Nursing Home Abuse Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index

Tracking how AI platforms recommend nursing home abuse lawyers. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

Mark Huntley, J.D.
By Mark Huntley, J.D.Growth Strategist & AI Discovery Analyst
6 minutes read

Benchmark Summary

Morgan & Morgan led the AI Market Discovery Index for Nursing Home Abuse Lawyers in August 2026, with valid recommendation coverage of 40.4%, down from 48.5% in July 2026. The next closest brand, Senior Justice Law Firm, recorded valid recommendation coverage of 15.7% in August 2026, down from 19.7% in July 2026, leaving a gap of 24.7 percentage points between the top two brands.

The largest coverage increase belonged to Wilshire Law Firm, which rose to 9.6% in August 2026 from 8.7% in July 2026. The largest coverage decline was recorded by The Lanier Law Firm, which fell to 11.5% in August 2026 from 22.0% in July 2026, a move beyond normal month-to-month variation.

The benchmark began with 517 prompt-surface observations in July 2026 and 586 in August 2026, producing 173 and 166 qualified observations, respectively.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026

  • Morgan & Morgan-8.1%
    Jul 202648.5%
    Aug 202640.4%
  • Senior Justice Law Firm-4.0%
    Jul 202619.7%
    Aug 202615.7%
  • The Lanier Law Firm-10.5% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202622.0%
    Aug 202611.5%
  • Wilshire Law Firm+0.9%
    Jul 20268.7%
    Aug 20269.6%
  • Levin & Perconti-5.0%
    Jul 20269.8%
    Aug 20264.8%
  • Sokolove Law-3.9%
    Jul 20267.5%
    Aug 20263.6%
  • Nursing Home Law Center-3.4%
    Jul 20266.4%
    Aug 20263.0%
  • Pintas & Mullins-0.5%
    Jul 20262.9%
    Aug 20262.4%
  • Garcia & Artigliere+1.2%
    Jul 20260.0%
    Aug 20261.2%
  • Schenk Nursing Home Abuse-0.6%
    Jul 20261.2%
    Aug 20260.6%

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Measure

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Movement

Qualified benchmark observations

173

166

Down 7

Tracked brands

10

10

No change

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

53.8%

48.2%

Down 5.6 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

56.6%

54.2%

Down 2.4 points

Leader by valid recommendation coverage

Morgan & Morgan

Morgan & Morgan

No change

Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. The benchmark recorded qualified observations across all six families in both months.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Nursing Home Abuse Lawyers

Research Scope and Qualification

Research stage

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

What it represents

Source prompt-surface observations

517

586

Raw prompt-surface collection

Unique questions

416

508

Distinct questions asked

Brand / competitor mentions

517

586

Prompts mentioning a brand

Relevant observations

237

239

On-topic responses

Irrelevant observations

280

347

Off-topic responses

Qualified benchmark observations

173

166

Public benchmark denominator

Brand-level percentages use the 173 and 166 qualified observations as the public denominator in July and August 2026, not the raw 517 and 586 collection sizes. See the AI Market Discovery Methodology.

Current Brand Standings

Brand

Presence rate

Valid recommendation coverage

Top-three rate

Rank-one rate

Net sentiment

Morgan & Morgan

77.1%

40.4%

33.7%

18.7%

0.8

Senior Justice Law Firm

18.1%

15.7%

15.1%

10.8%

0.9

The Lanier Law Firm

19.9%

11.5%

10.2%

1.2%

0.7

Wilshire Law Firm

11.5%

9.6%

9.6%

3.6%

0.9

Levin & Perconti

6.6%

4.8%

3.6%

1.8%

0.9

Sokolove Law

9.6%

3.6%

0.6%

0.0%

0.4

Nursing Home Law Center

3.6%

3.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.8

Pintas & Mullins

2.4%

2.4%

1.8%

0.0%

1.0

Garcia & Artigliere

1.2%

1.2%

1.2%

0.6%

1.0

Schenk Nursing Home Abuse

0.6%

0.6%

0.0%

0.0%

1.0

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

How to Read the Standings

  • Presence rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned in any form.
  • Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a recommendation shortlist.
  • Top-three rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears among the top three recommendations.
  • Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is the first recommendation.
  • Net sentiment: positive minus negative mention tone, divided by total mentions.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Brand

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Movement since baseline

Garcia & Artigliere

0.0%

1.2%

Up 1.2 points

Levin & Perconti

9.8%

4.8%

Down 5.0 points

Morgan & Morgan

48.5%

40.4%

Down 8.1 points

Nursing Home Law Center

6.4%

3.0%

Down 3.4 points

Pintas & Mullins

2.9%

2.4%

Down 0.5 points

Schenk Nursing Home Abuse

1.2%

0.6%

Down 0.6 points

Senior Justice Law Firm

19.7%

15.7%

Down 4.0 points

Sokolove Law

7.5%

3.6%

Down 3.9 points

The Lanier Law Firm

22.0%

11.5%

Down 10.5 points

Wilshire Law Firm

8.7%

9.6%

Up 0.9 points

Largest Decline: The Lanier Law Firm

The Lanier Law Firm recorded the largest coverage movement in August 2026, declining to 11.5% valid recommendation coverage from 22.0% in July 2026, a drop beyond normal month-to-month variation. This was a decline of 10.5 percentage points. The brand also declined in top-three rate, which fell to 10.2% from 17.9% over the same period. The brand's presence rate stood at 19.9% of qualified observations in August 2026, while its valid recommendation coverage across all qualified observations fell to 11.5% from 22.0% in July 2026.

Category Leader: Morgan & Morgan

Morgan & Morgan remained the category leader in valid recommendation coverage at 40.4% in August 2026, down from 48.5% in July 2026. Senior Justice Law Firm, the next-closest brand, recorded 15.7% coverage in August 2026, placing the leader 24.7 percentage points ahead. Despite the coverage decline, Morgan & Morgan's rank-one rate rose slightly, to 18.7% in August 2026 from 18.5% in July 2026.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Other Movers

The remaining tracked brands moved within normal month-to-month variation. Wilshire Law Firm posted the only notable increase, with valid recommendation coverage of 9.6% in August 2026, up from 8.7% in July 2026. Sokolove Law declined to 3.6% from 7.5%, and its rank-one rate fell to 0.0% from 1.7%. Garcia & Artigliere moved from 0.0% to 1.2% coverage, still a watch item rather than a trend.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Valid recommendation coverage measures whether a brand appears in a shortlist, but not how prominently. Among the leading brands in August 2026, placement varied.

Brand

Aug 2026 top-three rate

Aug 2026 rank-one rate

Jul 2026 top-three rate

Jul 2026 rank-one rate

Morgan & Morgan

33.7%

18.7%

38.1%

18.5%

Senior Justice Law Firm

15.1%

10.8%

19.1%

14.4%

The Lanier Law Firm

10.2%

1.2%

17.9%

2.3%

Wilshire Law Firm showed a notable placement shift: its top-three rate rose to 9.6% in August 2026 from 6.9% in July 2026, and its rank-one rate rose to 3.6% from 0.0% over the same period. Close coverage can still hide different first-position rates.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class, covering discovery and consideration intent.

Buyer-intent class

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Brand Recommendation

173

166

Pricing & Value

0

0

Multi-Brand Comparison

0

0

Total qualified observations

173

166

The current public series measures brand-recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.

Historical Measurement Record

Measurement

Qualified observations

Coverage leader

Leader coverage

Largest coverage movement

July 2026

173

Morgan & Morgan

48.5%

The Lanier Law Firm, down 10.5 points

August 2026

166

Morgan & Morgan

40.4%

The Lanier Law Firm, down 10.5 points

Evidence and Source Layer

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. These sources provide evidence about the information environment in which AI systems generate recommendations. Source presence indicates what information was available to the model. It does not by itself prove that a particular source caused a specific recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure:

  • Market share, revenue, or attributable sales from AI recommendations.
  • Every possible AI response a brand could receive.
  • Organic-search ranking positions in traditional search engines.
  • Social media mention volume or sentiment outside AI/search surfaces.
  • Private or sponsored channels such as brand-controlled chat assistants.
  • Causality from a metric movement alone; the data records change, not its cause.

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index is a neutral, audited monthly benchmark of how brands appear and are recommended across major AI and search surfaces. It tracks presence, recommendation coverage, placement, and sentiment on a consistent, qualified basis to show category-level movement over time.

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper, showing how a specific firm appears and is recommended across AI surfaces, with trends and placement detail tailored to that brand.

Get my free AI Company Index

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.