DUI Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend dui lawyers. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Increase: Manshoory Law Group
- 08Largest Decline: Chambers Law Firm and Greg Hill & Associates
- 09Category Leader: Wallin & Klarich
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
Wallin & Klarich led the DUI Lawyers benchmark in August 2026 with a valid recommendation coverage of 19.1%, a modest decline from 19.7% in July 2026. The gap to the next brand was 11.8 percentage points, as Manshoory Law Group held second place with 7.3% valid recommendation coverage in August 2026, up from 6.6% in July 2026.
The largest coverage increase among tracked brands was Manshoory Law Group, which rose 0.7 percentage points from 6.6% in July 2026 to 7.3% in August 2026. The largest coverage decline was shared by Chambers Law Firm and Greg Hill & Associates, each dropping 1.6 percentage points from 1.6% in July 2026 to 0.0% in August 2026.
No tracked brand moved beyond normal month-to-month variation in August 2026. The month was quiet overall, with all ten brands classified as stable. Wallin & Klarich's valid recommendation coverage of 19.1% in August 2026 was within normal variation of its 19.7% level in July 2026, and Manshoory Law Group's increase similarly stayed within expected bounds.
The benchmark began with 273 prompt-surface observations in August 2026 and produced 68 qualified observations after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026
- Wallin & Klarich-0.6%Jul 202619.7%Aug 202619.1%
- Manshoory Law Group+0.7%Jul 20266.6%Aug 20267.3%
- Bruno Naluno changeJul 20260.0%Aug 20260.0%
- Chambers Law Firm-1.6%Jul 20261.6%Aug 20260.0%
- DUI Defense Lawyersno changeJul 20260.0%Aug 20260.0%
- Esfandi Law Groupno changeJul 20260.0%Aug 20260.0%
- Greg Hill & Associates-1.6%Jul 20261.6%Aug 20260.0%
- Hawk Law Groupno changeJul 20260.0%Aug 20260.0%
- The Kavinoky Law Firmno changeJul 20260.0%Aug 20260.0%
- The Nieves Law Firmno changeJul 20260.0%Aug 20260.0%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 61 | 68 | Up 7 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 5 | 5 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 29.5% | 42.6% | Up 13.1 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 59.0% | 64.7% | Up 5.7 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Wallin & Klarich (19.7%) | Wallin & Klarich (19.1%) | Down 0.6 points |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. The DUI Lawyers benchmark captured qualified observations across five of the six families in both July and August 2026.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending DUI Lawyers
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 219 | 273 | Total prompts collected across AI/search surfaces |
Unique questions | 214 | 266 | Distinct questions after de-duplication |
Brand / competitor mentions | 219 | 273 | Prompts mentioning a brand or competitor |
Relevant observations | 76 | 82 | Prompts relevant to the DUI Lawyers category |
Irrelevant observations | 143 | 191 | Prompts not relevant to the category |
Qualified benchmark observations | 61 | 68 | Public denominator for brand-level percentages |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Market Discovery Methodology
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wallin & Klarich | 27.9% | 19.1% | 16.2% | 5.9% | 0.7 |
Manshoory Law Group | 7.3% | 7.3% | 7.3% | 1.5% | 1.0 |
Bruno Nalu | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Chambers Law Firm | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
DUI Defense Lawyers | 2.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.0 |
Esfandi Law Group | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Greg Hill & Associates | 1.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Hawk Law Group | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
The Kavinoky Law Firm | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
The Nieves Law Firm | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in any form, whether positive, negative, or neutral.
- Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist.
- Top-three rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears among the top three recommendations.
- Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is the first recommendation.
- Net sentiment: positive minus negative mentions divided by total mentions, where present.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Wallin & Klarich | 19.7% | 19.1% | Down 0.6 points |
Manshoory Law Group | 6.6% | 7.3% | Up 0.7 points |
Bruno Nalu | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Chambers Law Firm | 1.6% | 0.0% | Down 1.6 points |
DUI Defense Lawyers | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Esfandi Law Group | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Greg Hill & Associates | 1.6% | 0.0% | Down 1.6 points |
Hawk Law Group | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
The Kavinoky Law Firm | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
The Nieves Law Firm | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
August 2026 was a quiet month across the DUI Lawyers benchmark, with no brand moving beyond normal month-to-month variation. Several brands showed small directional shifts. Manshoory Law Group's top-three rate rose to 7.3% in August 2026 from 3.3% in July 2026, while its rank-one rate fell to 1.5% from 3.3% over the same period. Wallin & Klarich's presence rate declined to 27.9% in August 2026 from 31.1% in July 2026, though its top-three rate improved to 16.2% from 13.1% and its rank-one rate rose to 5.9% from 4.9%.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Largest Increase: Manshoory Law Group
Manshoory Law Group recorded the largest coverage increase in the DUI Lawyers benchmark, rising 0.7 percentage points from 6.6% in July 2026 to 7.3% in August 2026. The increase falls within normal month-to-month variation and was not flagged as a significant or streak-breaking movement.
Largest Decline: Chambers Law Firm and Greg Hill & Associates
Chambers Law Firm and Greg Hill & Associates each recorded the largest coverage decline in the benchmark, falling 1.6 percentage points from 1.6% in July 2026 to 0.0% in August 2026. Both declines fall within normal month-to-month variation and were not flagged as significant or streak-breaking.
Category Leader: Wallin & Klarich
Wallin & Klarich remained the category leader in August 2026 with 19.1% valid recommendation coverage, down from 19.7% in July 2026. The firm also held the highest presence rate at 27.9% in August 2026, down from 31.1% in July 2026. Its top-three rate improved to 16.2% in August 2026 from 13.1% in July 2026, and its rank-one rate rose to 5.9% from 4.9% over the same period.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The two brands with measurable coverage in August 2026 displayed quite different placement patterns.
Brand | Aug 2026 top-three rate | Aug 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wallin & Klarich | 16.2% | 5.9% | 13.1% | 4.9% |
Manshoory Law Group | 7.3% | 1.5% | 3.3% | 3.3% |
Wallin & Klarich converted a majority of its coverage into top-three placements in August 2026, with a 16.2% top-three rate against 19.1% coverage. Manshoory Law Group matched its coverage and top-three rate exactly at 7.3%, but its rank-one rate of 1.5% was lower than its 3.3% rank-one rate in July 2026. Similar coverage can still hide different first-position rates.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class, where buyers are seeking direct recommendations for DUI defense lawyers.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 61 | 68 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 61 | 68 |
The current public series measures brand-recommendation discovery only and does not yet contain qualified observations in the pricing and value or multi-brand comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 61 | Wallin & Klarich | 19.7% | Baseline month (no prior period data) |
Aug 2026 | 68 | Wallin & Klarich | 19.1% | Chambers Law Firm & Greg Hill & Associates down 1.6 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, private or sponsored channels, or causality from a metric movement alone.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how often and how prominently brands appear in AI-generated recommendations across the six canonical AI/search surface families.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Divorce Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Immigration Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Mesothelioma Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read