EV Charging Networks: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend ev charging networks. This public AI Visibility Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Increase: EVgo
- 08Largest Decline: ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings)
- 09Largest Decline: Tesla Wall Connector (Tesla, Inc.)
- 10Category Leader: EVgo
- 11Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 12Buyer-Intent Distribution
Benchmark Summary
Questions This Section Answers
- Which EV charging network leads the October 2026 benchmark, and by how much?
- Which brands saw the largest recommendation coverage gains or declines this month?
In October 2026, EVgo leads the EV Charging Networks benchmark with a valid recommendation coverage of 9.8%, up from 5.4% in July 2026. The gap to the next brand, Electrify America, is 2.5 percentage points, as Electrify America reached 7.3% in October 2026, up from 5.4% in July 2026.
The largest coverage increase was for EVgo, which moved from 5.4% in July 2026 to 9.8% in October 2026, a rise of 4.4 percentage points. Two brands recorded significant coverage declines: ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) fell from 28.3% in July 2026 to 0.0% in October 2026, and Tesla Wall Connector (Tesla, Inc.) fell from 26.2% in July 2026 to 0.0% in October 2026. Both leaders fell to zero, wiping out more than 26 points each.
The month registered significant movement in both directions. The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 509 qualified observations in October 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Oct 2026
- EVgo9.8%
- Electrify America7.3%
- Blink Charging5.3%
- Ionna2.9%
- FLO2.8%
- EV Connect2.0%
- Shell Recharge0.6%
- ChargePoint0.0%
- ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings)0.0%
- Francis Energy0.0%
- Tesla Supercharger0.0%
- Tesla Wall Connector (Tesla, Inc.)0.0%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 515 | 509 | Down 6 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 23.1% | 26.7% | Up 3.6 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 25.2% | 35.8% | Up 10.5 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) | EVgo | Changed |
Qualified surface breadth counts the number of canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation. The six families are ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending EV Charging Networks
Research Scope and Qualification
Questions This Section Answers
- How many observations were qualified for the public benchmark, and what happened to the rest?
- Why do brand-level percentages use qualified observations rather than the raw collection?
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. The funnel below shows how observations were qualified.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompt-surface observations collected |
Unique questions | 549 | 603 | Distinct questions asked |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts mentioning a tracked brand or competitor |
Relevant observations | 699 | 692 | Observations relevant to the benchmark |
Irrelevant observations | 101 | 108 | Observations not relevant to the benchmark |
Qualified benchmark observations | 515 | 509 | Public denominator for brand-level metrics |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Visibility Market Discovery Methodology
Current Brand Standings
Questions This Section Answers
- Which EV charging networks rank highest on valid recommendation coverage?
- How do presence rate and top-three rate differ across the leading brands?
This table is the primary current-month benchmark view, sorted by valid recommendation coverage.
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVgo | 60.3% | 9.8% | 7.1% | 1.0% | 0.2 |
Electrify America | 62.3% | 7.3% | 5.1% | 0.2% | 0.1 |
Blink Charging | 19.7% | 5.3% | 2.8% | 0.2% | 0.2 |
Ionna | 10.2% | 2.9% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.4 |
FLO | 4.1% | 2.8% | 1.4% | 0.2% | 0.7 |
EV Connect | 7.5% | 2.0% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.3 |
Shell Recharge | 3.7% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1 |
ChargePoint | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Francis Energy | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Tesla Supercharger | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Tesla Wall Connector (Tesla, Inc.) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned.
- Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations where the brand receives a valid recommendation.
- Top-three rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the top three recommendations.
- Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is the first recommendation.
- Net sentiment: positive minus negative sentiment among mentions, normalized.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Visibility Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Questions This Section Answers
- Which brands moved beyond normal month-to-month variation since July 2026?
- What happened to ChargePoint Home and Tesla Wall Connector's recommendation coverage?
Brand | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Blink Charging | 2.9% | 5.3% | Up 2.4 points |
ChargePoint | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) | 28.3% | 0.0% | Down 28.3 points |
Electrify America | 5.4% | 7.3% | Up 1.9 points |
EV Connect | 1.4% | 2.0% | Up 0.6 points |
EVgo | 5.4% | 9.8% | Up 4.4 points |
FLO | 1.2% | 2.8% | Up 1.6 points |
Francis Energy | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Ionna | 1.2% | 2.9% | Up 1.7 points |
Shell Recharge | 1.0% | 0.6% | Down 0.4 points |
Tesla Supercharger | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Tesla Wall Connector (Tesla, Inc.) | 26.2% | 0.0% | Down 26.2 points |
Largest Increase: EVgo
EVgo's valid recommendation coverage rose from 5.4% in July 2026 to 9.8% in October 2026, an increase of 4.4 percentage points, beyond normal month-to-month variation. EVgo also moved up from 6.3% in September 2026 to 9.8% in October 2026, a rise of 3.5 percentage points that also exceeded normal variation. Its top-three rate rose from 2.7% in July 2026 to 7.1% in October 2026, and its rank-one rate moved from 0.0% to 1.0%.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Largest Decline: ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings)
ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) fell from 28.3% valid recommendation coverage in July 2026 to 0.0% in October 2026, a decline of 28.3 percentage points. The brand also declined from 30.5% in September 2026 to 0.0% in October 2026, a drop of 30.5 percentage points. Its presence rate moved from 71.1% to 0.0%, and its top-three rate fell from 24.7% to 0.0%.
Largest Decline: Tesla Wall Connector (Tesla, Inc.)
Tesla Wall Connector (Tesla, Inc.) fell from 26.2% valid recommendation coverage in July 2026 to 0.0% in October 2026, a decline of 26.2 percentage points. The brand also declined from 27.6% in September 2026 to 0.0% in October 2026, a drop of 27.6 percentage points. Its presence rate moved from 81.9% to 0.0%, and its rank-one rate fell from 11.5% to 0.0%.
Category Leader: EVgo
EVgo leads the category at 9.8% valid recommendation coverage in October 2026, up from 5.4% in July 2026. Electrify America follows at 7.3%, up from 5.4% in July 2026. Blink Charging, at 5.3%, reported the largest prior-to-current jump in the category, rising from 0.6% in September 2026 to 5.3% in October 2026, though its move since the July 2026 baseline remains within normal variation.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Questions This Section Answers
- Where do the leading EV charging networks actually place when recommended?
- How does rank-one rate differ from top-three rate across EVgo, Electrify America, and Blink Charging?
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The table below shows placement for the leading brands.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Brand | Oct 2026 top-three rate | Oct 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EVgo | 7.1% | 1.0% | 2.7% | 0.0% |
Electrify America | 5.1% | 0.2% | 2.7% | 0.2% |
Blink Charging | 2.8% | 0.2% | 1.0% | 0.2% |
EVgo holds the highest top-three rate at 7.1% and the highest rank-one rate at 1.0%, while Electrify America and Blink Charging each held a rank-one rate of 0.2% in October 2026. Close coverage can still hide different first-position rates.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
Questions This Section Answers
- What buyer-intent classes does the current public series cover?
- Are Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison queries measured yet?
All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 515 | 509 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 515 | 509 |
The current public series measures brand recommendation discovery only. It does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
Questions This Section Answers
- How has the coverage leader changed across the July to October 2026 measurements?
- Which brands recorded the largest coverage swings across the historical record?
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 515 | ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) | 28.3% | ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) at 28.3% |
Aug 2026 | 535 | ChargePoint | 18.3% | ChargePoint at 18.3% |
Sep 2026 | 521 | ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) | 30.5% | Blink Charging down 2.3 points |
Oct 2026 | 509 | EVgo | 9.8% | ChargePoint Home (ChargePoint Holdings) down 30.5 points |
Leadership changed in October 2026, and the new leader holds a fraction of the former leader's coverage.
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment, not proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, or private and sponsored channels. A metric movement alone does not establish causality.
Top 10 Cited Domains
Questions This Section Answers
- Which domains were cited most often across AI platform responses?
- How concentrated are citations among the top domains, and which brand domains appear?
Across all AI platform responses in this measurement period, 6,893 citations were observed, spanning 1,625 unique domains.
Rank | Domain | Citations | Share | Platforms citing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | google.com | 512 | 7.4% | AI Mode, AI Overviews |
2 | youtube.com | 448 | 6.5% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode |
3 | reddit.com | 324 | 4.7% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode |
4 | blinkcharging.com | 129 | 1.9% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode |
5 | evgo.com | 107 | 1.6% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode |
6 | energysage.com | 106 | 1.5% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode |
7 | chargepoint.com | 99 | 1.4% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode |
8 | motortrend.com | 95 | 1.4% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode |
9 | tesla.com | 95 | 1.4% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode |
10 | facebook.com | 83 | 1.2% | AI Overviews, AI Mode, Perplexity |
Citations are broadly distributed, with the top three domains accounting for just 18.6% of all citations and the remaining top-ten domains each holding under 2%. Three tracked brand domains appear in the top ten — blinkcharging.com (rank 4), evgo.com (rank 5), and chargepoint.com (rank 7) — alongside tesla.com (rank 9), the home domain of the Tesla-branded entries tracked in this vertical. General platforms and review or editorial sources dominate the remaining positions, with reddit.com, energysage.com, motortrend.com, and facebook.com cited alongside the two largest general sites, google.com and youtube.com.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Visibility Market Discovery Index measures how AI and search surfaces discover, mention, and recommend brands across defined verticals. It is a neutral industry benchmark updated monthly.
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Visibility Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
The public percentage cannot identify the prompts, competitors, or sources causing the result.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Home EV Chargers: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Consumer Banking Alabama: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Women’s Clothing Rental: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read