Truck Accident Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index

Tracking how AI platforms recommend truck accident lawyers. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

Mark Huntley, J.D.
By Mark Huntley, J.D.Growth Strategist & AI Discovery Analyst
6 minutes read

Benchmark Summary

Morgan & Morgan led the Truck Accident Lawyers benchmark in August 2026 with valid recommendation coverage of 14.2%, a 47.7 percentage point decline from 61.9% in July 2026. The gap to the next closest brand, Stewart Miller Simmons at 2.8%, stood at 11.4 percentage points in August 2026.

The benchmark recorded significant movement this month, with six brands registering declines. Morgan & Morgan showed the largest coverage decrease, falling from 61.9% in July 2026 to 14.2% in August 2026. Stewart Miller Simmons posted the next largest decline, dropping from 24.3% in July 2026 to 2.8% in August 2026. No tracked brand recorded a significant coverage increase this month.

The current benchmark includes 289 qualified observations in August 2026, up from 202 in July 2026.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026

  • Morgan & Morgan-47.7% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202661.9%
    Aug 202614.2%
  • Stewart Miller Simmons-21.5% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202624.3%
    Aug 20262.8%
  • The Barnes Firm-14.6% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202616.3%
    Aug 20261.7%
  • Dolman Law Group-14.4% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202615.8%
    Aug 20261.4%
  • Zinda Law Group+0.2%
    Jul 20260.5%
    Aug 20260.7%
  • Cooper Hurley Injury Lawyers-0.5%
    Jul 20260.5%
    Aug 20260.0%
  • Fletcher Lawno change
    Jul 20260.0%
    Aug 20260.0%
  • Hensley Legal Group-2.5% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 20262.5%
    Aug 20260.0%
  • Lerner & Rowe-4.5% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 20264.5%
    Aug 20260.0%
  • Painter Law Firmno change
    Jul 20260.0%
    Aug 20260.0%

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Measure

July 2026

August 2026

Movement

Qualified benchmark observations

202

289

Up 87

Tracked brands

10

10

No change

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

56.9%

17.0%

Down 39.9 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

68.3%

15.2%

Down 53.1 points

Leader by valid recommendation coverage

Morgan & Morgan (61.9%)

Morgan & Morgan (14.2%)

No change

Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation in the month. The six canonical families are ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Truck Accident Lawyers

Current Brand Standings

This table shows the primary current-month benchmark view, sorted by valid recommendation coverage.

Brand

Presence rate

Valid recommendation coverage

Top-three rate

Rank-one rate

Net sentiment

Morgan & Morgan

31.5%

14.2%

11.1%

8.0%

0.7

Stewart Miller Simmons

2.8%

2.8%

2.8%

2.4%

1.0

The Barnes Firm

2.1%

1.7%

1.7%

0.0%

1.0

Dolman Law Group

1.7%

1.4%

0.7%

0.4%

0.8

Zinda Law Group

1.7%

0.7%

0.4%

0.0%

0.4

Cooper Hurley Injury Lawyers

0.4%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0

Fletcher Law

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0

Hensley Legal Group

0.4%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0

Lerner & Rowe

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0

Painter Law Firm

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0

How to Read the Standings

  • Presence rate: the share of qualified observations in which the brand is mentioned at all, whether recommended or not.
  • Valid recommendation coverage: the share of qualified observations in which the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist.
  • Top-three rate: the share of qualified observations in which the brand appears among the top three recommended options.
  • Rank-one rate: the share of qualified observations in which the brand is the first recommendation.
  • Net sentiment: the balance of positive over negative mention-level sentiment, scaled from -1.0 to 1.0.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Brand

July 2026

August 2026

Movement since baseline

Cooper Hurley Injury Lawyers

0.5%

0.0%

Down 0.5 points

Dolman Law Group

15.8%

1.4%

Down 14.4 points

Fletcher Law

0.0%

0.0%

No change

Hensley Legal Group

2.5%

0.0%

Down 2.5 points

Lerner & Rowe

4.5%

0.0%

Down 4.5 points

Morgan & Morgan

61.9%

14.2%

Down 47.7 points

Painter Law Firm

0.0%

0.0%

No change

Stewart Miller Simmons

24.3%

2.8%

Down 21.5 points

The Barnes Firm

16.3%

1.7%

Down 14.6 points

Zinda Law Group

0.5%

0.7%

Up 0.2 points

The category recorded significant declines across six brands this month. Each of these declines represents a single-month movement from the July 2026 baseline.

Largest Decline: Morgan & Morgan

Morgan & Morgan's valid recommendation coverage fell from 61.9% in July 2026 to 14.2% in August 2026, a drop of 47.7 percentage points. The brand's presence rate declined from 89.1% in July 2026 to 31.5% in August 2026, and its rank-one rate fell from 37.6% in July 2026 to 8.0% in August 2026. Morgan & Morgan remained the benchmark's category leader despite the decline.

Additional Declines

Stewart Miller Simmons declined from 24.3% in July 2026 to 2.8% in August 2026, a drop of 21.5 percentage points. The Barnes Firm declined from 16.3% in July 2026 to 1.7% in August 2026, a drop of 14.6 percentage points. Dolman Law Group declined from 15.8% in July 2026 to 1.4% in August 2026, a drop of 14.4 percentage points. Lerner & Rowe declined from 4.5% in July 2026 to 0.0% in August 2026, and Hensley Legal Group declined from 2.5% in July 2026 to 0.0% in August 2026.

Category Leader: Morgan & Morgan

Morgan & Morgan led the benchmark for a second consecutive month with 14.2% valid recommendation coverage in August 2026. The lead over the next closest brand, Stewart Miller Simmons at 2.8%, was 11.4 percentage points. The gap between Morgan & Morgan and Zinda Law Group narrowed by 47.9 percentage points to 13.5 points, and the gap between Morgan & Morgan and Painter Law Firm narrowed by 47.7 percentage points to 14.2 points since July 2026.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Stable Brands

Cooper Hurley Injury Lawyers, Fletcher Law, Painter Law Firm, and Zinda Law Group registered no significant movement this month. Zinda Law Group edged up from 0.5% in July 2026 to 0.7% in August 2026, within normal month-to-month variation. Cooper Hurley Injury Lawyers moved from 0.5% in July 2026 to 0.0% in August 2026, also within normal variation. Fletcher Law and Painter Law Firm recorded no qualified recommendations in either month.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Among the leading brands, placement patterns differed notably in August 2026.

Brand

August 2026 top-three rate

August 2026 rank-one rate

July 2026 top-three rate

July 2026 rank-one rate

Morgan & Morgan

11.1%

8.0%

49.0%

37.6%

Stewart Miller Simmons

2.8%

2.4%

22.3%

7.4%

The Barnes Firm

1.7%

0.0%

15.8%

4.5%

Similar coverage levels can still hide different first-position rates. Stewart Miller Simmons converted most of its coverage into rank-one placements at 2.4% in August 2026, while The Barnes Firm recorded no rank-one placements in the same month despite a comparable coverage rate.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

All qualified observations in July 2026 and August 2026 fell into the brand recommendation class.

Buyer-intent class

July 2026

August 2026

Brand Recommendation

202

289

Pricing & Value

0

0

Multi-Brand Comparison

0

0

Total qualified observations

202

289

The current public series measures brand recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the pricing and value or multi-brand comparison classes.

Historical Measurement Record

This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.

Measurement

Qualified observations

Coverage leader

Leader coverage

Largest coverage movement

Jul 2026 (Baseline)

202

Morgan & Morgan

61.9%

61.9% coverage for Morgan & Morgan

Aug 2026

289

Morgan & Morgan

14.2%

Down 47.7 points for Morgan & Morgan

Evidence and Source Layer

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure:

  • Market share or revenue attribution
  • Attributable sales or client conversions
  • Every possible AI response, only the sampled surfaces and prompts
  • Organic-search ranking positions
  • Social media mention volume
  • Private or sponsored channels such as gated content or paid placements
  • Causality from a metric movement alone; the benchmark records change, not its cause

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index is a neutral, industry-level benchmark tracking how brands appear and are recommended across major AI and search surfaces. It is updated monthly with new measurements added to the same report.

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper. The public percentage cannot identify the prompts, competitors, or sources causing the result.

Get my free AI Company Index

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.