Money Transfer Fintech: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend money transfer fintech. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Decline: Revolut
- 08Category Leader: BookMyForex
- 09Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 10Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 11Historical Measurement Record
- 12Evidence and Source Layer
Benchmark Summary
BookMyForex leads the Money Transfer Fintech AI Market Discovery Index with valid recommendation coverage of 50.4% in August 2026, up slightly from 50.3% in July 2026. Wise follows at 47.3%, down from 52.8% in July 2026, leaving a 3.1 percentage point gap between the two leaders.
The largest coverage increase belongs to ExTravelMoney, which rose to 12.7% in August 2026 from 9.6% in July 2026. The largest coverage decline belongs to Revolut, which fell to 14.3% in August 2026 from 19.4% in July 2026.
Wise's 5.5 point drop came despite its size. Revolut's decline went beyond normal month-to-month variation. BookMyForex, ExTravelMoney, Instarem, moneyHOP, Niyo, and Wise remained within normal variation this month.
The benchmark produced 567 qualified observations in August 2026, up from 509 in July 2026.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026
- BookMyForex+0.1%Jul 202650.3%Aug 202650.4%
- Wise-5.5%Jul 202652.8%Aug 202647.3%
- Niyo+2.2%Jul 202639.1%Aug 202641.3%
- Revolut-5.1% · beyond normal variationJul 202619.4%Aug 202614.3%
- ExTravelMoney+3.1%Jul 20269.6%Aug 202612.7%
- Instarem+0.5%Jul 20265.5%Aug 20266.0%
- moneyHOP-0.2%Jul 20260.6%Aug 20260.4%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | July 2026 | August 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 509 | 567 | Up 58 |
Tracked brands | 7 | 7 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 46.4% | 43.7% | Down 2.7 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 60.9% | 58.4% | Down 2.5 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | BookMyForex (50.3%) | BookMyForex (50.4%) | Up 0.1 points |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All six families registered qualified observations in both months.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of how AI search is recommending Money Transfer Fintech
Research Scope and Qualification
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection.
Research stage | July 2026 | August 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompts collected across AI/search surfaces |
Unique questions | 585 | 635 | Distinct questions after de-duplication |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts mentioning at least one tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 605 | 663 | Prompts relevant to the vertical |
Irrelevant observations | 195 | 137 | Prompts outside the vertical scope |
Qualified benchmark observations | 509 | 567 | Public denominator for brand metrics |
AI Market Discovery Methodology
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BookMyForex | 79.2% | 50.4% | 37.9% | 19.1% | 0.70 |
Wise | 83.6% | 47.3% | 39.0% | 24.5% | 0.68 |
Niyo | 47.3% | 41.3% | 34.6% | 10.2% | 0.95 |
Revolut | 36.7% | 14.3% | 10.4% | 1.2% | 0.51 |
ExTravelMoney | 23.6% | 12.7% | 9.5% | 0.7% | 0.58 |
Instarem | 9.2% | 6.0% | 4.1% | 0.2% | 0.77 |
moneyHOP | 0.9% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.40 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: Share of qualified observations in which the brand is mentioned at all.
- Valid recommendation coverage: Share of qualified observations in which the brand receives a clear recommendation.
- Top-three rate: Share of qualified observations in which the brand appears among the top three recommendations.
- Rank-one rate: Share of qualified observations in which the brand is the first recommendation.
- Net sentiment: Positive minus negative mention sentiment, scaled to a 0 to 1 range.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | July 2026 | August 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
BookMyForex | 50.3% | 50.4% | Up 0.1 points |
ExTravelMoney | 9.6% | 12.7% | Up 3.1 points |
Instarem | 5.5% | 6.0% | Up 0.5 points |
moneyHOP | 0.6% | 0.4% | Down 0.2 points |
Niyo | 39.1% | 41.3% | Up 2.2 points |
Revolut | 19.4% | 14.3% | Down 5.1 points |
Wise | 52.8% | 47.3% | Down 5.5 points |
Largest Decline: Revolut
Revolut's coverage decline went beyond normal month-to-month variation. Revolut's valid recommendation coverage fell to 14.3% from 19.4% in July 2026. Its presence rate also declined, falling to 36.7% in August 2026 from 43.4% in July 2026. Its top-three rate fell to 10.4% in August 2026 from 13.4% in July 2026, and its rank-one rate fell to 1.2% from 2.2% over the same period. Net sentiment held steady at 0.51, close to its July 2026 level of 0.54.
Category Leader: BookMyForex
BookMyForex remains the category leader with a 50.4% coverage rate, though the move was small. Its top-three rate rose to 37.9% in August 2026 from 37.1% in July 2026, and its rank-one rate rose to 19.1% from 17.3% over the same period.
Six of the seven tracked brands registered only small movements in August 2026, within normal month-to-month variation. BookMyForex, ExTravelMoney, Instarem, moneyHOP, Niyo, and Wise are all classified as stable.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Placement rates show whether a brand appears in the top three and whether it is the first recommendation.
Brand | August 2026 top-three rate | August 2026 rank-one rate | July 2026 top-three rate | July 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wise | 39.0% | 24.5% | 40.5% | 26.3% |
BookMyForex | 37.9% | 19.1% | 37.1% | 17.3% |
Niyo | 34.6% | 10.2% | 32.8% | 11.4% |
Wise and BookMyForex have similar top-three rates in August 2026, but Wise holds a stronger first-position rate at 24.5% versus BookMyForex's 19.1%. Similar coverage can still hide different first-position rates.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All 567 qualified observations in August 2026 fell into the Brand Recommendation class.
Buyer-intent class | July 2026 | August 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 509 | 567 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 509 | 567 |
The current public series cannot answer pricing, value, or head-to-head comparison questions. It measures brand recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (Jul 2026) | 509 | Wise | 52.8% | — |
Aug 2026 | 567 | BookMyForex | 50.4% | Revolut down 5.1 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment, not proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure:
- Market share or sales attribution
- Every possible AI response or surface
- Organic-search ranking performance
- Social mention volume
- Private or sponsored channels
- Causality from a metric movement alone
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how AI and search surfaces present brands across the discovery journey, measuring presence, recommendation coverage, placement, and sentiment on a consistent monthly basis. The benchmark uses a fixed methodology so that movements reflect real changes in AI surface behavior rather than changes in measurement.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper, identifying the prompts, competitors, and sources driving the result.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Money Market Accounts: 2026 AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Make Money Online: 2026 AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Window Replacement: 2026 AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read