Dedicated Hosting Services: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend dedicated hosting services. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Category Leader: IONOS
- 08Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 09Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 10Historical Measurement Record
- 11Evidence and Source Layer
- 12Scope Boundaries
Benchmark Summary
IONOS led the Dedicated Hosting Services benchmark in August 2026 with valid recommendation coverage of 61.3%, down from 63.9% in July 2026. The next closest brand was Bluehost at 53.6% in August 2026, down from 56.8% in July 2026, leaving a gap of 7.7 percentage points between the leader and the second-place brand.
The largest coverage decline belonged to DreamHost, whose valid recommendation coverage fell from 55.5% in July 2026 to 50.0% in August 2026. The only brand to post a coverage increase was OVHcloud, moving from 7.0% in July 2026 to 7.7% in August 2026, though this remained within normal month-to-month variation.
This was a quiet month overall. No brand moved beyond normal month-to-month variation, and the sector experienced no significant risers or decliners. Seven of nine tracked brands posted modest declines within normal variation, InMotion Hosting held steady at 32.6% in both July 2026 and August 2026, and OVHcloud was the sole gainer.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 470 qualified observations in August 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026
- IONOS-2.6%Jul 202663.9%Aug 202661.3%
- Bluehost-3.2%Jul 202656.8%Aug 202653.6%
- DreamHost-5.5%Jul 202655.5%Aug 202650.0%
- InMotion Hostingno changeJul 202632.6%Aug 202632.6%
- Liquid Web-3.0%Jul 202632.6%Aug 202629.6%
- HostGator-0.4%Jul 202622.1%Aug 202621.7%
- A2 Hosting-3.0%Jul 202616.2%Aug 202613.2%
- GoDaddy-0.6%Jul 202610.0%Aug 20269.4%
- OVHcloud+0.7%Jul 20267.0%Aug 20267.7%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 488 | 470 | Down 18 |
Tracked brands | 9 | 9 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 46.7% | 34.7% | Down 12.0 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 78.3% | 72.1% | Down 6.2 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | IONOS | IONOS | No change |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. Both months recorded qualified observations across all six families.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Dedicated Hosting Services
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. The funnel below shows how raw prompt-surface observations become the qualified benchmark.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompts collected across AI surfaces |
Unique questions | 591 | 624 | Distinct questions after removing duplicates |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts naming at least one tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 673 | 670 | Prompts relevant to the Dedicated Hosting Services category |
Irrelevant observations | 127 | 130 | Prompts outside category scope |
Qualified benchmark observations | 488 | 470 | Public denominator after reservation |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Market Discovery Methodology.
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IONOS | 73.8% | 61.3% | 33.8% | 10.4% | 0.9 |
Bluehost | 76.4% | 53.6% | 29.4% | 4.7% | 0.7 |
DreamHost | 63.0% | 50.0% | 13.0% | 0.4% | 0.9 |
InMotion Hosting | 38.9% | 32.6% | 11.9% | 4.0% | 0.9 |
Liquid Web | 35.3% | 29.6% | 12.1% | 4.7% | 0.9 |
HostGator | 37.0% | 21.7% | 5.7% | 0.2% | 0.6 |
A2 Hosting | 15.1% | 13.2% | 1.5% | 0.4% | 0.9 |
GoDaddy | 33.2% | 9.4% | 3.2% | 0.0% | 0.2 |
OVHcloud | 13.6% | 7.7% | 1.7% | 0.0% | 0.6 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned, regardless of context.
- Valid recommendation coverage: Share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a recommendation shortlist that can be attributed to a clear query intent.
- Top-three rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the first three recommended positions.
- Rank-one rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand is the first recommendation.
- Net sentiment: Balance of positive versus negative mentions, on a scale from 0 to 1.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
A2 Hosting | 16.2% | 13.2% | Down 3.0 points |
Bluehost | 56.8% | 53.6% | Down 3.2 points |
DreamHost | 55.5% | 50.0% | Down 5.5 points |
GoDaddy | 10.0% | 9.4% | Down 0.6 points |
HostGator | 22.1% | 21.7% | Down 0.4 points |
InMotion Hosting | 32.6% | 32.6% | No change |
IONOS | 63.9% | 61.3% | Down 2.6 points |
Liquid Web | 32.6% | 29.6% | Down 3.0 points |
OVHcloud | 7.0% | 7.7% | Up 0.7 points |
The month was quiet, with no movement beyond normal month-to-month variation. All tracked brands are classified as stable. DreamHost posted the largest single-month decline at 5.5 points, a move that remained within normal variation. OVHcloud was the only brand to increase, though by a modest 0.7 points. InMotion Hosting held exactly flat, with valid recommendation coverage of 32.6% in both July 2026 and August 2026.
Despite the broad stability in coverage, some secondary movements are worth noting. Bluehost's presence rate fell 5.6 points from 82.0% in July 2026 to 76.4% in August 2026, a larger shift than the primary coverage metric showed this month. IONOS saw its rank-one rate climb from 8.0% in July 2026 to 10.4% in August 2026, while its top-three rate declined slightly from 35.4% to 33.8% over the same period.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Category Leader: IONOS
IONOS remained the category leader with valid recommendation coverage of 61.3% in August 2026, down from 63.9% in July 2026. The brand also held the highest rank-one rate at 10.4% in August 2026, up from 8.0% in July 2026, suggesting that while overall coverage eased slightly, first-position recommendations strengthened.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The leading cluster by valid recommendation coverage shows different placement profiles.
Brand | Aug 2026 top-three rate | Aug 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IONOS | 33.8% | 10.4% | 35.4% | 8.0% |
Bluehost | 29.4% | 4.7% | 33.6% | 7.2% |
DreamHost | 13.0% | 0.4% | 16.2% | 1.0% |
IONOS ranked first in 10.4% of qualified observations in August 2026, more than double Bluehost's 4.7%, despite narrower gaps in top-three placement. DreamHost's top-three rate of 13.0% in August 2026 translated into a rank-one rate of just 0.4%, showing that similar coverage levels can still hide very different first-position rates.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All 470 qualified observations in August 2026 fell into the brand recommendation class, the same as July 2026 when all 488 qualified observations fell into that class.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 488 | 470 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 488 | 470 |
The current public series measures brand recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the pricing and value or multi-brand comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 488 | IONOS | 63.9% | IONOS up 0.0 points from baseline |
Aug 2026 | 470 | IONOS | 61.3% | DreamHost down 5.5 points from Jul 2026 |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, or private and sponsored channels. A metric movement alone does not establish causality. The benchmark records the change; it does not, by itself, explain why the change occurred.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how brands appear in AI-generated answers across six canonical AI and search surface families, providing a neutral industry-level view of presence, recommendation coverage, and placement. Research links:
- AI Market Discovery Index
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Web Hosting: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Video Hosting: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
VPS Hosting Services: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read