Enterprise SEO Marketing Agencies: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend enterprise seo marketing agencies. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Decline: First Page Sage
- 08Additional Notable Decliners
- 09Largest Increase: NoGood
- 10Category Leader: WebFX
- 11Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 12Buyer-Intent Distribution
Benchmark Summary
WebFX continues to lead the Enterprise SEO Marketing Agencies index with valid recommendation coverage of 66.1% in September 2026, down from 73.8% in the July 2026 baseline. The next closest brand, Searchbloom, holds a 39.4% valid recommendation coverage rate this month, creating a gap of 26.7 percentage points between the two leaders.
The largest coverage decline over the baseline-to-current period belongs to First Page Sage, which fell to 28.9% in September 2026 from 43.7% in July 2026, a drop of 14.8 percentage points. WebFX also declined over the same period, moving from 73.8% to 66.1%, including a 5.8-point move between August and September 2026. No brand recorded a large increase this period; NoGood posted the largest gain among tracked brands, rising to 13.0% in September 2026 from 11.7% in July 2026.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 502 qualified observations in September 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Sep 2026
- WebFX66.1%
- Searchbloom39.4%
- First Page Sage28.9%
- Siege Media26.5%
- Directive26.1%
- Omniscient Digital14.3%
- NoGood13.0%
- iPullRank10.8%
- Seer Interactive10.4%
- Avenue Z0.2%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 446 | 502 | Up 56 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 47.3% | 53.8% | Up 6.5 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 91.0% | 86.3% | Down 4.8 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | WebFX | WebFX | No change |
Qualified surface breadth counts the number of canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. The index recorded observations across all six families in both July and September 2026.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Enterprise SEO Marketing Agencies
Research Scope and Qualification
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompts collected across AI surfaces |
Unique questions | 574 | 570 | Distinct questions after removing duplicates |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts mentioning at least one tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 446 | 514 | Prompts relevant to the vertical |
Irrelevant observations | 354 | 286 | Prompts not relevant to the vertical |
Qualified benchmark observations | 446 | 502 | Public denominator for brand-level metrics |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Market Discovery Methodology
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WebFX | 75.1% | 66.1% | 47.4% | 29.1% | 0.93 |
Searchbloom | 45.4% | 39.4% | 19.9% | 5.8% | 0.93 |
First Page Sage | 33.5% | 28.9% | 17.9% | 9.2% | 0.90 |
Siege Media | 28.1% | 26.5% | 13.4% | 2.2% | 0.98 |
Directive | 27.3% | 26.1% | 13.0% | 5.8% | 0.98 |
Omniscient Digital | 14.7% | 14.3% | 9.2% | 2.2% | 0.99 |
NoGood | 14.1% | 13.0% | 8.0% | 2.8% | 0.94 |
iPullRank | 13.0% | 10.8% | 5.8% | 2.8% | 0.98 |
Seer Interactive | 11.6% | 10.4% | 6.2% | 1.4% | 0.95 |
Avenue Z | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 1.00 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned in any form.
- Valid recommendation coverage: Share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist.
- Top-three rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand is recommended in the top three positions.
- Rank-one rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand is recommended first.
- Net sentiment: Positive minus negative sentiment across mentions, scaled from -1 to 1.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
The table below tracks valid recommendation coverage from the July 2026 baseline to the current September 2026 measurement for all ten tracked brands.
Brand | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
WebFX | 73.8% | 66.1% | Down 7.7 points |
Searchbloom | 44.6% | 39.4% | Down 5.2 points |
First Page Sage | 43.7% | 28.9% | Down 14.8 points |
Siege Media | 28.2% | 26.5% | Down 1.7 points |
Directive | 29.4% | 26.1% | Down 3.3 points |
Omniscient Digital | 14.8% | 14.3% | Down 0.5 points |
NoGood | 11.7% | 13.0% | Up 1.3 points |
iPullRank | 16.6% | 10.8% | Down 5.8 points |
Seer Interactive | 16.8% | 10.4% | Down 6.4 points |
Avenue Z | 0.2% | 0.2% | No change |
Largest Decline: First Page Sage
First Page Sage recorded the largest coverage decline in the September 2026 index, falling to 28.9% from 43.7% in July 2026, a drop of 14.8 percentage points. The brand declined in each of the two months since the baseline, with its largest single-month decrease of 12.9 percentage points occurring between August and September 2026. Its presence rate also moved down to 33.5% in September 2026 from 48.2% in July 2026. The scale and speed of this decline suggest a material loss of AI recommendation visibility, not routine fluctuation.
Additional Notable Decliners
Seer Interactive declined to 10.4% in September 2026 from 16.8% in July 2026, a drop of 6.4 percentage points. The brand fell sharply between July and August 2026 to 9.7%, then edged up 0.7 percentage points in September.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
iPullRank declined to 10.8% in September 2026 from 16.6% in July 2026, a drop of 5.8 percentage points. The decline occurred entirely between July and August 2026, followed by no change in September.
Largest Increase: NoGood
NoGood recorded the largest gain in valid recommendation coverage among tracked brands this period, rising to 13.0% in September 2026 from 11.7% in July 2026, an increase of 1.3 percentage points. The brand posted gains across both tracked intervals, moving from 11.7% in July to 11.9% in August to 13.0% in September 2026. The movement is modest and should not yet be treated as a trend.
Category Leader: WebFX
WebFX remains the category leader with 66.1% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026, even after declining from 73.8% in the July 2026 baseline, including a 5.8-point move between August and September 2026. The brand's top-three rate of 47.4% and rank-one rate of 29.1% remain the highest in the index. Its rank-one rate rose to 29.1% in September 2026 from 24.2% in July 2026, even as its overall coverage moved down over the same period. A stable leadership position masks a strengthening first-choice preference.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage shows how often a brand appears, but not how prominently. WebFX leads on placement as well, appearing in the top three in 47.4% of observations and first in 29.1% of observations in September 2026. Searchbloom's top-three rate of 19.9% and rank-one rate of 5.8% show a mid-pack placement profile. Searchbloom's second-place coverage does not translate into a comparable first-choice position.
Brand | Sep 2026 top-three rate | Sep 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WebFX | 47.4% | 29.1% | 50.2% | 24.2% |
Searchbloom | 19.9% | 5.8% | 23.3% | 9.2% |
First Page Sage | 17.9% | 9.2% | 26.9% | 15.5% |
Close coverage levels can still hide different first-position rates. WebFX's rank-one rate rose to 29.1% in September 2026 from 24.2% in July 2026, even as its coverage moved down over the same period.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in September 2026 fell into the Brand Recommendation class, consistent with July and August 2026.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 446 | 502 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 446 | 502 |
The current public series measures brand recommendation discovery only and cannot answer pricing or comparison questions.
Historical Measurement Record
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Coverage movement vs. prior month |
|---|---|---|---|---|
July 2026 (baseline) | 446 | WebFX | 73.8% | Baseline month; no prior comparison |
August 2026 | 455 | WebFX | 71.9% | Seer Interactive, down 7.1 points (Jul to Aug) |
September 2026 | 502 | WebFX | 66.1% | First Page Sage, down 12.9 points (Aug to Sep) |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure:
- Market share or revenue attribution
- Actual sales or conversions from AI recommendations
- Every possible AI response to a given query
- Organic-search ranking positions
- Social media mention volume
- Private or sponsored AI channels
- Causality from a metric movement alone
Two months of directional change is insufficient to establish a durable trend.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index is a neutral, repeatable industry benchmark that tracks how often brands appear, are recommended, and are placed in AI-generated answers across six canonical AI/search surface families. New measurements are added to the same evergreen report each month.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper. The public percentage cannot identify the prompts, competitors, or sources causing the result.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Email Marketing Service: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Digital Marketing Agency: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Staffing Agencies: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read