Umbrella Insurance: AI Market Discovery Index

Tracking how AI platforms recommend umbrella insurance. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

Mark Huntley, J.D.
By Mark Huntley, J.D.Growth Strategist & AI Discovery Analyst
5 minutes read

Benchmark Summary

USAA led all tracked brands with 77.0% valid recommendation coverage in August 2026, up from 66.8% in July 2026. This represented a gap of 2.8 points over State Farm, the next closest brand at 74.2% in August 2026.

The largest coverage increase came from Progressive, which entered the benchmark at 63.8% in August 2026 with no comparable July figure. Liberty Mutual posted the largest gain among brands with a July baseline, rising to 43.8% in August 2026 from 28.5% in July 2026, a move beyond normal month-to-month variation.

The largest coverage decline belonged to Progressive RV Insurance, which fell to 0.0% in August 2026 from 23.6% in July 2026. Chubb also declined significantly to 23.8% in August 2026 from 37.8% in July 2026, and GEICO RV Insurance dropped to 0.0% in August 2026 from 17.2% in July 2026.

The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 365 qualified observations in August 2026 after qualification.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026

  • USAA+10.2% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202666.8%
    Aug 202677.0%
  • State Farm+10.5% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202663.7%
    Aug 202674.2%
  • Travelers+11.6% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202655.5%
    Aug 202667.1%
  • Progressive+63.8% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 20260.0%
    Aug 202663.8%
  • Geico+63.6% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 20260.0%
    Aug 202663.6%
  • Allstate+8.9% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202651.4%
    Aug 202660.3%
  • Farmers+9.6% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202634.2%
    Aug 202643.8%
  • Liberty Mutual+15.3% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202628.5%
    Aug 202643.8%
  • Nationwide+7.0% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202636.0%
    Aug 202643.0%
  • Chubb-14.0% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202637.8%
    Aug 202623.8%
  • GEICO RV Insurance-17.2% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202617.2%
    Aug 20260.0%
  • Progressive RV Insurance-23.6% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202623.6%
    Aug 20260.0%

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Measure

July 2026

August 2026

Movement

Qualified benchmark observations

389

365

Down 24

Tracked brands

10

10

No change

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

39.1%

37.5%

Down 1.6 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

64.5%

73.2%

Up 8.6 points

Leader by valid recommendation coverage

USAA

USAA

No change

Qualified surface breadth counts the number of canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation. The six families are ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Umbrella Insurance

Research Scope and Qualification

Research stage

July 2026

August 2026

What it represents

Source prompt-surface observations

800

800

Raw prompt collection universe

Unique questions

633

660

Distinct prompts after deduplication

Brand / competitor mentions

800

800

Prompts mentioning at least one tracked brand

Relevant observations

429

418

Prompts relevant to the umbrella insurance vertical

Irrelevant observations

371

382

Prompts not relevant to the vertical

Qualified benchmark observations

389

365

Public denominator used in brand-level metrics

Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Market Discovery Methodology.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Current Brand Standings

This table is the primary current-month benchmark view. Brands sorted by valid recommendation coverage.

Brand

Presence rate

Valid recommendation coverage

Top-three rate

Rank-one rate

Net sentiment

USAA

94.8%

77.0%

19.2%

9.3%

0.8

State Farm

97.8%

74.2%

45.2%

35.6%

0.8

Travelers

87.4%

67.1%

23.8%

12.0%

0.8

Progressive

95.6%

63.8%

36.4%

0.5%

0.6

Geico

85.5%

63.6%

41.9%

3.3%

0.7

Allstate

91.2%

60.3%

10.4%

0.3%

0.6

Farmers

68.2%

43.8%

1.1%

0.0%

0.6

Liberty Mutual

75.3%

43.8%

1.9%

0.3%

0.6

Nationwide

65.2%

43.0%

3.3%

0.5%

0.6

Chubb

31.5%

23.8%

2.5%

0.5%

0.8

How to Read the Standings

  • Presence rate: the share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned at all.
  • Valid recommendation coverage: the share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist.
  • Top-three rate: the share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the first three recommendation positions.
  • Rank-one rate: the share of qualified observations where the brand is the first recommendation.
  • Net sentiment: the balance of positive over negative mentions, from 0 to 1.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Brand

July 2026

August 2026

Movement since baseline

Allstate

51.4%

60.3%

Up 8.9 points

Chubb

37.8%

23.8%

Down 14.0 points

Farmers

34.2%

43.8%

Up 9.6 points

Geico

No data

63.6%

New to series

GEICO RV Insurance

17.2%

0.0%

Down 17.2 points

Liberty Mutual

28.5%

43.8%

Up 15.3 points

Nationwide

36.0%

43.0%

Up 7.0 points

Progressive

No data

63.8%

New to series

Progressive RV Insurance

23.6%

0.0%

Down 23.6 points

State Farm

63.7%

74.2%

Up 10.5 points

Travelers

55.5%

67.1%

Up 11.6 points

USAA

66.8%

77.0%

Up 10.2 points

Largest Increase: Progressive

Progressive entered the benchmark in August 2026 with 63.8% valid recommendation coverage, ranking fourth overall. Its 95.6% presence rate was among the highest in the field. The brand appeared in the top three in 36.4% of qualified observations.

Largest Increase (with baseline): Liberty Mutual

Liberty Mutual rose to 43.8% in August 2026 from 28.5% in July 2026, a gain of 15.3 points that exceeded normal month-to-month variation. Presence rose to 75.3% in August 2026 from 63.2% in July 2026. Despite the coverage gain, top-three placement slipped to 1.9% in August 2026 from 3.1% in July 2026.

Largest Decline: Progressive RV Insurance

Progressive RV Insurance fell to 0.0% in August 2026 from 23.6% in July 2026, a drop of 23.6 points beyond normal variation. The brand recorded no qualified observations in August 2026. GEICO RV Insurance followed a similar pattern, declining to 0.0% in August 2026 from 17.2% in July 2026.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Category Leader: USAA

USAA led the benchmark with 77.0% valid recommendation coverage in August 2026, up from 66.8% in July 2026. Its presence rate was 94.8% in August 2026, and its rank-one rate rose to 9.3% in August 2026 from 5.9% in July 2026. Top-three placement declined to 19.2% in August 2026 from 26.7% in July 2026, even as leadership strengthened.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Among the leading brands, first-position rates varied substantially.

Brand

August 2026 top-three rate

August 2026 rank-one rate

July 2026 top-three rate

July 2026 rank-one rate

State Farm

45.2%

35.6%

41.1%

24.7%

Travelers

23.8%

12.0%

11.6%

5.9%

USAA

19.2%

9.3%

26.7%

5.9%

Close coverage rates can still hide different first-position rates. State Farm's 35.6% rank-one rate far exceeds USAA's 9.3%, despite USAA's higher overall coverage. State Farm and Travelers both raised their top-three and rank-one rates from July to August 2026, while USAA's top-three rate fell even as its rank-one rate rose.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

All 365 qualified observations in August 2026 and all 389 in July 2026 fell into the brand recommendation class, covering discovery and consideration queries.

Buyer-intent class

July 2026

August 2026

Brand Recommendation

389

365

Pricing & Value

0

0

Multi-Brand Comparison

0

0

Total qualified observations

389

365

The current public series measures brand recommendation discovery only; pricing, value, and multi-brand comparison questions have no public signal in this data.

Historical Measurement Record

This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.

Measurement

Qualified observations

Coverage leader

Leader coverage

Largest coverage movement

July 2026

389

USAA

66.8%

Baseline month (no prior period for comparison)

August 2026

365

USAA

77.0%

Progressive entry to series (63.8%)

Evidence and Source Layer

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure:

  • Market share or attributable sales
  • Every possible AI response to a given prompt
  • Organic-search ranking or social mention volume
  • Private or sponsored channels
  • Causality from a metric movement alone

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how often brands appear in AI-generated recommendations across major AI surfaces. This umbrella insurance edition covers ten brands across six AI surface families with monthly measurements.

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.

Get my free AI Company Index

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.