and appears in a majority of reviewed answers, with most of those appearances also carrying an endorsement. Its recommendations are overwhelmingly shortlist placements, and roughly half of them are first-place results. Wording is almost entirely positive, with few neutral and a single negative mention.
Compared with the prior month, both mentions and recommendations were lower, and the recommendation rate also eased. That is a recorded comparison across separate monthly samples, not evidence of a cause.
American Van Lines
Questions This Section Answers
- What do the November 2026 AI answer results show about American Van Lines mentions, recommendations and placement?
American Van Lines ranks 2 by recommendation count. Mentions: 395 (77.30%); recommendations: 192 (37.57%). Top 3 placements: 187 (36.59%); first-place placements: 69 (13.50%).
Wording about the company: 292 positive, 102 neutral, 1 negative mentions. The proportion of mentions that also included a recommendation was 48.6%. The net framing score was 0.74 (defined in Methodology).
203 mentions had no recorded recommendation. Of recorded recommendations, 97.40% were Top 3 and 35.94% were first-place.
From October 2026 to November 2026, American Van Lines' mention count rose from 253 to 395, while its recommendation count fell from 247 to 192. The recommendation rate was 45.57% and 37.57% respectively.
American Van Lines has the widest reach among tracked carriers, appearing in most reviewed answers, yet its recommendation count is lower than its mention count would suggest. Its recommendation-to-mention ratio is the lowest of the larger carriers, and a large block of mentions carried neutral wording. Shortlist placements account for nearly all of its recommendations, with first-place results a smaller subset.
Month over month, mentions rose while recommendations and the recommendation rate fell. The samples differ, so the movement is reported without explanation.
JK Moving Services
Questions This Section Answers
- What do the November 2026 AI answer results show about JK Moving Services mentions, recommendations and placement?
JK Moving Services ranks 3 by recommendation count. Mentions: 207 (40.51%); recommendations: 187 (36.59%). Top 3 placements: 185 (36.20%); first-place placements: 121 (23.68%).
Wording about the company: 201 positive, 6 neutral, 0 negative mentions. The proportion of mentions that also included a recommendation was 90.3%. The net framing score was 0.97 (defined in Methodology).
20 mentions had no recorded recommendation. Of recorded recommendations, 98.93% were Top 3 and 64.71% were first-place.
From October 2026 to November 2026, JK Moving Services' mention count rose from 184 to 207, while its recommendation count rose from 179 to 187. The recommendation rate was 33.03% and 36.59% respectively.
JK Moving Services pairs a moderate mention count with a high recommendation-to-mention ratio, and its wording is almost entirely positive with no negative mentions recorded. Nearly all of its recommendations are shortlist placements, and a large share of those are first-place results, giving it a strong placement profile relative to its reach.
Both mentions and recommendations were higher than the prior month, and the recommendation rate rose as well. These are separate monthly samples, so the comparison does not establish why the figures moved.
Colonial Van Lines
Questions This Section Answers
- What do the November 2026 AI answer results show about Colonial Van Lines mentions, recommendations and placement?
Colonial Van Lines ranks 4 by recommendation count. Mentions: 199 (38.94%); recommendations: 146 (28.57%). Top 3 placements: 139 (27.20%); first-place placements: 47 (9.20%).
Wording about the company: 178 positive, 19 neutral, 2 negative mentions. The proportion of mentions that also included a recommendation was 73.4%. The net framing score was 0.88 (defined in Methodology).
53 mentions had no recorded recommendation. Of recorded recommendations, 95.21% were Top 3 and 32.19% were first-place.
From October 2026 to November 2026, Colonial Van Lines' mention count rose from 191 to 199, while its recommendation count fell from 180 to 146. The recommendation rate was 33.21% and 28.57% respectively.
Colonial Van Lines sits mid-table on recommendation count, with a recommendation-to-mention ratio that is solid but below the leading carriers. Most of its recommendations are shortlist placements, and about a third of those are first-place results. Wording is predominantly positive, with a small number of neutral and negative mentions.
Month over month, mentions edged higher while recommendations and the recommendation rate declined. That recorded comparison spans different answer samples and does not show a cause.
Safeway Moving
Questions This Section Answers
- What do the November 2026 AI answer results show about Safeway Moving mentions, recommendations and placement?
Safeway Moving ranks 5 by recommendation count. Mentions: 108 (21.14%); recommendations: 85 (16.63%). Top 3 placements: 84 (16.44%); first-place placements: 47 (9.20%).
Wording about the company: 99 positive, 7 neutral, 2 negative mentions. The proportion of mentions that also included a recommendation was 78.7%. The net framing score was 0.90 (defined in Methodology).
23 mentions had no recorded recommendation. Of recorded recommendations, 98.82% were Top 3 and 55.29% were first-place.
From October 2026 to November 2026, Safeway Moving's mention count fell from 123 to 108, while its recommendation count fell from 113 to 85. The recommendation rate was 20.85% and 16.63% respectively.
Safeway Moving records a smaller mention and recommendation base than the carriers above it, consistent with lower reach across the reviewed answers. Its recommendation-to-mention ratio is fairly high, and nearly all of its recommendations are shortlist placements, with a majority of those landing first. Wording is mostly positive, with few neutral or negative mentions.
Mentions, recommendations and the recommendation rate were all lower than the prior month. The comparison reflects separate samples rather than a demonstrated trend.
Wheaton World Wide Moving
Questions This Section Answers
- What do the November 2026 AI answer results show about Wheaton World Wide Moving mentions, recommendations and placement?
Wheaton World Wide Moving ranks 6 by recommendation count. Mentions: 3 (0.59%); recommendations: 1 (0.20%). Top 3 placements: 1 (0.20%); first-place placements: 1 (0.20%).
Wording about the company: 1 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative mentions. The proportion of mentions that also included a recommendation was 33.3%. The net framing score was 0.33 (defined in Methodology).
2 mentions had no recorded recommendation. Of recorded recommendations, 100.00% were Top 3 and 100.00% were first-place.
From October 2026 to November 2026, Wheaton World Wide Moving's mention count fell from 5 to 3, while its recommendation count rose from 0 to 1. The recommendation rate was 0.00% and 0.20% respectively.
Wheaton World Wide Moving has a very small measured footprint: a handful of mentions and a single recommendation, which was also a shortlist and first-place result. Wording across those few mentions was mostly neutral, with one positive mention and no negatives.
Because the base is so small, the recommendation-to-mention ratio is fragile and should be read with caution. Month over month, mentions fell slightly while the recommendation count moved from zero to one; these are separate samples and do not establish a trend.
Earlier ranking snapshot context
Questions This Section Answers
- How do the available Long Distance Moving Carriers snapshots from July 2026 to November 2026 differ in recommendation coverage and measurement scope?
Company | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Sep 2026 | Oct 2026 | Nov 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
International Van Lines | 217 / 472 (45.97%) | 241 / 532 (45.30%) | 251 / 561 (44.74%) | 304 / 542 (56.09%) | 269 / 511 (52.64%) |
American Van Lines | 238 / 472 (50.42%) | 220 / 532 (41.35%) | 227 / 561 (40.46%) | 247 / 542 (45.57%) | 192 / 511 (37.57%) |
JK Moving Services | 211 / 472 (44.70%) | 188 / 532 (35.34%) | 186 / 561 (33.16%) | 179 / 542 (33.03%) | 187 / 511 (36.59%) |
Colonial Van Lines | 185 / 472 (39.19%) | 169 / 532 (31.77%) | 164 / 561 (29.23%) | 180 / 542 (33.21%) | 146 / 511 (28.57%) |
Safeway Moving | 94 / 472 (19.92%) | 92 / 532 (17.29%) | 97 / 561 (17.29%) | 113 / 542 (20.85%) | 85 / 511 (16.63%) |
Wheaton World Wide Moving | 3 / 472 (0.64%) | 1 / 532 (0.19%) | 0 / 561 (0.00%) | 0 / 542 (0.00%) | 1 / 511 (0.20%) |
Company | Jul 2026 rank | Aug 2026 rank | Sep 2026 rank | Oct 2026 rank | Nov 2026 rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
International Van Lines | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
American Van Lines | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
JK Moving Services | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
Colonial Van Lines | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
Safeway Moving | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Wheaton World Wide Moving | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
Only months with verified results are shown. Monthly sample coverage is listed in Methodology.
The monthly history shows separate selected samples of AI answers, each with its own answer total. Counts and rates should be read together, since a rate depends on both the recommendation count and the answers included that month. Rank positions are ordered within each month's sample.
Smaller answer totals in a given month do not establish why a company's counts or rates changed. The snapshots show recorded results across months, not rank stability or equivalent sampling.
AI recommendation trend
Observed recommendation rate (%), Jul 2026 to Nov 2026
- International Van Lines52.6%
- American Van Lines37.6%
- JK Moving Services36.6%
- Colonial Van Lines28.6%
- Safeway Moving16.6%
- Wheaton World Wide Moving0.2%
What the November Rankings Show
The November results answer several distinct questions. Reach asks how often a carrier appeared in the reviewed answers; recommendation asks how often that appearance carried an affirmative endorsement; placement asks where endorsed carriers sat within an answer's ordering; and framing asks how the surrounding wording was classified. These measures can diverge, which is why a wide presence does not guarantee a high recommendation count.
Reading them together gives a fuller picture than any single column, while keeping each measure in its own lane. None of these figures measures customer sentiment, sales or conversion, and the comparisons across months describe recorded changes rather than their causes.
Methodology
Questions This Section Answers
- How were the November 2026 Long Distance Moving Carriers AI visibility measures counted, and what do they not establish?
This benchmark has partial coverage: 2 of 3 planned question categories contributed usable observations; 1 contributed none. This describes question-category coverage, not demonstrated platform outages. Findings apply to the available answer set.
The month in the title is the reporting period. The exact dates when the original AI answers were collected have not been verified.
Each company is counted at most once in each answer that meets the benchmark rules. A recommendation requires both an affirmative endorsement and positive wording. Mention, recommendation, Top 3 and first-place rates use the full benchmark answer total. Top 3 and first-place results are included within recommendations, not added to them.
The recommendation-to-mention ratio divides recommendations by mentions. It describes AI answer wording, not customer conversion. Net framing is positive minus negative mentions, divided by all mentions, on a scale from -1 to +1. It does not measure customer satisfaction or company quality.
Market: US; 6 tracked companies. AI services represented: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity.
Research screening totals (answer observations can include repeated questions):
Screening measure | Count |
|---|---|
Answers included in the benchmark | 511 |
Answers marked relevant during screening | 760 |
Answers marked reserved (screening label) | 249 |
Answers marked irrelevant during screening | 17 |
Captured answer observations | 777 |
Distinct questions | 415 |
Answer observations marked as mentioning a brand | 777 |
The source does not provide a reader-facing definition of “reserved”; that screening label is reported without inferring a reason for exclusion. Only the included benchmark answers form the rate denominator.
One answer can mention or recommend several companies. Adding company totals would therefore count some answers more than once. The results describe the AI answers reviewed, not independently verified facts about the companies or their products.
Monthly sample coverage:
Reporting month | Answers included | AI services covered | Services |
|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 472 | 6 | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity |
Aug 2026 | 532 | 6 | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity |
Sep 2026 | 561 | 6 | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity |
Oct 2026 | 542 | 6 | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity |
Nov 2026 | 511 | 6 | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity |
The answer samples differ between months. These comparisons show how the recorded results changed; they do not establish why they changed.
This benchmark covers only part of the planned question categories, so findings apply to the available answer set rather than the full intended scope. The reporting month labels the period, but exact collection dates were not verified. Each company is counted at most once per qualifying answer, and placement results are nested within recommendations rather than added to them.
The recommendation-to-mention ratio and net framing describe answer wording, not customer satisfaction or company quality. One answer can name several companies, so company totals overlap. Monthly samples differ, and comparisons show recorded change without establishing why it occurred.
Archived editions
Browse earlier published research snapshots for this article. The latest edition remains at the current URL.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Mattresses AI Visibility Ranking Trends - November 2026
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Mortgage AI Visibility Ranking Trends - November 2026
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Blockchain Platforms AI Visibility Ranking Trends - November 2026
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read