VPS Hosting Services: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend vps hosting services. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Increase: Vultr
- 08Category Leader: Hostinger
- 09Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 10Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 11Historical Measurement Record
- 12Evidence and Source Layer
Benchmark Summary
Hostinger led the VPS hosting category in August 2026 with a valid recommendation coverage of 81.8%, up from 79.0% in July 2026, and ahead of IONOS at 65.8% in August 2026, up from 63.7% in July 2026. The largest coverage increase came from Vultr, which rose to 16.0% in August 2026 from 12.1% in July 2026. The largest coverage decline was for Liquid Web, which fell to 26.1% in August 2026 from 30.3% in July 2026.
Vultr was the only brand classified as a significant riser this month, with its gain of 3.9 percentage points exceeding normal month-to-month variation. Hostinger, the category leader, also gained in top-three placement (70.9% from 64.1%) and rank-one rate (57.5% from 51.4%), while Liquid Web's raw presence rate moved to 31.1% from 36.5% over the same period. All other tracked brands were classified as stable on the primary coverage metric.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 694 qualified observations in July 2026 and 652 in August 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026
- Hostinger+2.8%Jul 202679.0%Aug 202681.8%
- IONOS+2.1%Jul 202663.7%Aug 202665.8%
- Bluehost-1.1%Jul 202658.2%Aug 202657.1%
- DreamHost-3.0%Jul 202657.9%Aug 202654.9%
- Liquid Web-4.2%Jul 202630.3%Aug 202626.1%
- InMotion Hosting-0.4%Jul 202622.8%Aug 202622.4%
- Vultr+3.9% · beyond normal variationJul 202612.1%Aug 202616.0%
- Linode (Akamai)+1.7%Jul 202611.5%Aug 202613.2%
- Kamatera-0.1%Jul 202612.8%Aug 202612.7%
- A2 Hosting-2.2%Jul 202612.5%Aug 202610.3%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 694 | 652 | Down 42 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 44.4% | 38.0% | Down 6.3 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 83.3% | 86.7% | Up 3.4 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Hostinger (79.0%) | Hostinger (81.8%) | Up 2.8 points |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation. The six families are ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending VPS Hosting Services
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. The table below shows how observations flowed from raw prompts to the qualified benchmark.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompts collected across surfaces |
Unique questions | 504 | 582 | Distinct questions after deduplication |
Brand / competitor mentions | 799 | 799 | Prompts mentioning at least one tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 783 | 768 | On-topic for the vertical |
Irrelevant observations | 16 | 31 | Off-topic or non-substantive |
Qualified benchmark observations | 694 | 652 | Public denominator for brand metrics |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Market Discovery Methodology.
Current Brand Standings
This table shows the current-month benchmark view for all ten tracked brands, sorted by valid recommendation coverage.
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hostinger | 92.8% | 81.8% | 70.9% | 57.5% | 0.9 |
IONOS | 73.9% | 65.8% | 36.2% | 10.6% | 0.9 |
Bluehost | 70.5% | 57.1% | 37.0% | 2.1% | 0.8 |
DreamHost | 64.0% | 54.9% | 17.8% | 0.8% | 0.9 |
Liquid Web | 31.1% | 26.1% | 5.7% | 0.9% | 0.9 |
InMotion Hosting | 26.1% | 22.4% | 4.9% | 0.8% | 0.9 |
Vultr | 20.7% | 16.0% | 6.3% | 0.9% | 0.8 |
Linode (Akamai) | 18.2% | 13.2% | 3.4% | 0.3% | 0.8 |
Kamatera | 13.7% | 12.7% | 4.3% | 0.6% | 1.0 |
A2 Hosting | 11.7% | 10.3% | 3.7% | 0.8% | 0.9 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: The share of qualified observations in which the brand is mentioned at all, regardless of recommendation status.
- Valid recommendation coverage: The share of qualified observations in which the brand receives a valid recommendation, the primary metric.
- Top-three rate: The share of qualified observations in which the brand appears among the top three recommended options.
- Rank-one rate: The share of qualified observations in which the brand is the single top recommendation.
- Net sentiment: Positive minus negative mentions divided by total mentions, where mentions include both recommended and non-recommended appearances.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
A2 Hosting | 12.5% | 10.3% | Down 2.2 points |
Bluehost | 58.2% | 57.1% | Down 1.1 points |
DreamHost | 57.9% | 54.9% | Down 3.0 points |
Hostinger | 79.0% | 81.8% | Up 2.8 points |
InMotion Hosting | 22.8% | 22.4% | Down 0.4 points |
IONOS | 63.7% | 65.8% | Up 2.1 points |
Kamatera | 12.8% | 12.7% | Down 0.1 points |
Linode (Akamai) | 11.5% | 13.2% | Up 1.7 points |
Liquid Web | 30.3% | 26.1% | Down 4.2 points |
Vultr | 12.1% | 16.0% | Up 3.9 points |
Largest Increase: Vultr
Vultr's valid recommendation coverage rose to 16.0% in August 2026 from 12.1% in July 2026, a gain of 3.9 percentage points that exceeded normal month-to-month variation. The raw presence rate also rose in parallel, so the movement reflects broader visibility rather than a shift in recommendation behavior alone. Supported by 104 valid recommendations out of 652 qualified observations in August 2026.
Category Leader: Hostinger
Hostinger's strength is not just coverage but first-choice dominance. Its valid recommendation coverage reached 81.8% in August 2026 from 79.0% in July 2026, a movement within normal month-to-month variation. The brand also gained in placement: its top-three rate rose to 70.9% in August 2026 from 64.1% in July 2026, and its rank-one rate rose to 57.5% from 51.4% over the same period. Supported by 533 valid recommendations out of 652 qualified observations in August 2026.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
There were no significant decliners this month. Among stable brands, Liquid Web saw the largest coverage drop, to 26.1% in August 2026 from 30.3% in July 2026, a movement within normal variation. Its raw presence rate moved to 31.1% in August 2026 from 36.5% in July 2026 over the same months.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The table below shows placement rates for the leading cluster.
Brand | Aug 2026 top-three rate | Aug 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hostinger | 70.9% | 57.5% | 64.1% | 51.4% |
Bluehost | 37.0% | 2.1% | 31.3% | 2.0% |
IONOS | 36.2% | 10.6% | 36.6% | 9.8% |
Similar top-three coverage can hide very different rates of being the single top recommendation. Hostinger showed the strongest first-position rate at 57.5% in August 2026, while Bluehost and IONOS had similar top-three rates of 37.0% and 36.2% respectively but sharply different rank-one rates of 2.1% and 10.6%.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
The qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class of discovery.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 694 | 652 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 694 | 652 |
The current public series cannot answer pricing, value, or head-to-head comparison questions. It measures the Brand Recommendation class of discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 694 | Hostinger | 79.0% | Liquid Web down 4.2 points (Jul 2026 to Aug 2026) |
Aug 2026 | 652 | Hostinger | 81.8% | Vultr up 3.9 points (Jul 2026 to Aug 2026) |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure:
- Market share or sales attribution
- Every possible AI response across all models and configurations
- Organic-search ranking positions
- Social media mention volume
- Private or sponsored channels and branded query responses
- Causality from a metric movement alone
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how AI systems discover, surface, and recommend brands across canonical AI/search surfaces. It is a neutral, industry-level benchmark built from prompt-level observations with transparent qualification rules.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper into your brand's specific AI discovery profile and explain the prompts, competitors, or sources driving your result.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Web Hosting: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Video Hosting: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Dedicated Hosting Services: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read