Debt Management: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend debt management. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since May 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Decline: National Debt Relief
- 08Second-Largest Decline: Freedom Debt Relief
- 09Category Leader: Money Management International
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
Money Management International led the August 2026 benchmark with valid recommendation coverage of 8.6%, ahead of National Debt Relief at 7.7% and Freedom Debt Relief at 7.5% — a gap of 0.9 points between the top two brands. No brand recorded a significant rise from the May 2026 baseline; GreenPath Financial Wellness posted the only modest increase, up 1.1 points to 6.1%, which the series treats as stable rather than significant.
The largest coverage decline from the May 2026 baseline came from National Debt Relief, which fell from 30.1% to 7.7% in August 2026, a drop of 22.4 percentage points; the brand had reached 44.0% in July 2026 before falling 36.3 points in the most recent month. Freedom Debt Relief posted the next-largest baseline decline, from 25.7% in May 2026 to 7.5% in August 2026 (down 18.2 points), after peaking at 41.2% in July 2026.
Nearly every tracked brand recorded a significant decline from July 2026 to August 2026, following a July spike across the category. For six brands — Accredited Debt Relief, Curadebt, Financial Counseling Association of America, Freedom Debt Relief, National Debt Relief, and National Foundation for Credit Counseling — the August decline extends a net decline already visible from the May baseline. For four brands — Money Management International, GreenPath Financial Wellness, American Consumer Credit Counseling, and Clearpoint — the August decline mostly reverses a July increase, leaving August 2026 levels close to or above the May 2026 baseline. The series treats these four brands as stable across the full period despite the sharp single-month swing.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in August 2026 and produced 428 qualified observations after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, May 2026 to Aug 2026
- Money Management International8.6%
- National Debt Relief7.7%
- Freedom Debt Relief7.5%
- GreenPath Financial Wellness6.1%
- Accredited Debt Relief5.1%
- National Foundation for Credit Counseling4.2%
- American Consumer Credit Counseling2.8%
- Financial Counseling Association of America0.7%
- Clearpoint0.0%
- Curadebt0.0%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | May 2026 | August 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 522 | 428 | Down 94 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 9 | Down 1 |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 15.7% | 7.2% | Down 8.5 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 36.4% | 11.2% | Down 25.2 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | National Debt Relief (30.1%) | Money Management International (8.6%) | Changed |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Qualified surface breadth counts canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation across ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. Both months measured all six families.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Debt Management
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection.
Research stage | May 2026 | August 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 522 | 800 | Total prompts collected across AI surfaces |
Unique questions | 522 | 503 | Distinct questions after deduplication |
Brand / competitor mentions | 522 | 800 | Prompts mentioning a tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 522 | 771 | Prompts on-topic for the vertical |
Irrelevant observations | 0 | 14 | Prompts off-topic or unclassifiable |
Qualified benchmark observations | 522 | 428 | Public denominator after reservation |
For the full collection pipeline, see AI Market Discovery Methodology.
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Money Management International | 8.9% | 8.6% | 5.8% | 3.5% | 1.0 |
National Debt Relief | 9.8% | 7.7% | 6.5% | 5.6% | 0.7 |
Freedom Debt Relief | 8.2% | 7.5% | 6.8% | 0.7% | 0.9 |
GreenPath Financial Wellness | 6.1% | 6.1% | 5.1% | 1.2% | 1.0 |
Accredited Debt Relief | 5.4% | 5.1% | 4.7% | 0.5% | 1.0 |
National Foundation for Credit Counseling | 9.6% | 4.2% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.8 |
American Consumer Credit Counseling | 3.0% | 2.8% | 1.9% | 0.2% | 0.9 |
Financial Counseling Association of America | 4.4% | 0.7% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.7 |
Clearpoint | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate is the share of qualified observations in which the brand is mentioned at all.
- Valid recommendation coverage is the share of qualified observations in which the brand is recommended in a qualifying answer.
- Top-three rate is the share of qualified observations in which the brand appears in the top three recommended positions.
- Rank-one rate is the share of qualified observations in which the brand is the first recommendation.
- Net sentiment measures the balance of positive over negative mentions, from 0 to 1.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | May 2026 | August 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Accredited Debt Relief | 21.5% | 5.1% | Down 16.4 points |
American Consumer Credit Counseling | 3.3% | 2.8% | Down 0.5 points |
Clearpoint | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Curadebt | 4.8% | 0.0% | Down 4.8 points |
Financial Counseling Association of America | 2.5% | 0.7% | Down 1.8 points |
Freedom Debt Relief | 25.7% | 7.5% | Down 18.2 points |
GreenPath Financial Wellness | 5.0% | 6.1% | Up 1.1 points |
Money Management International | 12.4% | 8.6% | Down 3.8 points |
National Debt Relief | 30.1% | 7.7% | Down 22.4 points |
National Foundation for Credit Counseling | 7.5% | 4.2% | Down 3.3 points |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Largest Decline: National Debt Relief
National Debt Relief fell from 30.1% valid recommendation coverage in May 2026 to 7.7% in August 2026, a drop of 22.4 percentage points and the largest baseline-to-current decline in the benchmark. The brand peaked at 44.0% in July 2026 before falling 36.3 points in August. Rank-one placement also dropped, from 23.6% in May 2026 to 5.6% in August 2026, a difference of 18.0 points.
Second-Largest Decline: Freedom Debt Relief
Freedom Debt Relief dropped from 25.7% in May 2026 to 7.5% in August 2026, down 18.2 points. The brand reached 41.2% in July 2026 before falling 33.7 points in August. Presence fell from 28.5% in May 2026 to 8.2% in August 2026.
Category Leader: Money Management International
Money Management International led the August 2026 benchmark at 8.6% valid recommendation coverage, holding the top position despite a decline from 12.4% in May 2026 and a July 2026 peak of 55.3%. National Debt Relief posted the highest rank-one rate among tracked brands in August 2026, at 5.6%, compared with Money Management International's 3.5% rank-one rate and 5.8% top-three rate.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The top three brands by current coverage show notably different placement profiles.
Brand | August 2026 top-three rate | August 2026 rank-one rate | May 2026 top-three rate | May 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Money Management International | 5.8% | 3.5% | 8.2% | 4.8% |
National Debt Relief | 6.5% | 5.6% | 26.2% | 23.6% |
Freedom Debt Relief | 6.8% | 0.7% | 22.6% | 0.0% |
National Debt Relief converted most of its coverage into first position, with a rank-one rate of 5.6% in August 2026 against a top-three rate of 6.5%. Freedom Debt Relief appeared in the top three at 6.8% but ranked first only 0.7% of the time. Close coverage can still hide different first-position rates.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All 428 qualified observations in August 2026 fell into the Brand Recommendation class, the same class that held all 522 qualified observations in May 2026.
Buyer-intent class | May 2026 | August 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 522 | 428 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 522 | 428 |
The current public series measures brand-recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
May 2026 | 522 | National Debt Relief | 30.1% | Baseline month (no prior month for comparison) |
July 2026 | 425 | Money Management International | 55.3% | Money Management International up 42.9 points |
August 2026 | 428 | Money Management International | 8.6% | Money Management International down 46.7 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
This benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure:
- Market share or attributable sales
- Every possible AI response to a given prompt
- Organic-search ranking positions
- Social media mention volume
- Private or sponsored channels and paywalled assistant content
- Causality from a metric movement alone (the benchmark records the change, not why it occurred)
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how AI and search surfaces recommend brands across verticals, using a consistent prompt-level methodology applied month over month. The benchmark focuses on recommendation placement and coverage as distinct signals of AI-driven brand discovery. The modeled AI Authority Value is a separate, complementary measure.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Debt Consolidation Loans: 2026 AI Market Discovery Index
A directional category benchmark from LLM Authority Index showing how major AI platforms appear to discover, compare, frame, and recommend debt consolidation loan providers across high-intent borrower prompts.
ReadIndustry Reports
Debt Relief & Consolidation: 2026 AI Market Discovery Index
A benchmark of how major AI platforms discover, compare, and recommend debt relief firms, debt settlement providers, and consolidation lenders across financial decision prompts.
ReadIndustry Reports
Construction Management Software: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read