TV Streaming Services: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend tv streaming services. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Category Leader: Hulu
- 08Riser: Netflix
- 09Riser: YouTube TV
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
The TV Streaming Services category was quiet in September 2026, with no tracked brand moving beyond normal month-to-month variation. Hulu continued as the coverage leader with 37.1% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026, down from 40.6% in July 2026. The gap to the next brand, YouTube TV, narrowed to 3.6 points, with YouTube TV at 33.5% in September 2026, up from 29.8% in July 2026. The largest coverage increases over the full series belonged to Netflix, which moved to 26.5% in September 2026 from 22.3% in July 2026, and YouTube TV, which moved to 33.5% from 29.8%. The largest coverage decline was Hulu, which moved to 37.1% in September 2026 from 40.6% in July 2026. Category-wide, the benchmark described September 2026 as a quiet month.
Across the three-month series, several brands moved consistently even though no single month crossed the significance threshold. Netflix rose in valid recommendation coverage in each month since July 2026 (22.3% in July 2026, 25.2% in August 2026, 26.5% in September 2026). Disney+ declined in each of the two months since July 2026 (29.7% to 28.8% to 27.6%). The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 728 qualified observations in September 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Sep 2026
- Hulu37.1%
- YouTube TV33.5%
- HBO Max28.8%
- Disney+27.6%
- Amazon Prime Video27.2%
- Netflix26.5%
- Peacock25.0%
- Paramount+24.3%
- Sling TV24.2%
- Apple TV+23.8%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 727 | 728 | Up 1 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 21.0% | 20.3% | Down 0.7 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 33.8% | 34.1% | Up 0.3 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Hulu | Hulu | No change |
Qualified surface breadth refers to the number of canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation. The six canonical families are ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. August 2026 recorded 697 qualified observations and a recommendation-shaped answer share of 19.7%, the middle point of the series.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending TV Streaming Services
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompts collected across surfaces |
Unique questions | 573 | 587 | Distinct questions after de-duplication |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts mentioning at least one tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 783 | 767 | Prompts relevant to the category |
Irrelevant observations | 17 | 33 | Prompts not relevant to the category |
Qualified benchmark observations | 727 | 728 | Public denominator after all qualification |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See AI Market Discovery Methodology.
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hulu | 98.2% | 37.1% | 12.4% | 2.2% | 0.48 |
YouTube TV | 82.7% | 33.5% | 9.9% | 7.7% | 0.51 |
HBO Max | 85.0% | 28.9% | 14.6% | 3.4% | 0.42 |
Disney+ | 89.6% | 27.6% | 13.3% | 2.2% | 0.39 |
Amazon Prime Video | 82.4% | 27.2% | 9.8% | 2.9% | 0.45 |
Netflix | 92.9% | 26.5% | 17.7% | 16.4% | 0.34 |
Peacock | 82.4% | 25.0% | 2.5% | 1.1% | 0.39 |
Paramount+ | 81.5% | 24.3% | 2.6% | 0.5% | 0.40 |
Sling TV | 67.6% | 24.2% | 2.1% | 0.1% | 0.46 |
Apple TV+ | 73.8% | 23.8% | 5.8% | 0.1% | 0.45 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned at all.
- Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a valid recommendation, the primary benchmark metric.
- Top-three rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is recommended in the top three positions.
- Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is recommended first.
- Net sentiment: positive minus negative mention share.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Hulu | 40.6% | 37.1% | Down 3.5 points |
YouTube TV | 29.8% | 33.5% | Up 3.7 points |
HBO Max | 28.9% | 28.9% | No change |
Disney+ | 29.7% | 27.6% | Down 2.1 points |
Amazon Prime Video | 26.3% | 27.2% | Up 0.9 points |
Netflix | 22.3% | 26.5% | Up 4.2 points |
Peacock | 28.2% | 25.0% | Down 3.2 points |
Paramount+ | 26.1% | 24.3% | Down 1.8 points |
Sling TV | 25.0% | 24.2% | Down 0.8 points |
Apple TV+ | 25.7% | 23.8% | Down 1.9 points |
August 2026 sat at the midpoint of the three-month series. Peacock moved to 25.0% in September 2026 from 28.4% in August 2026. Paramount+ moved to 24.3% in September 2026 from 27.0% in August 2026. YouTube TV moved to 33.5% in September 2026 from 30.7% in August 2026, extending its two-month upward pattern in valid recommendation coverage.
Category Leader: Hulu
Hulu remained the category leader with 37.1% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026, down from 40.6% in July 2026. This movement was within normal month-to-month variation. Hulu's wide lead over the rest of the category compressed from 10.8 points over YouTube TV in July 2026 to 3.6 points by September 2026.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Riser: Netflix
Netflix recorded the largest cumulative gain of the series, rising 4.2 points to 26.5% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026 from 22.3% in July 2026. The brand moved up in every month of the series (22.3% in July 2026, 25.2% in August 2026, 26.5% in September 2026). Netflix also carried the strongest rank-one rate in the category at 16.4% in September 2026, up from 12.7% in July 2026, and its top-three rate of 17.7% led all brands.
Riser: YouTube TV
YouTube TV rose to 33.5% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026 from 29.8% in July 2026, up 3.7 points, with gains in each month of the series. Its presence rate moved to 82.7% in September 2026 from 76.5% in July 2026, up 6.2 points. YouTube TV's net sentiment was the highest in the category at 0.51 in September 2026.
Coverage declines were spread across several stable brands. Peacock moved to 25.0% in September 2026 from 28.2% in July 2026. Disney+ moved to 27.6% in September 2026 from 29.7% in July 2026, with its rank-one rate moving to 2.2% from 4.7%. Hulu's top-three rate and rank-one rate also moved down over the same period, to 12.4% and 2.2% respectively from 16.8% and 4.4% in July 2026. Amazon Prime Video, Apple TV+, HBO Max, Sling TV, and Paramount+ all remained within normal month-to-month variation across the series.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Netflix presents a striking contrast: its 26.5% valid recommendation coverage ranked sixth in the category, yet its 16.4% rank-one rate was by far the highest, more than double the next brand. Hulu's 37.1% coverage lead came with a 12.4% top-three rate and a 2.2% rank-one rate in September 2026. HBO Max's 28.9% coverage came with a 14.6% top-three rate, the second highest in the category.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Brand | Sep 2026 top-three rate | Sep 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Netflix | 17.7% | 16.4% | 15.5% | 12.7% |
HBO Max | 14.6% | 3.4% | 13.9% | 3.2% |
Disney+ | 13.3% | 2.2% | 16.6% | 4.7% |
Similar coverage levels can still hide very different first-position rates. Netflix's 26.5% coverage produced a 16.4% rank-one rate, while Paramount+'s comparable 24.3% coverage produced a 0.5% rank-one rate.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in the series fell into the Brand Recommendation class.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 727 | 728 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 727 | 728 |
The current public series measures brand-recommendation discovery only and does not yet contain qualified observations in the pricing or comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 727 | Hulu | 40.6% | Amazon Prime Video up 0.9 points |
Aug 2026 | 697 | Hulu | 34.7% | Hulu down 5.9 points |
Sep 2026 | 728 | Hulu | 37.1% | Netflix up 4.2 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, or private or sponsored channels. A movement in a metric alone does not establish causality.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index is a neutral, recurring measurement of how AI and search surfaces mention and recommend brands within a category. It is built from prompt-level observations across six canonical AI/search surface families.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper and identify the prompts, competitors, or sources causing the result.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Vitamins and Dietary Supplements: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
VA Loans Lenders: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Prestige Makeup Brands: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read