Video Hosting: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend video hosting. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Decline: Vidyard
- 08Category Leader: Vimeo
- 09Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 10Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 11Historical Measurement Record
- 12Evidence and Source Layer
Benchmark Summary
In August 2026, Vimeo led the Video Hosting AI Market Discovery Index with a valid recommendation coverage of 57.3%, up from 55.8% in July 2026. The gap to the next brand widened to 23.6 percentage points, as Wistia held second place at 33.7%, down from 37.3% in July 2026.
Vidyard recorded the largest coverage decline, falling to 16.7% in August 2026 from 24.3% in July 2026, a drop of 7.6 percentage points. No brand recorded a significant coverage increase; the largest gain was Vimeo's 1.5 percentage point rise.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 300 qualified observations in August 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026
- Vimeo+1.5%Jul 202655.8%Aug 202657.3%
- Wistia-3.6%Jul 202637.3%Aug 202633.7%
- Brightcove-4.9%Jul 202632.2%Aug 202627.3%
- Vidyard-7.6% · beyond normal variationJul 202624.3%Aug 202616.7%
- Kaltura-2.5%Jul 202618.5%Aug 202616.0%
- Dacast-2.1%Jul 202617.8%Aug 202615.7%
- SproutVideo-2.7%Jul 202613.7%Aug 202611.0%
- Uscreen-5.0%Jul 202614.7%Aug 20269.7%
- JW Player-1.0%Jul 20262.7%Aug 20261.7%
- Cincopa+0.3%Jul 20260.0%Aug 20260.3%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 292 | 300 | Up 8 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 25.7% | 37.3% | Up 11.6 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 56.8% | 58.3% | Up 1.5 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Vimeo | Vimeo | No change |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Video Hosting
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompts collected across surfaces |
Unique questions | 516 | 588 | Distinct questions after deduplication |
Brand / competitor mentions | 799 | 800 | Prompts mentioning a tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 507 | 538 | On-topic for the vertical |
Irrelevant observations | 292 | 262 | Off-topic for the vertical |
Qualified benchmark observations | 292 | 300 | Public denominator |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Market Discovery Methodology
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vimeo | 93.7% | 57.3% | 44.7% | 30.7% | 0.7 |
Wistia | 48.0% | 33.7% | 24.3% | 5.0% | 0.8 |
Brightcove | 42.7% | 27.3% | 16.0% | 3.7% | 0.8 |
Vidyard | 23.3% | 16.7% | 7.7% | 1.0% | 0.8 |
Kaltura | 26.0% | 16.0% | 6.3% | 0.7% | 0.7 |
Dacast | 21.0% | 15.7% | 8.0% | 2.0% | 0.8 |
SproutVideo | 16.3% | 11.0% | 7.3% | 0.3% | 0.8 |
Uscreen | 15.7% | 9.7% | 4.0% | 1.3% | 0.8 |
JW Player | 3.7% | 1.7% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.6 |
Cincopa | 0.7% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.5 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate is the share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned at all.
- Valid recommendation coverage is the share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist.
- Top-three rate is the share of qualified observations where the brand is recommended in the top three positions.
- Rank-one rate is the share of qualified observations where the brand is recommended first.
- Net sentiment is the balance of positive over negative mentions across qualified observations.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Vimeo | 55.8% | 57.3% | Up 1.5 points |
Wistia | 37.3% | 33.7% | Down 3.6 points |
Brightcove | 32.2% | 27.3% | Down 4.9 points |
Vidyard | 24.3% | 16.7% | Down 7.6 points |
Kaltura | 18.5% | 16.0% | Down 2.5 points |
Dacast | 17.8% | 15.7% | Down 2.1 points |
Uscreen | 14.7% | 9.7% | Down 5.0 points |
SproutVideo | 13.7% | 11.0% | Down 2.7 points |
JW Player | 2.7% | 1.7% | Down 1.0 point |
Cincopa | 0.0% | 0.3% | Up 0.3 points |
Nine of the ten tracked brands saw their recommendation coverage move within normal month-to-month variation. Cincopa rose from 0.0% in July 2026 to 0.3% in August 2026. Dacast's presence rate also declined, to 21.0% in August 2026 from 28.1% in July 2026.
Largest Decline: Vidyard
Vidyard's valid recommendation coverage declined by 7.6 percentage points to 16.7% in August 2026 from 24.3% in July 2026, beyond normal month-to-month variation. Its presence rate also declined, to 23.3% in August 2026 from 31.2% in July 2026. The brand appeared in 50 valid recommendations in August 2026, down from 71 in July 2026.
Category Leader: Vimeo
Vimeo has held the category lead in both months of the current series, at 55.8% in July 2026 and 57.3% in August 2026. Its presence rate held at 93.7% in August 2026, essentially unchanged from 93.5% in July 2026, and its rank-one rate rose to 30.7% in August 2026 from 28.8% in July 2026.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Vimeo's rank-one rate of 30.7% far exceeds its closest peers, with its top-three rate of 44.7% in August 2026.
Brand | Aug 2026 top-three rate | Aug 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Vimeo | 44.7% | 30.7% | 47.6% | 28.8% |
Wistia | 24.3% | 5.0% | 22.6% | 5.8% |
Brightcove | 16.0% | 3.7% | 18.1% | 2.7% |
Vimeo's top-three rate declined slightly while its rank-one rate rose, showing that close coverage figures can still hide different first-position rates.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
In both July 2026 and August 2026, all qualified observations fell into the Brand Recommendation class.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 292 | 300 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 292 | 300 |
The current public series measures Brand Recommendation discovery only and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 292 | Vimeo | 55.8% | N/A (baseline) |
Aug 2026 | 300 | Vimeo | 57.3% | Vidyard down 7.6 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment, not proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, private or sponsored channels, or causality from a metric movement alone.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index is a neutral, repeatable industry benchmark that tracks how AI and search surfaces mention, recommend, and rank brands across canonical surface families. New measurements are added to the same evergreen report.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Web Hosting: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
VPS Hosting Services: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Dedicated Hosting Services: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read