DUI Lawyers: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend dui lawyers. This public AI Visibility Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Increase: Manshoory Law Group
- 08Largest Decline: Wallin & Klarich
- 09Category Leader: Manshoory Law Group
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
Questions This Section Answers
- Who leads the DUI Lawyers benchmark in October 2026, and by how much?
- Which brand recorded the largest recommendation coverage increase, and which declined?
- How has the gap between the two leading DUI defense brands changed since July 2026?
Manshoory Law Group leads the DUI Lawyers benchmark in October 2026 with valid recommendation coverage of 22.6%, up from 6.6% in July 2026. The standing gap to the next brand is 7.1 percentage points, with Wallin & Klarich holding 15.5% valid recommendation coverage in October 2026, down from 19.7% in July 2026.
Manshoory Law Group recorded the largest coverage increase, rising 16.0 percentage points from 6.6% in July 2026 to 22.6% in October 2026, and is the only brand flagged as a significant riser for the series. Wallin & Klarich recorded the largest coverage decline, down 4.2 percentage points from 19.7% in July 2026 to 15.5% in October 2026. No brand was flagged as a significant decliner, and no brand moved beyond normal month-to-month variation in October 2026 itself. The gap between the two leading brands has moved in Manshoory Law Group's favor in every month of the series, from a 13.1-point deficit behind Wallin & Klarich in July 2026 to a 7.1-point lead in October 2026.
The benchmark began with 271 prompt-surface observations in October 2026 and produced 84 qualified observations after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Oct 2026
- Manshoory Law Group22.6%
- Wallin & Klarich15.5%
- Esfandi Law Group3.6%
- Chambers Law Firm2.4%
- Greg Hill & Associates1.2%
- The Nieves Law Firm1.2%
- Bruno Nalu0.0%
- DUI Defense Lawyers0.0%
- Hawk Law Group0.0%
- The Kavinoky Law Firm0.0%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 61 | 84 | Up 23 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 5 | 5 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 29.5% | 54.8% | Up 25.3 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 59.0% | 71.4% | Up 12.4 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Wallin & Klarich (19.7%) | Manshoory Law Group (22.6%) | Leadership changed |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. The DUI Lawyers benchmark captured qualified observations across five of the six families in both July and October 2026. August 2026 and September 2026 also recorded five families.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending DUI Lawyers
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 219 | 271 | Total prompts collected across AI/search surfaces |
Unique questions | 214 | 259 | Distinct questions after de-duplication |
Brand / competitor mentions | 219 | 267 | Prompts mentioning a brand or competitor |
Relevant observations | 76 | 97 | Prompts relevant to the DUI Lawyers category |
Irrelevant observations | 143 | 170 | Prompts not relevant to the category |
Qualified benchmark observations | 61 | 84 | Public denominator for brand-level percentages |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Visibility Market Discovery Methodology
Current Brand Standings
Questions This Section Answers
- Which DUI defense brands earned valid recommendation coverage in October 2026?
- How do presence rate, top-three rate, and rank-one rate differ across the leading firms?
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Manshoory Law Group | 23.8% | 22.6% | 17.9% | 11.9% | 0.9 |
Wallin & Klarich | 22.6% | 15.5% | 11.9% | 4.8% | 0.7 |
Esfandi Law Group | 4.8% | 3.6% | 2.4% | 0.0% | 0.8 |
Chambers Law Firm | 2.4% | 2.4% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 1.0 |
Greg Hill & Associates | 2.4% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.5 |
The Nieves Law Firm | 3.6% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.7 |
Bruno Nalu | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
DUI Defense Lawyers | 3.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Hawk Law Group | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
The Kavinoky Law Firm | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in any form, whether positive, negative, or neutral.
- Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist.
- Top-three rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears among the top three recommendations.
- Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is the first recommendation.
- Net sentiment: positive minus negative mentions divided by total mentions, where present.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Visibility Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Questions This Section Answers
- Which brands gained or lost recommendation coverage since the July 2026 baseline?
- Was Wallin & Klarich's coverage decline statistically significant, or within normal variation?
- What supporting metrics moved alongside Manshoory Law Group's coverage gains?
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Brand | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Manshoory Law Group | 6.6% | 22.6% | Up 16.0 points |
Wallin & Klarich | 19.7% | 15.5% | Down 4.2 points |
Esfandi Law Group | 0.0% | 3.6% | Up 3.6 points |
Chambers Law Firm | 1.6% | 2.4% | Up 0.8 points |
Greg Hill & Associates | 1.6% | 1.2% | Down 0.4 points |
The Nieves Law Firm | 0.0% | 1.2% | Up 1.2 points |
Bruno Nalu | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
DUI Defense Lawyers | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Hawk Law Group | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
The Kavinoky Law Firm | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Largest Increase: Manshoory Law Group
Manshoory Law Group recorded the largest coverage increase in the DUI Lawyers benchmark, rising 16.0 percentage points from 6.6% in July 2026 to 22.6% in October 2026. The move was flagged as a significant riser for the series and is the only such classification in the benchmark. The firm rose in each of the three months since July 2026: 6.6% in July 2026, 7.3% in August 2026, 12.2% in September 2026, and 22.6% in October 2026. Its valid recommendation count rose to 19 in October 2026 from 4 in July 2026. Supporting measures moved with it: its presence rate rose 17.2 percentage points to 23.8% in October 2026 from 6.6% in July 2026, its top-three rate rose 14.6 percentage points to 17.9% from 3.3%, and its rank-one rate rose 8.6 percentage points to 11.9% from 3.3% over the same period.
Largest Decline: Wallin & Klarich
Wallin & Klarich recorded the largest coverage decline in the benchmark, falling 4.2 percentage points from 19.7% in July 2026 to 15.5% in October 2026. The firm dropped from the coverage lead it held across the earlier months of the series. Its top-three rate fell 1.2 percentage points to 11.9% in October 2026 from 13.1% in July 2026, and its rank-one rate slipped 0.1 percentage points to 4.8% from 4.9%. The decline falls within normal month-to-month variation and was not flagged as significant.
Category Leader: Manshoory Law Group
Manshoory Law Group became the category leader in October 2026 with 22.6% valid recommendation coverage, up from 6.6% in July 2026. The firm also held the highest presence rate at 23.8% in October 2026, up from 6.6% in July 2026, and the highest rank-one rate at 11.9%, up from 3.3%. Its top-three rate was 17.9% in October 2026 against 3.3% in July 2026. Its net sentiment score was 0.9 in October 2026, down from 1.0 in July 2026.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Questions This Section Answers
- How did the two highest-coverage DUI brands differ in top-three and rank-one placement?
- Does strong coverage translate into first-position recommendations for these firms?
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The two brands with the largest coverage in October 2026 displayed different placement patterns.
Brand | Oct 2026 top-three rate | Oct 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Manshoory Law Group | 17.9% | 11.9% | 3.3% | 3.3% |
Wallin & Klarich | 11.9% | 4.8% | 13.1% | 4.9% |
Esfandi Law Group | 2.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Manshoory Law Group placed 17.9% of observations in the top three against 22.6% coverage in October 2026, while its rank-one rate of 11.9% outpaced Wallin & Klarich's 4.8%. The two brands' coverage figures sit 7.1 percentage points apart, and their rank-one rates differ by the same 7.1 percentage points, so the coverage gap and the first-position gap move in step for this pair of brands.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class, where buyers are seeking direct recommendations for DUI defense lawyers.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 61 | 84 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 61 | 84 |
The current public series measures brand-recommendation discovery only and does not yet contain qualified observations in the pricing and value or multi-brand comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
Questions This Section Answers
- How many qualified observations has the benchmark captured each month?
- When did the coverage lead change hands, and who held it before October 2026?
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 61 | Wallin & Klarich | 19.7% | Baseline month (no prior period data) |
Aug 2026 | 68 | Wallin & Klarich | 19.1% | Wallin & Klarich down 0.6 points |
Sep 2026 | 74 | Wallin & Klarich | 20.3% | Manshoory Law Group up 4.9 points |
Oct 2026 | 84 | Manshoory Law Group | 22.6% | Manshoory Law Group up 10.4 points |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
The coverage lead changed hands in October 2026, ending Wallin & Klarich's hold across the earlier months of the series.
Evidence and Source Layer
Questions This Section Answers
- What evidence does each prompt-level observation capture?
- Does a source's presence in AI citations prove it caused a recommendation?
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
- Market share or attributable sales
- Every possible AI response
- Organic-search ranking
- Social mention volume
- Private or sponsored channels
- Causality from a metric movement alone
The benchmark cannot establish causality from a metric movement alone, and none of these areas are covered by the public series.
Top 10 Cited Domains
Across all AI platform responses in October 2026, the benchmark observed 2,251 citations drawn from 801 unique domains.
Rank | Domain | Citations | Share | Platforms citing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | google.com | 421 | 18.7% | AI Mode, AI Overviews |
2 | youtube.com | 114 | 5.1% | Gemini, AI Overviews |
3 | wklaw.com | 98 | 4.4% | Copilot, Gemini, AI Overviews |
4 | justia.com | 44 | 2.0% | Copilot, AI Mode, AI Overviews |
5 | greghillassociates.com | 37 | 1.6% | Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews |
6 | en.wikipedia.org | 32 | 1.4% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Overviews |
7 | reddit.com | 31 | 1.4% | Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews |
8 | losangelescriminallawyer.pro | 30 | 1.3% | Copilot, AI Overviews |
9 | codes.findlaw.com | 30 | 1.3% | AI Overviews |
10 | egattorneys.com | 29 | 1.3% | Copilot, Gemini, AI Overviews |
Citations are concentrated at the top of the list, with google.com alone accounting for 18.7% of all citations observed, and the remainder of the top 10 distributed thinly at 1.3% to 5.1% each. Two tracked brands' own domains appear in the top 10: wklaw.com at rank 3 and greghillassociates.com at rank 5. Beyond the search and video platforms, the list mixes legal directories and reference sources such as justia.com and codes.findlaw.com, community discussion on reddit.com, and attorney websites including losangelescriminallawyer.pro and egattorneys.com.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Visibility Market Discovery Index tracks how often and how prominently brands appear in AI-generated recommendations across the six canonical AI/search surface families.
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Visibility Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Divorce Lawyers: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Immigration Lawyers: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Mesothelioma Lawyers: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read