Outdoor Apparel and Technical Outfits: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend outdoor apparel and technical outfits. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since August 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Increase: REI
- 08Largest Decline: Marmot
- 09Category Leader: Patagonia
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
Patagonia led all tracked brands in valid recommendation coverage in September 2026 at 75.4%, ahead of Arc'teryx at 69.7%, a gap of 5.7 points. The largest coverage increase came from REI, which moved from a reconstructed baseline of 0.0% in August 2026 to 62.4% in September 2026, reflecting a brand-name tracking change from REI Co-op. The largest coverage decline came from Marmot, moving from 28.2% in August 2026 to 22.0% in September 2026, a drop of 6.2 points.
The month was mixed overall, with significant movement in both directions. Beyond Marmot, other notable declines came from Arc'teryx (75.5% to 69.7%), Patagonia (80.8% to 75.4%), Outdoor Research (60.3% to 54.3%), and Mountain Hardwear (36.5% to 31.2%). REI Co-op, which is not part of the September 2026 tracked set after the brand-name transition, moved from 67.1% coverage in August 2026 to 0.0% in the baseline comparison.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 702 qualified observations in August 2026 and 696 in September 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Aug 2026 to Sep 2026
- Patagonia-5.4% · beyond normal variationAug 202680.8%Sep 202675.4%
- Arc'teryx-5.8% · beyond normal variationAug 202675.5%Sep 202669.7%
- REI+62.4% · beyond normal variationAug 20260.0%Sep 202662.4%
- Outdoor Research-6.0% · beyond normal variationAug 202660.3%Sep 202654.3%
- The North Face-4.1%Aug 202656.3%Sep 202652.2%
- Columbia Sportswear-3.7%Aug 202646.4%Sep 202642.7%
- Mountain Hardwear-5.3% · beyond normal variationAug 202636.5%Sep 202631.2%
- Black Diamond-2.1%Aug 202626.5%Sep 202624.4%
- Marmot-6.2% · beyond normal variationAug 202628.2%Sep 202622.0%
- KÜHL-1.3%Aug 202615.8%Sep 202614.5%
- REI Co-op-67.1% · beyond normal variationAug 202667.1%Sep 20260.0%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Aug 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 702 | 696 | Down 6 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 49.4% | 46.8% | Down 2.6 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 84.6% | 77.3% | Down 7.3 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Patagonia (80.8%) | Patagonia (75.4%) | No change |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All six families were represented in both months.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Outdoor Apparel and Technical Outfits
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. The funnel below shows how observations were qualified.
Research stage | Aug 2026 | Sep 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompts collected across AI surfaces |
Unique questions | 634 | 628 | Distinct questions after deduplication |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts naming at least one tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 789 | 786 | On-topic for the vertical |
Irrelevant observations | 11 | 14 | Off-topic and excluded |
Qualified benchmark observations | 702 | 696 | Public denominator after all exclusions |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Market Discovery Methodology for full details.
Current Brand Standings
This table is the primary current-month benchmark view for September 2026, sorted by valid recommendation coverage.
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patagonia | 98.3% | 75.4% | 64.1% | 49.9% | 0.89 |
Arc'teryx | 92.0% | 69.7% | 50.3% | 9.8% | 0.88 |
REI | 82.9% | 62.4% | 19.1% | 1.4% | 0.85 |
Outdoor Research | 71.8% | 54.3% | 16.1% | 4.0% | 0.88 |
The North Face | 78.0% | 52.2% | 15.8% | 1.7% | 0.80 |
Columbia Sportswear | 66.2% | 42.7% | 12.6% | 0.6% | 0.79 |
Mountain Hardwear | 48.1% | 31.2% | 9.3% | 1.0% | 0.81 |
Black Diamond | 33.8% | 24.4% | 9.3% | 0.7% | 0.86 |
Marmot | 40.2% | 22.0% | 3.0% | 0.4% | 0.65 |
KÜHL | 29.0% | 14.5% | 2.0% | 0.0% | 0.65 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate is the share of qualified observations in which the brand is mentioned at all, regardless of recommendation status.
- Valid recommendation coverage is the share of qualified observations in which the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist.
- Top-three rate is the share of qualified observations in which the brand appears among the top three recommended options.
- Rank-one rate is the share of qualified observations in which the brand is the first recommended option.
- Net sentiment is the balance of positive over negative mentions among observations where the brand appears.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Aug 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Arc'teryx | 75.5% | 69.7% | Down 5.8 points |
Black Diamond | 26.5% | 24.4% | Down 2.1 points |
Columbia Sportswear | 46.4% | 42.7% | Down 3.7 points |
KÜHL | 15.8% | 14.5% | Down 1.3 points |
Marmot | 28.2% | 22.0% | Down 6.2 points |
Mountain Hardwear | 36.5% | 31.2% | Down 5.3 points |
Outdoor Research | 60.3% | 54.3% | Down 6.0 points |
Patagonia | 80.8% | 75.4% | Down 5.4 points |
REI | 0.0% | 62.4% | Up 62.4 points |
REI Co-op | 67.1% | 0.0% | Down 67.1 points |
The North Face | 56.3% | 52.2% | Down 4.1 points |
Largest Increase: REI
REI appears in the September 2026 tracked set following a brand-name transition from REI Co-op. Its valid recommendation coverage was 62.4% in September 2026, with presence at 82.9% and a top-three rate of 19.1% across 434 valid recommendation observations. The baseline comparison of 0.0% reflects the tracking change rather than an absence of brand activity in August 2026.
Largest Decline: Marmot
Marmot declined from 28.2% in August 2026 to 22.0% in September 2026, a drop of 6.2 percentage points that moved beyond normal month-to-month variation. Presence slipped modestly from 42.6% to 40.2%, while the top-three rate ticked up from 2.7% to 3.0%, meaning the decline was concentrated in lower-ranked or non-shortlist mentions rather than top placements. The brand recorded 153 valid recommendation observations in September 2026.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Category Leader: Patagonia
Patagonia remained the category leader for valid recommendation coverage in September 2026 at 75.4%, down from 80.8% in August 2026. The decrease of 5.4 points moved beyond normal variation. Patagonia's presence rate edged up from 96.9% to 98.3%, and its rank-one rate rose from 47.9% to 49.9%, indicating that even as overall shortlist coverage narrowed, first-position recommendations strengthened. The brand recorded 525 valid recommendation observations in September 2026.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The top three brands by valid recommendation coverage show distinct placement profiles.
Brand | Sep 2026 top-three rate | Sep 2026 rank-one rate | Aug 2026 top-three rate | Aug 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Patagonia | 64.1% | 49.9% | 66.0% | 47.9% |
Arc'teryx | 50.3% | 9.8% | 54.4% | 12.8% |
REI | 19.1% | 1.4% | n/a | n/a |
Patagonia and Arc'teryx both appear in the top three in the majority of their recommendation appearances, but Patagonia is named first in 49.9% of observations versus 9.8% for Arc'teryx. Close coverage totals can still hide very different first-position rates. REI's September 2026 placements cannot be compared against an August baseline under the same brand tracking.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All 702 qualified observations in August 2026 and all 696 in September 2026 fell into the Brand Recommendation class, where the AI response recommends one or more specific brands.
Buyer-intent class | Aug 2026 | Sep 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 702 | 696 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 702 | 696 |
The current public series measures brand-recommendation discovery only and does not yet contain qualified observations in the pricing or multi-brand comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 2026 | 702 | Patagonia | 80.8% | REI Co-op baseline entry |
Sep 2026 | 696 | Patagonia | 75.4% | REI up 62.4 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Each observation preserves the full context needed to understand how and why a brand appeared in an AI response. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, or the full universe of possible AI responses. It does not capture organic-search ranking, social mention volume, or private and sponsored channels such as branded plugins or paid placements inside AI assistants. Observations reflect what public-facing AI surfaces returned at the time of collection. A movement in any single metric does not, by itself, establish a causal explanation.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index is an independent, neutral industry benchmark that tracks how often and how prominently brands appear in AI-generated discovery responses across major AI and search surfaces. It is published monthly with consistent methodology so that changes over time are comparable.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper, examining how your brand appears across AI surfaces relative to the specific queries and contexts most relevant to your market.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Outdoor Retail and Gear Marketplaces: AI Market Discovery Index
A benchmark of how AI platforms compare and recommend outdoor retailers, gear marketplaces, and shopping destinations across outdoor buying prompts.
ReadIndustry Reports
Kids and Family Graphic Apparel: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Camp Cooking, Grills and Outdoor: AI Market Discovery Index
A public benchmark of AI recommendation patterns across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, Google AI Overviews, and commerce AI systems.
Read