Recruiting Agencies: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend recruiting agencies. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Decline: Robert Half
- 08Additional Declines: Randstad, Adecco, and Korn Ferry
- 09Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 10Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 11Historical Measurement Record
- 12Evidence and Source Layer
Benchmark Summary
The Recruiting Agencies benchmark recorded a decline across all ten tracked brands in August 2026. Every brand's valid recommendation coverage fell to 0.0%, down from baseline levels that ranged from 19.4% to 46.8% in July 2026. In July 2026, Robert Half led the category with 46.8% valid recommendation coverage, ahead of Randstad at 38.2% and Adecco at 35.9%. In August 2026, none of the ten tracked brands registered a measurable presence, recommendation, or sentiment signal across the qualified observations.
The largest coverage decline belonged to Robert Half, falling from 46.8% in July 2026 to 0.0% in August 2026, a drop of 46.8 points. Randstad declined the next most, from 38.2% to 0.0% over the same period, followed by Adecco (35.9% to 0.0%) and Korn Ferry (31.7% to 0.0%). Every tracked brand moved to 0.0% in August 2026, so no brand held recommendation coverage this month.
The benchmark began with 792 prompt-surface observations in July 2026 and 791 in August 2026, producing 521 and 579 qualified observations respectively after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026
- Adecco-35.9% · beyond normal variationJul 202635.9%Aug 20260.0%
- Aerotek-24.8% · beyond normal variationJul 202624.8%Aug 20260.0%
- Heidrick & Struggles-19.8% · beyond normal variationJul 202619.8%Aug 20260.0%
- Insight Global-28.0% · beyond normal variationJul 202628.0%Aug 20260.0%
- Kelly Services-19.4% · beyond normal variationJul 202619.4%Aug 20260.0%
- Korn Ferry-31.7% · beyond normal variationJul 202631.7%Aug 20260.0%
- ManpowerGroup-24.6% · beyond normal variationJul 202624.6%Aug 20260.0%
- Randstad-38.2% · beyond normal variationJul 202638.2%Aug 20260.0%
- Robert Half-46.8% · beyond normal variationJul 202646.8%Aug 20260.0%
- Spencer Stuart-21.5% · beyond normal variationJul 202621.5%Aug 20260.0%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 521 | 579 | Up 58 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 32.1% | 0.0% | Down 32.1 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 56.0% | 0.0% | Down 56.0 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Robert Half | None | N/A |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI surface families (ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode) with at least one qualified observation. All six families were present in both months.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Recruiting Agencies
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection size.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 792 | 791 | Raw prompt-surface collection |
Unique questions | 514 | 551 | Distinct questions asked |
Brand / competitor mentions | 791 | 791 | Prompts mentioning at least one brand |
Relevant observations | 570 | 676 | On-topic observations retained |
Irrelevant observations | 221 | 115 | Off-topic observations excluded |
Qualified benchmark observations | 521 | 579 | Public benchmark denominator |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
For full methodology, see AI Market Discovery Methodology.
Current Brand Standings
In August 2026, none of the ten tracked brands registered measurable presence, recommendation coverage, or sentiment signals. The table below reflects the current-month benchmark view, sorted by valid recommendation coverage.
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adecco | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Aerotek | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Heidrick & Struggles | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Insight Global | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Kelly Services | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Korn Ferry | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
ManpowerGroup | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Randstad | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Robert Half | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Spencer Stuart | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: share of qualified observations in which the brand is mentioned at all.
- Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations in which the brand receives a valid recommendation.
- Top-three rate: share of qualified observations in which the brand appears in the top three recommended positions.
- Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations in which the brand is the first recommendation.
- Net sentiment: positive minus negative sentiment among mentions, on a scale from -1 to 1.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Adecco | 35.9% | 0.0% | Down 35.9 points |
Aerotek | 24.8% | 0.0% | Down 24.8 points |
Heidrick & Struggles | 19.8% | 0.0% | Down 19.8 points |
Insight Global | 28.0% | 0.0% | Down 28.0 points |
Kelly Services | 19.4% | 0.0% | Down 19.4 points |
Korn Ferry | 31.7% | 0.0% | Down 31.7 points |
ManpowerGroup | 24.6% | 0.0% | Down 24.6 points |
Randstad | 38.2% | 0.0% | Down 38.2 points |
Robert Half | 46.8% | 0.0% | Down 46.8 points |
Spencer Stuart | 21.5% | 0.0% | Down 21.5 points |
Every tracked brand declined in August 2026. All ten brands are classified as decliners this month, with no riser recorded in the category. Because the shift affects every tracked brand in the same direction and by a similar magnitude, it is best read as a difference in the measured output distribution for this vertical rather than as a story about any single brand losing ground to a competitor.
Largest Decline: Robert Half
Robert Half's valid recommendation coverage fell from 46.8% in July 2026 to 0.0% in August 2026, a drop of 46.8 points. This was the largest single-month decline among all tracked brands. Presence rate fell from 70.6% to 0.0% and top-three rate fell from 30.9% to 0.0% over the same period.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Additional Declines: Randstad, Adecco, and Korn Ferry
Randstad declined from 38.2% to 0.0% (down 38.2 points). Adecco fell from 35.9% to 0.0% (down 35.9 points). Korn Ferry declined from 31.7% to 0.0% (down 31.7 points). These three brands, along with every other tracked brand, moved to zero valid recommendation coverage in August 2026.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The table below tracks top-three and rank-one placement for the two brands with the largest July 2026 coverage.
Brand | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Aug 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate | Aug 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robert Half | 30.9% | 0.0% | 22.1% | 0.0% |
Randstad | 15.7% | 0.0% | 5.4% | 0.0% |
Close coverage can still hide different first-position rates. In July 2026, Randstad's 38.2% coverage produced a 15.7% top-three rate and a 5.4% rank-one rate, while Robert Half's higher coverage produced a 30.9% top-three rate and a 22.1% rank-one rate. In August 2026, no brand registered any measurable top-three or rank-one placement.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
In both July and August 2026, all qualified observations fell into the Brand Recommendation class.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 521 | 579 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 521 | 579 |
The current public series measures Brand Recommendation discovery exclusively and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 521 | Robert Half | 46.8% | N/A (baseline) |
Aug 2026 | 579 | None | 0.0% | Robert Half, down 46.8 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
In August 2026, the qualified observations did not surface any brand-level recommendation signal for any tracked brand. Within the current dataset, that outcome reflects a difference in the measured output distribution, not a confirmed cause. The benchmark cannot distinguish platform behavior from measurement effects, and the data does not establish why every brand's recommendation signal moved to zero in the same month.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure:
- Market share or sales attributable to AI-driven discovery
- Every possible AI response, only the sampled prompt-surface combinations
- Organic-search ranking or social mention volume
- Private or sponsored channels
- Causality from a metric movement alone
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how often brands are present and recommended across leading AI search and assistant surfaces. Each month, the benchmark publishes category-level standings based on qualified prompt-surface observations.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Staffing Agencies: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Debt Collection Agencies: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Digital Marketing Agencies: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read