Roofing Companies: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend roofing companies. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Increase: CertainTeed
- 08Largest Decline: DECRA
- 09Category Leader: GAF
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
GAF leads the Roofing Companies index with 54.5% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026, up from 48.4% in July 2026. Owens Corning holds the second position at 54.4% in September 2026, a gap of 0.1 points behind GAF.
The largest coverage increase from baseline to current came from CertainTeed, which rose to 52.1% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026, up from 44.1% in July 2026, a gain of 8.0 points — the largest among tracked brands. Malarkey also recorded a substantial gain, reaching 42.7% in September 2026, up from 35.1% in July 2026, a gain of 7.6 points. The largest coverage decline was DECRA, which fell to 0.0% in September 2026, down from 0.9% in July 2026.
Five brands recorded significant rises from baseline to current: Atlas Roofing, CertainTeed, GAF, Malarkey, and Owens Corning. DECRA was the sole significant decliner. GAF has risen in each of the two months since July 2026, moving from 48.4% in July 2026 to 54.5% in September 2026. Owens Corning likewise rose in each month, from 47.6% to 54.4% over the same span.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 539 qualified observations in September 2026 after qualification, up from 533 in July 2026.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Sep 2026
- GAF54.5%
- Owens Corning54.4%
- CertainTeed52.1%
- Malarkey42.7%
- Atlas Roofing27.5%
- IKO11.9%
- TAMKO10.6%
- Erie Home2.6%
- Power Home Remodeling2.4%
- **CertainTeed0.0%
- **Malarkey0.0%
- DECRA0.0%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 533 | 539 | Up |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 24.0% | 26.2% | Up 2.2 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 48.0% | 57.7% | Up 9.7 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | GAF (48.4%) | GAF (54.5%) | Leader held |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. The benchmark recorded observations on Grok in August 2026; Grok observations are tracked separately and are not counted toward the six-family qualified surface breadth calculation.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Roofing Companies
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompts collected across AI/search surfaces |
Unique questions | 455 | 492 | Distinct questions after deduplication |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts mentioning at least one tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 783 | 784 | Prompts relevant to the benchmark scope |
Irrelevant observations | 17 | 16 | Prompts outside the benchmark scope |
Qualified benchmark observations | 533 | 539 | Public denominator for brand-level metrics |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Market Discovery Methodology
Current Brand Standings
This table is the primary current-month benchmark view.
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAF | 97.8% | 54.5% | 44.3% | 24.1% | 0.66 |
Owens Corning | 94.2% | 54.4% | 42.3% | 11.3% | 0.66 |
CertainTeed | 88.7% | 52.1% | 40.1% | 9.5% | 0.65 |
Malarkey | 53.2% | 42.7% | 4.1% | 0.7% | 0.87 |
Atlas Roofing | 38.6% | 27.5% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.77 |
IKO | 32.5% | 11.9% | 1.1% | 0.2% | 0.46 |
TAMKO | 31.9% | 10.6% | 2.2% | 0.7% | 0.38 |
Erie Home | 4.3% | 2.6% | 1.1% | 0.7% | 0.70 |
Power Home Remodeling | 3.7% | 2.4% | 1.1% | 0.2% | 0.70 |
DECRA | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.25 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned in the AI response.
- Valid recommendation coverage: Share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist.
- Top-three rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the first three recommendation positions.
- Rank-one rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand is the first recommendation.
- Net sentiment: Positive minus negative mention sentiment, scaled by total mentions.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Atlas Roofing | 20.4% | 27.5% | Up 7.1 points |
CertainTeed | 44.1% | 52.1% | Up 8.0 points |
DECRA | 0.9% | 0.0% | Down 0.9 points |
Erie Home | 2.6% | 2.6% | No change |
GAF | 48.4% | 54.5% | Up 6.1 points |
IKO | 12.0% | 11.9% | Down 0.1 points |
Malarkey | 35.1% | 42.7% | Up 7.6 points |
Owens Corning | 47.6% | 54.4% | Up 6.8 points |
Power Home Remodeling | 2.8% | 2.4% | Down 0.4 points |
TAMKO | 10.1% | 10.6% | Up 0.5 points |
Largest Increase: CertainTeed
CertainTeed recorded valid recommendation coverage of 52.1% in September 2026, up from 44.1% in July 2026, a gain of 8.0 points from baseline — the largest among tracked brands. The brand appeared in 281 valid recommendation shortlists out of 539 qualified observations in September 2026, compared with 235 out of 533 in July 2026. CertainTeed's presence rate moved from 87.1% to 88.7% over the same span.
Largest Decline: DECRA
DECRA recorded valid recommendation coverage of 0.0% in September 2026, down from 0.9% in July 2026. The brand appeared in 0 valid recommendation shortlists out of 539 qualified observations in September 2026, compared with 5 out of 533 in July 2026. DECRA's presence rate fell from 3.2% to 0.7% over the same span, and its recommendation coverage declined in each of the two months since July 2026.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Category Leader: GAF
GAF leads the index with 54.5% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026, up from 48.4% in July 2026. GAF appeared in a valid recommendation shortlist in 294 qualified observations in September 2026. Owens Corning holds the second position at 54.4%, a gap of 0.1 points behind the leader.
Note that CertainTeed and Malarkey each recorded 0.0% valid recommendation coverage in August 2026 before recovering to 52.1% and 42.7% respectively in September 2026. Their mid-series readings of 0.0% in August 2026 were followed by full recovery to levels above their July 2026 baselines.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Among the leading brands in September 2026, GAF held the highest rank-one rate at 24.1%, while Owens Corning recorded 11.3% and CertainTeed recorded 9.5%.
Brand | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate | Sep 2026 top-three rate | Sep 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GAF | 42.8% | 28.7% | 44.3% | 24.1% |
Owens Corning | 40.9% | 7.1% | 42.3% | 11.3% |
CertainTeed | 38.3% | 7.5% | 40.1% | 9.5% |
Similar coverage can still hide different first-position rates: GAF and Owens Corning stand close on coverage in September 2026 at 54.5% and 54.4%, but they differ by 12.8 points in rank-one rate at 24.1% versus 11.3%.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
In both July and September 2026, all qualified observations fell into the Brand Recommendation class.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 533 | 539 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 533 | 539 |
The current public series measures Brand Recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes. Price, value, and head-to-head comparison have no public signal in this data.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 533 | GAF | 48.4% | GAF up 48.4% from zero baseline |
Aug 2026 | 610 | GAF / Owens Corning | 51.6% | CertainTeed down 44.1 points |
Sep 2026 | 539 | GAF | 54.5% | Malarkey up 42.7 points from August 2026 |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure:
- Market share or sales attribution
- Every possible AI response to a given query
- Organic-search ranking positions
- Social mention volume
- Private or sponsored channels (for example, brand-specific apps or paid placements)
- Causality from a metric movement alone
A single monthly movement should not yet be treated as a trend on its own. The current dataset cannot answer pricing or head-to-head comparison questions.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how AI search and chat surfaces discover, evaluate, and recommend brands in a category. Each monthly measurement follows the same research protocol so category-level standings are comparable over time.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper, showing how your brand appears across specific AI surfaces, geographies, and question types, with actionable steps to improve presence and recommendation rates.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Moving Container Companies: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Life Insurance Companies: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Credit Card Processing Companies: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read