Enterprise SEO Marketing Agencies: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend enterprise seo marketing agencies. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Current-Month Movement: WebFX
- 08Largest Decline: First Page Sage
- 09Category Leader: WebFX
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
WebFX leads the Enterprise SEO Marketing Agencies index in October 2026 with valid recommendation coverage of 71.9%. That figure sits slightly below the 73.8% recorded in the July 2026 baseline (down 1.9 points), a difference the data treats as within normal month-to-month variation rather than a change in standing. The next closest brand, Searchbloom, holds 46.0% valid recommendation coverage, a gap of 25.9 percentage points behind the leader.
No brand posted a significant coverage increase across the full baseline-to-current period. The most notable movement within the series belongs to WebFX, which rose to 71.9% in October 2026 from 66.1% in September 2026, a gain of 5.8 percentage points that reverses the prior month's decline.
The largest baseline-to-current decline belongs to First Page Sage, which fell to 25.6% in October 2026 from 43.7% in July 2026, a drop of 18.1 percentage points, declining in each of the three months since the baseline. Directive, iPullRank, and Seer Interactive also recorded significant declines over the same period.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 480 qualified observations in October 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Oct 2026
- WebFX71.9%
- Searchbloom46.0%
- First Page Sage25.6%
- Directive23.5%
- Siege Media23.5%
- Omniscient Digital13.5%
- NoGood11.9%
- iPullRank11.0%
- Seer Interactive11.0%
- Avenue Z0.4%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 446 | 480 | Up 34 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 47.3% | 65.8% | Up 18.5 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 91.0% | 95.2% | Up 4.2 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | WebFX | WebFX | No change |
Qualified surface breadth counts the number of canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. The index recorded observations across all six families in both July and October 2026.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Enterprise SEO Marketing Agencies
Research Scope and Qualification
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompts collected across AI surfaces |
Unique questions | 574 | 573 | Distinct questions after removing duplicates |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts mentioning at least one tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 446 | 492 | Prompts relevant to the vertical |
Irrelevant observations | 354 | 308 | Prompts not relevant to the vertical |
Qualified benchmark observations | 446 | 480 | Public denominator for brand-level metrics |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Market Discovery Methodology
Current Brand Standings
Questions This Section Answers
- Which enterprise SEO agency ranks first on valid recommendation coverage, and how large is the lead?
- How do presence rate and rank-one rate differ across the tracked brands?
- Which agencies are clustered in the middle of the standings?
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WebFX | 75.2% | 71.9% | 55.6% | 38.1% | 0.96 |
Searchbloom | 47.5% | 46.0% | 29.6% | 7.1% | 0.97 |
First Page Sage | 27.7% | 25.6% | 17.9% | 6.7% | 0.94 |
Siege Media | 24.8% | 23.5% | 14.0% | 3.8% | 0.97 |
Directive | 24.8% | 23.5% | 12.3% | 5.0% | 0.97 |
Omniscient Digital | 14.2% | 13.5% | 8.5% | 1.9% | 0.96 |
NoGood | 12.5% | 11.9% | 6.9% | 1.7% | 0.97 |
iPullRank | 12.3% | 11.0% | 6.0% | 2.9% | 1.00 |
Seer Interactive | 11.9% | 11.0% | 7.3% | 2.3% | 0.98 |
Avenue Z | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 1.00 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned in any form.
- Valid recommendation coverage: Share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist.
- Top-three rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand is recommended in the top three positions.
- Rank-one rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand is recommended first.
- Net sentiment: Positive minus negative sentiment across mentions, scaled from -1 to 1.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Questions This Section Answers
- Which enterprise SEO agencies gained or lost the most recommendation coverage since the July 2026 baseline?
- What accounts for WebFX's month-over-month coverage swing and its rising rank-one rate?
- How consistent was First Page Sage's decline across the three months since the baseline?
Brand | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
WebFX | 73.8% | 71.9% | Down 1.9 points |
Searchbloom | 44.6% | 46.0% | Up 1.4 points |
First Page Sage | 43.7% | 25.6% | Down 18.1 points |
Siege Media | 28.2% | 23.5% | Down 4.7 points |
Directive | 29.4% | 23.5% | Down 5.9 points |
Omniscient Digital | 14.8% | 13.5% | Down 1.3 points |
NoGood | 11.7% | 11.9% | Up 0.2 points |
iPullRank | 16.6% | 11.0% | Down 5.6 points |
Seer Interactive | 16.8% | 11.0% | Down 5.8 points |
Avenue Z | 0.2% | 0.4% | Up 0.2 points |
Current-Month Movement: WebFX
WebFX posted the only significant single-month coverage change in the index this period, rising to 71.9% in October 2026 from 66.1% in September 2026, a gain of 5.8 percentage points that reverses the prior month's decline. Measured against the July 2026 baseline, the brand's coverage sits slightly lower, at 71.9% versus 73.8%, a difference of 1.9 points that falls within normal month-to-month variation. Its rank-one rate stands at 38.1% in October 2026, up from 24.2% in July 2026.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Largest Decline: First Page Sage
First Page Sage recorded the largest baseline-to-current coverage decline in the October 2026 index, falling to 25.6% from 43.7% in July 2026, a drop of 18.1 percentage points. The brand declined in each of the three months since the baseline, including a 3.3-point move between September and October 2026. Its presence rate moved down to 27.7% in October 2026 from 48.2% in July 2026, and its top-three rate fell to 17.9% from 26.9% over the same period.
Category Leader: WebFX
WebFX remains the category leader with 71.9% valid recommendation coverage in October 2026, including a 5.8-point increase between September and October 2026 that reversed the prior month's decline. Measured against the July 2026 baseline, the brand's coverage is essentially flat (73.8% to 71.9%, within normal month-to-month variation). The brand's top-three rate of 55.6% and rank-one rate of 38.1% are the highest in the index; its rank-one rate rose to 38.1% in October 2026 from 24.2% in July 2026. Close coverage levels can still sit above different first-position rates.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Questions This Section Answers
- Which enterprise SEO agencies appear most often in the top three recommendations and in first position?
- Why can two brands with similar coverage still show very different rank-one rates?
Coverage shows how often a brand appears, but not how prominently. WebFX leads on placement as well, appearing in the top three in 55.6% of observations and first in 38.1% of observations in October 2026. Searchbloom's top-three rate of 29.6% and rank-one rate of 7.1% show a mid-pack placement profile. First Page Sage's top-three rate of 17.9% and rank-one rate of 6.7% remain in the top third of the index despite its coverage decline.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Brand | Oct 2026 top-three rate | Oct 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WebFX | 55.6% | 38.1% | 50.2% | 24.2% |
Searchbloom | 29.6% | 7.1% | 23.3% | 9.2% |
First Page Sage | 17.9% | 6.7% | 26.9% | 15.5% |
Close coverage levels can still hide different first-position rates. WebFX's rank-one rate rose to 38.1% in October 2026 from 24.2% in July 2026, even as its coverage moved down slightly over the same period.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
Questions This Section Answers
- What buyer-intent class do all qualified observations fall into, and what does that mean for the benchmark's scope?
All qualified observations in October 2026 fell into the Brand Recommendation class, consistent with July, August, and September 2026.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 446 | 480 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 446 | 480 |
The current public series measures that class of discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the empty classes.
Historical Measurement Record
Questions This Section Answers
- Which brands have led recommendation coverage across every month of the record?
- Which months produced the largest single-brand coverage movements in the series?
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
July 2026 (baseline) | 446 | WebFX | 73.8% | Baseline month; no prior comparison |
August 2026 | 455 | WebFX | 71.9% | Seer Interactive, down 7.1 points (Jul to Aug) |
September 2026 | 502 | WebFX | 66.1% | First Page Sage, down 12.9 points (Aug to Sep) |
October 2026 | 480 | WebFX | 71.9% | WebFX, up 5.8 points (Sep to Oct) |
Evidence and Source Layer
Questions This Section Answers
- What kind of evidence does the benchmark retain at the prompt level?
- How should citation and source presence be interpreted in relation to a brand being recommended?
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure:
- Market share or revenue attribution
- Actual sales or conversions from AI recommendations
- Every possible AI response to a given query
- Organic-search ranking positions
- Social media mention volume
- Private or sponsored AI channels
- Causality from a metric movement alone
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Top 10 Cited Domains
Questions This Section Answers
- Which domains are cited most often across AI platform responses in October 2026?
- How distributed are citations across domains, and which tracked brand domains appear in the top ten?
- What types of sources dominate the upper ranks of cited references?
Across all AI platform responses in October 2026, the benchmark observed 6,558 citations drawn from 2,089 unique domains.
Rank | Domain | Citations | Share | Platforms citing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | clutch.co | 325 | 5.0% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
2 | youtube.com | 275 | 4.2% | Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
3 | google.com | 257 | 3.9% | AI Mode, AI Overviews |
4 | reddit.com | 207 | 3.2% | Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
5 | firstpagesage.com | 167 | 2.5% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
6 | thriveagency.com | 138 | 2.1% | Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
7 | goodfirms.co | 113 | 1.7% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
8 | webfx.com | 106 | 1.6% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
9 | designrush.com | 100 | 1.5% | ChatGPT, Copilot, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
10 | searchbloom.com | 93 | 1.4% | ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
Citations are broadly distributed rather than concentrated: no single domain exceeds 5.0% share, and the top ten domains together account for a minority of all citations. Two tracked brands' own domains appear in the top ten, firstpagesage.com at rank five with 167 citations and webfx.com at rank eight with 106 citations, alongside searchbloom.com at rank ten. Aggregator and directory sources dominate the upper ranks, with clutch.co, goodfirms.co, and designrush.com together accounting for a meaningful share of cited references, while video and community platforms such as youtube.com and reddit.com also feature prominently.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index is a neutral, repeatable industry benchmark that tracks how often brands appear, are recommended, and are placed in AI-generated answers across six canonical AI/search surface families. New measurements are added to the same evergreen report each month.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Email Marketing Service: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Digital Marketing Agency: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Staffing Agencies: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read