SIEM Software: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend siem software. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Increase: Microsoft Sentinel
- 08Largest Decline: Microsoft SharePoint
- 09Category Leader: Splunk
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
Splunk leads the SIEM Software benchmark with valid recommendation coverage of 42.0% in August 2026, up from 35.8% in July 2026. The gap to the next brand narrowed. Microsoft Sentinel, new to the tracked set in August 2026, reached 35.6% valid recommendation coverage, close behind the leader.
The largest coverage increase came from Microsoft Sentinel, which entered the benchmark with 35.6% valid recommendation coverage in August 2026 after not being tracked in July 2026. Microsoft SharePoint recorded the largest coverage decline, falling to a 0.0% valid recommendation coverage in August 2026, down from 2.0% in July 2026, and it is no longer reported in the current brand set.
Over the two comparable months, Splunk moved from 35.8% to 42.0%, Securonix held steady from 9.9% to 10.1%, and Exabeam moved from 11.3% to 7.5% in valid recommendation coverage. This was a mixed month, with one significant riser, one significant decliner, and eight brands within normal month-to-month variation.
The benchmark began with 787 prompt-surface observations in July 2026 and 800 in August 2026, producing 355 and 424 qualified observations respectively after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026
- Splunk+6.2%Jul 202635.8%Aug 202642.0%
- Microsoft Sentinel+35.6% · beyond normal variationJul 20260.0%Aug 202635.6%
- IBM QRadar+1.6%Jul 202617.5%Aug 202619.1%
- Elastic Security+0.7%Jul 202617.2%Aug 202617.9%
- Rapid7 InsightIDR-0.5%Jul 202613.5%Aug 202613.0%
- Google Chronicle+3.8%Jul 20268.2%Aug 202612.0%
- Securonix+0.2%Jul 20269.9%Aug 202610.1%
- Exabeam-3.8%Jul 202611.3%Aug 20267.5%
- Sumo Logic-2.7%Jul 20266.2%Aug 20263.5%
- Microsoft SharePoint-2.0% · beyond normal variationJul 20262.0%Aug 20260.0%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 355 | 424 | Up 69 |
Tracked brands | 9 | 9 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 25.4% | 18.4% | Down 7.0 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 39.4% | 34.2% | Down 5.2 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Splunk (35.8%) | Splunk (42.0%) | Up 6.2 points |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families that produced at least one qualified observation. The six families are ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending SIEM Software
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 787 | 800 | Total prompts collected across AI/search surfaces |
Unique questions | 526 | 596 | Distinct questions asked |
Brand / competitor mentions | 786 | 760 | Prompts mentioning a brand or competitor |
Relevant observations | 507 | 606 | On-topic responses |
Irrelevant observations | 279 | 154 | Off-topic or unusable responses |
Qualified benchmark observations | 355 | 424 | Public benchmark denominator |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
For methodology details, see AI Market Discovery Methodology.
Current Brand Standings
The table below is the primary current-month benchmark view, sorted by valid recommendation coverage.
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Splunk | 92.9% | 42.0% | 25.5% | 9.9% | 0.5 |
Microsoft Sentinel | 77.1% | 35.6% | 21.2% | 12.7% | 0.5 |
IBM QRadar | 51.4% | 19.1% | 6.6% | 0.5% | 0.4 |
Elastic Security | 39.6% | 17.9% | 4.2% | 0.5% | 0.5 |
Rapid7 InsightIDR | 18.2% | 13.0% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 0.7 |
Google Chronicle | 22.6% | 12.0% | 4.5% | 0.0% | 0.6 |
Securonix | 13.7% | 10.1% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.8 |
Exabeam | 19.3% | 7.5% | 1.4% | 0.9% | 0.5 |
Sumo Logic | 10.1% | 3.5% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 0.4 |
How to Read the Standings
Presence rate is the share of qualified observations in which the brand is mentioned at all. Valid recommendation coverage is the share of qualified observations in which the brand receives a clear, actionable recommendation. Top-three rate is the share of qualified observations in which the brand appears among the top three recommended options. Rank-one rate is the share of qualified observations in which the brand is the single first recommendation. Net sentiment reflects the balance of positive versus negative mentions, from -1 to +1.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Elastic Security | 17.2% | 17.9% | Up 0.7 points |
Exabeam | 11.3% | 7.5% | Down 3.8 points |
Google Chronicle | 8.2% | 12.0% | Up 3.8 points |
IBM QRadar | 17.5% | 19.1% | Up 1.6 points |
Microsoft Sentinel | 0.0% | 35.6% | Up 35.6 points |
Microsoft SharePoint | 2.0% | 0.0% | Down 2.0 points |
Rapid7 InsightIDR | 13.5% | 13.0% | Down 0.5 points |
Securonix | 9.9% | 10.1% | Up 0.2 points |
Splunk | 35.8% | 42.0% | Up 6.2 points |
Sumo Logic | 6.2% | 3.5% | Down 2.7 points |
Largest Increase: Microsoft Sentinel
Microsoft Sentinel entered the tracked set in August 2026 with valid recommendation coverage of 35.6%, and a presence rate of 77.1%. It was reached in 151 of 424 qualified observations. This entry moved it into second position in the standings, behind only Splunk. Its rank-one rate of 12.7% was the highest of any tracked brand in August 2026.
Largest Decline: Microsoft SharePoint
Microsoft SharePoint's valid recommendation coverage fell to 0.0% in August 2026, down from 2.0% in July 2026, and the brand is no longer present in the current month's tracked set. In July 2026 it appeared in 7 of 355 qualified observations. The move was beyond normal month-to-month variation for its sample, though absolute counts were small.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Category Leader: Splunk
Splunk remained the coverage leader in August 2026 at 42.0%, up from 35.8% in July 2026, though this movement stayed within normal month-to-month variation. Its presence rate rose to 92.9% from 90.4%. Its top-three rate declined to 25.5% from 30.7% and its rank-one rate declined to 9.9% from 13.5%, even as overall coverage rose.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Among the leading brands, placement patterns differed meaningfully in August 2026.
Brand | Aug 2026 top-three rate | Aug 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Splunk | 25.5% | 9.9% | 30.7% | 13.5% |
Microsoft Sentinel | 21.2% | 12.7% | N/A | N/A |
IBM QRadar | 6.6% | 0.5% | 10.4% | 0.0% |
Close coverage figures can still hide different first-position rates. Microsoft Sentinel reached a slightly lower top-three rate than Splunk but a higher rank-one rate, while both brands led the field on placement.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class, representing discovery and consideration intent.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 355 | 424 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 355 | 424 |
The current public series measures brand recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the pricing and value or multi-brand comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 355 | Splunk | 35.8% | N/A (baseline month) |
Aug 2026 | 424 | Splunk | 42.0% | Microsoft Sentinel +35.6 points baseline to current |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, or private and sponsored channels. A metric movement alone does not establish causality.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how AI and search surfaces present and recommend brands within a vertical, using standardized prompt collections across canonical AI surfaces each month. All metrics follow documented definitions and research standards.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Procurement Software: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
eSignature Software: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Customer Service Software: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read