Stock Tips: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index

Benchmark Summary

Seeking Alpha leads the Stock Tips category by valid recommendation coverage in October 2026 at 14.6%, ahead of Morningstar at 12.9%, a gap of 1.7 percentage points between the top two brands. The largest coverage increase since baseline belongs to The Motley Fool, which moved from 0.0% in July 2026 to 9.9% in October 2026, although coverage contracted from 15.1% in September 2026 to 9.9% in October 2026. The largest decline since baseline belongs to Morningstar, down from 24.0% in July 2026 to 12.9% in October 2026.

October 2026 was a mixed month for AI recommendation visibility in the Stock Tips vertical, with one significant riser and four significant decliners across the baseline-to-current series. The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 425 qualified observations after qualification in October 2026.

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. Keyword variants of AI Overviews and AI Mode are rolled into their parent families and are not counted separately.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Stock Tips

Research Scope and Qualification

Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. For full methodology, see AI Visibility Market Discovery Methodology.

Current Brand Standings

Questions This Section Answers

• Which stock tips brands had the highest valid recommendation coverage in AI answers in October 2026?
• How do presence rate and valid recommendation coverage differ across the top Stock Tips brands in October 2026?

How to Read the Standings

• Presence rate measures how often a brand appears in any qualified AI response, regardless of whether it is recommended.
• Valid recommendation coverage measures how often a brand appears in a qualified shortlist or recommendation-shaped answer. This is the primary metric for this benchmark.
• Top-three rate measures how often a brand is recommended in one of the first three positions when a ranked recommendation is given.
• Rank-one rate measures how often a brand is recommended in the first position.
• Net sentiment reflects the balance of positive and negative mentions across all observations where the brand appears, on a scale from -1.0 to 1.0.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Visibility Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Simply Wall St: Company Position

Questions This Section Answers

• How does Simply Wall St's AI recommendation coverage compare with Seeking Alpha in the October 2026 Stock Tips benchmark?
• Why does Simply Wall St's AI presence rate in the Stock Tips category not translate proportionally into valid recommendation coverage?

Simply Wall St shows a 21.9% presence rate in October 2026, meaning the brand appears in roughly one in five qualified AI responses across the Stock Tips vertical. That presence has not translated into recommendation strength: valid recommendation coverage stands at 3.1%, with a top-three rate of 0.9%, a rank-one rate of 0.2%, and net sentiment of 0.2. Coverage has moved only marginally since baseline, from 2.8% in July 2026 to 3.1% in October 2026, a gain of 0.3 percentage points. The brand's own domain, simplywall.st, was the 8th most-cited domain across the vertical in October 2026, with 178 citations and a 2.8% share.

Seeking Alpha records 14.6% on valid recommendation coverage, while Simply Wall St stands at 3.1%. The more important issue is what that gap means for Simply Wall St's recommendation position: a brand that trails the category leader by 11.5 percentage points on the primary metric is being referenced in AI answers far less often as an actual recommendation than as a passing mention. This is reinforced by the presence-to-recommendation pattern inside the brand's own tier: Simply Wall St's 21.9% presence rate is well above Benzinga's 12.9%, yet Benzinga still edges ahead of Simply Wall St on valid recommendation coverage (3.8% versus 3.1%). Although Simply Wall St may already appear across relevant AI responses, that visibility is currently converting into the stronger commercial outcome less often than brands with substantially less presence. Left unresolved, this is a competitive gap on the category's primary metric, not a sentiment or awareness problem, since Simply Wall St's net sentiment of 0.2 is in line with most of the category.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Why is Simply Wall St's 21.9% presence rate failing to convert into valid recommendation coverage at a rate comparable to, or better than, lower-presence competitors like Benzinga?

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Questions This Section Answers

• Which stock tips brands saw the largest changes in AI recommendation coverage between July and October 2026?
• How did Morningstar's AI recommendation coverage change between July and October 2026?
• How did The Motley Fool's AI recommendation coverage change between July and October 2026?

Largest Increase: The Motley Fool

The Motley Fool's valid recommendation coverage rose from 0.0% in July 2026 to 9.9% in October 2026. The brand first entered the qualified series in September 2026 at 15.1%, then declined to 9.9% in October 2026. Its presence rate in October 2026 was 32.7%, with a top-three rate of 8.9% and a rank-one rate of 6.1%.

Largest Decline: Morningstar

Morningstar's valid recommendation coverage fell from 24.0% in July 2026 to 12.9% in October 2026, a decline of 11.1 percentage points. The brand declined in each of the three months from August 2026 through October 2026. Its presence rate also fell from 57.8% in July 2026 to 36.2% in October 2026, and its top-three rate declined from 14.4% to 7.3% over the same period.

Category Leader: Seeking Alpha

Seeking Alpha leads the category by valid recommendation coverage at 14.6% in October 2026, down from 21.4% in July 2026. The brand declined in each of the three months from August 2026 through October 2026. Its rank-one rate stands at 4.5%, the second-highest in the category after The Motley Fool.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Questions This Section Answers

• Which stock tips brand had the highest rank-one recommendation rate in AI answers in October 2026?
• How do top-three and rank-one recommendation rates differ between Seeking Alpha and The Motley Fool in October 2026?

While Seeking Alpha leads by overall coverage in October 2026, The Motley Fool records the highest rank-one rate at 6.1%, followed by Seeking Alpha at 4.5% and TipRanks at 1.4%.

Close coverage can still hide different first-position rates: The Motley Fool and Seeking Alpha are separated by less than five percentage points in valid recommendation coverage, yet The Motley Fool records the higher rank-one rate while Seeking Alpha holds the higher top-three rate.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

Questions This Section Answers

• Which buyer-intent classes are represented in the Stock Tips AI visibility benchmark and which are not yet measured?

All qualified observations fell into the Brand Recommendation class in both July 2026 and October 2026.

The current public series measures the Brand Recommendation class of discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.

This public benchmark covers the brand-recommendation moment. Paid plans track all 10 buying moments for your company, including pricing, comparisons and alternatives. Compare plans

Historical Measurement Record

Evidence and Source Layer

Questions This Section Answers

• Does a citation in an AI answer prove that the cited source caused the brand recommendation in the Stock Tips benchmark?

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

• This benchmark does not measure market share, revenue, or attributable sales.
• It does not capture every possible AI response, only those collected and qualified in each measurement period.
• It does not measure organic-search ranking or social mention volume.
• It does not include private or sponsored channels.
• It does not establish causality from any metric movement alone.

Top 10 Cited Domains

Questions This Section Answers

• Which domains were most frequently cited in AI answers for the Stock Tips category in October 2026?
• What share of AI citations in the Stock Tips category went to the top 10 domains in October 2026?

Across all AI responses in October 2026, the benchmark recorded 6,249 citations across 741 unique domains.

Citations are broadly distributed: the top 10 domains account for a combined 42.8% of all citations, leaving 57.2% spread across the remaining 731 domains. Six of the top 10 domains belong to tracked brands in this benchmark, including marketbeat.com, tipranks.com, fool.com, zacks.com, morningstar.com, and simplywall.st. The remaining four are third-party finance portals and one video platform. Official brand sites and financial data aggregators dominate the cited sources, with no news outlets, government sites, or review platforms appearing in the top 10.

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Visibility Market Discovery Index measures how often and how prominently brands are recommended across major AI/search surfaces. Each monthly measurement uses a consistent prompt set and qualification process to produce comparable industry-level benchmarks.

• AI Visibility Market Discovery Methodology
• AI Visibility Market Discovery Metric Definitions
• AI Visibility Market Discovery Research Standards
• Modeled AI Visibility Authority Value

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.

Get my free AI Company Index