Travel Insurance: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend travel insurance. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Decline: World Nomads
- 08Largest Decline: HTH Travel Insurance
- 09Category Leader: Seven Corners
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
Seven Corners led the Travel Insurance benchmark in August 2026 with valid recommendation coverage of 76.1%, a 1.2-point gap ahead of Travelex at 74.9%; World Nomads followed at 66.9%. No brand recorded a significant increase in coverage this month. The month's largest coverage decline was World Nomads, which fell 11.5 percentage points from 78.4% in July 2026 to 66.9% in August 2026. HTH Travel Insurance was the other significant decliner, moving from 15.0% in July 2026 to 11.0% in August 2026. All other tracked brands remained within normal month-to-month variation, and Seven Corners has led the category in both measured months.
This was a month of movement across the series, though most brands stayed within normal month-to-month variation. A single-month decline should not yet be treated as a trend. The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 764 qualified observations in July 2026 and 752 in August 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026
- Seven Corners-3.1%Jul 202679.2%Aug 202676.1%
- Travelex-1.8%Jul 202676.7%Aug 202674.9%
- World Nomads-11.5% · beyond normal variationJul 202678.4%Aug 202666.9%
- Tin Leg-4.2%Jul 202640.6%Aug 202636.4%
- Faye-2.1%Jul 202636.3%Aug 202634.2%
- HTH Travel Insurance-4.0% · beyond normal variationJul 202615.0%Aug 202611.0%
- Generali Global Assistance-2.6%Jul 202613.2%Aug 202610.6%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 764 | 752 | Down 12 |
Tracked brands | 7 | 7 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 33.8% | 43.6% | Up 9.8 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 93.5% | 92.0% | Down 1.5 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Seven Corners (79.2%) | Seven Corners (76.1%) | Down 3.1 points |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All six families were represented in both months.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Travel Insurance
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Raw prompt-surface observations collected |
Unique questions | 411 | 475 | Distinct questions across surfaces |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts mentioning at least one tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 799 | 798 | On-topic prompts |
Irrelevant observations | 1 | 2 | Off-topic prompts |
Qualified benchmark observations | 764 | 752 | Public denominator after reservation |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See AI Market Discovery Methodology.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Seven Corners | 81.1% | 76.1% | 39.2% | 6.5% | 1.0 |
Travelex | 79.5% | 74.9% | 59.3% | 38.6% | 1.0 |
World Nomads | 70.3% | 66.9% | 25.9% | 2.9% | 1.0 |
Tin Leg | 38.3% | 36.4% | 17.9% | 5.7% | 1.0 |
Faye | 36.8% | 34.2% | 10.6% | 3.1% | 0.9 |
HTH Travel Insurance | 11.6% | 11.0% | 1.3% | 0.0% | 1.0 |
Generali Global Assistance | 12.6% | 10.6% | 4.3% | 0.8% | 0.9 |
How to Read the Standings
Presence rate is the share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the answer. Valid recommendation coverage is the share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a recommendation shortlist. Top-three rate is the share where the brand ranks in the top three positions. Rank-one rate is the share where the brand is recommended first. Net sentiment is the share of positive mentions minus negative mentions.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Faye | 36.3% | 34.2% | Down 2.1 points |
Generali Global Assistance | 13.2% | 10.6% | Down 2.6 points |
HTH Travel Insurance | 15.0% | 11.0% | Down 4.0 points |
Seven Corners | 79.2% | 76.1% | Down 3.1 points |
Tin Leg | 40.6% | 36.4% | Down 4.2 points |
Travelex | 76.7% | 74.9% | Down 1.8 points |
World Nomads | 78.4% | 66.9% | Down 11.5 points |
Largest Decline: World Nomads
World Nomads valid recommendation coverage fell 11.5 points from 78.4% in July 2026 to 66.9% in August 2026, the largest movement in the benchmark. Presence rate dropped from 80.8% to 70.3%, while the top-three rate declined from 29.1% to 25.9%. World Nomads remained the third-ranked brand by coverage, but the decline is large enough to warrant close monitoring.
Largest Decline: HTH Travel Insurance
HTH Travel Insurance coverage declined 4.0 points from 15.0% in July 2026 to 11.0% in August 2026. Presence rate fell from 15.3% to 11.6%. The brand had only 83 valid recommendations in August 2026, down from 115 in July 2026, and small counts limit what can be concluded.
Category Leader: Seven Corners
Seven Corners led coverage at 76.1% in August 2026, down 3.1 points from 79.2% in July 2026. The brand led Travelex by 1.2 points in August 2026, a narrower margin than the 2.5-point gap in July 2026. The leadership gap has narrowed, though Seven Corners led the benchmark in both months.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Travelex led the first-position rate in August 2026 despite ranking second by coverage.
Brand | Aug 2026 top-three rate | Aug 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Travelex | 59.3% | 38.6% | 57.3% | 42.0% |
Seven Corners | 39.2% | 6.5% | 35.5% | 4.3% |
World Nomads | 25.9% | 2.9% | 29.1% | 2.9% |
Travelex was recommended first in 38.6% of qualified observations in August 2026 versus 6.5% for Seven Corners, showing that close coverage can still hide very different first-position rates.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 764 | 752 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 764 | 752 |
The current public series measures brand-recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in pricing or comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 764 | Seven Corners | 79.2% | 4.2 points down (Tin Leg) |
Aug 2026 | 752 | Seven Corners | 76.1% | 11.5 points down (World Nomads) |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, private or sponsored channels, or causality from a metric movement alone. A movement in one month should not be read as directional proof.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how AI and search surfaces recommend brands within a vertical, using qualified prompt-level observations across six canonical surface families. Research links:
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper. The public percentage cannot identify the prompts, competitors, or sources causing the result.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Flight Compensation Travel: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Boat Insurance: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Umbrella Insurance: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read