Small Business Loans: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend small business loans. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Decline: Bank of America
- 08Largest Decline: Chase
- 09Category Leader: Bluevine
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
Bluevine led the Small Business Loans benchmark in August 2026 with a valid recommendation coverage of 63.5%, down from 69.8% in July 2026. The gap to the next brand, onDeck, was 22.0 points, as onDeck recorded 41.5% in August 2026, down from 46.0% in July 2026.
The largest coverage increase among tracked brands was Biz2Credit, which rose from 3.7% in July 2026 to 5.3% in August 2026. The largest coverage decline was Bank of America, which fell 13.3 points, from 56.5% in July 2026 to 43.2% in August 2026.
Chase also registered a significant decline, moving from 49.0% in July 2026 to 36.2% in August 2026, a fall of 12.8 points. Beyond these two decliners, most other brands moved within normal month-to-month variation.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 437 qualified observations in July 2026 and 414 in August 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026
- Bluevine-6.3%Jul 202669.8%Aug 202663.5%
- Bank of America-13.3% · beyond normal variationJul 202656.5%Aug 202643.2%
- onDeck-4.5%Jul 202646.0%Aug 202641.5%
- Fundbox+1.5%Jul 202639.8%Aug 202641.3%
- Chase-12.8% · beyond normal variationJul 202649.0%Aug 202636.2%
- Lendio-5.3%Jul 202631.4%Aug 202626.1%
- National Funding-3.2%Jul 202611.7%Aug 20268.5%
- Biz2Credit+1.6%Jul 20263.7%Aug 20265.3%
- Funding Circle-0.2%Jul 20262.1%Aug 20261.9%
- QuickBridge-0.9%Jul 20262.8%Aug 20261.9%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 437 | 414 | Down 23 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 46.2% | 44.0% | Down 2.2 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 78.0% | 65.9% | Down 12.1 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Bluevine | Bluevine | No change |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation. The six families are ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Small Business Loans
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. The table below shows how the raw prompt pool narrows to the qualified benchmark observations that form the public denominator.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Raw prompt-surface observations |
Unique questions | 565 | 590 | Distinct questions after deduplication |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts mentioning a brand or competitor |
Relevant observations | 476 | 464 | On-topic for the vertical |
Irrelevant observations | 324 | 336 | Off-topic for the vertical |
Qualified benchmark observations | 437 | 414 | Public denominator |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Market Discovery Methodology
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bluevine | 77.5% | 63.5% | 33.6% | 14.5% | 0.9 |
onDeck | 52.7% | 41.5% | 19.6% | 4.1% | 0.8 |
Fundbox | 48.8% | 41.3% | 17.2% | 6.3% | 0.9 |
Bank of America | 71.3% | 43.2% | 18.8% | 5.1% | 0.7 |
Chase | 60.6% | 36.2% | 22.0% | 10.6% | 0.7 |
Lendio | 37.9% | 26.1% | 7.0% | 3.4% | 0.8 |
National Funding | 13.3% | 8.5% | 2.9% | 1.2% | 0.7 |
Biz2Credit | 8.2% | 5.3% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.8 |
Funding Circle | 2.9% | 1.9% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 1.0 |
QuickBridge | 2.2% | 1.9% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.9 |
Bluevine holds a 22.0-point coverage lead over onDeck, but its rank-one rate of 14.5% is more than three times onDeck's 4.1%, showing first-choice preference is far more concentrated than overall coverage.
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: the share of qualified observations in which the brand is mentioned, regardless of recommendation.
- Valid recommendation coverage: the share of qualified observations in which the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist.
- Top-three rate: the share of qualified observations in which the brand appears among the top three recommended options.
- Rank-one rate: the share of qualified observations in which the brand is the first recommended option.
- Net sentiment: the balance of positive over negative mentions, from 0 to 1.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Bank of America | 56.5% | 43.2% | Down 13.3 points |
Biz2Credit | 3.7% | 5.3% | Up 1.6 points |
Bluevine | 69.8% | 63.5% | Down 6.3 points |
Chase | 49.0% | 36.2% | Down 12.8 points |
Fundbox | 39.8% | 41.3% | Up 1.5 points |
Funding Circle | 2.1% | 1.9% | Down 0.2 points |
Lendio | 31.4% | 26.1% | Down 5.3 points |
National Funding | 11.7% | 8.5% | Down 3.2 points |
onDeck | 46.0% | 41.5% | Down 4.5 points |
QuickBridge | 2.8% | 1.9% | Down 0.9 points |
Largest Decline: Bank of America
Bank of America recorded the largest coverage decline of the month, moving from 56.5% in July 2026 to 43.2% in August 2026. The top-three rate also fell, from 27.0% to 18.8%, and the rank-one rate dropped from 10.3% to 5.1%. Presence held more steady at 71.3%, indicating the issue is recommendation conversion, not discoverability.
Largest Decline: Chase
Chase was the other significant decliner, moving from 49.0% in July 2026 to 36.2% in August 2026. The top-three rate fell from 28.4% to 22.0%, while the rank-one rate moved from 12.4% to 10.6%, which was within normal variation. Presence declined from 65.5% to 60.6%, also within normal variation, but the 12.8-point coverage drop was not.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Category Leader: Bluevine
Bluevine remained the category leader in August 2026 with a valid recommendation coverage of 63.5%, down from 69.8% in July 2026. The decline was within normal month-to-month variation. Bluevine also led on presence rate at 77.5% in August 2026, up slightly from 77.3% in July 2026, and on rank-one rate at 14.5%, up from 14.4% in July 2026.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The table below adds placement detail for the leading brands.
Brand | Aug 2026 top-three rate | Aug 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bluevine | 33.6% | 14.5% | 39.4% | 14.4% |
Chase | 22.0% | 10.6% | 28.4% | 12.4% |
onDeck | 19.6% | 4.1% | 24.9% | 5.7% |
Similar coverage hides different first-position outcomes. Bluevine and Chase both converted a substantial share of their coverage into top-three placements, but Bluevine converted more of those into first position. onDeck's 41.5% coverage produces a rank-one rate of only 4.1%, showing second-tier placement without first-choice strength.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class, where the AI response names or recommends specific lenders.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 437 | 414 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 437 | 414 |
The current public series cannot answer pricing, value, or head-to-head comparison questions because it contains no qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 437 | Bluevine | 69.8% | Baseline month |
Aug 2026 | 414 | Bluevine | 63.5% | Down 13.3 points (Bank of America) |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment, not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure:
- Market share or sales attribution
- Every possible AI response to a given query
- Organic-search ranking performance
- Social media mention volume
- Private or sponsored AI channels
- Causality from a metric movement alone
The August movements, including the Bank of America and Chase declines, should not yet be treated as trends until further monthly measurements confirm direction.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how AI and search surfaces discover, mention, and recommend brands within a vertical. Each brand is measured on presence, recommendation coverage, placement, and sentiment across six canonical AI surface families.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can reveal the specific prompts, competitors, and sources driving your brand's visibility.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Human Resources Software for Small Businesses: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Business Brokers: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Business Phone Systems: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read