Live Chat Software: AI Market Discovery Index

Tracking how AI platforms recommend live chat software. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

Mark Huntley, J.D.
By Mark Huntley, J.D.Growth Strategist & AI Discovery Analyst
6 minutes read

Benchmark Summary

Tidio led the Live Chat Software benchmark in September 2026 with valid recommendation coverage of 68.9%, ahead of tawk.to at 61.3%, a gap of 7.6 points. Across the three-month series, LiveChat (Text S.A. (formerly LiveChat Software S.A.) posted the largest coverage movement, rising from 11.2% in July 2026 to 23.3% in September 2026, an increase beyond normal variation for the baseline-to-current period. No brand posted a series-level decline beyond normal variation.

Within the month, LiveChat's coverage moved from 40.2% in August 2026 to 23.3% in September 2026, a decline of 16.9 percentage points that was itself beyond normal month-to-month variation, even as the brand's baseline-to-current trend remains a significant increase. The benchmark produced 408 qualified observations in September 2026, up from 349 in July 2026, after qualification.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Sep 2026

0%20%40%60%80%Jul 2026Aug 2026Sep 2026
  • Tidio68.9%
  • tawk.to61.3%
  • Intercom46.3%
  • Zendesk Chat42.6%
  • HubSpot Live Chat40.4%
  • Crisp36.5%
  • LiveChat (Text S.A. (formerly LiveChat Software S.A.)23.3%
  • Drift6.6%
  • Olark3.2%
  • LivePerson0.5%

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Measure

Jul 2026

Sep 2026

Movement

Qualified benchmark observations

349

408

Up 59

Tracked brands

10

10

No change

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

53.6%

47.8%

Down 5.8 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

75.9%

77.9%

Up 2.0 points

Leader by valid recommendation coverage

Tidio

Tidio

No change

The August 2026 series point of 371 qualified observations sits between the baseline and current months. Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation among ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. The benchmark maintained breadth across all six families in each month.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Live Chat Software

Research Scope and Qualification

The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection.

Research stage

Jul 2026

Sep 2026

What it represents

Source prompt-surface observations

800

800

Total prompts collected across surfaces

Unique questions

607

580

Distinct questions after deduplication

Brand / competitor mentions

800

800

Prompts mentioning a brand or competitor

Relevant observations

446

520

On-topic for the live chat software vertical

Irrelevant observations

354

280

Off-topic or not analyzable

Qualified benchmark observations

349

408

Public denominator after all qualification

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Each brand-level percentage in the standings below is calculated against these qualified observations, not against the raw collection total.

AI Market Discovery Methodology

Current Brand Standings

Brand

Presence rate

Valid recommendation coverage

Top-three rate

Rank-one rate

Net sentiment

Tidio

84.8%

68.9%

42.4%

10.8%

0.9

tawk.to

68.4%

61.3%

44.4%

21.6%

0.9

Intercom

62.0%

46.3%

32.4%

11.8%

0.8

Zendesk Chat

56.1%

42.6%

19.9%

3.2%

0.8

HubSpot Live Chat

50.0%

40.4%

15.2%

1.7%

0.9

Crisp

43.9%

36.5%

14.7%

0.0%

0.9

LiveChat (Text S.A. (formerly LiveChat Software S.A.)

34.3%

23.3%

20.3%

12.5%

0.7

Drift

12.0%

6.6%

3.2%

0.5%

0.6

Olark

4.7%

3.2%

0.2%

0.0%

0.7

LivePerson

1.2%

0.5%

0.0%

0.0%

0.4

How to Read the Standings

Presence rate is the share of qualified observations where a brand is mentioned at all, regardless of whether it is recommended. Valid recommendation coverage is the share of qualified observations where a brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist. Top-three rate is the share where a brand appears among the top three recommended options. Rank-one rate is the share where a brand is the first recommendation. Net sentiment measures the balance of positive versus negative mentions among all mentions of a brand, and reflects the tone of benchmark answers rather than customer satisfaction or reviews.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Brand

Jul 2026

Sep 2026

Movement since baseline

Crisp

33.2%

36.5%

Up 3.3 points

Drift

6.6%

6.6%

No change

HubSpot Live Chat

42.4%

40.4%

Down 2.0 points

Intercom

45.3%

46.3%

Up 1.0 points

LiveChat (Text S.A. (formerly LiveChat Software S.A.)

11.2%

23.3%

Up 12.1 points

LivePerson

1.1%

0.5%

Down 0.6 points

Olark

6.0%

3.2%

Down 2.8 points

tawk.to

63.0%

61.3%

Down 1.7 points

Tidio

67.9%

68.9%

Up 1.0 points

Zendesk Chat

45.6%

42.6%

Down 3.0 points

LiveChat (Text S.A. (formerly LiveChat Software S.A.) moved from 40.2% valid recommendation coverage in August 2026 to 23.3% in September 2026, a decline of 16.9 percentage points beyond normal month-to-month variation. Crisp's top-three rate rose from 9.5% in July 2026 to 14.7% in September 2026, and HubSpot Live Chat's top-three rate rose from 9.5% to 15.2% over the same period. Intercom's top-three rate rose from 22.1% to 32.4% and its rank-one rate rose from 6.3% to 11.8% across the same three months.

Largest Increase: LiveChat (Text S.A. (formerly LiveChat Software S.A.)

LiveChat (Text S.A. (formerly LiveChat Software S.A.) rose from 11.2% valid recommendation coverage in July 2026 to 23.3% in September 2026. The brand's presence rate rose from 18.1% to 34.3%, its top-three rate climbed from 7.7% to 20.3%, and its rank-one rate moved from 4.3% to 12.5% over the period. The brand remains classified as a significant riser across the three-month series even after the single-month decline from August to September 2026.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Category Leader: Tidio

Tidio held the category lead with valid recommendation coverage of 68.9% in September 2026, up from 67.9% in July 2026. The brand's presence rate rose from 79.7% to 84.8% across the series.

Stable Brands

Most tracked brands remained within normal month-to-month variation in September 2026. Crisp, Drift, HubSpot Live Chat, Intercom, LivePerson, Olark, tawk.to, Tidio, and Zendesk Chat all stayed within their expected ranges, with HubSpot Live Chat, Olark, and Zendesk Chat each posting two straight months of decline without moving beyond normal variation.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Top-three and rank-one rates reveal placement quality within the shortlists where a brand appears, and the two leaders show different profiles.

Brand

Sep 2026 top-three rate

Sep 2026 rank-one rate

Jul 2026 top-three rate

Jul 2026 rank-one rate

tawk.to

44.4%

21.6%

41.3%

18.6%

Tidio

42.4%

10.8%

37.5%

8.9%

Although Tidio holds the coverage lead, tawk.to achieves roughly twice the rank-one rate, with 21.6% in September 2026 versus Tidio's 10.8%. Close coverage can still hide different first-position rates.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class, where the prompt asks for a brand or product recommendation.

Buyer-intent class

Jul 2026

Sep 2026

Brand Recommendation

349

408

Pricing & Value

0

0

Multi-Brand Comparison

0

0

Total qualified observations

349

408

The current public series measures Brand Recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.

Historical Measurement Record

New measurements are added to the same report.

Measurement

Qualified observations

Coverage leader

Leader coverage

Largest coverage movement

July 2026

349

Tidio

67.9%

No significant movement

August 2026

371

Tidio

67.7%

LiveChat (Text S.A. (formerly LiveChat Software S.A.), Up 29.0 points

September 2026

408

Tidio

68.9%

LiveChat (Text S.A. (formerly LiveChat Software S.A.), Down 16.9 points

Evidence and Source Layer

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, private or sponsored channels, or causality from a metric movement alone. The benchmark records the change. It does not, by itself, establish why the change occurred.

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how often and how prominently brands appear in AI-generated recommendations across six canonical AI surface families. It is a neutral industry benchmark built from prompt-level observations.

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.