Cyber Insurance: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend cyber insurance. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Increase: Hiscox Usa
- 08Largest Decline: Hiscox
- 09Category Leader: Chubb
- 10Stable Brands
- 11Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 12Buyer-Intent Distribution
Benchmark Summary
Chubb led the category in valid recommendation coverage in September 2026 at 55.8%, down from 62.7% in July 2026. Travelers tied Chubb at 55.8% in September 2026, up from 60.5% in July 2026. The largest coverage increase came from Hiscox Usa, which rose to 22.3% in September 2026 from 0.0% in July 2026, a move beyond normal month-to-month variation. The largest coverage decline came from Hiscox, which fell to 0.0% in September 2026 from 49.1% in July 2026 and has now declined in each of the two months since July 2026.
The September 2026 series reflects a notable shift in brand tracking. Hiscox, which held 49.1% valid recommendation coverage in July 2026 and 48.9% in August 2026, recorded no qualified observations in September 2026 under that brand name. Hiscox Usa, a separately tracked brand, appeared for the first time in September 2026 at 22.3%. The benchmark treats these as distinct tracked entities. Travelers' rank-one rate rose to 8.1% in September 2026, up from 3.1% in July 2026. Coalition rose to 25.9% coverage in September 2026 from 7.9% in August 2026.
The September 2026 series reflects a tracking shift in which Hiscox observations moved to Hiscox Usa, creating a 49.1-point coverage decline for one tracked entity and a 22.3-point debut for the other.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 197 qualified observations in September 2026 after qualification, down from 228 in July 2026 and up from 139 in August 2026.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Sep 2026
- Chubb55.8%
- Travelers55.8%
- Coalition25.9%
- Hiscox Usa22.3%
- AIG19.8%
- At-Bay13.2%
- AXA XL11.7%
- CNA11.7%
- Beazley8.1%
- Cowbell Cyber2.5%
- Hiscox0.0%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 228 | 197 | Down 31 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 47.8% | 40.6% | Down 7.2 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 71.5% | 57.9% | Down 13.6 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Chubb | Chubb | No change |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All six families qualified in each month of the series. August 2026 saw 139 qualified observations, the lowest in the series to date.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Cyber Insurance
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompts across surfaces |
Unique questions | 522 | 580 | Distinct questions asked |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts mentioning a tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 274 | 251 | On-topic responses |
Irrelevant observations | 526 | 549 | Off-topic responses |
Qualified benchmark observations | 228 | 197 | Public denominator |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Market Discovery Methodology
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chubb | 95.4% | 55.8% | 41.6% | 25.4% | 0.63 |
Travelers | 88.3% | 55.8% | 33.0% | 8.1% | 0.67 |
Hiscox Usa | 27.4% | 22.3% | 11.7% | 2.0% | 0.85 |
AIG | 48.7% | 19.8% | 5.1% | 0.5% | 0.45 |
At-Bay | 19.3% | 13.2% | 3.0% | 0.5% | 0.84 |
AXA XL | 19.8% | 11.7% | 5.1% | 0.0% | 0.67 |
CNA | 24.9% | 11.7% | 1.5% | 0.0% | 0.47 |
Beazley | 14.7% | 8.1% | 3.0% | 1.0% | 0.66 |
Coalition | 34.5% | 25.9% | 11.2% | 2.0% | 0.84 |
Cowbell Cyber | 2.5% | 2.5% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 1.00 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in any capacity.
- Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist.
- Top-three rate: share of observations where the brand appears among the top three recommended options.
- Rank-one rate: share of observations where the brand is the first recommended option.
- Net sentiment: positive mentions minus negative mentions, divided by total brand mentions.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
AIG | 14.9% | 19.8% | Up 4.9 points |
At-Bay | 17.5% | 13.2% | Down 4.3 points |
AXA XL | 9.7% | 11.7% | Up 2.0 points |
Beazley | 8.8% | 8.1% | Down 0.7 points |
Chubb | 62.7% | 55.8% | Down 6.9 points |
CNA | 8.8% | 11.7% | Up 2.9 points |
Coalition | 25.0% | 25.9% | Up 0.9 points |
Cowbell Cyber | 2.6% | 2.5% | Down 0.1 points |
Hiscox | 49.1% | 0.0% | Down 49.1 points |
Hiscox Usa | 0.0% | 22.3% | Up 22.3 points |
Travelers | 60.5% | 55.8% | Down 4.7 points |
Several brands showed notable prior-to-current moves in September 2026. AIG rose 12.6 points from August 2026 to reach 19.8%. Coalition rose 18.0 points to 25.9%. AXA XL rose 8.8 points to 11.7%. At-Bay rose 10.3 points to 13.2%. Cowbell Cyber rose 2.5 points from August 2026 to 2.5%. Chubb declined 12.5 points from August 2026 to 55.8%. Hiscox declined 48.9 points to 0.0%.
Largest Increase: Hiscox Usa
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Hiscox Usa rose to 22.3% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026 from 0.0% in July 2026, an increase of 22.3 percentage points beyond normal month-to-month variation. The brand recorded a 27.4% presence rate, 11.7% top-three rate, and 2.0% rank-one rate in September 2026. The appearance of Hiscox Usa in the September series coincides with the absence of Hiscox as a separately tracked brand, reflecting a shift in how the insurer surfaced in qualified responses.
Largest Decline: Hiscox
Hiscox fell to 0.0% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026 from 49.1% in July 2026, a decline of 49.1 percentage points beyond normal month-to-month variation. The brand declined in both months of the series, moving from 49.1% in July 2026 to 48.9% in August 2026 and then to 0.0% in September 2026. Raw mention presence stood at 55.3% in July 2026, and no presence data was recorded for September 2026 under this brand name.
Category Leader: Chubb
Chubb led the category in valid recommendation coverage in September 2026 at 55.8%, a level it held through the series despite a decline from 62.7% in July 2026. The brand also led on prominence, with a 41.6% top-three rate and a 25.4% rank-one rate in September 2026, up from 39.0% and 23.7% in July 2026 respectively. Presence rate rose to 95.4% in September 2026 from 90.3% in July 2026. Travelers matched Chubb's 55.8% coverage in September, creating a two-way tie at the top of the category.
Stable Brands
AIG, Coalition, At-Bay, AXA XL, CNA, Cowbell Cyber, Travelers, and Beazley moved within ranges that the series treats as ordinary month-to-month fluctuation.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Chubb led placement in September 2026 with a 41.6% top-three rate and a 25.4% rank-one rate, ahead of Travelers and Hiscox Usa.
Brand | Sep 2026 top-three rate | Sep 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Chubb | 41.6% | 25.4% | 39.0% | 23.7% |
Travelers | 33.0% | 8.1% | 29.4% | 3.1% |
Hiscox Usa | 11.7% | 2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Chubb and Travelers shared the same 55.8% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026, yet Chubb appeared first in 25.4% of observations compared with Travelers' 8.1%. Close coverage can still hide different first-position rates.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All 197 qualified observations in September 2026 fell into the Brand Recommendation class.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 228 | 197 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 228 | 197 |
The current public series measures brand-recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the pricing and value or multi-brand comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 228 | Chubb | 62.7% | N/A (baseline month) |
Aug 2026 | 139 | Chubb | 68.3% | Coalition down 17.1 points (Jul→Aug) |
Sep 2026 | 197 | Chubb | 55.8% | Hiscox down 49.1 points (Jul→Sep) |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, or private and sponsored channels. A metric movement alone does not establish causality.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how often and how prominently brands appear in AI-generated recommendations across six canonical AI surface families. It provides a neutral, repeatable measure of AI-driven brand discovery.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Boat Insurance: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Umbrella Insurance: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Gap Insurance: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read