Endpoint Detection and Response Software: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend endpoint detection and response software. Updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Decline: Sophos Intercept X
- 08Category Leader: CrowdStrike Falcon
- 09Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 10Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 11Historical Measurement Record
- 12Evidence and Source Layer
Benchmark Summary
In August 2026, CrowdStrike Falcon leads the Endpoint Detection and Response Software benchmark with a valid recommendation coverage of 61.0%, down from 62.5% in July 2026. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint follows closely at 60.1% in August 2026, down from 61.4% in July 2026, a gap of 0.9 percentage points between the two leaders.
The largest coverage decline this month belongs to Sophos Intercept X, which fell to 35.3% in August 2026 from 43.2% in July 2026, a drop of 7.9 percentage points that exceeds normal month-to-month variation. There was no significant riser in August 2026; the largest increase was VMware Carbon Black, which rose to 2.2% in August 2026 from 1.5% in July 2026, though this movement remained within normal variation.
The benchmark recorded significant movement this month, driven primarily by the Sophos Intercept X decline. Across the full July-to-August series, CrowdStrike Falcon held the lead with stable coverage, while several other brands saw modest declines within normal variation.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 536 qualified observations in August 2026 and 456 in July 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026
- CrowdStrike Falcon-1.5%Jul 202662.5%Aug 202661.0%
- Microsoft Defender for Endpoint-1.3%Jul 202661.4%Aug 202660.1%
- SentinelOne-1.6%Jul 202658.1%Aug 202656.5%
- Sophos Intercept X-7.9% · beyond normal variationJul 202643.2%Aug 202635.3%
- Bitdefender GravityZone+0.6%Jul 202628.3%Aug 202628.9%
- Palo Alto Cortex XDR-1.2%Jul 202629.2%Aug 202628.0%
- Trend Micro-4.1%Jul 202615.3%Aug 202611.2%
- Trellix-1.6%Jul 20264.4%Aug 20262.8%
- VMware Carbon Black+0.7%Jul 20261.5%Aug 20262.2%
- Cybereason+0.6%Jul 20261.1%Aug 20261.7%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | July 2026 | August 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 456 | 536 | Up 80 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 46.5% | 46.5% | No change |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 70.4% | 57.5% | Down 12.9 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | CrowdStrike Falcon | CrowdStrike Falcon | No change |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Endpoint Detection and Response Software
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. The funnel below shows how observations were qualified.
Research stage | July 2026 | August 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompts sent to AI surfaces |
Unique questions | 490 | 553 | Distinct questions after deduplication |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 798 | Prompts mentioning a tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 603 | 682 | Prompts relevant to the category |
Irrelevant observations | 197 | 116 | Prompts not relevant to the category |
Qualified benchmark observations | 456 | 536 | Public denominator for brand metrics |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Market Discovery Methodology.
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrowdStrike Falcon | 85.5% | 61.0% | 45.7% | 31.5% | 0.8 |
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | 84.0% | 60.1% | 41.6% | 8.8% | 0.8 |
SentinelOne | 77.0% | 56.5% | 34.7% | 2.8% | 0.8 |
Sophos Intercept X | 43.1% | 35.3% | 7.6% | 0.8% | 0.9 |
Bitdefender GravityZone | 35.4% | 28.9% | 13.8% | 8.2% | 0.9 |
Palo Alto Cortex XDR | 40.5% | 28.0% | 8.0% | 2.4% | 0.7 |
Trend Micro | 21.1% | 11.2% | 2.1% | 0.0% | 0.6 |
Trellix | 6.2% | 2.8% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.5 |
VMware Carbon Black | 6.2% | 2.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3 |
Cybereason | 2.8% | 1.7% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.7 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: share of qualified observations in which the brand is mentioned at all.
- Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations in which the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist.
- Top-three rate: share of qualified observations in which the brand appears among the top three recommended options.
- Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations in which the brand is the first recommendation.
- Net sentiment: positive mentions minus negative mentions divided by total mentions.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | July 2026 | August 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Bitdefender GravityZone | 28.3% | 28.9% | Up 0.6 points |
CrowdStrike Falcon | 62.5% | 61.0% | Down 1.5 points |
Cybereason | 1.1% | 1.7% | Up 0.6 points |
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | 61.4% | 60.1% | Down 1.3 points |
Palo Alto Cortex XDR | 29.2% | 28.0% | Down 1.2 points |
SentinelOne | 58.1% | 56.5% | Down 1.6 points |
Sophos Intercept X | 43.2% | 35.3% | Down 7.9 points |
Trellix | 4.4% | 2.8% | Down 1.6 points |
Trend Micro | 15.3% | 11.2% | Down 4.1 points |
VMware Carbon Black | 1.5% | 2.2% | Up 0.7 points |
Largest Decline: Sophos Intercept X
Sophos Intercept X posted the only significant movement in August 2026, with valid recommendation coverage falling by 7.9 percentage points beyond normal month-to-month variation. Presence rate also declined to 43.1% in August 2026 from 49.8% in July 2026, even though the brand appeared in more qualified observations overall — 231 in August 2026, up from 227 in July 2026, reflecting the larger overall observation base that month. Its valid recommendation count fell to 189 from 197.
Category Leader: CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon remained the category leader in August 2026 with a valid recommendation coverage of 61.0%, down from 62.5% in July 2026. This change was within normal variation. Its top-three rate fell to 45.7% in August 2026 from 59.9% in July 2026, and its rank-one rate declined to 31.5% from 47.1%. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint narrowed the rank-one gap, with its rank-one rate rising to 8.8% in August 2026 from 4.6% in July 2026, even as its own top-three rate declined to 41.6% from 52.4% in the same period.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
The other seven tracked brands remained stable. SentinelOne, Palo Alto Cortex XDR, Trellix, and Trend Micro each saw modest declines within normal variation, while Bitdefender GravityZone, Cybereason, and VMware Carbon Black each saw small increases within normal variation.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Placement rates reveal where brands sit within the recommendation list.
Brand | August 2026 top-three rate | August 2026 rank-one rate | July 2026 top-three rate | July 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CrowdStrike Falcon | 45.7% | 31.5% | 59.9% | 47.1% |
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | 41.6% | 8.8% | 52.4% | 4.6% |
Bitdefender GravityZone | 13.8% | 8.2% | 10.8% | 7.0% |
Close coverage can still hide different first-position rates. CrowdStrike Falcon and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint sit within 0.9 percentage points of each other on coverage, yet CrowdStrike Falcon leads on rank-one placement by 22.7 percentage points in August 2026 (31.5% versus 8.8%).
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class, representing discovery and consideration intent.
Buyer-intent class | July 2026 | August 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 456 | 536 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 456 | 536 |
The current public series measures the Brand Recommendation class of discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
July 2026 | 456 | CrowdStrike Falcon | 62.5% | None |
August 2026 | 536 | CrowdStrike Falcon | 61.0% | Sophos Intercept X, down 7.9 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure:
- Market share or vendor revenue
- Attributable sales or pipeline conversion
- Every possible AI response to a given query
- Organic-search ranking positions outside the tested AI surfaces
- Social mention volume or sentiment outside the tested AI surfaces
- Private or sponsored AI channels
- Causality from a metric movement alone
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index is a neutral, repeatable industry benchmark that tracks how often and how prominently brands appear in AI-generated recommendations across six canonical AI/search surface families: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. It measures presence, recommendation coverage, placement, and sentiment as distinct signals of AI market discovery.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper into your brand's specific AI discovery profile, recommendation placement, and competitive context.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Customer Service Software: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Payroll Software: 2026 AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
ERP Software: 2026 AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read