Medical Malpractice Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index

Benchmark Summary

Morgan & Morgan led the Medical Malpractice Lawyers benchmark with valid recommendation coverage of 47.5%, a lead of more than 27 points over the next-closest brand. The largest coverage increase among tracked brands was The Cochran Firm, which rose to 19.8% in August 2026 from 15.7% in July 2026. The largest coverage decline was Munley Law, which fell to 11.1% in August 2026 from 18.2% in July 2026.

No brand moved beyond normal month-to-month variation in August 2026 on the primary coverage metric. The month was quiet by benchmark standards, with all ten tracked brands classified as stable. Across the full series from July 2026 to August 2026, Morgan & Morgan retained the top position in valid recommendation coverage, but the order among the next two brands shifted: The Cochran Firm moved ahead of Munley Law, reversing the July ranking. The gap between Morgan & Morgan and The Cochran Firm also narrowed, from 37.8 points in July 2026 to 27.7 points in August 2026.

The benchmark began with 489 prompt-surface observations in July 2026 and 578 in August 2026, producing 159 and 162 qualified observations after qualification, respectively.

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All six families were represented in both months.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Medical Malpractice Lawyers

Research Scope and Qualification

The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. Qualification removes observations that do not meet relevance or eligibility standards.

Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Market Discovery Methodology for full details.

Current Brand Standings

This table shows the current-month benchmark view, sorted by valid recommendation coverage.

How to Read the Standings

• Presence rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned in any form.
• Valid recommendation coverage: Share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist.
• Top-three rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the top three recommended positions.
• Rank-one rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand is the first or only recommendation.
• Net sentiment: Positive mentions minus negative mentions, divided by total mentions, on a scale from -1 to 1.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

The month-to-month changes in August 2026 matched the baseline-to-current changes for every brand, since this is a two-month series. Morgan & Morgan's top-three rate fell from 47.2% in July 2026 to 34.0% in August 2026, even though its overall valid recommendation coverage remained within normal month-to-month variation. Munley Law's top-three rate also fell, from 17.0% to 7.4%, over the same period.

Category Leader: Morgan & Morgan

Morgan & Morgan led the category in August 2026 with valid recommendation coverage of 47.5%, down from 53.5% in July 2026. The brand also held the highest presence rate at 93.8%, up from 90.6% in July 2026, and the highest top-three rate at 34.0%, down from 47.2% in July 2026. Its rank-one rate was 25.9% in August 2026, with 42 rank-one placements out of 162 qualified observations — a much stronger first-choice position than its nearest competitor.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The table below compares top-three and rank-one rates for the leading brands.

The Cochran Firm and Munley Law both held positive top-three presence, but neither converted to rank-one placement at meaningful rates. Morgan & Morgan, by contrast, was the first-position recommendation in 42 of 162 qualified observations. Close coverage rates can still hide very different first-position rates across brands.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class of discovery.

The current public series measures brand recommendation discovery only and does not yet contain qualified observations in the pricing or multi-brand comparison classes.

Historical Measurement Record

This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.

Evidence and Source Layer

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure:

• Market share or sales attribution
• Every possible AI response to a given query
• Organic-search ranking positions
• Social media mention volume
• Private or sponsored channels
• Causality from a metric movement alone

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how brands appear in AI-generated answers across major AI and search surfaces. Each monthly measurement captures presence, recommendation behavior, placement, and sentiment from qualified observations, providing a consistent view of brand visibility in AI discovery.

• AI Market Discovery Methodology
• AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
• AI Market Discovery Research Standards
• Modeled AI Authority Value

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper into your brand's specific AI visibility, recommendation performance, and competitive positioning.

Get my free AI Company Index