Business Checking Accounts: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend business checking accounts. This public AI Visibility Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Increase: Mercury
- 08Largest Decline: Bank of America
- 09Category Leader: Bluevine
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
Questions This Section Answers
- Who leads the Business Checking Accounts benchmark in October 2026, and by how much?
- Which brand posted the largest month-over-month recommendation coverage gain?
- What happened to Bank of America's coverage in October 2026?
Bluevine led the Business Checking Accounts benchmark in October 2026 with valid recommendation coverage of 53.2%, ahead of second-place Mercury at 48.5% by a 4.7-point margin. Bluevine's coverage rose from 43.1% in September 2026, a significant month-over-month gain that extends the lead it has held since entering the tracked set in July 2026 at 30.3%. Mercury recorded the largest valid recommendation coverage increase in the four-month series, rising to 48.5% in October 2026 from no recorded coverage in July 2026, while Bank of America recorded the largest decline, falling to no recorded coverage in October 2026 from 43.9% in July 2026.
The month was active rather than quiet. Eleven brands posted coverage gains beyond normal month-to-month variation, and six posted declines. The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 423 qualified observations in October 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Oct 2026
- Bluevine53.2%
- Mercury48.5%
- Relay44.2%
- Capital One36.9%
- Axos Bank32.4%
- Found27.7%
- U.S. Bancorp21.8%
- Bank of America Corp.18.0%
- PNC Bank12.5%
- Wells Fargo & Co.11.1%
- Varo Bank9.9%
- Citi7.8%
- Current4.3%
- Truist Bank3.5%
- Baselane0.7%
- Chase Credit Journey0.2%
- Citizens Bank & Trust0.2%
- Mid Penn Bank0.2%
- Nbh Bank0.2%
- Align Credit Union0.0%
- Autobooks0.0%
- Baker Boyer Bank0.0%
- Bank of America0.0%
- Bank Of The West0.0%
- Banknewport0.0%
- Candescent0.0%
- Capital One Auto Finance0.0%
- Carroll Bank And Trust0.0%
- Centime0.0%
- Chase0.0%
- Clear Mountain Bank0.0%
- Codat0.0%
- Field & Main Bank0.0%
- First Bank Of Berne0.0%
- First County Bank0.0%
- First Federal Bank0.0%
- First Security Bank Of Missoula0.0%
- Five Star Bank0.0%
- Fps Gold0.0%
- Hanmi Bank0.0%
- Ixonia Bank0.0%
- Mainstreet Bank0.0%
- Merchant's Pact0.0%
- Merrimack County Savings Bank (the Merrimack)0.0%
- Mid-missouri Bank0.0%
- Mountainone0.0%
- North Valley Bank Ohio0.0%
- Northwest Community Bank0.0%
- Outdoor Bank0.0%
- Progressive Ozark Bank0.0%
- Sanibel Captiva Community Bank0.0%
- Susser Bank0.0%
- U.S. Bank0.0%
- United Federal Credit Union0.0%
- Wells Fargo0.0%
- West Gate Bank0.0%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 264 | 423 | Up 159 |
Tracked brands | 48 | 50 | Up 2 |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 34.5% | 70.9% | Up 36.4 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 58.7% | 82.7% | Up 24.0 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Bank of America | Bluevine | Changed |
Qualified surface breadth counts the six canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Business Checking Accounts
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompts collected across AI/search surfaces |
Unique questions | 664 | 703 | Distinct questions after de-duplication |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts mentioning at least one tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 273 | 478 | Prompts on-topic for the vertical |
Irrelevant observations | 527 | 322 | Prompts off-topic after review |
Qualified benchmark observations | 264 | 423 | Public denominator for brand metrics |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Visibility Market Discovery Methodology for details.
Current Brand Standings
Questions This Section Answers
- Which brands rank highest by valid recommendation coverage in October 2026?
- How does presence rate differ from valid recommendation coverage in the standings table?
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bluevine | 53.7% | 53.2% | 45.9% | 27.0% | 1.0 |
Mercury | 49.4% | 48.5% | 28.1% | 2.8% | 1.0 |
Relay | 45.1% | 44.2% | 24.1% | 2.8% | 1.0 |
Capital One | 55.3% | 36.9% | 19.6% | 7.6% | 0.7 |
Axos Bank | 33.1% | 32.4% | 14.2% | 3.8% | 1.0 |
Found | 28.8% | 27.7% | 6.4% | 0.5% | 1.0 |
U.S. Bancorp | 36.6% | 21.8% | 6.2% | 1.2% | 0.6 |
Bank of America Corp. | 37.1% | 18.0% | 6.4% | 0.2% | 0.5 |
PNC Bank | 29.1% | 12.5% | 3.3% | 0.7% | 0.4 |
Wells Fargo & Co. | 28.4% | 11.1% | 4.7% | 1.7% | 0.4 |
Varo Bank | 10.4% | 9.9% | 5.9% | 2.8% | 1.0 |
Citi | 23.6% | 7.8% | 3.1% | 0.2% | 0.3 |
Current | 4.3% | 4.3% | 0.9% | 0.2% | 1.0 |
Truist Bank | 16.6% | 3.5% | 0.7% | 0.2% | 0.2 |
Baselane | 0.9% | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.8 |
Chase Credit Journey | 0.9% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.5 |
Citizens Bank & Trust | 1.7% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.1 |
Mid Penn Bank | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 1.0 |
Nbh Bank | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.0 |
Align Credit Union | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Autobooks | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Baker Boyer Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Bank of America | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Bank Of The West | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Banknewport | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Candescent | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Capital One Auto Finance | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Carroll Bank And Trust | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Centime | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Chase | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Clear Mountain Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Codat | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Field & Main Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
First Bank Of Berne | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
First County Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
First Federal Bank | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
First Security Bank Of Missoula | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Five Star Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Fps Gold | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Hanmi Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Ixonia Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Mainstreet Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Merchant's Pact | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Merrimack County Savings Bank (the Merrimack) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Mid-missouri Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Mountainone | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
North Valley Bank Ohio | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Northwest Community Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Outdoor Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Progressive Ozark Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Sanibel Captiva Community Bank | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Susser Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
U.S. Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
United Federal Credit Union | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
Wells Fargo | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
West Gate Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 |
How to Read the Standings
Presence rate is the share of qualified observations in which a brand appears in the AI response. Valid recommendation coverage is the share of qualified observations in which a brand receives a clear recommendation. Top-three rate is the share of qualified observations where a brand appears among the top three recommendations. Rank-one rate is the share where a brand is the first recommendation. Net sentiment reflects positive minus negative mentions where sentiment is exposed.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Visibility Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Questions This Section Answers
- Which business checking brands saw the largest coverage gains since July 2026?
- Which brands experienced the sharpest coverage declines over the four-month series?
- How did Bluevine's coverage trajectory look across the measurement period?
Coverage movement across the four-month series was mixed. Eleven brands posted gains beyond normal variation since July 2026, and six posted declines beyond normal variation. Bank of America and U.S. Bank, which held the leading and second coverage positions in July 2026, both fell to no recorded coverage in October 2026.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Brand | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Align Credit Union | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Autobooks | 0.4% | 0.0% | Down 0.4 points |
Axos Bank | 20.4% | 32.4% | Up 12.0 points |
Baker Boyer Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Bank of America | 43.9% | 0.0% | Down 43.9 points |
Bank of America Corp. | 0.0% | 18.0% | Up 18.0 points |
Bank Of The West | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Banknewport | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Baselane | 0.8% | 0.7% | Down 0.1 points |
Bluevine | 30.3% | 53.2% | Up 22.9 points |
Candescent | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Capital One | 0.0% | 36.9% | Up 36.9 points |
Capital One Auto Finance | 3.4% | 0.0% | Down 3.4 points |
Carroll Bank And Trust | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Centime | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Chase | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Chase Credit Journey | 0.0% | 0.2% | Up 0.2 points |
Citi | 0.0% | 7.8% | Up 7.8 points |
Citizens Bank & Trust | 0.0% | 0.2% | Up 0.2 points |
Clear Mountain Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Codat | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Current | 0.4% | 4.3% | Up 3.9 points |
Field & Main Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
First Bank Of Berne | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
First County Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
First Federal Bank | 1.9% | 0.0% | Down 1.9 points |
First Security Bank Of Missoula | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Five Star Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Found | 11.7% | 27.7% | Up 16.0 points |
Fps Gold | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Hanmi Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Ixonia Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Mainstreet Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Merchant's Pact | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Mercury | 0.0% | 48.5% | Up 48.5 points |
Merrimack County Savings Bank (the Merrimack) | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Mid Penn Bank | 0.0% | 0.2% | Up 0.2 points |
Mid-missouri Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Mountainone | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Nbh Bank | 0.0% | 0.2% | Up 0.2 points |
North Valley Bank Ohio | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Northwest Community Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Outdoor Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
PNC Bank | 17.1% | 12.5% | Down 4.6 points |
Progressive Ozark Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Relay | 20.4% | 44.2% | Up 23.8 points |
Sanibel Captiva Community Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Susser Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Truist Bank | 8.0% | 3.5% | Down 4.5 points |
U.S. Bancorp | 0.0% | 21.8% | Up 21.8 points |
U.S. Bank | 40.2% | 0.0% | Down 40.2 points |
United Federal Credit Union | 0.4% | 0.0% | Down 0.4 points |
Varo Bank | 7.2% | 9.9% | Up 2.7 points |
Wells Fargo | 31.8% | 0.0% | Down 31.8 points |
Wells Fargo & Co. | 0.0% | 11.1% | Up 11.1 points |
West Gate Bank | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Largest Increase: Mercury
Mercury recorded the largest valid recommendation coverage gain in the four-month series, rising to 48.5% in October 2026 from no recorded coverage in July 2026. Capital One posted the second-largest gain among brands entering the series, rising to 36.9% in October 2026 from no recorded coverage in July 2026. Among brands with July 2026 data, Relay posted the largest gain, rising to 44.2% in October 2026 from 20.4% in July 2026, a move of 23.8 points beyond normal variation. Axos Bank rose to 32.4% from 20.4% over the same period, a move of 12.0 points, and its coverage increased from 16.7% in September 2026 to 32.4% in October 2026, a move of 15.7 points beyond normal variation.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Largest Decline: Bank of America
Bank of America recorded the largest valid recommendation coverage decline in the four-month series, falling to no recorded coverage in October 2026 from 43.9% in July 2026. U.S. Bank fell to no recorded coverage in October 2026 from 40.2% in July 2026, and Wells Fargo fell to no recorded coverage in October 2026 from 31.8% in July 2026. U.S. Bank and Wells Fargo each declined in both of the two months since August 2026, while Bank of America's decline is concentrated in the most recent month, following two months of gains. Their companion entities, Bank of America Corp., U.S. Bancorp, and Wells Fargo & Co., entered the tracked set in October 2026 at 18.0%, 21.8%, and 11.1% respectively.
Category Leader: Bluevine
Bluevine led the benchmark with 53.2% valid recommendation coverage in October 2026, up from 43.1% in September 2026 and 30.3% in July 2026. The brand has held the coverage lead since entering the tracked set in July 2026, though its monthly trajectory has been uneven.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Questions This Section Answers
- Which brand has the strongest first-position recommendation rate in business checking?
- Why can two brands with similar coverage have very different rank-one rates?
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Bluevine and Mercury both ranked within the top tier for coverage in October 2026, while their first-position rates differed.
Brand | Oct 2026 top-three rate | Oct 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bluevine | 45.9% | 27.0% | 20.4% | 14.8% |
Mercury | 28.1% | 2.8% | N/A | N/A |
Relay | 24.1% | 2.8% | 9.8% | 0.8% |
Coverage can look similar while first-position rates diverge sharply: Mercury and Relay both reached top-three placement rates above 24% in October 2026, yet each converted just 2.8% of observations into the first position, compared with 27.0% for Bluevine.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in both July 2026 and October 2026 fell into the Brand Recommendation class.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 264 | 423 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 264 | 423 |
The current public series measures the Brand Recommendation class of discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
Questions This Section Answers
- Who has led the benchmark in each measurement period?
- How has the number of qualified observations shifted across the four months?
Each measurement is added to the same evergreen benchmark report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 264 | Bank of America | 43.9% | N/A |
Aug 2026 | 197 | Chase | 66.5% | Chase, Up 66.5 points |
Sep 2026 | 144 | Chase | 58.3% | Relay, Down 20.4 points vs Jul 2026 |
Oct 2026 | 423 | Bluevine | 53.2% | Mercury, Up 48.5 points vs Jul 2026 |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, private or sponsored channels, or causality from a metric movement alone. Movement in a metric reflects a change in the benchmark; it does not by itself establish why the change occurred.
Top 10 Cited Domains
Questions This Section Answers
- Which domains are cited most often in AI responses about business checking accounts?
- Are citations concentrated among a few sources, or spread across many?
Across all AI platform responses in October 2026, the benchmark recorded 6,466 citations spanning 1,097 unique domains.
Rank | Domain | Citations | Share | Platforms citing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | nerdwallet.com | 543 | 8.4% | ChatGPT, Copilot, AI Mode, Perplexity, AI Overviews |
2 | youtube.com | 267 | 4.1% | ChatGPT, AI Mode, Perplexity, AI Overviews |
3 | google.com | 245 | 3.8% | AI Mode, AI Overviews |
4 | bankrate.com | 234 | 3.6% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, Perplexity, AI Overviews |
5 | cnbc.com | 214 | 3.3% | ChatGPT, Copilot, AI Mode, Perplexity, AI Overviews |
6 | airwallex.com | 180 | 2.8% | ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Mode, Perplexity, AI Overviews |
7 | reddit.com | 169 | 2.6% | ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Mode, Perplexity, AI Overviews |
8 | forbes.com | 162 | 2.5% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, Perplexity, AI Overviews |
9 | bluevine.com | 100 | 1.5% | ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Mode, Perplexity, AI Overviews |
10 | finance.yahoo.com | 92 | 1.4% | ChatGPT, Copilot, AI Mode, Perplexity, AI Overviews |
Citations are spread broadly across the information environment, with the top 10 domains accounting for a minority of total citations and more than a thousand unique domains appearing overall. Bluevine's own domain (bluevine.com) is the only tracked brand domain in the top 10, at rank nine with 100 citations. Review and comparison sites dominate the top of the list, led by nerdwallet.com and bankrate.com, alongside news outlets such as cnbc.com and forbes.com, community sources such as reddit.com and youtube.com, and industry sources such as airwallex.com.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Visibility Market Discovery Index tracks how AI and search surfaces discover, mention, and recommend brands in response to prompt-level research across six canonical AI surface families. The benchmark records presence, recommendation coverage, placement, and sentiment as distinct signals.
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Visibility Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
The public percentage cannot identify the prompts, competitors, or sources causing the result.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Business Brokers: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Business Phone Systems: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Business Insurance: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
A directional category benchmark of how six AI platforms discover, compare, and recommend business insurance brands across high-intent buying clusters.
Read