Dedicated Hosting Services: AI Market Discovery Index

Tracking how AI platforms recommend dedicated hosting services. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

Mark Huntley, J.D.
By Mark Huntley, J.D.Growth Strategist & AI Discovery Analyst
6 minutes read

Benchmark Summary

IONOS led the Dedicated Hosting Services benchmark in August 2026 with valid recommendation coverage of 61.3%, down from 63.9% in July 2026. The next closest brand was Bluehost at 53.6% in August 2026, down from 56.8% in July 2026, leaving a gap of 7.7 percentage points between the leader and the second-place brand.

The largest coverage decline belonged to DreamHost, whose valid recommendation coverage fell from 55.5% in July 2026 to 50.0% in August 2026. The only brand to post a coverage increase was OVHcloud, moving from 7.0% in July 2026 to 7.7% in August 2026, though this remained within normal month-to-month variation.

This was a quiet month overall. No brand moved beyond normal month-to-month variation, and the sector experienced no significant risers or decliners. Seven of nine tracked brands posted modest declines within normal variation, InMotion Hosting held steady at 32.6% in both July 2026 and August 2026, and OVHcloud was the sole gainer.

The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 470 qualified observations in August 2026 after qualification.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026

  • IONOS-2.6%
    Jul 202663.9%
    Aug 202661.3%
  • Bluehost-3.2%
    Jul 202656.8%
    Aug 202653.6%
  • DreamHost-5.5%
    Jul 202655.5%
    Aug 202650.0%
  • InMotion Hostingno change
    Jul 202632.6%
    Aug 202632.6%
  • Liquid Web-3.0%
    Jul 202632.6%
    Aug 202629.6%
  • HostGator-0.4%
    Jul 202622.1%
    Aug 202621.7%
  • A2 Hosting-3.0%
    Jul 202616.2%
    Aug 202613.2%
  • GoDaddy-0.6%
    Jul 202610.0%
    Aug 20269.4%
  • OVHcloud+0.7%
    Jul 20267.0%
    Aug 20267.7%

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Measure

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Movement

Qualified benchmark observations

488

470

Down 18

Tracked brands

9

9

No change

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

46.7%

34.7%

Down 12.0 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

78.3%

72.1%

Down 6.2 points

Leader by valid recommendation coverage

IONOS

IONOS

No change

Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. Both months recorded qualified observations across all six families.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Dedicated Hosting Services

Research Scope and Qualification

The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. The funnel below shows how raw prompt-surface observations become the qualified benchmark.

Research stage

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

What it represents

Source prompt-surface observations

800

800

Total prompts collected across AI surfaces

Unique questions

591

624

Distinct questions after removing duplicates

Brand / competitor mentions

800

800

Prompts naming at least one tracked brand

Relevant observations

673

670

Prompts relevant to the Dedicated Hosting Services category

Irrelevant observations

127

130

Prompts outside category scope

Qualified benchmark observations

488

470

Public denominator after reservation

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Market Discovery Methodology.

Current Brand Standings

Brand

Presence rate

Valid recommendation coverage

Top-three rate

Rank-one rate

Net sentiment

IONOS

73.8%

61.3%

33.8%

10.4%

0.9

Bluehost

76.4%

53.6%

29.4%

4.7%

0.7

DreamHost

63.0%

50.0%

13.0%

0.4%

0.9

InMotion Hosting

38.9%

32.6%

11.9%

4.0%

0.9

Liquid Web

35.3%

29.6%

12.1%

4.7%

0.9

HostGator

37.0%

21.7%

5.7%

0.2%

0.6

A2 Hosting

15.1%

13.2%

1.5%

0.4%

0.9

GoDaddy

33.2%

9.4%

3.2%

0.0%

0.2

OVHcloud

13.6%

7.7%

1.7%

0.0%

0.6

How to Read the Standings

  • Presence rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned, regardless of context.
  • Valid recommendation coverage: Share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a recommendation shortlist that can be attributed to a clear query intent.
  • Top-three rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the first three recommended positions.
  • Rank-one rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand is the first recommendation.
  • Net sentiment: Balance of positive versus negative mentions, on a scale from 0 to 1.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Brand

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Movement since baseline

A2 Hosting

16.2%

13.2%

Down 3.0 points

Bluehost

56.8%

53.6%

Down 3.2 points

DreamHost

55.5%

50.0%

Down 5.5 points

GoDaddy

10.0%

9.4%

Down 0.6 points

HostGator

22.1%

21.7%

Down 0.4 points

InMotion Hosting

32.6%

32.6%

No change

IONOS

63.9%

61.3%

Down 2.6 points

Liquid Web

32.6%

29.6%

Down 3.0 points

OVHcloud

7.0%

7.7%

Up 0.7 points

The month was quiet, with no movement beyond normal month-to-month variation. All tracked brands are classified as stable. DreamHost posted the largest single-month decline at 5.5 points, a move that remained within normal variation. OVHcloud was the only brand to increase, though by a modest 0.7 points. InMotion Hosting held exactly flat, with valid recommendation coverage of 32.6% in both July 2026 and August 2026.

Despite the broad stability in coverage, some secondary movements are worth noting. Bluehost's presence rate fell 5.6 points from 82.0% in July 2026 to 76.4% in August 2026, a larger shift than the primary coverage metric showed this month. IONOS saw its rank-one rate climb from 8.0% in July 2026 to 10.4% in August 2026, while its top-three rate declined slightly from 35.4% to 33.8% over the same period.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Category Leader: IONOS

IONOS remained the category leader with valid recommendation coverage of 61.3% in August 2026, down from 63.9% in July 2026. The brand also held the highest rank-one rate at 10.4% in August 2026, up from 8.0% in July 2026, suggesting that while overall coverage eased slightly, first-position recommendations strengthened.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The leading cluster by valid recommendation coverage shows different placement profiles.

Brand

Aug 2026 top-three rate

Aug 2026 rank-one rate

Jul 2026 top-three rate

Jul 2026 rank-one rate

IONOS

33.8%

10.4%

35.4%

8.0%

Bluehost

29.4%

4.7%

33.6%

7.2%

DreamHost

13.0%

0.4%

16.2%

1.0%

IONOS ranked first in 10.4% of qualified observations in August 2026, more than double Bluehost's 4.7%, despite narrower gaps in top-three placement. DreamHost's top-three rate of 13.0% in August 2026 translated into a rank-one rate of just 0.4%, showing that similar coverage levels can still hide very different first-position rates.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

All 470 qualified observations in August 2026 fell into the brand recommendation class, the same as July 2026 when all 488 qualified observations fell into that class.

Buyer-intent class

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Brand Recommendation

488

470

Pricing & Value

0

0

Multi-Brand Comparison

0

0

Total qualified observations

488

470

The current public series measures brand recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the pricing and value or multi-brand comparison classes.

Historical Measurement Record

This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.

Measurement

Qualified observations

Coverage leader

Leader coverage

Largest coverage movement

Jul 2026

488

IONOS

63.9%

IONOS up 0.0 points from baseline

Aug 2026

470

IONOS

61.3%

DreamHost down 5.5 points from Jul 2026

Evidence and Source Layer

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, or private and sponsored channels. A metric movement alone does not establish causality. The benchmark records the change; it does not, by itself, explain why the change occurred.

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how brands appear in AI-generated answers across six canonical AI and search surface families, providing a neutral industry-level view of presence, recommendation coverage, and placement. Research links:

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.

Get my free AI Company Index

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.