Blockchain Platforms: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index

Benchmark Summary

Avalanche, BNB Chain, and Solana Foundation share the lead in the Blockchain Platforms benchmark in October 2026, each at 16.1% valid recommendation coverage. The gap to the nearest brand below that cluster is 9.2 points, with Ethereum Foundation at 6.9%. October 2026 was a quiet month: no tracked brand recorded a change beyond normal month-to-month variation.

The largest coverage increase from July 2026 to October 2026 came from Avalanche, which rose from 11.2% in July 2026 to 16.1% in October 2026. The largest decline across the same four-month span came from Polygon Labs, which fell from 6.5% in July 2026 to 3.5% in October 2026.

The current month fits the full series rather than reversing it. Avalanche moved 11.2% in July 2026, 6.9% in August 2026, 14.2% in September 2026, and 16.1% in October 2026, and has now risen in each of the last two months. Solana Foundation moved 13.1%, 8.9%, 17.7%, and 16.1% across the same months. Ethereum Foundation moved 4.7%, 3.0%, 15.0%, then 6.9%, the largest single-month move in the series at 12.0 points. NEAR Foundation declined in each of the three months since July 2026: 2.8% in July 2026, 2.0% in August 2026, 1.8% in September 2026, and 1.1% in October 2026, a cumulative move that remains within normal variation.

The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 87 qualified observations in October 2026.

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All six families were present in July 2026 and October 2026. In September 2026, the intermediate month, Solana Foundation led at 17.7% and Ethereum Foundation recorded a 15.0% reading before easing to 6.9% in October 2026.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Blockchain Platforms

Research Scope and Qualification

Questions This Section Answers

• What was measured at each research stage, and why is the public benchmark denominator smaller than the raw collection?
• Which observations count as qualified for the brand-level rates?

The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Visibility Market Discovery Methodology for the full qualification process.

Current Brand Standings

Questions This Section Answers

• Which blockchain platforms lead the October 2026 standings, and how do presence rate and valid recommendation coverage differ?
• How do top-three and rank-one rates separate brands with similar recommendation coverage?

How to Read the Standings

• Presence rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned at all.
• Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist.
• Top-three rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the top three recommendation slots.
• Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is the first recommendation.
• Net sentiment: positive minus negative mention tone, scaled by total mentions.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Visibility Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Questions This Section Answers

• Which blockchain platforms gained or lost valid recommendation coverage since the July 2026 baseline?
• Why does Avalanche's coverage gain contrast with its flat top-three placement?
• What does TRON DAO's flat coverage alongside peer gains mean for the gap to the category leaders?

Six brands sit within normal month-to-month variation across the four-month series, and the category summary records a quiet month with no significant risers and no significant decliners.

Largest Increase: Avalanche

Avalanche recorded the largest baseline-to-current gain in valid recommendation coverage, moving from 11.2% in July 2026 to 16.1% in October 2026, a rise of 4.9 points, and from 14.2% in September 2026 to 16.1% in October 2026, a rise of 1.9 points. It has now increased in each of the last two months. Its presence rate eased from 83.2% in July 2026 to 75.9% in October 2026 and its top-three rate moved from 1.9% in July 2026 to 0.0% in October 2026, so the coverage gain is not mirrored in placement. Its net sentiment improved from 0.17 in July 2026 to 0.38 in October 2026.

Largest Decline: Polygon Labs

Polygon Labs recorded the largest baseline-to-current decline in valid recommendation coverage, falling from 6.5% in July 2026 to 3.5% in October 2026, a drop of 3.0 points, and from 8.0% in September 2026 to 3.5% in October 2026, a drop of 4.5 points. Its top-three rate fell from 3.7% in July 2026 to 0.0% in October 2026, and its rank-one rate fell from 0.9% in July 2026 to 0.0% in October 2026. Its presence rate eased from 57.9% in July 2026 to 46.0% in October 2026 while its net sentiment firmed from 0.13 in July 2026 to 0.20 in October 2026.

Category Leader: Avalanche, BNB Chain, Solana Foundation

The benchmark records a three-way tie at the top of valid recommendation coverage in October 2026, with Avalanche, BNB Chain, and Solana Foundation each at 16.1%. BNB Chain and Solana Foundation each moved from 13.1% in July 2026 to 16.1% in October 2026, up 3.0 points, while Avalanche moved from 11.2% in July 2026, up 4.9 points. Solana Foundation recorded the strongest top-three rate in the group at 14.9% in October 2026, up from 10.3% in July 2026, while Avalanche and Ethereum Foundation both recorded 6.9% and BNB Chain recorded 6.9%, and Solana Foundation and BNB Chain both recorded 0.0% rank-one rates against Ethereum Foundation's 4.6%. Solana Foundation's net sentiment was the highest in the benchmark at 0.52 in October 2026, up from 0.26 in July 2026.

NEAR Foundation: Watch Item

NEAR Foundation has declined in valid recommendation coverage in each of the three months since July 2026: 2.8% in July 2026, 2.0% in August 2026, 1.8% in September 2026, and 1.1% in October 2026, a cumulative move of 1.7 points that remains within normal month-to-month variation. This is not yet a trend. Its presence rate rose from 6.5% in July 2026 to 13.8% in October 2026, and its top-three and rank-one rates both sat at 0.0% throughout.

TRON DAO: Current Position

TRON DAO recorded 23.0% presence rate, 4.6% valid recommendation coverage, 0.0% top-three rate, 0.0% rank-one rate, and 0.30 net sentiment in October 2026. Coverage has been essentially flat across the four-month series, moving from 4.7% in July 2026 to 4.6% in October 2026, a decline of 0.1 points that sits within normal month-to-month variation on its own.

Avalanche, BNB Chain, and Solana Foundation each record 16.1% valid recommendation coverage in October 2026, while TRON DAO stands at 4.6%. The more important issue is what that gap means for TRON DAO's recommendation position: the three category leaders gained between 3.0 and 4.9 points since July 2026, while TRON DAO's coverage did not move in the same direction, so the gap to the top of the benchmark widened over the same four-month window rather than closing. TRON DAO also posted 0.0% on both top-three rate and rank-one rate in October 2026, compared with Solana Foundation's 14.9% top-three rate and Ethereum Foundation's 4.6% rank-one rate, meaning TRON DAO's 23.0% presence rate is not yet translating into either a recommendation slot or a first-choice placement anywhere in the benchmark.

Highest-priority diagnostic: Why has TRON DAO's valid recommendation coverage remained flat at approximately 4.6%–4.7% while three peer brands gained 3.0 to 4.9 points over the same four-month period, and what would it take to move TRON DAO off 0.0% on both top-three rate and rank-one rate?

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Questions This Section Answers

• How do top-three and rank-one rates differ among brands with similar recommendation coverage?
• Which brand converts its coverage into top-three placement most often?

Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Among the leading brands, placement patterns diverge sharply even where coverage converges.

Avalanche, BNB Chain, and Solana Foundation each held 16.1% valid recommendation coverage in October 2026, yet Solana Foundation's top-three rate of 14.9% far outpaced Avalanche's 0.0% and BNB Chain's 6.9%. Close coverage can still hide very different first-position rates.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

Questions This Section Answers

• Which buyer-intent class did all qualified observations fall into?
• Why are Pricing & Value and Multi-Brand Comparison absent from the current series?

All qualified observations in October 2026 fell into the Brand Recommendation class.

The current public series measures Brand Recommendation discovery only. It does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.

This public benchmark covers the brand-recommendation moment. Paid plans track all 10 buying moments for your company, including pricing, comparisons and alternatives. Compare plans

Historical Measurement Record

Questions This Section Answers

• How has the coverage leader changed across the July to October 2026 measurements?
• Which month recorded the largest coverage movement?

This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.

Evidence and Source Layer

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure:

• Market share or sales attribution
• Every possible AI response to a given query
• Organic-search ranking positions
• Social media mention volume
• Private or sponsored channels and campaigns
• Causality from a metric movement alone

Top 10 Cited Domains

Questions This Section Answers

• Which domains were most cited across AI platform responses in October 2026?
• How concentrated are citations among the top domains, and which sources are specific to the blockchain category?

Across all AI platform responses in October 2026, the benchmark observed 5,641 citations drawn from 2,100 unique domains.

Citation share is broadly distributed rather than concentrated: the ten most-cited domains together account for a modest slice of the 5,641 citations observed across 2,100 unique domains, and no single source exceeds 7.8%. The list is dominated by general-purpose platforms and community sources, including YouTube, Wikipedia, Reddit, and Facebook, with price-tracking site coinmarketcap.com the only domain in the top ten that is specific to the crypto and blockchain category. None of the tracked brands' own domains appears in the top ten.

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Visibility Market Discovery Index tracks how AI and search surfaces name, describe, and recommend brands within a vertical category. It is a neutral industry benchmark built from prompt-level observations across six canonical AI/search surface families. This report is updated monthly with new measurements added to the same evergreen index.

• AI Visibility Market Discovery Methodology
• AI Visibility Market Discovery Metric Definitions
• AI Visibility Market Discovery Research Standards
• Modeled AI Visibility Authority Value

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.

Get my free AI Company Index