Criminal Defense Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend criminal defense lawyers. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Increase: Monder Criminal Lawyer Group
- 08Largest Decline: The Rodriguez Law Group
- 09Category Leader: Spodek Law Group
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
Spodek Law Group led the Criminal Defense Lawyers benchmark in September 2026 with valid recommendation coverage of 21.4%, up slightly from 21.0% in August 2026. The next closest brand was Kraut Law Group at 14.4% in September 2026, up from 11.9% in August 2026, leaving a 7.0 percentage-point gap between the two leaders.
The largest coverage increase this month belonged to Kraut Law Group, which rose from 11.9% in August 2026 to 14.4% in September 2026, a gain of 2.5 points. No brand posted a coverage decline beyond normal month-to-month variation in September 2026.
This was a quiet month at the category level, with no significant movement beyond normal variation. Over the full series from July 2026, the larger moves have already occurred: Spodek Law Group declined from 27.9% in July 2026 to 21.4% in September 2026, while The Rodriguez Law Group fell from 14.7% in July 2026 to 6.9% in September 2026. Monder Criminal Lawyer Group rose from 0.0% in July 2026 to 2.3% in September 2026, a move beyond normal month-to-month variation.
The benchmark began with 340 prompt-surface observations in September 2026 and produced 173 qualified observations after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Sep 2026
- Spodek Law Group21.4%
- Kraut Law Group14.4%
- The Rodriguez Law Group6.9%
- The Cochran Firm5.8%
- Wallin & Klarich4.6%
- Goldstein Mehta2.9%
- Monder Criminal Lawyer Group2.3%
- Chambers Law Firm1.2%
- Esfandi Law Group1.2%
- Greg Hill & Associates0.6%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 136 | 173 | Up 37 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 4 | 6 | Up 2 |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 44.9% | 32.4% | Down 12.5 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 50.7% | 50.9% | Up 0.1 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Spodek Law Group | Spodek Law Group | No change |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. In September 2026, all six families were represented, up from four in July 2026. August 2026 marked the first appearance of ChatGPT in the series.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Criminal Defense Lawyers
Research Scope and Qualification
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 232 | 340 | Starting prompt count across AI surfaces |
Unique questions | 228 | 321 | Distinct questions posed |
Brand / competitor mentions | 232 | 340 | Prompts naming an entity |
Relevant observations | 199 | 212 | On-topic observations |
Irrelevant observations | 33 | 128 | Off-topic observations |
Qualified benchmark observations | 136 | 173 | Public denominator |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Market Discovery Methodology
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spodek Law Group | 28.3% | 21.4% | 17.9% | 12.7% | 0.76 |
Kraut Law Group | 38.7% | 14.4% | 6.9% | 2.9% | 0.39 |
The Rodriguez Law Group | 8.1% | 6.9% | 6.4% | 2.3% | 0.86 |
The Cochran Firm | 9.8% | 5.8% | 3.5% | 0.0% | 0.76 |
Wallin & Klarich | 19.7% | 4.6% | 2.9% | 0.0% | 0.24 |
Goldstein Mehta | 3.5% | 2.9% | 2.9% | 1.2% | 0.83 |
Monder Criminal Lawyer Group | 2.3% | 2.3% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 1.00 |
Chambers Law Firm | 2.3% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.50 |
Esfandi Law Group | 2.3% | 1.2% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.50 |
Greg Hill & Associates | 6.4% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.09 |
How to Read the Standings
Presence rate is the share of qualified observations where the brand appears in any capacity. Valid recommendation coverage is the share where the brand receives a valid recommendation. Top-three rate is the share where the brand appears among the first three recommended options. Rank-one rate is the share where the brand is the first or only recommendation. Net sentiment measures the tone of mentions on a scale from negative to positive.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Chambers Law Firm | 0.0% | 1.2% | Up 1.2 points |
Esfandi Law Group | 2.2% | 1.2% | Down 1.0 points |
Goldstein Mehta | 1.5% | 2.9% | Up 1.4 points |
Greg Hill & Associates | 0.7% | 0.6% | Down 0.1 points |
Kraut Law Group | 19.9% | 14.4% | Down 5.5 points |
Monder Criminal Lawyer Group | 0.0% | 2.3% | Up 2.3 points |
Spodek Law Group | 27.9% | 21.4% | Down 6.5 points |
The Cochran Firm | 8.8% | 5.8% | Down 3.0 points |
The Rodriguez Law Group | 14.7% | 6.9% | Down 7.8 points |
Wallin & Klarich | 4.4% | 4.6% | Up 0.2 points |
Largest Increase: Monder Criminal Lawyer Group
Monder Criminal Lawyer Group rose from 0.0% valid recommendation coverage in July 2026 to 2.3% in September 2026, a gain of 2.3 points based on only 4 qualified recommendations. Presence rate rose from 0.0% to 2.3% over the same period. This brand moved beyond normal month-to-month variation, driven entirely by its August 2026 increase from 0.0% to 2.3%, which held steady into September 2026.
Largest Decline: The Rodriguez Law Group
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
The Rodriguez Law Group fell from 14.7% valid recommendation coverage in July 2026 to 6.9% in September 2026, a decline of 7.8 points based on only 12 qualified recommendations. Rank-one rate fell from 7.3% in July 2026 to 2.3% in September 2026. The bulk of the decline occurred between July and August 2026, from 14.7% to 6.8%, with coverage holding at 6.9% in September 2026.
Category Leader: Spodek Law Group
Spodek Law Group remained the category leader in September 2026 at 21.4% valid recommendation coverage, down from 27.9% in July 2026. The brand also led in top-three rate at 17.9% and rank-one rate at 12.7% in September 2026. While the decline of 6.5 points since baseline stayed within normal variation, coverage did tick up 0.4 points from August 2026 to September 2026, its first increase since July 2026.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Among the leading brands, placement patterns varied. Spodek Law Group converted most of its coverage into top-three and first-position slots, while Kraut Law Group held meaningful coverage with a much lower top-three rate and a small rank-one rate in September 2026.
Brand | Sep 2026 top-three rate | Sep 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Spodek Law Group | 17.9% | 12.7% | 24.3% | 11.8% |
Kraut Law Group | 6.9% | 2.9% | 11.8% | 0.7% |
The Rodriguez Law Group | 6.4% | 2.3% | 11.8% | 7.3% |
Buyer-Intent Distribution
The qualified observations in September 2026 fell into the Brand Recommendation class, which captures discovery and consideration intent.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 136 | 173 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 136 | 173 |
All qualified observations sat in one class in both months. The current public series measures Brand Recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 136 | Spodek Law Group | 27.9% | Baseline month (no prior-period comparison) |
Aug 2026 | 176 | Spodek Law Group | 21.0% | The Rodriguez Law Group, down 7.9 points |
Sep 2026 | 173 | Spodek Law Group | 21.4% | The Rodriguez Law Group, down 7.8 points since baseline |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, or private or sponsored channels. A metric movement alone does not establish causality.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how often brands appear and are recommended across major AI and search surfaces, providing an industry-level view of AI-driven discovery.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
DUI Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Divorce Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Immigration Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read