Money Market Accounts: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index

Tracking how AI platforms recommend money market accounts. This public AI Visibility Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

Mark Huntley, J.D.
By Mark Huntley, J.D.Growth Strategist & AI Discovery Analyst
8 minutes read

Benchmark Summary

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which money market account brand leads recommendation coverage in October 2026, and by how much?
  • What were the largest coverage gains and declines since the July 2026 baseline?

Ally Bank leads valid recommendation coverage in October 2026 at 71.0%, ahead of Capital One at 66.0%, a gap of 5.0 percentage points between the two leaders. Ally Bank's coverage is up 8.6 points from 62.4% in July 2026, and it has now risen for two consecutive months after a dip in August 2026.

The largest coverage increase since baseline came from Capital One, which entered the benchmark at 66.0% in October 2026 from 0.0% in July 2026, an increase of 66.0 percentage points. The largest coverage decline was CIT Bank (Acquiring Company: First Citizens BancShares, Inc), which fell to 0.0% in October 2026 from 57.1% in July 2026, a drop of 57.1 percentage points. Both movements reflect changes in the tracking set label rather than within-month movement.

The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 670 qualified observations in October 2026 after qualification.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Oct 2026

0%20%40%60%80%Jul 2026Aug 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
  • Ally Bank71.0%
  • Capital One66.0%
  • Marcus by Goldman Sachs63.6%
  • CIT Bank50.3%
  • UFB Direct-Parent Company(Axos Financial, Inc.)29.8%
  • Synchrony Bank25.4%
  • Vio Bank-(MidFirst Bank)16.7%
  • Sallie Mae11.6%
  • Quontic Bank8.5%
  • Discover Home Loans0.3%
  • Capital One Auto Finance0.0%
  • CIT Bank (Acquiring Company: First Citizens BancShares, Inc)0.0%
  • Sallie Mae Bank0.0%
  • Synchrony0.0%

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Measure

Jul 2026

Oct 2026

Movement

Qualified benchmark observations

729

670

Down 59

Tracked brands

10

10

No change

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

33.9%

60.7%

Up 26.8 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

86.8%

95.1%

Up 8.3 points

Leader by valid recommendation coverage

Marcus by Goldman Sachs

Ally Bank

Changed

Qualified surface breadth counts the number of canonical AI surface families, out of six, that produced at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode.

September 2026 recorded 684 qualified observations. Recommendation-shaped answer share rose for the second consecutive month, reaching 60.7% in October 2026.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Money Market Accounts

Research Scope and Qualification

Questions This Section Answers

  • Why is the public benchmark smaller than the raw prompt observations collected?
  • How do AI responses get qualified into the public money market account benchmark?

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.

Research stage

Jul 2026

Oct 2026

What it represents

Source prompt-surface observations

800

800

Raw prompt-surface observations collected

Unique questions

590

617

Distinct questions posed across surfaces

Brand / competitor mentions

800

800

Observations mentioning at least one tracked brand

Relevant observations

796

761

Observations relevant to the research scope

Irrelevant observations

4

39

Observations deemed irrelevant

Qualified benchmark observations

729

670

Public denominator for brand-level rates

Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Visibility Market Discovery Methodology.

Current Brand Standings

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which money market account brands lead in presence, recommendation coverage, and top-three placement?
  • How do rank-one rates and net sentiment differ across the tracked banks?

Brand

Presence rate

Valid recommendation coverage

Top-three rate

Rank-one rate

Net sentiment

Ally Bank

74.6%

71.0%

49.0%

18.5%

0.96

Capital One

71.9%

66.0%

38.8%

9.1%

0.93

Marcus by Goldman Sachs

66.6%

63.6%

29.8%

6.1%

0.97

CIT Bank

53.4%

50.3%

32.8%

9.4%

0.97

UFB Direct-Parent Company(Axos Financial, Inc.)

30.8%

29.8%

16.3%

7.6%

0.98

Synchrony Bank

28.7%

25.4%

7.3%

1.9%

0.91

Vio Bank-(MidFirst Bank)

18.4%

16.7%

4.3%

0.8%

0.93

Sallie Mae

13.7%

11.6%

3.0%

0.3%

0.87

Quontic Bank

10.3%

8.5%

4.3%

0.0%

0.84

Discover Home Loans

0.3%

0.3%

0.0%

0.0%

1.00

How to Read the Standings

  • Presence rate: Share of qualified observations in which the brand is mentioned at all.
  • Valid recommendation coverage: Share of qualified observations in which the brand receives a clear, attributable recommendation.
  • Top-three rate: Share of qualified observations in which the brand appears among the first three recommended options.
  • Rank-one rate: Share of qualified observations in which the brand is recommended first.
  • Net sentiment: Positive mentions minus negative mentions divided by total mentions, on a scale from -1 to 1.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Visibility Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which money market account brands moved most since the July 2026 baseline, and how much of that reflects tracking-set label changes?

The movement table below compares October 2026 to the July 2026 baseline. The tracking set was updated in September 2026, and several brands are now recorded under simpler names. Movements for brand names that entered or left the tracking set reflect that change rather than a shift in coverage.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Brand

Jul 2026

Oct 2026

Movement since baseline

Ally Bank

62.4%

71.0%

Up 8.6 points

Capital One

0.0%

66.0%

Up 66.0 points

Capital One Auto Finance

11.9%

0.0%

Down 11.9 points

CIT Bank

0.0%

50.3%

Up 50.3 points

CIT Bank (Acquiring Company: First Citizens BancShares, Inc)

57.1%

0.0%

Down 57.1 points

Discover Home Loans

5.3%

0.3%

Down 5.0 points

Marcus by Goldman Sachs

62.4%

63.6%

Up 1.2 points

Quontic Bank

9.5%

8.5%

Down 1.0 points

Sallie Mae

0.0%

11.6%

Up 11.6 points

Sallie Mae Bank

4.0%

0.0%

Down 4.0 points

Synchrony

29.5%

0.0%

Down 29.5 points

Synchrony Bank

0.0%

25.4%

Up 25.4 points

UFB Direct-Parent Company(Axos Financial, Inc.)

15.1%

29.8%

Up 14.7 points

Vio Bank-(MidFirst Bank)

30.2%

16.7%

Down 13.5 points

Several brands also moved significantly between September and October 2026. Marcus by Goldman Sachs rose 11.6 percentage points from 52.0% in September 2026 to 63.6% in October 2026. UFB Direct-Parent Company(Axos Financial, Inc.) rose 10.4 points from 19.4% to 29.8%. Synchrony Bank rose 7.9 points from 17.5% to 25.4%. Discover Home Loans declined 10.7 points from 11.0% in September 2026 to 0.3% in October 2026. Quontic Bank declined 5.0 points from 13.5% to 8.5%.

Largest Increase: Capital One

Capital One entered the benchmark with valid recommendation coverage of 66.0% in October 2026, up from 0.0% in July 2026, an increase of 66.0 percentage points. Presence rate measured 71.9% in October 2026, with a top-three rate of 38.8% and a rank-one rate of 9.1%. Capital One was not tracked in the July 2026 baseline under its current name. The entry places Capital One second overall, and its coverage has risen in each of the two months since it entered the tracking set. Capital One's rank-one rate of 9.1% places it behind CIT Bank at 9.4% for first-position recommendations despite its higher overall coverage.

Largest Decline: CIT Bank (Acquiring Company: First Citizens BancShares, Inc)

CIT Bank (Acquiring Company: First Citizens BancShares, Inc) fell to 0.0% in October 2026 from 57.1% in July 2026, down 57.1 percentage points. The tracking set introduced a CIT Bank entry at 50.3% in October 2026 and retired the longer-form name, so the recorded decline reflects a change in the brand label used in the tracking set. In July 2026, presence rate was 64.2% and top-three rate was 30.7%. The recorded decline is a tracking-label change rather than a loss of AI visibility.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Category Leader: Ally Bank

Ally Bank led valid recommendation coverage at 71.0% in October 2026, up from 70.6% in September 2026 and 62.4% in July 2026. Ally Bank has now held the leader position for two consecutive months and has risen in each of the last two months after a dip in August 2026. Its top-three rate of 49.0% and rank-one rate of 18.5% both lead the category. Marcus by Goldman Sachs, which shared the leader position at the July 2026 baseline, finished October 2026 at 63.6%, a gap of 7.4 points to the leader.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Questions This Section Answers

  • How did top-three and rank-one placement differ between Ally Bank, Capital One, and Marcus by Goldman Sachs?
  • How can a small coverage gap translate into a large difference in first-position recommendations?

Coverage rates alone do not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Among the leading brands, placement patterns varied in October 2026.

Brand

Oct 2026 top-three rate

Oct 2026 rank-one rate

Jul 2026 top-three rate

Jul 2026 rank-one rate

Ally Bank

49.0%

18.5%

32.5%

14.3%

Capital One

38.8%

9.1%

N/A

N/A

Marcus by Goldman Sachs

29.8%

6.1%

28.9%

7.7%

Ally Bank had the highest top-three rate at 49.0% in October 2026 and the highest rank-one rate at 18.5%. Close coverage can still hide materially different first-position rates. Capital One's 66.0% coverage yields a 9.1% rank-one rate, while Ally Bank's 71.0% coverage produces an 18.5% rank-one rate, roughly double the chance of appearing first despite only a 5.0-point coverage gap.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which buyer-intent classes appear in the current money market account benchmark, and which ones remain empty?

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class, representing discovery and consideration.

Buyer-intent class

Jul 2026

Oct 2026

Brand Recommendation

729

670

Pricing & Value

0

0

Multi-Brand Comparison

0

0

Total qualified observations

729

670

The current public series measures the Brand Recommendation class of discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.

Historical Measurement Record

Questions This Section Answers

  • How has the money market account coverage leader changed across the four measurements?
  • Which month recorded the largest single-brand coverage movement in the record?

This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.

Measurement

Qualified observations

Coverage leader

Leader coverage

Largest coverage movement

Jul 2026

729

Marcus by Goldman Sachs

62.4%

No movement (baseline)

Aug 2026

728

Marcus by Goldman Sachs

60.6%

Up 6.4 points (Sallie Mae Bank)

Sep 2026

684

Ally Bank

70.6%

Up 62.9 points (Capital One)

Oct 2026

670

Ally Bank

71.0%

Up 66.0 points (Capital One)

Evidence and Source Layer

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

  • Market share or total addressable market
  • Attributable sales or revenue outcomes
  • Every possible AI response across all surfaces
  • Organic-search ranking
  • Social mention volume
  • Private or sponsored channels
  • Causality from a metric movement alone

Top 10 Cited Domains

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which domains are most frequently cited across AI platforms for money market account recommendations?
  • How concentrated are citations across the top domains, and does any tracked brand's own site appear?

Across all AI platform responses in October 2026, 5,959 citations were observed across 498 unique domains.

Rank

Domain

Citations

Share

Platforms citing

1

bankrate.com

742

12.5%

ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

2

nerdwallet.com

557

9.3%

ChatGPT, Copilot, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

3

cnbc.com

315

5.3%

ChatGPT, Copilot, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

4

google.com

270

4.5%

AI Mode, AI Overviews

5

forbes.com

258

4.3%

ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

6

finance.yahoo.com

225

3.8%

ChatGPT, Copilot, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

7

wsj.com

213

3.6%

ChatGPT, Copilot, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

8

usnews.com

176

3.0%

Copilot, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

9

investopedia.com

175

2.9%

ChatGPT, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

10

reddit.com

167

2.8%

ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

Citations are moderately concentrated: the top 10 domains account for 52.0% of all citations, while the remaining 488 domains account for the other 48.0%. No tracked brand's own domain appears in the top 10. Financial comparison and review sites (bankrate.com, nerdwallet.com, investopedia.com) dominate, followed by general news and finance outlets (cnbc.com, forbes.com, finance.yahoo.com, wsj.com, usnews.com). Reddit is the only user-generated content source in the top 10.

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Visibility Market Discovery Index is a neutral industry benchmark that tracks how often brands are recommended across major AI chat, answer, and search surfaces. The project records presence, recommendation coverage, placement, and sentiment in plain, comparable terms.

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.

Get my free AI Company Index

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.