Procurement Software: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend procurement software. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Decline: Coupa
- 08Largest Decline: SAP Ariba
- 09Decline: Procurify
- 10Category Leader: Coupa
- 11Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 12Buyer-Intent Distribution
Benchmark Summary
Coupa led the Procurement Software benchmark in August 2026 with a valid recommendation coverage of 45.2%, ahead of SAP Ariba at 42.9%, a gap of 2.3 percentage points. No brand posted a significant increase in valid recommendation coverage this month. Eight of the ten tracked brands recorded significant declines: Coupa, GEP SMART, Ivalua, Jaggaer, Precoro, Procurify, SAP Ariba, and Zip. Kissflow Procurement and Tradeshift held stable within normal month-to-month variation.
The largest coverage decline came from Coupa, which fell from 65.6% in July 2026 to 45.2% in August 2026, a drop of 20.4 percentage points. Procurify recorded the next largest decline, falling from 45.4% in July 2026 to 27.7% in August 2026, down 17.7 percentage points.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 476 qualified observations in August 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026
- Coupa-20.4% · beyond normal variationJul 202665.6%Aug 202645.2%
- SAP Ariba-19.7% · beyond normal variationJul 202662.6%Aug 202642.9%
- Precoro-11.4% · beyond normal variationJul 202639.5%Aug 202628.1%
- Procurify-17.7% · beyond normal variationJul 202645.4%Aug 202627.7%
- GEP SMART-16.0% · beyond normal variationJul 202636.0%Aug 202620.0%
- Ivalua-12.1% · beyond normal variationJul 202629.3%Aug 202617.2%
- Jaggaer-7.7% · beyond normal variationJul 202622.6%Aug 202614.9%
- Zip-13.5% · beyond normal variationJul 202624.2%Aug 202610.7%
- Kissflow Procurement-1.3%Jul 20263.8%Aug 20262.5%
- Tradeshiftno changeJul 20260.8%Aug 20260.8%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 372 | 476 | Up 104 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 39.5% | 28.6% | Down 10.9 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 67.5% | 48.5% | Down 19.0 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Coupa | Coupa | No change |
Qualified surface breadth refers to the number of canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. The benchmark maintained coverage across all six families in both months.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Procurement Software
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompt-surface observations collected |
Unique questions | 548 | 573 | Distinct questions after deduplication |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts mentioning a tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 409 | 555 | On-topic observations retained for review |
Irrelevant observations | 391 | 245 | Off-topic observations excluded |
Qualified benchmark observations | 372 | 476 | Public denominator for brand metrics |
For additional detail on the research approach, see AI Market Discovery Methodology.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coupa | 94.1% | 45.2% | 36.8% | 17.0% | 0.6 |
SAP Ariba | 89.5% | 42.9% | 31.5% | 13.7% | 0.7 |
Precoro | 43.3% | 28.1% | 11.1% | 3.1% | 0.8 |
Procurify | 46.2% | 27.7% | 14.1% | 3.8% | 0.8 |
GEP SMART | 31.9% | 20.0% | 11.1% | 0.6% | 0.8 |
Ivalua | 33.6% | 17.2% | 8.4% | 0.6% | 0.7 |
Jaggaer | 35.5% | 14.9% | 2.1% | 0.2% | 0.6 |
Zip | 17.2% | 10.7% | 3.4% | 1.1% | 0.8 |
Tradeshift | 1.3% | 0.8% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.7 |
Kissflow Procurement | 3.4% | 2.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.8 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: the share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned at all.
- Valid recommendation coverage: the share of qualified observations where the brand receives a valid recommendation.
- Top-three rate: the share of qualified observations where the brand appears among the top three recommended options.
- Rank-one rate: the share of qualified observations where the brand is the first recommendation.
- Net sentiment: the balance of positive over neutral and negative mentions, scaled from 0 to 1.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Coupa | 65.6% | 45.2% | Down 20.4 points |
SAP Ariba | 62.6% | 42.9% | Down 19.7 points |
Procurify | 45.4% | 27.7% | Down 17.7 points |
GEP SMART | 36.0% | 20.0% | Down 16.0 points |
Zip | 24.2% | 10.7% | Down 13.5 points |
Ivalua | 29.3% | 17.2% | Down 12.1 points |
Precoro | 39.5% | 28.1% | Down 11.4 points |
Jaggaer | 22.6% | 14.9% | Down 7.7 points |
Kissflow Procurement | 3.8% | 2.5% | Down 1.3 points |
Tradeshift | 0.8% | 0.8% | No change |
Largest Decline: Coupa
Coupa's valid recommendation coverage fell from 65.6% in July 2026 to 45.2% in August 2026, down 20.4 percentage points, beyond normal month-to-month variation. The decline was accompanied by drops in top-three rate from 57.0% to 36.8% and rank-one rate from 32.8% to 17.0%. Presence rate remained comparatively stable at 94.1%, indicating the issue is recommendation conversion, not discoverability.
Largest Decline: SAP Ariba
SAP Ariba's valid recommendation coverage fell from 62.6% in July 2026 to 42.9% in August 2026, down 19.7 percentage points, beyond normal variation. Top-three rate declined from 44.9% to 31.5%, and rank-one rate declined from 19.6% to 13.7%. Presence rate held steady at 89.5% in August 2026, down from 90.6% in July 2026, within normal variation.
Decline: Procurify
Procurify's valid recommendation coverage fell from 45.4% in July 2026 to 27.7% in August 2026, down 17.7 percentage points, beyond normal variation. Presence rate declined from 55.4% to 46.2%, also beyond normal variation. Top-three rate moved from 17.5% to 14.1%, within normal variation.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Category Leader: Coupa
Coupa remained the category leader in August 2026 with valid recommendation coverage of 45.2%, ahead of SAP Ariba at 42.9%. Coupa's lead narrowed from 3.0 percentage points in July 2026 to 2.3 percentage points in August 2026, as both brands posted significant declines.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. While Coupa and SAP Ariba lead in valid recommendation coverage, their top-three and rank-one rates reveal how often they appear in the most prominent positions.
Brand | Aug 2026 top-three rate | Aug 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Coupa | 36.8% | 17.0% | 57.0% | 32.8% |
SAP Ariba | 31.5% | 13.7% | 44.9% | 19.6% |
Procurify | 14.1% | 3.8% | 17.5% | 4.0% |
Coupa's top-three rate of 36.8% in August 2026 was more than double its nearest brand's rate, while its rank-one rate of 17.0% led the category. Close coverage figures can still hide different first-position rates, as seen with Precoro at 28.1% coverage and a 3.1% rank-one rate versus Procurify at 27.7% coverage and a 3.8% rank-one rate.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
The qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class of discovery.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 372 | 476 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 372 | 476 |
Price, value, and head-to-head comparison have no public signal in this data. The current public series measures the Brand Recommendation class of discovery exclusively and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 372 | Coupa | 65.6% | No prior comparable month |
Aug 2026 | 476 | Coupa | 45.2% | Coupa down 20.4 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, private or sponsored channels, or causality from a metric movement alone. The current dataset cannot answer pricing or comparison questions.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how often brands appear in AI-generated responses across major AI/search surfaces, using a structured research methodology applied to a defined prompt universe each month.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper. The public percentage cannot identify the prompts, competitors, or sources causing the result.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
eSignature Software: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
SIEM Software: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Customer Service Software: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read