Professional Liability Insurance: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend professional liability insurance. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Increase: The Hartford
- 08Largest Decline: Progressive Commercial
- 09Category Leader: The Hartford
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
The Hartford led the Professional Liability Insurance benchmark in August 2026 with valid recommendation coverage of 82.8%, up from 77.2% in July 2026. The gap to the next brand, Next Insurance, widened to 9.8 percentage points in August 2026, compared with 6.7 percentage points in July 2026.
The largest coverage increase among tracked brands was The Hartford, rising from 77.2% in July 2026 to 82.8% in August 2026. The largest coverage decline was Progressive Commercial, falling from 47.2% in July 2026 to 40.8% in August 2026. CNA also declined significantly, moving from 4.5% in July 2026 to 0.0% in August 2026, and was replaced in the tracking set by CNA Surety, which entered at 3.2%.
This was a month of mixed movement across the benchmark. The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 491 qualified observations in July 2026 and 493 in August 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026
- The Hartford+5.6% · beyond normal variationJul 202677.2%Aug 202682.8%
- Next Insurance+2.5%Jul 202670.5%Aug 202673.0%
- Hiscox-2.7%Jul 202662.3%Aug 202659.6%
- Progressive Commercial-6.4% · beyond normal variationJul 202647.2%Aug 202640.8%
- Thimble+0.3%Jul 202640.5%Aug 202640.8%
- biBERK+4.0%Jul 202635.0%Aug 202639.0%
- Chubb-1.1%Jul 202635.2%Aug 202634.1%
- Travelers+0.1%Jul 202629.7%Aug 202629.8%
- CNA Surety+3.2% · beyond normal variationJul 20260.0%Aug 20263.2%
- Embroker+0.6%Jul 20260.0%Aug 20260.6%
- CNA-4.5% · beyond normal variationJul 20264.5%Aug 20260.0%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 491 | 493 | Up 2 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 44.2% | 56.4% | Up 12.2 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 81.5% | 81.9% | Up 0.4 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | The Hartford | The Hartford | No change |
Qualified surface breadth counts the AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Professional Liability Insurance
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. The table below shows how raw prompt-surface observations were filtered to the qualified set.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompts collected across AI/search surfaces |
Unique questions | 450 | 507 | Distinct questions after de-duplication |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts mentioning at least one tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 519 | 525 | Prompts relevant to the vertical |
Irrelevant observations | 281 | 275 | Prompts not relevant to the vertical |
Qualified benchmark observations | 491 | 493 | Public denominator for brand metrics |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Market Discovery Methodology for full details.
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Hartford | 94.9% | 82.8% | 64.1% | 40.2% | 0.88 |
Next Insurance | 80.5% | 73.0% | 55.4% | 20.9% | 0.91 |
Hiscox | 67.3% | 59.6% | 34.9% | 3.6% | 0.89 |
Progressive Commercial | 54.0% | 40.8% | 14.2% | 2.6% | 0.76 |
Thimble | 46.0% | 40.8% | 17.2% | 2.6% | 0.89 |
biBERK | 44.2% | 38.9% | 14.8% | 0.4% | 0.90 |
Chubb | 41.4% | 34.1% | 12.8% | 3.5% | 0.83 |
Travelers | 36.1% | 29.8% | 10.9% | 2.4% | 0.83 |
CNA Surety | 4.9% | 3.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.67 |
Embroker | 0.8% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.75 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate is the share of qualified observations in which the brand is mentioned.
- Valid recommendation coverage is the share of qualified observations in which the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist.
- Top-three rate is the share of qualified observations in which the brand appears in the first three positions of a recommendation.
- Rank-one rate is the share of qualified observations in which the brand is the first recommendation.
- Net sentiment is the balance of positive over negative mentions, from 0 to 1.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
The Hartford | 77.2% | 82.8% | Up 5.6 points |
Next Insurance | 70.5% | 73.0% | Up 2.5 points |
Hiscox | 62.3% | 59.6% | Down 2.7 points |
Progressive Commercial | 47.2% | 40.8% | Down 6.4 points |
Thimble | 40.5% | 40.8% | Up 0.3 points |
biBERK | 35.0% | 38.9% | Up 3.9 points |
Chubb | 35.2% | 34.1% | Down 1.1 points |
Travelers | 29.7% | 29.8% | Up 0.1 points |
CNA | 4.5% | 0.0% | Down 4.5 points |
CNA Surety | 0.0% | 3.2% | Up 3.2 points |
Embroker | 0.0% | 0.6% | Up 0.6 points |
Largest Increase: The Hartford
The Hartford's valid recommendation coverage rose from 77.2% in July 2026 to 82.8% in August 2026, a gain of 5.6 percentage points. This was the largest increase in the benchmark. The Hartford also led all brands on presence rate, at 94.9% in August 2026, up from 93.7% in July 2026, and held the highest top-three rate at 64.1%, up from 60.3%.
Largest Decline: Progressive Commercial
Progressive Commercial's valid recommendation coverage fell by 6.4 percentage points, from 47.2% to 40.8%. Presence rate also declined, from 60.5% to 54.0%. The brand remained in the middle of the field but moved closer to Thimble, which held steady at 40.8%.
Category Leader: The Hartford
The Hartford's lead over Next Insurance widened from 6.7 to 9.8 percentage points in August 2026. The Hartford also led on rank-one rate, appearing first in 40.2% of qualified observations in August 2026, up from 38.1% in July 2026.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Among the three leading brands, The Hartford held the strongest placement: a 64.1% top-three rate and a 40.2% rank-one rate in August 2026. Next Insurance showed a 55.4% top-three rate and a 20.9% rank-one rate, while Hiscox recorded a 34.9% top-three rate and a 3.6% rank-one rate.
Brand | Aug 2026 top-three rate | Aug 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
The Hartford | 64.1% | 40.2% | 60.3% | 38.1% |
Next Insurance | 55.4% | 20.9% | 48.5% | 18.7% |
Hiscox | 34.9% | 3.6% | 33.4% | 3.3% |
Despite similar coverage levels, brands can differ sharply in how often they appear in the first position. Hiscox and Next Insurance had very different rank-one rates at 3.6% and 20.9%, respectively, even though their coverage gaps were smaller.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class of discovery.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 491 | 493 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 491 | 493 |
The current public series measures Brand Recommendation discovery only and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 491 | The Hartford | 77.2% | The Hartford, up 5.6 points |
Aug 2026 | 493 | The Hartford | 82.8% | The Hartford, up 5.6 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure:
- Market share, sales, or revenue attributable to any brand
- Every possible AI response to every possible query
- Organic-search ranking performance
- Social media mention volume or engagement
- Private or sponsored channels, including gated or authenticated AI experiences
- Causality from a metric movement alone; the benchmark records the change, not the reason for it
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index is a neutral, repeatable industry benchmark that tracks how brands appear in AI-generated answers and recommendation surfaces across six canonical AI/search families. Each month, a fixed set of prompt-surface observations is collected, qualified, and scored for presence, recommendation coverage, placement, and sentiment.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Product Liability Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Mortgage Industry Professional Associations: AI Market Discovery Index — August 2026
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Umbrella Insurance: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read