Solar Panels: AI Market Discovery Index

Tracking how AI platforms recommend solar panels. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

Mark Huntley, J.D.
By Mark Huntley, J.D.Growth Strategist & AI Discovery Analyst
5 minutes read

Benchmark Summary

Qcells leads the Solar Panels benchmark in September 2026 with a valid recommendation coverage of 65.5%, up from 59.7% in July 2026. REC Group follows at 63.4% in September 2026, up from 57.6% in July 2026, a gap of 2.1 percentage points between the top two brands.

This was a month of significant movement. REC Group recorded the largest coverage increase, rising from 57.4% in August 2026 to 63.4% in September 2026, an increase of 6.0 percentage points. No brand recorded a significant coverage decline in September 2026.

Across the full series, Qcells and REC Group both moved beyond normal month-to-month variation since July 2026, each rising 5.8 percentage points. Qcells has risen in each of the two months since July 2026.

The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 566 qualified observations in September 2026 after qualification.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Sep 2026

0%20%40%60%80%Jul 2026Aug 2026Sep 2026
  • Qcells65.5%
  • REC Group63.4%
  • Maxeon (SunPower)62.4%
  • Canadian Solar49.6%
  • JinkoSolar23.5%
  • Silfab Solar23.3%
  • LONGi Solar18.0%
  • Trina Solar15.9%
  • Panasonic14.0%
  • Mission Solar2.6%

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Measure

Jul 2026

Sep 2026

Movement

Qualified benchmark observations

595

566

Down 29

Tracked brands

10

10

No change

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

50.6%

43.6%

Down 7.0 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

70.9%

72.3%

Up 1.4 points

Leader by valid recommendation coverage

Maxeon (SunPower)

Qcells

Changed

August 2026 sat between these two months, with Maxeon (SunPower) leading at 60.6% before Qcells moved ahead in September 2026.

Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All six families were active in both months.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Solar Panels

Research Scope and Qualification

The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.

Research stage

Jul 2026

Sep 2026

What it represents

Source prompt-surface observations

800

800

Total prompts collected across AI surfaces

Unique questions

441

464

Distinct questions after deduplication

Brand / competitor mentions

800

800

Prompts mentioning at least one tracked brand

Relevant observations

726

702

Prompts relevant to the solar panel category

Irrelevant observations

74

98

Prompts outside the category scope

Qualified benchmark observations

595

566

Public denominator after all qualification

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Market Discovery Methodology.

Current Brand Standings

Brand

Presence rate

Valid recommendation coverage

Top-three rate

Rank-one rate

Net sentiment

Qcells

82.5%

65.5%

31.6%

3.5%

0.9

REC Group

70.1%

63.4%

43.3%

27.6%

0.9

Maxeon (SunPower)

71.9%

62.4%

38.3%

14.7%

0.9

Canadian Solar

70.0%

49.6%

6.4%

0.5%

0.8

JinkoSolar

45.1%

23.5%

5.3%

4.1%

0.7

Silfab Solar

32.5%

23.3%

3.9%

0.4%

0.9

LONGi Solar

35.9%

18.0%

6.2%

0.7%

0.7

Trina Solar

35.2%

15.9%

3.4%

0.2%

0.6

Panasonic

18.0%

14.0%

4.1%

0.2%

0.8

Mission Solar

9.9%

2.6%

0.5%

0.0%

0.6

How to Read the Standings

Presence rate is the share of qualified observations where the brand appears in any form, whether recommended, mentioned, or discussed.

Valid recommendation coverage is the share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a valid recommendation context, the primary metric for this benchmark.

Top-three rate is the share of qualified observations where the brand appears within the first three recommended positions.

Rank-one rate is the share of qualified observations where the brand is the single first recommendation.

Net sentiment reflects the balance of positive versus negative mentions, scored from -1.0 to 1.0.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Brand

Jul 2026

Sep 2026

Movement since baseline

Qcells

59.7%

65.5%

Up 5.8 points

REC Group

57.6%

63.4%

Up 5.8 points

Maxeon (SunPower)

59.2%

62.4%

Up 3.2 points

Canadian Solar

49.1%

49.6%

Up 0.5 points

JinkoSolar

27.6%

23.5%

Down 4.1 points

Silfab Solar

23.4%

23.3%

Down 0.1 points

LONGi Solar

18.3%

18.0%

Down 0.3 points

Trina Solar

15.3%

15.9%

Up 0.6 points

Panasonic

15.3%

14.0%

Down 1.3 points

Mission Solar

3.7%

2.6%

Down 1.1 points

Between August 2026 and September 2026, REC Group rose 6.0 points and Qcells rose 5.3 points, the two largest month-over-month moves in the series.

Largest Increase: REC Group

REC Group recorded the largest coverage increase in September 2026, rising from 57.4% in August 2026 to 63.4% in September 2026, up 6.0 points in a single month, a move beyond normal variation. Across the full series the brand rose from 57.6% in July 2026. Its rank-one rate rose sharply, from 14.8% in July 2026 to 27.6% in September 2026, an increase of 12.8 points.

Category Leader: Qcells

Qcells became the category leader in September 2026 with a valid recommendation coverage of 65.5%, up from 59.7% in July 2026, a rise beyond normal month-to-month variation. It leads REC Group by 2.1 points (63.4% in September 2026) and Maxeon (SunPower) by 3.1 points (62.4% in September 2026). The brand's presence rate was 82.5% in September 2026, holding steady from 82.9% in July 2026.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Placement rates reveal how often a brand appears at the top of the recommendation list versus lower in the response.

Brand

Sep 2026 top-three rate

Sep 2026 rank-one rate

Jul 2026 top-three rate

Jul 2026 rank-one rate

REC Group

43.3%

27.6%

37.6%

14.8%

Maxeon (SunPower)

38.3%

14.7%

40.2%

24.7%

Qcells

31.6%

3.5%

30.6%

3.0%

REC Group and Maxeon (SunPower) show top-three rates within 5.0 points in September 2026 (43.3% versus 38.3%), but their rank-one rates differ sharply: REC Group leads at 27.6% versus 14.7% for Maxeon (SunPower). This shows how similar top-three coverage can still hide very different first-position rates.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

All qualified observations in both months fell into the brand recommendation class, representing discovery and consideration intent.

Buyer-intent class

Jul 2026

Sep 2026

Brand Recommendation

595

566

Pricing & Value

0

0

Multi-Brand Comparison

0

0

Total qualified observations

595

566

The current public series measures the brand recommendation class of discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the pricing and value or multi-brand comparison classes.

Historical Measurement Record

This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.

Measurement

Qualified observations

Coverage leader

Leader coverage

Largest coverage movement

Jul 2026

595

Maxeon (SunPower)

59.2%

(baseline)

Aug 2026

566

Maxeon (SunPower)

60.6%

Trina Solar up 1.3 points

Sep 2026

566

Qcells

65.5%

REC Group up 6.0 points

Evidence and Source Layer

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure:

  • Market share or sales attribution
  • Every possible AI response a user might receive
  • Organic-search ranking positions
  • Social media mention volume
  • Private or sponsored AI channels
  • Causality from a metric movement alone

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how often and how prominently brands appear in AI-generated recommendations across six canonical AI/search surface families. It is a neutral, industry-level benchmark updated monthly.

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.

Get my free AI Company Index

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.