Home EV Chargers: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend home ev chargers. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Decline: Wallbox Pulsar Plus
- 08Category Leader: ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings)
- 09Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 10Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 11Historical Measurement Record
- 12Evidence and Source Layer
Benchmark Summary
ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) leads the Home EV Chargers benchmark with valid recommendation coverage of 53.3% in September 2026, though this represents a notable decline from 61.5% in July 2026. The gap to the second-place brand narrowed: Tesla Wall Connector (Tesla, Inc.) holds 51.8% in September 2026, down from 56.3% in July 2026, leaving a 1.5 percentage point gap between the two leaders.
Three brands recorded notable coverage declines across the full series. ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings): down to 53.3% in September 2026 from 61.5% in July 2026. Emporia EV Charger (Emporia Energy): down to 39.8% in September 2026 from 46.0% in July 2026. Wallbox Pulsar Plus fell to 14.4% in September 2026 from 23.7% in July 2026. No tracked brand recorded a notable increase.
Within month-to-month movement, no notable risers or decliners emerged in September 2026, as the largest prior-month shifts were within normal variation. The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 568 qualified observations after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Sep 2026
- ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings)53.3%
- Tesla Wall Connector (Tesla, Inc.)51.8%
- Emporia EV Charger (Emporia Energy)39.8%
- Grizzl-E (United Chargers Inc.)38.6%
- Wallbox Pulsar Plus14.4%
- Autel MaxiCharger (Autel Energy)12.2%
- Lectron11.1%
- Enphase IQ (Enphase Energy)1.4%
- Siemens VersiCharge (Siemens AG)0.5%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 535 | 568 | Up 33 |
Tracked brands | 9 | 9 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 43.7% | 49.6% | Up 5.9 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 64.1% | 65.8% | Up 1.7 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) | ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) | No change |
Qualified surface breadth counts the six canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. In August 2026, the benchmark saw 554 qualified observations, an intermediate point between the two comparison months.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Home EV Chargers
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Raw prompt-surface observations collected |
Unique questions | 514 | 536 | Distinct questions asked |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts mentioning a brand or competitor |
Relevant observations | 691 | 722 | Prompts relevant to the vertical |
Irrelevant observations | 109 | 78 | Prompts not relevant to the vertical |
Qualified benchmark observations | 535 | 568 | Public denominator after qualification |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
For the full research pipeline, see AI Market Discovery Methodology.
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) | 72.0% | 53.3% | 48.8% | 21.5% | 0.8 |
Tesla Wall Connector (Tesla, Inc.) | 75.5% | 51.8% | 48.1% | 23.2% | 0.7 |
Emporia EV Charger (Emporia Energy) | 46.5% | 39.8% | 34.5% | 8.8% | 0.9 |
Grizzl-E (United Chargers Inc.) | 44.2% | 38.6% | 11.8% | 1.4% | 0.9 |
Wallbox Pulsar Plus | 20.4% | 14.4% | 6.0% | 0.7% | 0.8 |
Autel MaxiCharger (Autel Energy) | 16.7% | 12.2% | 6.5% | 1.1% | 0.8 |
Lectron | 20.2% | 11.1% | 6.2% | 1.4% | 0.6 |
Siemens VersiCharge (Siemens AG) | 0.9% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 1.0 |
Enphase IQ (Enphase Energy) | 4.8% | 1.4% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.4 |
How to Read the Standings
Presence rate is the share of qualified observations in which a brand is mentioned at all. Valid recommendation coverage is the share of qualified observations in which a brand appears in a recommendation-shaped response. Top-three rate and rank-one rate capture how prominently a recommended brand is positioned. Net sentiment scores the tone of brand mentions on a scale where higher is more positive. For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) | 61.5% | 53.3% | Down 8.2 points |
Tesla Wall Connector (Tesla, Inc.) | 56.3% | 51.8% | Down 4.5 points |
Emporia EV Charger (Emporia Energy) | 46.0% | 39.8% | Down 6.2 points |
Grizzl-E (United Chargers Inc.) | 37.2% | 38.6% | Up 1.4 points |
Wallbox Pulsar Plus | 23.7% | 14.4% | Down 9.3 points |
Autel MaxiCharger (Autel Energy) | 12.3% | 12.2% | Down 0.1 points |
Lectron | 11.0% | 11.1% | Up 0.1 points |
Siemens VersiCharge (Siemens AG) | 0.6% | 0.5% | Down 0.1 points |
Enphase IQ (Enphase Energy) | 2.4% | 1.4% | Down 1.0 points |
Largest Decline: Wallbox Pulsar Plus
Wallbox Pulsar Plus recorded the largest movement in the benchmark, with valid recommendation coverage falling 9.3 percentage points to 14.4% in September 2026 from 23.7% in July 2026. The brand declined in each of the two months since July 2026, moving to 16.1% in August 2026 before reaching 14.4% in September 2026. Presence also declined, to 20.4% in September 2026 from 30.3% in July 2026. The brand held 127 qualified recommendations in July 2026 and 82 in September 2026.
Category Leader: ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings)
ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) remains the coverage leader at 53.3% in September 2026, down 8.2 points from 61.5% in July 2026. The brand declined in each of the two months since July 2026, moving to 57.6% in August 2026 before reaching 53.3% in September 2026. Rank-one rate fell to 21.5% in September 2026 from 31.4% in July 2026. The leading position remains intact, though the margin over the second-place brand has narrowed to 1.5 percentage points.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The leading cluster shows meaningful differences in first-position rates even where coverage is close.
Brand | Sep 2026 top-three rate | Sep 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) | 48.8% | 21.5% | 54.9% | 31.4% |
Tesla Wall Connector (Tesla, Inc.) | 48.1% | 23.2% | 48.8% | 21.1% |
Emporia EV Charger (Emporia Energy) | 34.5% | 8.8% | 35.7% | 5.6% |
Tesla Wall Connector (Tesla, Inc.) was recommended first in 23.2% of September 2026 observations, ahead of ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) at 21.5%, even though ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) held a 1.5 point coverage lead. Close coverage can still hide different first-position rates.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 535 | 568 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 535 | 568 |
The current public series measures Brand Recommendation discovery only and does not yet contain qualified observations in Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 535 | ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) | 61.5% | Wallbox Pulsar Plus, down 9.3 points since Jul 2026 |
Aug 2026 | 554 | ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) | 57.6% | Wallbox Pulsar Plus, down 9.3 points since Jul 2026 |
Sep 2026 | 568 | ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) | 53.3% | Wallbox Pulsar Plus, down 9.3 points since Jul 2026 |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, private or sponsored channels, or causality from a metric movement alone. It records the change; it does not, by itself, establish why the change occurred.
About This Benchmark
The AI Market Discovery Index is a neutral, industry-level benchmark that tracks how AI assistants and search surfaces present brands in response to real user discovery prompts. Research links:
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Home Warranties: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Home Builders: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Home Security Systems: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read