EV Charging Networks: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend ev charging networks. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Decline: Blink Charging
- 08Category Leader: ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings)
- 09Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 10Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 11Historical Measurement Record
- 12Evidence and Source Layer
Benchmark Summary
In September 2026, ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) led the EV Charging Networks benchmark with a valid recommendation coverage of 30.5%, up from 28.3% in July 2026. The gap to the next brand, Tesla Wall Connector (Tesla, Inc.), was 2.9 percentage points, as Tesla Wall Connector (Tesla, Inc.) reached 27.6% in September 2026, up from 26.2% in July 2026.
The largest coverage decline was for Blink Charging, which moved from 2.9% in July 2026 to 0.6% in September 2026, a drop of 2.3 percentage points, reflecting movement beyond normal month-to-month variation. No tracked brand registered a significant coverage increase this month.
The current month marks a return to a two-brand leadership structure after August 2026, when the benchmark tracked a different brand set that placed ChargePoint, Tesla Supercharger, Electrify America, and EVgo in a tight 16% to 18% cluster. In September 2026, the July leader set reappeared, with ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) and Tesla Wall Connector (Tesla, Inc.) again holding the top two positions.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 521 qualified observations in September 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Sep 2026
- ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings)30.5%
- Tesla Wall Connector (Tesla, Inc.)27.6%
- EVgo6.3%
- Electrify America5.2%
- Ionna1.5%
- FLO0.8%
- Blink Charging0.6%
- EV Connect0.4%
- Shell Recharge0.4%
- ChargePoint0.0%
- Francis Energy0.0%
- Tesla Supercharger0.0%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 515 | 521 | Up 6 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 23.1% | 23.0% | Down 0.1 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 25.2% | 29.0% | Up 3.8 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) | ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) | No change |
Qualified surface breadth counts the number of canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation. The six families are ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending EV Charging Networks
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. The funnel below shows how observations were qualified.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompt-surface observations collected |
Unique questions | 549 | 597 | Distinct questions asked |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts mentioning a tracked brand or competitor |
Relevant observations | 699 | 729 | Observations relevant to the benchmark |
Irrelevant observations | 101 | 71 | Observations not relevant to the benchmark |
Qualified benchmark observations | 515 | 521 | Public denominator for brand-level metrics |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Market Discovery Methodology
Current Brand Standings
This table is the primary current-month benchmark view, sorted by valid recommendation coverage.
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) | 74.9% | 30.5% | 26.1% | 9.4% | 0.5 |
Tesla Wall Connector (Tesla, Inc.) | 79.7% | 27.6% | 25.7% | 16.1% | 0.5 |
EVgo | 66.8% | 6.3% | 3.1% | 0.4% | 0.2 |
Electrify America | 68.0% | 5.2% | 3.6% | 0.2% | 0.1 |
Ionna | 9.8% | 1.5% | 0.6% | 0.2% | 0.3 |
FLO | 6.9% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3 |
Blink Charging | 22.8% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1 |
EV Connect | 9.8% | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2 |
Shell Recharge | 6.7% | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2 |
Francis Energy | 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned.
- Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations where the brand receives a valid recommendation.
- Top-three rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the top three recommendations.
- Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is the first recommendation.
- Net sentiment: positive minus negative sentiment among mentions, normalized.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Blink Charging | 2.9% | 0.6% | Down 2.3 points |
ChargePoint | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) | 28.3% | 30.5% | Up 2.2 points |
Electrify America | 5.4% | 5.2% | Down 0.2 points |
EV Connect | 1.4% | 0.4% | Down 1.0 points |
EVgo | 5.4% | 6.3% | Up 0.9 points |
FLO | 1.2% | 0.8% | Down 0.4 points |
Francis Energy | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Ionna | 1.2% | 1.5% | Up 0.3 points |
Shell Recharge | 1.0% | 0.4% | Down 0.6 points |
Tesla Supercharger | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Tesla Wall Connector (Tesla, Inc.) | 26.2% | 27.6% | Up 1.4 points |
Largest Decline: Blink Charging
Blink Charging's valid recommendation coverage fell from 2.9% in July 2026 to 0.6% in September 2026, a decline of 2.3 percentage points, beyond normal month-to-month variation. The series recorded a value of 5.8% in August 2026 before returning to a lower level in September. Blink Charging's presence rate held roughly steady at 22.8%, while its top-three rate fell from 1.0% to 0.0%, showing that presence without top-three placement produces almost no valid recommendations.
Category Leader: ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings)
ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) leads the category with 30.5% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026, up from 28.3% in July 2026. Tesla Wall Connector (Tesla, Inc.) follows at 27.6%, up from 26.2% in July 2026. Both leaders returned to form after August 2026, when the benchmark tracked these brands under different names with no coverage recorded. The next closest brand, EVgo, sat at 6.3%, roughly one-fifth of the leader's coverage.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The table below shows placement for the leading brands.
Brand | Sep 2026 top-three rate | Sep 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) | 26.1% | 9.4% | 24.7% | 13.2% |
Tesla Wall Connector (Tesla, Inc.) | 25.7% | 16.1% | 22.7% | 11.5% |
Tesla Wall Connector (Tesla, Inc.) held a 16.1% rank-one rate in September 2026, up from 11.5% in July 2026 (up 4.6 points), while ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) rank-one rate moved from 13.2% in July 2026 to 9.4% in September 2026 (down 3.8 points). Close coverage can still hide different first-position strength.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 515 | 521 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 515 | 521 |
The current public series measures brand recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 515 | ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) | 28.3% | ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) at 28.3% |
Aug 2026 | 535 | ChargePoint | 18.3% | ChargePoint at 18.3% |
Sep 2026 | 521 | ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) | 30.5% | Blink Charging down 2.3 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, or private and sponsored channels. A metric movement alone does not establish causality.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index measures how AI and search surfaces discover, mention, and recommend brands across defined verticals. It is a neutral industry benchmark updated monthly.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Home EV Chargers: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Vitamins and Dietary Supplements: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
VA Loans Lenders: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read