Medical Malpractice Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend medical malpractice lawyers. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Decline: Morgan & Morgan
- 08Also Declining: Munley Law
- 09Also Declining: Lubin & Meyer
- 10Category Leader: Morgan & Morgan
- 11Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 12Buyer-Intent Distribution
Benchmark Summary
Morgan & Morgan led the Medical Malpractice Lawyers benchmark with valid recommendation coverage of 39.3% in September 2026. The next-closest brand, The Cochran Firm, held valid recommendation coverage of 11.5% in September 2026, a gap of 27.8 points. The largest coverage decline among tracked brands was Munley Law, which fell to 4.9% in September 2026 from 18.2% in July 2026. No brand recorded a coverage increase beyond normal month-to-month variation in September 2026.
Movement in September 2026 was significant for three brands: Lubin & Meyer, Morgan & Morgan, and Munley Law all declined beyond normal variation. Morgan & Morgan has declined in each of the two months since July 2026, from 53.5% in July 2026 to 47.5% in August 2026, then to 39.3% in September 2026. Munley Law followed the same two-month downward path, from 18.2% in July 2026 to 11.1% in August 2026, then to 4.9% in September 2026. Lubin & Meyer declined to 1.1% in September 2026 from 5.7% in July 2026. The Cochran Firm rose to 19.8% in August 2026 before settling at 11.5% in September 2026, a move that fell within normal variation across the full series.
The benchmark began with 636 prompt-surface observations in September 2026 and produced 183 qualified observations after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Sep 2026
- Morgan & Morgan39.3%
- The Cochran Firm11.5%
- Munley Law4.9%
- Lubin & Meyer1.1%
- Miller & Zois0.5%
- Gilman & Bedigian0.0%
- Lopez McHugh0.0%
- Newsome Melton0.0%
- Paulson & Nace0.0%
- Pegalis Law Group0.0%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 159 | 183 | Up 24 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 44.0% | 32.2% | Down 11.8 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 54.7% | 38.3% | Down 16.4 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Morgan & Morgan | Morgan & Morgan | No change |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All six families were represented in each month of the series.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Medical Malpractice Lawyers
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. Qualification removes observations that do not meet relevance or eligibility standards.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 489 | 636 | Raw collection across AI/search surfaces |
Unique questions | 406 | 472 | Distinct prompt questions collected |
Brand / competitor mentions | 489 | 636 | Prompts referencing tracked brands |
Relevant observations | 266 | 357 | On-topic for the vertical |
Irrelevant observations | 223 | 279 | Off-topic or not applicable |
Qualified benchmark observations | 159 | 183 | Public denominator |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Market Discovery Methodology for full details.
Current Brand Standings
This table shows the current-month benchmark view, sorted by valid recommendation coverage.
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Morgan & Morgan | 91.8% | 39.3% | 29.5% | 20.8% | 0.8 |
The Cochran Firm | 19.1% | 11.5% | 10.9% | 0.5% | 0.7 |
Munley Law | 8.2% | 4.9% | 4.9% | 0.0% | 0.8 |
Lubin & Meyer | 2.7% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.8 |
Miller & Zois | 2.7% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2 |
Gilman & Bedigian | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Lopez McHugh | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Newsome Melton | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Paulson & Nace | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Pegalis Law Group | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned in any form.
- Valid recommendation coverage: Share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist.
- Top-three rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the top three recommended positions.
- Rank-one rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand is the first or only recommendation.
- Net sentiment: Positive mentions minus negative mentions, divided by total mentions, on a scale from -1 to 1.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Gilman & Bedigian | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Lopez McHugh | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Lubin & Meyer | 5.7% | 1.1% | Down 4.6 points |
Miller & Zois | 0.0% | 0.5% | Up 0.5 points |
Morgan & Morgan | 53.5% | 39.3% | Down 14.2 points |
Munley Law | 18.2% | 4.9% | Down 13.3 points |
Newsome Melton | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Paulson & Nace | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Pegalis Law Group | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
The Cochran Firm | 15.7% | 11.5% | Down 4.2 points |
Largest Decline: Morgan & Morgan
Morgan & Morgan held valid recommendation coverage of 39.3% in September 2026, down from 53.5% in July 2026, a decline of 14.2 points beyond normal month-to-month variation. Presence remained high at 91.8%, so the decline was concentrated in placement rather than discoverability. The top-three rate fell to 29.5% in September 2026 from 47.2% in July 2026, and the rank-one rate fell to 20.8% from 35.9% over the same period. Morgan & Morgan declined in each of the two months since July 2026.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Also Declining: Munley Law
Munley Law fell to valid recommendation coverage of 4.9% in September 2026 from 18.2% in July 2026, a decline of 13.3 points beyond normal variation. Presence also fell, from 21.4% in July 2026 to 8.2% in September 2026. The top-three rate dropped to 4.9% from 17.0%, and the rank-one rate fell to 0.0%. Munley Law declined in each of the two months since July 2026.
Also Declining: Lubin & Meyer
Lubin & Meyer fell to valid recommendation coverage of 1.1% in September 2026 from 5.7% in July 2026, a decline of 4.6 points beyond normal variation. The top-three rate dropped to 1.1% in September 2026 from 5.0% in July 2026. The rank-one rate fell to 0.0% from 1.3% over the same period. Coverage rose slightly to 6.2% in August 2026 before falling sharply in September 2026.
Category Leader: Morgan & Morgan
Morgan & Morgan led the category in September 2026 with valid recommendation coverage of 39.3%, ahead of The Cochran Firm at 11.5%. The brand also held the highest presence rate at 91.8% and the highest top-three rate at 29.5%. Morgan & Morgan was the first-position recommendation in 38 of 183 qualified observations in September 2026.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The table below compares top-three and rank-one rates for the leading brands.
Brand | Sep 2026 top-three rate | Sep 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Morgan & Morgan | 29.5% | 20.8% | 47.2% | 35.9% |
The Cochran Firm | 10.9% | 0.5% | 14.5% | 0.0% |
Munley Law | 4.9% | 0.0% | 17.0% | 0.6% |
Morgan & Morgan converted a large share of its coverage into first-position placement, at 20.8% in September 2026, while The Cochran Firm and Munley Law rarely appeared as the first or only recommendation. Close coverage rates can still hide very different first-position rates across brands.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class of discovery.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 159 | 183 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 159 | 183 |
The current public series measures brand recommendation discovery only and does not yet contain qualified observations in the pricing or multi-brand comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 159 | Morgan & Morgan | 53.5% | First tracked measurement (baseline month) |
Aug 2026 | 162 | Morgan & Morgan | 47.5% | Munley Law down 7.1 points |
Sep 2026 | 183 | Morgan & Morgan | 39.3% | Morgan & Morgan down 8.2 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure:
- Market share or sales attribution
- Every possible AI response to a given query
- Organic-search ranking positions
- Social media mention volume
- Private or sponsored channels
- Causality from a metric movement alone
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how brands appear in AI-generated answers across major AI and search surfaces. Each monthly measurement captures presence, recommendation behavior, placement, and sentiment from qualified observations, providing a consistent view of brand visibility in AI discovery.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper into your brand's specific AI visibility, recommendation performance, and competitive positioning.
The public percentage cannot identify the prompts, competitors, or sources causing the result.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Medical Billing Services: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Medical Spas: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Medical Evacuation: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read