Workers Compensation Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend workers compensation lawyers. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Increase: Morgan & Morgan
- 08Category Leader: Morgan & Morgan
- 09Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 10Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 11Historical Measurement Record
- 12Evidence and Source Layer
Benchmark Summary
Morgan & Morgan led the Workers Compensation Lawyers benchmark in August 2026 with valid recommendation coverage of 40.3%, up from 26.2% in July 2026. The gap to the next brand widened to 23.1 percentage points over second-place Pond Lehocky, which fell to 17.2% in August 2026 from 20.6% in July 2026.
The largest coverage increase came from Morgan & Morgan, which rose from 26.2% in July 2026 to 40.3% in August 2026, a move beyond normal month-to-month variation. The largest coverage decline was Hensley Legal Group, which fell from 8.7% in July 2026 to 4.3% in August 2026, though this remained within normal variation.
The benchmark began with 458 prompt-surface observations in July 2026 and 571 in August 2026, producing 126 and 186 qualified observations respectively after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026
- Morgan & Morgan+14.1% · beyond normal variationJul 202626.2%Aug 202640.3%
- Pond Lehocky-3.4%Jul 202620.6%Aug 202617.2%
- Krasno Krasno & Onwudinjo-1.1%Jul 202616.7%Aug 202615.6%
- Hensley Legal Group-4.4%Jul 20268.7%Aug 20264.3%
- Berger and Green-0.3%Jul 20262.4%Aug 20262.1%
- Gerber & Holderno changeJul 20261.6%Aug 20261.6%
- Klezmer Maudlin-2.4%Jul 20264.0%Aug 20261.6%
- Bross & Frankel-0.5%Jul 20261.6%Aug 20261.1%
- Jan Dils Attorneys-1.9%Jul 20262.4%Aug 20260.5%
- Calhoun Meredithno changeJul 20260.0%Aug 20260.0%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 126 | 186 | Up 60 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 46.0% | 28.5% | Down 17.5 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 50.8% | 61.3% | Up 10.5 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Morgan & Morgan | Morgan & Morgan | No change |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation. The six families are ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. Both months registered qualified observations across all six.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Workers Compensation Lawyers
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 458 | 571 | Total prompts collected across surfaces |
Unique questions | 375 | 495 | Distinct questions after deduplication |
Brand / competitor mentions | 458 | 571 | Prompts mentioning a tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 251 | 343 | On-topic for the vertical |
Irrelevant observations | 207 | 228 | Off-topic or not usable |
Qualified benchmark observations | 126 | 186 | Public denominator after reservation |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Market Discovery Methodology for full details.
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Morgan & Morgan | 76.3% | 40.3% | 24.2% | 12.4% | 0.82 |
Pond Lehocky | 21.5% | 17.2% | 13.4% | 9.1% | 0.83 |
Krasno Krasno & Onwudinjo | 16.1% | 15.6% | 6.5% | 1.1% | 0.97 |
Hensley Legal Group | 5.4% | 4.3% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 0.80 |
Berger and Green | 2.7% | 2.1% | 1.1% | 0.5% | 0.80 |
Gerber & Holder | 1.6% | 1.6% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 1.00 |
Klezmer Maudlin | 1.6% | 1.6% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.00 |
Bross & Frankel | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 1.00 |
Jan Dils Attorneys | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 1.00 |
Calhoun Meredith | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.00 |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the AI response, regardless of recommendation status.
- Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations where the brand is recommended with a valid, attributable recommendation.
- Top-three rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears among the top three recommended options.
- Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is the first or primary recommendation.
- Net sentiment: positive minus negative mention tone, scaled to a 0 to 1 range where 1 is entirely positive.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Berger and Green | 2.4% | 2.1% | Down 0.3 points |
Bross & Frankel | 1.6% | 1.1% | Down 0.5 points |
Calhoun Meredith | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Gerber & Holder | 1.6% | 1.6% | No change |
Hensley Legal Group | 8.7% | 4.3% | Down 4.4 points |
Jan Dils Attorneys | 2.4% | 0.5% | Down 1.9 points |
Klezmer Maudlin | 4.0% | 1.6% | Down 2.4 points |
Krasno Krasno & Onwudinjo | 16.7% | 15.6% | Down 1.1 points |
Morgan & Morgan | 26.2% | 40.3% | Up 14.1 points |
Pond Lehocky | 20.6% | 17.2% | Down 3.4 points |
Largest Increase: Morgan & Morgan
Morgan & Morgan moved beyond normal variation, rising from 26.2% in July 2026 to 40.3% in August 2026, an increase of 14.1 percentage points. The brand's top-three rate rose from 16.7% to 24.2% and its rank-one rate rose from 8.7% to 12.4% over the same period. Presence remained broadly stable at 76.3% in August 2026 versus 75.4% in July 2026, meaning the higher coverage came from a larger share of its existing presence converting to valid recommendations.
Category Leader: Morgan & Morgan
Morgan & Morgan led the category with 40.3% valid recommendation coverage in August 2026. The lead over second-place Pond Lehocky widened from 5.6 percentage points in July 2026 to 23.1 percentage points in August 2026.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The leading brands show different patterns between top-three placement and first-position placement.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Brand | Aug 2026 top-three rate | Aug 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Morgan & Morgan | 24.2% | 12.4% | 16.7% | 8.7% |
Pond Lehocky | 13.4% | 9.1% | 17.5% | 11.1% |
Krasno Krasno & Onwudinjo | 6.5% | 1.1% | 7.9% | 2.4% |
Close coverage can still hide different first-position rates. Krasno Krasno & Onwudinjo held 15.6% coverage in August 2026 but only 1.1% rank-one placement, while Pond Lehocky converted 9.1% of its 17.2% coverage into first position.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 126 | 186 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 126 | 186 |
The current public series measures brand recommendation discovery only and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 (Baseline) | 126 | Morgan & Morgan | 26.2% | Baseline month, no prior comparison |
Aug 2026 | 186 | Morgan & Morgan | 40.3% | Morgan & Morgan up 14.1 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure:
- Market share or revenue attribution
- Attributable sales or client conversions
- Every possible AI response to a given query
- Organic-search ranking positions
- Social media mention volume
- Private or sponsored channels and gated content
- Causality from a metric movement alone
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how often brands appear and are recommended across major AI and search surfaces. It is a neutral, observational industry benchmark built from structured prompt-level research. Canonical research links:
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Flight Compensation Travel: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
DUI Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Divorce Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read