Enterprise SEO Marketing Agencies: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index

Tracking how AI platforms recommend enterprise seo marketing agencies. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

Mark Huntley, J.D.
By Mark Huntley, J.D.Growth Strategist & AI Discovery Analyst
8 minutes read

Benchmark Summary

WebFX leads the Enterprise SEO Marketing Agencies index in October 2026 with valid recommendation coverage of 71.9%. That figure sits slightly below the 73.8% recorded in the July 2026 baseline (down 1.9 points), a difference the data treats as within normal month-to-month variation rather than a change in standing. The next closest brand, Searchbloom, holds 46.0% valid recommendation coverage, a gap of 25.9 percentage points behind the leader.

No brand posted a significant coverage increase across the full baseline-to-current period. The most notable movement within the series belongs to WebFX, which rose to 71.9% in October 2026 from 66.1% in September 2026, a gain of 5.8 percentage points that reverses the prior month's decline.

The largest baseline-to-current decline belongs to First Page Sage, which fell to 25.6% in October 2026 from 43.7% in July 2026, a drop of 18.1 percentage points, declining in each of the three months since the baseline. Directive, iPullRank, and Seer Interactive also recorded significant declines over the same period.

The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 480 qualified observations in October 2026 after qualification.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Oct 2026

0%20%40%60%80%Jul 2026Aug 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
  • WebFX71.9%
  • Searchbloom46.0%
  • First Page Sage25.6%
  • Directive23.5%
  • Siege Media23.5%
  • Omniscient Digital13.5%
  • NoGood11.9%
  • iPullRank11.0%
  • Seer Interactive11.0%
  • Avenue Z0.4%

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Measure

Jul 2026

Oct 2026

Movement

Qualified benchmark observations

446

480

Up 34

Tracked brands

10

10

No change

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

47.3%

65.8%

Up 18.5 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

91.0%

95.2%

Up 4.2 points

Leader by valid recommendation coverage

WebFX

WebFX

No change

Qualified surface breadth counts the number of canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. The index recorded observations across all six families in both July and October 2026.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Enterprise SEO Marketing Agencies

Research Scope and Qualification

Research stage

Jul 2026

Oct 2026

What it represents

Source prompt-surface observations

800

800

Total prompts collected across AI surfaces

Unique questions

574

573

Distinct questions after removing duplicates

Brand / competitor mentions

800

800

Prompts mentioning at least one tracked brand

Relevant observations

446

492

Prompts relevant to the vertical

Irrelevant observations

354

308

Prompts not relevant to the vertical

Qualified benchmark observations

446

480

Public denominator for brand-level metrics

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Market Discovery Methodology

Current Brand Standings

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which enterprise SEO agency ranks first on valid recommendation coverage, and how large is the lead?
  • How do presence rate and rank-one rate differ across the tracked brands?
  • Which agencies are clustered in the middle of the standings?

Brand

Presence rate

Valid recommendation coverage

Top-three rate

Rank-one rate

Net sentiment

WebFX

75.2%

71.9%

55.6%

38.1%

0.96

Searchbloom

47.5%

46.0%

29.6%

7.1%

0.97

First Page Sage

27.7%

25.6%

17.9%

6.7%

0.94

Siege Media

24.8%

23.5%

14.0%

3.8%

0.97

Directive

24.8%

23.5%

12.3%

5.0%

0.97

Omniscient Digital

14.2%

13.5%

8.5%

1.9%

0.96

NoGood

12.5%

11.9%

6.9%

1.7%

0.97

iPullRank

12.3%

11.0%

6.0%

2.9%

1.00

Seer Interactive

11.9%

11.0%

7.3%

2.3%

0.98

Avenue Z

0.4%

0.4%

0.2%

0.0%

1.00

How to Read the Standings

  • Presence rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned in any form.
  • Valid recommendation coverage: Share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist.
  • Top-three rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand is recommended in the top three positions.
  • Rank-one rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand is recommended first.
  • Net sentiment: Positive minus negative sentiment across mentions, scaled from -1 to 1.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which enterprise SEO agencies gained or lost the most recommendation coverage since the July 2026 baseline?
  • What accounts for WebFX's month-over-month coverage swing and its rising rank-one rate?
  • How consistent was First Page Sage's decline across the three months since the baseline?

Brand

Jul 2026

Oct 2026

Movement since baseline

WebFX

73.8%

71.9%

Down 1.9 points

Searchbloom

44.6%

46.0%

Up 1.4 points

First Page Sage

43.7%

25.6%

Down 18.1 points

Siege Media

28.2%

23.5%

Down 4.7 points

Directive

29.4%

23.5%

Down 5.9 points

Omniscient Digital

14.8%

13.5%

Down 1.3 points

NoGood

11.7%

11.9%

Up 0.2 points

iPullRank

16.6%

11.0%

Down 5.6 points

Seer Interactive

16.8%

11.0%

Down 5.8 points

Avenue Z

0.2%

0.4%

Up 0.2 points

Current-Month Movement: WebFX

WebFX posted the only significant single-month coverage change in the index this period, rising to 71.9% in October 2026 from 66.1% in September 2026, a gain of 5.8 percentage points that reverses the prior month's decline. Measured against the July 2026 baseline, the brand's coverage sits slightly lower, at 71.9% versus 73.8%, a difference of 1.9 points that falls within normal month-to-month variation. Its rank-one rate stands at 38.1% in October 2026, up from 24.2% in July 2026.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Largest Decline: First Page Sage

First Page Sage recorded the largest baseline-to-current coverage decline in the October 2026 index, falling to 25.6% from 43.7% in July 2026, a drop of 18.1 percentage points. The brand declined in each of the three months since the baseline, including a 3.3-point move between September and October 2026. Its presence rate moved down to 27.7% in October 2026 from 48.2% in July 2026, and its top-three rate fell to 17.9% from 26.9% over the same period.

Category Leader: WebFX

WebFX remains the category leader with 71.9% valid recommendation coverage in October 2026, including a 5.8-point increase between September and October 2026 that reversed the prior month's decline. Measured against the July 2026 baseline, the brand's coverage is essentially flat (73.8% to 71.9%, within normal month-to-month variation). The brand's top-three rate of 55.6% and rank-one rate of 38.1% are the highest in the index; its rank-one rate rose to 38.1% in October 2026 from 24.2% in July 2026. Close coverage levels can still sit above different first-position rates.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which enterprise SEO agencies appear most often in the top three recommendations and in first position?
  • Why can two brands with similar coverage still show very different rank-one rates?

Coverage shows how often a brand appears, but not how prominently. WebFX leads on placement as well, appearing in the top three in 55.6% of observations and first in 38.1% of observations in October 2026. Searchbloom's top-three rate of 29.6% and rank-one rate of 7.1% show a mid-pack placement profile. First Page Sage's top-three rate of 17.9% and rank-one rate of 6.7% remain in the top third of the index despite its coverage decline.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Brand

Oct 2026 top-three rate

Oct 2026 rank-one rate

Jul 2026 top-three rate

Jul 2026 rank-one rate

WebFX

55.6%

38.1%

50.2%

24.2%

Searchbloom

29.6%

7.1%

23.3%

9.2%

First Page Sage

17.9%

6.7%

26.9%

15.5%

Close coverage levels can still hide different first-position rates. WebFX's rank-one rate rose to 38.1% in October 2026 from 24.2% in July 2026, even as its coverage moved down slightly over the same period.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

Questions This Section Answers

  • What buyer-intent class do all qualified observations fall into, and what does that mean for the benchmark's scope?

All qualified observations in October 2026 fell into the Brand Recommendation class, consistent with July, August, and September 2026.

Buyer-intent class

Jul 2026

Oct 2026

Brand Recommendation

446

480

Pricing & Value

0

0

Multi-Brand Comparison

0

0

Total qualified observations

446

480

The current public series measures that class of discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the empty classes.

Historical Measurement Record

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which brands have led recommendation coverage across every month of the record?
  • Which months produced the largest single-brand coverage movements in the series?

Measurement

Qualified observations

Coverage leader

Leader coverage

Largest coverage movement

July 2026 (baseline)

446

WebFX

73.8%

Baseline month; no prior comparison

August 2026

455

WebFX

71.9%

Seer Interactive, down 7.1 points (Jul to Aug)

September 2026

502

WebFX

66.1%

First Page Sage, down 12.9 points (Aug to Sep)

October 2026

480

WebFX

71.9%

WebFX, up 5.8 points (Sep to Oct)

Evidence and Source Layer

Questions This Section Answers

  • What kind of evidence does the benchmark retain at the prompt level?
  • How should citation and source presence be interpreted in relation to a brand being recommended?

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure:

  • Market share or revenue attribution
  • Actual sales or conversions from AI recommendations
  • Every possible AI response to a given query
  • Organic-search ranking positions
  • Social media mention volume
  • Private or sponsored AI channels
  • Causality from a metric movement alone

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Top 10 Cited Domains

Questions This Section Answers

  • Which domains are cited most often across AI platform responses in October 2026?
  • How distributed are citations across domains, and which tracked brand domains appear in the top ten?
  • What types of sources dominate the upper ranks of cited references?

Across all AI platform responses in October 2026, the benchmark observed 6,558 citations drawn from 2,089 unique domains.

Rank

Domain

Citations

Share

Platforms citing

1

clutch.co

325

5.0%

ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

2

youtube.com

275

4.2%

Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

3

google.com

257

3.9%

AI Mode, AI Overviews

4

reddit.com

207

3.2%

Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

5

firstpagesage.com

167

2.5%

ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

6

thriveagency.com

138

2.1%

Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

7

goodfirms.co

113

1.7%

ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

8

webfx.com

106

1.6%

ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

9

designrush.com

100

1.5%

ChatGPT, Copilot, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

10

searchbloom.com

93

1.4%

ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity

Citations are broadly distributed rather than concentrated: no single domain exceeds 5.0% share, and the top ten domains together account for a minority of all citations. Two tracked brands' own domains appear in the top ten, firstpagesage.com at rank five with 167 citations and webfx.com at rank eight with 106 citations, alongside searchbloom.com at rank ten. Aggregator and directory sources dominate the upper ranks, with clutch.co, goodfirms.co, and designrush.com together accounting for a meaningful share of cited references, while video and community platforms such as youtube.com and reddit.com also feature prominently.

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index is a neutral, repeatable industry benchmark that tracks how often brands appear, are recommended, and are placed in AI-generated answers across six canonical AI/search surface families. New measurements are added to the same evergreen report each month.

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.

Get my free AI Company Index

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.