Mesothelioma Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index

Tracking how AI platforms recommend mesothelioma lawyers. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

Mark Huntley, J.D.
By Mark Huntley, J.D.Growth Strategist & AI Discovery Analyst
6 minutes read

Benchmark Summary

Simmons Hanly Conroy leads the benchmark with 67.9% valid recommendation coverage in August 2026, a 29.5 percentage point gap over second-place Weitz & Luxenberg at 38.4%. No brand recorded a significant increase in valid recommendation coverage this month; all ten tracked brands declined from July, though only four moved beyond normal variation. The largest coverage decline was Weitz & Luxenberg, falling from 58.2% in July 2026 to 38.4% in August 2026, a 19.8 percentage point drop beyond normal variation.

Four brands moved beyond normal variation this month, all in the same direction. Kazan McClain fell from 11.6% in July 2026 to 5.8% in August 2026. Shrader & Associates declined from 18.1% to 7.6%. Simmons Hanly Conroy dropped from 84.9% to 67.9%. Weitz & Luxenberg fell from 58.2% to 38.4%. No brand posted a significant increase.

The benchmark began with 300 prompt-surface observations in July 2026 and 761 in August 2026, producing 232 and 224 qualified observations respectively after qualification.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026

  • Simmons Hanly Conroy-17.0% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202684.9%
    Aug 202667.9%
  • Weitz & Luxenberg-19.8% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202658.2%
    Aug 202638.4%
  • Sokolove Law-2.3%
    Jul 202622.8%
    Aug 202620.5%
  • Cooney & Conway-5.2%
    Jul 202616.8%
    Aug 202611.6%
  • Shrader & Associates-10.5% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202618.1%
    Aug 20267.6%
  • Kazan McClain-5.8% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 202611.6%
    Aug 20265.8%
  • Belluck & Fox-0.2%
    Jul 20265.6%
    Aug 20265.4%
  • Nemeroff Law-3.3%
    Jul 20266.9%
    Aug 20263.6%
  • Goldberg Persky White-2.5%
    Jul 20264.7%
    Aug 20262.2%
  • Galiher DeRobertis-0.9%
    Jul 20262.2%
    Aug 20261.3%

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Measure

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Movement

Qualified benchmark observations

232

224

Down 8

Tracked brands

10

10

No change

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

52.6%

68.3%

Up 15.7 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

87.5%

69.2%

Down 18.3 points

Leader by valid recommendation coverage

Simmons Hanly Conroy

Simmons Hanly Conroy

No change

Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All six families were represented in both months.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Mesothelioma Lawyers

Research Scope and Qualification

The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.

Research stage

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

What it represents

Source prompt-surface observations

300

761

Total prompts collected across AI surfaces

Unique questions

238

614

Distinct questions after de-duplication

Brand / competitor mentions

300

462

Prompts mentioning at least one tracked brand

Relevant observations

236

256

On-topic observations retained for review

Irrelevant observations

64

206

Off-topic observations excluded

Qualified benchmark observations

232

224

Public denominator for all brand metrics

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Market Discovery Methodology.

Current Brand Standings

Brand

Presence rate

Valid recommendation coverage

Top-three rate

Rank-one rate

Net sentiment

Simmons Hanly Conroy

78.6%

67.9%

58.5%

38.4%

0.86

Weitz & Luxenberg

46.9%

38.4%

33.5%

10.7%

0.82

Sokolove Law

30.4%

20.5%

12.5%

3.1%

0.68

Cooney & Conway

12.0%

11.6%

7.1%

2.7%

0.96

Shrader & Associates

10.3%

7.6%

3.6%

0.0%

0.74

Kazan McClain

5.8%

5.8%

2.7%

0.9%

1.00

Belluck & Fox

5.8%

5.4%

2.2%

0.0%

0.92

Nemeroff Law

3.6%

3.6%

2.7%

0.9%

1.00

Goldberg Persky White

2.2%

2.2%

2.2%

0.9%

1.00

Galiher DeRobertis

1.3%

1.3%

0.9%

0.4%

1.00

How to Read the Standings

Presence rate is the share of qualified observations in which the brand appears in any form. Valid recommendation coverage is the share of qualified observations in which the brand receives a clear recommendation. Top-three rate measures how often the brand appears in the first three recommended positions. Rank-one rate measures how often the brand is the single top recommendation. Net sentiment reflects the balance of positive versus negative mention tone.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Brand

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Movement since baseline

Belluck & Fox

5.6%

5.4%

Down 0.2 points

Cooney & Conway

16.8%

11.6%

Down 5.2 points

Galiher DeRobertis

2.2%

1.3%

Down 0.9 points

Goldberg Persky White

4.7%

2.2%

Down 2.5 points

Kazan McClain

11.6%

5.8%

Down 5.8 points

Nemeroff Law

6.9%

3.6%

Down 3.3 points

Shrader & Associates

18.1%

7.6%

Down 10.5 points

Simmons Hanly Conroy

84.9%

67.9%

Down 17.0 points

Sokolove Law

22.8%

20.5%

Down 2.3 points

Weitz & Luxenberg

58.2%

38.4%

Down 19.8 points

Largest Decline: Weitz & Luxenberg

Weitz & Luxenberg fell from 58.2% in July 2026 to 38.4% in August 2026, a 19.8 percentage point decline beyond normal variation. The brand's rank-one rate also fell from 16.4% to 10.7%, while net sentiment eased from 1.0 to 0.8.

Largest Decline: Simmons Hanly Conroy

Simmons Hanly Conroy remains the category leader despite a 17.0 percentage point drop from 84.9% in July 2026 to 67.9% in August 2026. The decline was beyond normal variation. Presence rate fell from 89.7% to 78.6% over the same period.

Largest Decline: Shrader & Associates

Shrader & Associates declined from 18.1% in July 2026 to 7.6% in August 2026, a 10.5 percentage point drop beyond normal variation. Presence fell from 19.0% to 10.3%, and the brand recorded no rank-one placements in August.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Largest Decline: Kazan McClain

Kazan McClain fell from 11.6% in July 2026 to 5.8% in August 2026, a 5.8 percentage point decline beyond normal variation.

Category Leader: Simmons Hanly Conroy

Simmons Hanly Conroy leads the category with 67.9% valid recommendation coverage in August 2026, ahead of Weitz & Luxenberg at 38.4%. The leader posted a top-three rate of 58.5% and a rank-one rate of 38.4% in the current month.

The remaining six brands moved within normal month-to-month variation. Belluck & Fox, Cooney & Conway, Galiher DeRobertis, Goldberg Persky White, Nemeroff Law, and Sokolove Law all recorded declines in August but none exceeded their significance thresholds. Sokolove Law's coverage eased from 22.8% in July 2026 to 20.5% in August 2026.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The following table shows where the leading brands appear in recommendation order.

Brand

Aug 2026 top-three rate

Aug 2026 rank-one rate

Jul 2026 top-three rate

Jul 2026 rank-one rate

Simmons Hanly Conroy

58.5%

38.4%

79.7%

50.9%

Weitz & Luxenberg

33.5%

10.7%

53.9%

16.4%

Sokolove Law

12.5%

3.1%

10.8%

3.0%

Simmons Hanly Conroy leads on first-position placement in both months. Weitz & Luxenberg's rank-one rate fell from 16.4% in July 2026 to 10.7% in August 2026, a narrower decline than its top-three rate. Similar coverage levels can still hide different first-position rates, as seen in the gap between Sokolove Law's top-three and rank-one rates.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

The qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class, which represents discovery and consideration intent.

Buyer-intent class

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Brand Recommendation

232

224

Pricing & Value

0

0

Multi-Brand Comparison

0

0

Total qualified observations

232

224

The current public series measures Brand Recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.

Historical Measurement Record

This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.

Measurement

Qualified observations

Coverage leader

Leader coverage

Largest coverage movement

Jul 2026

232

Simmons Hanly Conroy

84.9%

Simmons Hanly Conroy, down 17.0 points in Aug

Aug 2026

224

Simmons Hanly Conroy

67.9%

Weitz & Luxenberg, down 19.8 points from Jul

Evidence and Source Layer

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and wherever exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, or private and sponsored channels. A metric movement alone does not establish causality.

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how AI and search surfaces present brands in response to real user queries, providing a consistent measure of brand presence, recommendation coverage, placement, and sentiment.

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.

Get my free AI Company Index

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.