Healthcare and Medical Devices: AI Market Discovery Index

Tracking how AI platforms recommend healthcare and medical devices. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

Mark Huntley, J.D.
By Mark Huntley, J.D.Growth Strategist & AI Discovery Analyst
5 minutes read

Benchmark Summary

Abbott FreeStyle led the Healthcare and Medical Devices benchmark in August 2026 with a valid recommendation coverage of 61.6%, up from 55.6% in July 2026. The gap to the next brand, Ascensia CONTOUR at 41.0% in August 2026, widened to 20.6 points from 15.5 points in July 2026.

Prodigy Diabetes Care recorded the largest coverage increase, rising to 3.0% in August 2026 from 0.9% in July 2026. No brand recorded a significant coverage decline during the month.

Across the full July-to-August series, Abbott FreeStyle climbed 6.0 points, Ascensia CONTOUR rose 0.9 points, LifeScan OneTouch gained 0.6 points, Roche Accu-Chek increased 2.5 points, and Trividia Health edged down 0.3 points. Prodigy Diabetes Care posted the only movement classified as beyond normal month-to-month variation.

The benchmark began with 645 prompt-surface observations in August 2026 and produced 393 qualified observations after qualification.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026

  • Abbott FreeStyle+6.0%
    Jul 202655.6%
    Aug 202661.6%
  • Ascensia CONTOUR+0.9%
    Jul 202640.1%
    Aug 202641.0%
  • Roche Accu-Chek+2.5%
    Jul 202628.5%
    Aug 202631.0%
  • LifeScan OneTouch+0.6%
    Jul 202610.9%
    Aug 202611.5%
  • Prodigy Diabetes Care+2.1% · beyond normal variation
    Jul 20260.9%
    Aug 20263.0%
  • Trividia Health-0.3%
    Jul 20260.5%
    Aug 20260.2%

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Measure

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Movement

Qualified benchmark observations

432

393

Down 39

Tracked brands

6

6

No change

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

30.8%

36.9%

Up 6.1 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

56.5%

57.5%

Up 1.0 points

Leader by valid recommendation coverage

Abbott FreeStyle (55.6%)

Abbott FreeStyle (61.6%)

Up 6.0 points

Qualified surface breadth counts the six canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All six families were represented in both months.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Healthcare and Medical Devices

Research Scope and Qualification

The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.

Research stage

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

What it represents

Source prompt-surface observations

657

645

Total prompt-surface observations collected

Unique questions

469

486

Distinct questions asked

Brand / competitor mentions

657

645

Prompts mentioning at least one tracked brand

Relevant observations

648

637

Observations relevant to the vertical

Irrelevant observations

9

8

Observations outside the research scope

Qualified benchmark observations

432

393

Public denominator for brand metrics

Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Market Discovery Methodology

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Current Brand Standings

Brand

Presence rate

Valid recommendation coverage

Top-three rate

Rank-one rate

Net sentiment

Abbott FreeStyle

95.2%

61.6%

53.2%

9.7%

0.8

Ascensia CONTOUR

49.1%

41.0%

37.1%

28.5%

0.9

Roche Accu-Chek

37.7%

31.0%

24.2%

2.5%

0.9

LifeScan OneTouch

19.9%

11.5%

7.6%

0.2%

0.7

Prodigy Diabetes Care

3.6%

3.0%

2.5%

0.0%

0.9

Trividia Health

1.3%

0.2%

0.2%

0.0%

0.6

How to Read the Standings

  • Presence rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned at all.
  • Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist.
  • Top-three rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the top three recommended positions.
  • Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is the first recommendation.
  • Net sentiment: positive minus negative mention sentiment, scaled.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Brand

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Movement since baseline

Abbott FreeStyle

55.6%

61.6%

Up 6.0 points

Ascensia CONTOUR

40.1%

41.0%

Up 0.9 points

LifeScan OneTouch

10.9%

11.5%

Up 0.6 points

Prodigy Diabetes Care

0.9%

3.0%

Up 2.1 points

Roche Accu-Chek

28.5%

31.0%

Up 2.5 points

Trividia Health

0.5%

0.2%

Down 0.3 points

Largest Increase: Prodigy Diabetes Care

Prodigy Diabetes Care more than tripled its valid recommendation coverage, rising to 3.0% in August 2026 from 0.9% in July 2026, a gain of 2.1 points that moved beyond normal month-to-month variation. The increase was driven by a rise in top-three placements, which grew to 2.5% in August 2026 from 0.2% in July 2026. The brand recorded only 12 valid recommendation appearances in August 2026, up from 4 in July 2026. Presence also rose to 3.6% in August 2026 from 1.8% in July 2026.

Category Leader: Abbott FreeStyle

Abbott FreeStyle held the top valid recommendation coverage in August 2026 at 61.6%, up from 55.6% in July 2026. The brand's rank-one rate eased to 9.7% from 10.4%, even as its coverage lead widened. Presence remained high at 95.2% in August 2026, slightly down from 96.8% in July 2026. The gap between Abbott FreeStyle and the second-place brand widened every month in the series.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The leading brands show different patterns in first-position placement. Abbott FreeStyle led top-three rate at 53.2% in August 2026, while Ascensia CONTOUR led rank-one rate at 28.5% and posted a top-three rate of 37.1%.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Brand

Aug 2026 top-three rate

Aug 2026 rank-one rate

Jul 2026 top-three rate

Jul 2026 rank-one rate

Abbott FreeStyle

53.2%

9.7%

51.8%

10.4%

Ascensia CONTOUR

37.1%

28.5%

39.1%

28.0%

Roche Accu-Chek

24.2%

2.5%

20.8%

1.2%

Close coverage can still hide different first-position rates: Abbott FreeStyle appeared in the top three more often than Ascensia CONTOUR in August 2026, yet Ascensia CONTOUR was the first recommendation more than twice as often.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class, which covers discovery and consideration queries.

Buyer-intent class

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Brand Recommendation

432

393

Pricing & Value

0

0

Multi-Brand Comparison

0

0

Total qualified observations

432

393

The current public series measures the Brand Recommendation class of discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.

Historical Measurement Record

This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.

Measurement

Qualified observations

Coverage leader

Leader coverage

Largest coverage movement

Jul 2026

432

Abbott FreeStyle

55.6%

Abbott FreeStyle up 6.0 points (Jul to Aug)

Aug 2026

393

Abbott FreeStyle

61.6%

Prodigy Diabetes Care up 2.1 points

Evidence and Source Layer

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, private or sponsored channels, or causality from a metric movement alone.

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how AI search and chat surfaces discover, mention, and recommend brands within a vertical. The Healthcare and Medical Devices index covers six tracked brands across six canonical AI/search surface families, measuring presence, recommendation coverage, placement, and sentiment on a monthly basis.

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.

Get my free AI Company Index

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.