Money Market Accounts: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend money market accounts. This public AI Visibility Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Increase: Capital One
- 08Largest Decline: CIT Bank (Acquiring Company: First Citizens BancShares, Inc)
- 09Category Leader: Ally Bank
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
Questions This Section Answers
- Which money market account brand leads recommendation coverage in October 2026, and by how much?
- What were the largest coverage gains and declines since the July 2026 baseline?
Ally Bank leads valid recommendation coverage in October 2026 at 71.0%, ahead of Capital One at 66.0%, a gap of 5.0 percentage points between the two leaders. Ally Bank's coverage is up 8.6 points from 62.4% in July 2026, and it has now risen for two consecutive months after a dip in August 2026.
The largest coverage increase since baseline came from Capital One, which entered the benchmark at 66.0% in October 2026 from 0.0% in July 2026, an increase of 66.0 percentage points. The largest coverage decline was CIT Bank (Acquiring Company: First Citizens BancShares, Inc), which fell to 0.0% in October 2026 from 57.1% in July 2026, a drop of 57.1 percentage points. Both movements reflect changes in the tracking set label rather than within-month movement.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 670 qualified observations in October 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Oct 2026
- Ally Bank71.0%
- Capital One66.0%
- Marcus by Goldman Sachs63.6%
- CIT Bank50.3%
- UFB Direct-Parent Company(Axos Financial, Inc.)29.8%
- Synchrony Bank25.4%
- Vio Bank-(MidFirst Bank)16.7%
- Sallie Mae11.6%
- Quontic Bank8.5%
- Discover Home Loans0.3%
- Capital One Auto Finance0.0%
- CIT Bank (Acquiring Company: First Citizens BancShares, Inc)0.0%
- Sallie Mae Bank0.0%
- Synchrony0.0%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 729 | 670 | Down 59 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 33.9% | 60.7% | Up 26.8 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 86.8% | 95.1% | Up 8.3 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Marcus by Goldman Sachs | Ally Bank | Changed |
Qualified surface breadth counts the number of canonical AI surface families, out of six, that produced at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode.
September 2026 recorded 684 qualified observations. Recommendation-shaped answer share rose for the second consecutive month, reaching 60.7% in October 2026.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Money Market Accounts
Research Scope and Qualification
Questions This Section Answers
- Why is the public benchmark smaller than the raw prompt observations collected?
- How do AI responses get qualified into the public money market account benchmark?
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Raw prompt-surface observations collected |
Unique questions | 590 | 617 | Distinct questions posed across surfaces |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Observations mentioning at least one tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 796 | 761 | Observations relevant to the research scope |
Irrelevant observations | 4 | 39 | Observations deemed irrelevant |
Qualified benchmark observations | 729 | 670 | Public denominator for brand-level rates |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Visibility Market Discovery Methodology.
Current Brand Standings
Questions This Section Answers
- Which money market account brands lead in presence, recommendation coverage, and top-three placement?
- How do rank-one rates and net sentiment differ across the tracked banks?
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ally Bank | 74.6% | 71.0% | 49.0% | 18.5% | 0.96 |
Capital One | 71.9% | 66.0% | 38.8% | 9.1% | 0.93 |
Marcus by Goldman Sachs | 66.6% | 63.6% | 29.8% | 6.1% | 0.97 |
CIT Bank | 53.4% | 50.3% | 32.8% | 9.4% | 0.97 |
UFB Direct-Parent Company(Axos Financial, Inc.) | 30.8% | 29.8% | 16.3% | 7.6% | 0.98 |
Synchrony Bank | 28.7% | 25.4% | 7.3% | 1.9% | 0.91 |
Vio Bank-(MidFirst Bank) | 18.4% | 16.7% | 4.3% | 0.8% | 0.93 |
Sallie Mae | 13.7% | 11.6% | 3.0% | 0.3% | 0.87 |
Quontic Bank | 10.3% | 8.5% | 4.3% | 0.0% | 0.84 |
Discover Home Loans | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.00 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: Share of qualified observations in which the brand is mentioned at all.
- Valid recommendation coverage: Share of qualified observations in which the brand receives a clear, attributable recommendation.
- Top-three rate: Share of qualified observations in which the brand appears among the first three recommended options.
- Rank-one rate: Share of qualified observations in which the brand is recommended first.
- Net sentiment: Positive mentions minus negative mentions divided by total mentions, on a scale from -1 to 1.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Visibility Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Questions This Section Answers
- Which money market account brands moved most since the July 2026 baseline, and how much of that reflects tracking-set label changes?
The movement table below compares October 2026 to the July 2026 baseline. The tracking set was updated in September 2026, and several brands are now recorded under simpler names. Movements for brand names that entered or left the tracking set reflect that change rather than a shift in coverage.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Brand | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Ally Bank | 62.4% | 71.0% | Up 8.6 points |
Capital One | 0.0% | 66.0% | Up 66.0 points |
Capital One Auto Finance | 11.9% | 0.0% | Down 11.9 points |
CIT Bank | 0.0% | 50.3% | Up 50.3 points |
CIT Bank (Acquiring Company: First Citizens BancShares, Inc) | 57.1% | 0.0% | Down 57.1 points |
Discover Home Loans | 5.3% | 0.3% | Down 5.0 points |
Marcus by Goldman Sachs | 62.4% | 63.6% | Up 1.2 points |
Quontic Bank | 9.5% | 8.5% | Down 1.0 points |
Sallie Mae | 0.0% | 11.6% | Up 11.6 points |
Sallie Mae Bank | 4.0% | 0.0% | Down 4.0 points |
Synchrony | 29.5% | 0.0% | Down 29.5 points |
Synchrony Bank | 0.0% | 25.4% | Up 25.4 points |
UFB Direct-Parent Company(Axos Financial, Inc.) | 15.1% | 29.8% | Up 14.7 points |
Vio Bank-(MidFirst Bank) | 30.2% | 16.7% | Down 13.5 points |
Several brands also moved significantly between September and October 2026. Marcus by Goldman Sachs rose 11.6 percentage points from 52.0% in September 2026 to 63.6% in October 2026. UFB Direct-Parent Company(Axos Financial, Inc.) rose 10.4 points from 19.4% to 29.8%. Synchrony Bank rose 7.9 points from 17.5% to 25.4%. Discover Home Loans declined 10.7 points from 11.0% in September 2026 to 0.3% in October 2026. Quontic Bank declined 5.0 points from 13.5% to 8.5%.
Largest Increase: Capital One
Capital One entered the benchmark with valid recommendation coverage of 66.0% in October 2026, up from 0.0% in July 2026, an increase of 66.0 percentage points. Presence rate measured 71.9% in October 2026, with a top-three rate of 38.8% and a rank-one rate of 9.1%. Capital One was not tracked in the July 2026 baseline under its current name. The entry places Capital One second overall, and its coverage has risen in each of the two months since it entered the tracking set. Capital One's rank-one rate of 9.1% places it behind CIT Bank at 9.4% for first-position recommendations despite its higher overall coverage.
Largest Decline: CIT Bank (Acquiring Company: First Citizens BancShares, Inc)
CIT Bank (Acquiring Company: First Citizens BancShares, Inc) fell to 0.0% in October 2026 from 57.1% in July 2026, down 57.1 percentage points. The tracking set introduced a CIT Bank entry at 50.3% in October 2026 and retired the longer-form name, so the recorded decline reflects a change in the brand label used in the tracking set. In July 2026, presence rate was 64.2% and top-three rate was 30.7%. The recorded decline is a tracking-label change rather than a loss of AI visibility.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Category Leader: Ally Bank
Ally Bank led valid recommendation coverage at 71.0% in October 2026, up from 70.6% in September 2026 and 62.4% in July 2026. Ally Bank has now held the leader position for two consecutive months and has risen in each of the last two months after a dip in August 2026. Its top-three rate of 49.0% and rank-one rate of 18.5% both lead the category. Marcus by Goldman Sachs, which shared the leader position at the July 2026 baseline, finished October 2026 at 63.6%, a gap of 7.4 points to the leader.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Questions This Section Answers
- How did top-three and rank-one placement differ between Ally Bank, Capital One, and Marcus by Goldman Sachs?
- How can a small coverage gap translate into a large difference in first-position recommendations?
Coverage rates alone do not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Among the leading brands, placement patterns varied in October 2026.
Brand | Oct 2026 top-three rate | Oct 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ally Bank | 49.0% | 18.5% | 32.5% | 14.3% |
Capital One | 38.8% | 9.1% | N/A | N/A |
Marcus by Goldman Sachs | 29.8% | 6.1% | 28.9% | 7.7% |
Ally Bank had the highest top-three rate at 49.0% in October 2026 and the highest rank-one rate at 18.5%. Close coverage can still hide materially different first-position rates. Capital One's 66.0% coverage yields a 9.1% rank-one rate, while Ally Bank's 71.0% coverage produces an 18.5% rank-one rate, roughly double the chance of appearing first despite only a 5.0-point coverage gap.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
Questions This Section Answers
- Which buyer-intent classes appear in the current money market account benchmark, and which ones remain empty?
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class, representing discovery and consideration.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 729 | 670 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 729 | 670 |
The current public series measures the Brand Recommendation class of discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
Questions This Section Answers
- How has the money market account coverage leader changed across the four measurements?
- Which month recorded the largest single-brand coverage movement in the record?
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 729 | Marcus by Goldman Sachs | 62.4% | No movement (baseline) |
Aug 2026 | 728 | Marcus by Goldman Sachs | 60.6% | Up 6.4 points (Sallie Mae Bank) |
Sep 2026 | 684 | Ally Bank | 70.6% | Up 62.9 points (Capital One) |
Oct 2026 | 670 | Ally Bank | 71.0% | Up 66.0 points (Capital One) |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
- Market share or total addressable market
- Attributable sales or revenue outcomes
- Every possible AI response across all surfaces
- Organic-search ranking
- Social mention volume
- Private or sponsored channels
- Causality from a metric movement alone
Top 10 Cited Domains
Questions This Section Answers
- Which domains are most frequently cited across AI platforms for money market account recommendations?
- How concentrated are citations across the top domains, and does any tracked brand's own site appear?
Across all AI platform responses in October 2026, 5,959 citations were observed across 498 unique domains.
Rank | Domain | Citations | Share | Platforms citing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | bankrate.com | 742 | 12.5% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
2 | nerdwallet.com | 557 | 9.3% | ChatGPT, Copilot, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
3 | cnbc.com | 315 | 5.3% | ChatGPT, Copilot, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
4 | google.com | 270 | 4.5% | AI Mode, AI Overviews |
5 | forbes.com | 258 | 4.3% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
6 | finance.yahoo.com | 225 | 3.8% | ChatGPT, Copilot, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
7 | wsj.com | 213 | 3.6% | ChatGPT, Copilot, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
8 | usnews.com | 176 | 3.0% | Copilot, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
9 | investopedia.com | 175 | 2.9% | ChatGPT, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
10 | reddit.com | 167 | 2.8% | ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
Citations are moderately concentrated: the top 10 domains account for 52.0% of all citations, while the remaining 488 domains account for the other 48.0%. No tracked brand's own domain appears in the top 10. Financial comparison and review sites (bankrate.com, nerdwallet.com, investopedia.com) dominate, followed by general news and finance outlets (cnbc.com, forbes.com, finance.yahoo.com, wsj.com, usnews.com). Reddit is the only user-generated content source in the top 10.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Visibility Market Discovery Index is a neutral industry benchmark that tracks how often brands are recommended across major AI chat, answer, and search surfaces. The project records presence, recommendation coverage, placement, and sentiment in plain, comparable terms.
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Visibility Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Money Transfer Fintech: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Business Checking Accounts: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Directional benchmark: 848 ChatGPT observations across business banking prompts, focused on how AI answers shortlist business checking accounts.
ReadIndustry Reports
Make Money Online: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read