Workers Compensation Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index

Tracking how AI platforms recommend workers compensation lawyers. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

Mark Huntley, J.D.
By Mark Huntley, J.D.Growth Strategist & AI Discovery Analyst
5 minutes read

Benchmark Summary

Morgan & Morgan led the Workers Compensation Lawyers benchmark in August 2026 with valid recommendation coverage of 40.3%, up from 26.2% in July 2026. The gap to the next brand widened to 23.1 percentage points over second-place Pond Lehocky, which fell to 17.2% in August 2026 from 20.6% in July 2026.

The largest coverage increase came from Morgan & Morgan, which rose from 26.2% in July 2026 to 40.3% in August 2026, a move beyond normal month-to-month variation. The largest coverage decline was Hensley Legal Group, which fell from 8.7% in July 2026 to 4.3% in August 2026, though this remained within normal variation.

The benchmark began with 458 prompt-surface observations in July 2026 and 571 in August 2026, producing 126 and 186 qualified observations respectively after qualification.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026

  • Morgan & Morgan+14.1% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202626.2%
    Aug 202640.3%
  • Pond Lehocky-3.4%
    Jul 202620.6%
    Aug 202617.2%
  • Krasno Krasno & Onwudinjo-1.1%
    Jul 202616.7%
    Aug 202615.6%
  • Hensley Legal Group-4.4%
    Jul 20268.7%
    Aug 20264.3%
  • Berger and Green-0.3%
    Jul 20262.4%
    Aug 20262.1%
  • Gerber & Holderno change
    Jul 20261.6%
    Aug 20261.6%
  • Klezmer Maudlin-2.4%
    Jul 20264.0%
    Aug 20261.6%
  • Bross & Frankel-0.5%
    Jul 20261.6%
    Aug 20261.1%
  • Jan Dils Attorneys-1.9%
    Jul 20262.4%
    Aug 20260.5%
  • Calhoun Meredithno change
    Jul 20260.0%
    Aug 20260.0%

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Measure

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Movement

Qualified benchmark observations

126

186

Up 60

Tracked brands

10

10

No change

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

46.0%

28.5%

Down 17.5 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

50.8%

61.3%

Up 10.5 points

Leader by valid recommendation coverage

Morgan & Morgan

Morgan & Morgan

No change

Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation. The six families are ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. Both months registered qualified observations across all six.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Workers Compensation Lawyers

Research Scope and Qualification

The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.

Research stage

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

What it represents

Source prompt-surface observations

458

571

Total prompts collected across surfaces

Unique questions

375

495

Distinct questions after deduplication

Brand / competitor mentions

458

571

Prompts mentioning a tracked brand

Relevant observations

251

343

On-topic for the vertical

Irrelevant observations

207

228

Off-topic or not usable

Qualified benchmark observations

126

186

Public denominator after reservation

Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Market Discovery Methodology for full details.

Current Brand Standings

Brand

Presence rate

Valid recommendation coverage

Top-three rate

Rank-one rate

Net sentiment

Morgan & Morgan

76.3%

40.3%

24.2%

12.4%

0.82

Pond Lehocky

21.5%

17.2%

13.4%

9.1%

0.83

Krasno Krasno & Onwudinjo

16.1%

15.6%

6.5%

1.1%

0.97

Hensley Legal Group

5.4%

4.3%

2.7%

2.7%

0.80

Berger and Green

2.7%

2.1%

1.1%

0.5%

0.80

Gerber & Holder

1.6%

1.6%

0.5%

0.0%

1.00

Klezmer Maudlin

1.6%

1.6%

1.1%

1.1%

1.00

Bross & Frankel

1.1%

1.1%

1.1%

0.0%

1.00

Jan Dils Attorneys

0.5%

0.5%

0.5%

0.0%

1.00

Calhoun Meredith

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.00

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

How to Read the Standings

  • Presence rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the AI response, regardless of recommendation status.
  • Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations where the brand is recommended with a valid, attributable recommendation.
  • Top-three rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears among the top three recommended options.
  • Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is the first or primary recommendation.
  • Net sentiment: positive minus negative mention tone, scaled to a 0 to 1 range where 1 is entirely positive.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Brand

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Movement since baseline

Berger and Green

2.4%

2.1%

Down 0.3 points

Bross & Frankel

1.6%

1.1%

Down 0.5 points

Calhoun Meredith

0.0%

0.0%

No change

Gerber & Holder

1.6%

1.6%

No change

Hensley Legal Group

8.7%

4.3%

Down 4.4 points

Jan Dils Attorneys

2.4%

0.5%

Down 1.9 points

Klezmer Maudlin

4.0%

1.6%

Down 2.4 points

Krasno Krasno & Onwudinjo

16.7%

15.6%

Down 1.1 points

Morgan & Morgan

26.2%

40.3%

Up 14.1 points

Pond Lehocky

20.6%

17.2%

Down 3.4 points

Largest Increase: Morgan & Morgan

Morgan & Morgan moved beyond normal variation, rising from 26.2% in July 2026 to 40.3% in August 2026, an increase of 14.1 percentage points. The brand's top-three rate rose from 16.7% to 24.2% and its rank-one rate rose from 8.7% to 12.4% over the same period. Presence remained broadly stable at 76.3% in August 2026 versus 75.4% in July 2026, meaning the higher coverage came from a larger share of its existing presence converting to valid recommendations.

Category Leader: Morgan & Morgan

Morgan & Morgan led the category with 40.3% valid recommendation coverage in August 2026. The lead over second-place Pond Lehocky widened from 5.6 percentage points in July 2026 to 23.1 percentage points in August 2026.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The leading brands show different patterns between top-three placement and first-position placement.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Brand

Aug 2026 top-three rate

Aug 2026 rank-one rate

Jul 2026 top-three rate

Jul 2026 rank-one rate

Morgan & Morgan

24.2%

12.4%

16.7%

8.7%

Pond Lehocky

13.4%

9.1%

17.5%

11.1%

Krasno Krasno & Onwudinjo

6.5%

1.1%

7.9%

2.4%

Close coverage can still hide different first-position rates. Krasno Krasno & Onwudinjo held 15.6% coverage in August 2026 but only 1.1% rank-one placement, while Pond Lehocky converted 9.1% of its 17.2% coverage into first position.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class.

Buyer-intent class

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Brand Recommendation

126

186

Pricing & Value

0

0

Multi-Brand Comparison

0

0

Total qualified observations

126

186

The current public series measures brand recommendation discovery only and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.

Historical Measurement Record

This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.

Measurement

Qualified observations

Coverage leader

Leader coverage

Largest coverage movement

Jul 2026 (Baseline)

126

Morgan & Morgan

26.2%

Baseline month, no prior comparison

Aug 2026

186

Morgan & Morgan

40.3%

Morgan & Morgan up 14.1 points

Evidence and Source Layer

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure:

  • Market share or revenue attribution
  • Attributable sales or client conversions
  • Every possible AI response to a given query
  • Organic-search ranking positions
  • Social media mention volume
  • Private or sponsored channels and gated content
  • Causality from a metric movement alone

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how often brands appear and are recommended across major AI and search surfaces. It is a neutral, observational industry benchmark built from structured prompt-level research. Canonical research links:

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.

Get my free AI Company Index

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.