Mesothelioma Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend mesothelioma lawyers. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Decline: Weitz & Luxenberg
- 08Largest Decline: Simmons Hanly Conroy
- 09Largest Decline: Shrader & Associates
- 10Largest Decline: Kazan McClain
- 11Category Leader: Simmons Hanly Conroy
- 12Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Benchmark Summary
Simmons Hanly Conroy leads the benchmark with 67.9% valid recommendation coverage in August 2026, a 29.5 percentage point gap over second-place Weitz & Luxenberg at 38.4%. No brand recorded a significant increase in valid recommendation coverage this month; all ten tracked brands declined from July, though only four moved beyond normal variation. The largest coverage decline was Weitz & Luxenberg, falling from 58.2% in July 2026 to 38.4% in August 2026, a 19.8 percentage point drop beyond normal variation.
Four brands moved beyond normal variation this month, all in the same direction. Kazan McClain fell from 11.6% in July 2026 to 5.8% in August 2026. Shrader & Associates declined from 18.1% to 7.6%. Simmons Hanly Conroy dropped from 84.9% to 67.9%. Weitz & Luxenberg fell from 58.2% to 38.4%. No brand posted a significant increase.
The benchmark began with 300 prompt-surface observations in July 2026 and 761 in August 2026, producing 232 and 224 qualified observations respectively after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026
- Simmons Hanly Conroy-17.0% · beyond normal variationJul 202684.9%Aug 202667.9%
- Weitz & Luxenberg-19.8% · beyond normal variationJul 202658.2%Aug 202638.4%
- Sokolove Law-2.3%Jul 202622.8%Aug 202620.5%
- Cooney & Conway-5.2%Jul 202616.8%Aug 202611.6%
- Shrader & Associates-10.5% · beyond normal variationJul 202618.1%Aug 20267.6%
- Kazan McClain-5.8% · beyond normal variationJul 202611.6%Aug 20265.8%
- Belluck & Fox-0.2%Jul 20265.6%Aug 20265.4%
- Nemeroff Law-3.3%Jul 20266.9%Aug 20263.6%
- Goldberg Persky White-2.5%Jul 20264.7%Aug 20262.2%
- Galiher DeRobertis-0.9%Jul 20262.2%Aug 20261.3%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 232 | 224 | Down 8 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 52.6% | 68.3% | Up 15.7 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 87.5% | 69.2% | Down 18.3 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Simmons Hanly Conroy | Simmons Hanly Conroy | No change |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All six families were represented in both months.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Mesothelioma Lawyers
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 300 | 761 | Total prompts collected across AI surfaces |
Unique questions | 238 | 614 | Distinct questions after de-duplication |
Brand / competitor mentions | 300 | 462 | Prompts mentioning at least one tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 236 | 256 | On-topic observations retained for review |
Irrelevant observations | 64 | 206 | Off-topic observations excluded |
Qualified benchmark observations | 232 | 224 | Public denominator for all brand metrics |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Market Discovery Methodology.
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Simmons Hanly Conroy | 78.6% | 67.9% | 58.5% | 38.4% | 0.86 |
Weitz & Luxenberg | 46.9% | 38.4% | 33.5% | 10.7% | 0.82 |
Sokolove Law | 30.4% | 20.5% | 12.5% | 3.1% | 0.68 |
Cooney & Conway | 12.0% | 11.6% | 7.1% | 2.7% | 0.96 |
Shrader & Associates | 10.3% | 7.6% | 3.6% | 0.0% | 0.74 |
Kazan McClain | 5.8% | 5.8% | 2.7% | 0.9% | 1.00 |
Belluck & Fox | 5.8% | 5.4% | 2.2% | 0.0% | 0.92 |
Nemeroff Law | 3.6% | 3.6% | 2.7% | 0.9% | 1.00 |
Goldberg Persky White | 2.2% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 0.9% | 1.00 |
Galiher DeRobertis | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.9% | 0.4% | 1.00 |
How to Read the Standings
Presence rate is the share of qualified observations in which the brand appears in any form. Valid recommendation coverage is the share of qualified observations in which the brand receives a clear recommendation. Top-three rate measures how often the brand appears in the first three recommended positions. Rank-one rate measures how often the brand is the single top recommendation. Net sentiment reflects the balance of positive versus negative mention tone.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Belluck & Fox | 5.6% | 5.4% | Down 0.2 points |
Cooney & Conway | 16.8% | 11.6% | Down 5.2 points |
Galiher DeRobertis | 2.2% | 1.3% | Down 0.9 points |
Goldberg Persky White | 4.7% | 2.2% | Down 2.5 points |
Kazan McClain | 11.6% | 5.8% | Down 5.8 points |
Nemeroff Law | 6.9% | 3.6% | Down 3.3 points |
Shrader & Associates | 18.1% | 7.6% | Down 10.5 points |
Simmons Hanly Conroy | 84.9% | 67.9% | Down 17.0 points |
Sokolove Law | 22.8% | 20.5% | Down 2.3 points |
Weitz & Luxenberg | 58.2% | 38.4% | Down 19.8 points |
Largest Decline: Weitz & Luxenberg
Weitz & Luxenberg fell from 58.2% in July 2026 to 38.4% in August 2026, a 19.8 percentage point decline beyond normal variation. The brand's rank-one rate also fell from 16.4% to 10.7%, while net sentiment eased from 1.0 to 0.8.
Largest Decline: Simmons Hanly Conroy
Simmons Hanly Conroy remains the category leader despite a 17.0 percentage point drop from 84.9% in July 2026 to 67.9% in August 2026. The decline was beyond normal variation. Presence rate fell from 89.7% to 78.6% over the same period.
Largest Decline: Shrader & Associates
Shrader & Associates declined from 18.1% in July 2026 to 7.6% in August 2026, a 10.5 percentage point drop beyond normal variation. Presence fell from 19.0% to 10.3%, and the brand recorded no rank-one placements in August.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Largest Decline: Kazan McClain
Kazan McClain fell from 11.6% in July 2026 to 5.8% in August 2026, a 5.8 percentage point decline beyond normal variation.
Category Leader: Simmons Hanly Conroy
Simmons Hanly Conroy leads the category with 67.9% valid recommendation coverage in August 2026, ahead of Weitz & Luxenberg at 38.4%. The leader posted a top-three rate of 58.5% and a rank-one rate of 38.4% in the current month.
The remaining six brands moved within normal month-to-month variation. Belluck & Fox, Cooney & Conway, Galiher DeRobertis, Goldberg Persky White, Nemeroff Law, and Sokolove Law all recorded declines in August but none exceeded their significance thresholds. Sokolove Law's coverage eased from 22.8% in July 2026 to 20.5% in August 2026.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The following table shows where the leading brands appear in recommendation order.
Brand | Aug 2026 top-three rate | Aug 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Simmons Hanly Conroy | 58.5% | 38.4% | 79.7% | 50.9% |
Weitz & Luxenberg | 33.5% | 10.7% | 53.9% | 16.4% |
Sokolove Law | 12.5% | 3.1% | 10.8% | 3.0% |
Simmons Hanly Conroy leads on first-position placement in both months. Weitz & Luxenberg's rank-one rate fell from 16.4% in July 2026 to 10.7% in August 2026, a narrower decline than its top-three rate. Similar coverage levels can still hide different first-position rates, as seen in the gap between Sokolove Law's top-three and rank-one rates.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
The qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class, which represents discovery and consideration intent.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 232 | 224 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 232 | 224 |
The current public series measures Brand Recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 232 | Simmons Hanly Conroy | 84.9% | Simmons Hanly Conroy, down 17.0 points in Aug |
Aug 2026 | 224 | Simmons Hanly Conroy | 67.9% | Weitz & Luxenberg, down 19.8 points from Jul |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and wherever exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, or private and sponsored channels. A metric movement alone does not establish causality.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how AI and search surfaces present brands in response to real user queries, providing a consistent measure of brand presence, recommendation coverage, placement, and sentiment.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
DUI Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Divorce Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Immigration Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read