Raw Freeze-Dried and Biologically Appropriate Pet Food: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend raw freeze-dried and biologically appropriate pet food. Updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Category Leader: Orijen (Champion Petfoods)
- 08Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 09Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 10Historical Measurement Record
- 11Evidence and Source Layer
- 12Scope Boundaries
Benchmark Summary
Orijen (Champion Petfoods) remained the category leader in valid recommendation coverage at 59.8% in September 2026, a lead of 17.9 percentage points over second-place Stella & Chewy's, despite a decline from 65.7% in July 2026. Stella & Chewy's followed at 41.9% in September 2026, down from 43.0% in July 2026. Acana (Champion Petfoods) rose to 39.5% in September 2026 from 37.3% in July 2026, the largest gain among tracked brands, while Orijen (Champion Petfoods) recorded the largest decline over the same period.
No tracked brand registered a movement beyond normal month-to-month variation in September 2026; the month was quiet across the category, and no brand recorded an increase or decrease beyond normal variation. Within the broader three-month series, Instinct Pet Food declined in each of the two months since July 2026, to 9.4% in September 2026 from 13.7% in July 2026, and Primal Pet Foods also declined in each of the two months since July 2026, to 10.4% from 12.4%. Orijen (Champion Petfoods) held the category lead throughout the series despite a single-month decline in September 2026, to 59.8% from 65.9% in August 2026.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 413 qualified observations in September 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Sep 2026
- Orijen (Champion Petfoods)59.8%
- Stella & Chewy’s41.9%
- Acana (Champion Petfoods)39.5%
- Primal Pet Foods10.4%
- Instinct Pet Food9.4%
- Smallbatch Pets1.9%
- Champion Petfoods1.5%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 402 | 413 | Up 11 |
Tracked brands | 7 | 7 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 54.7% | 50.6% | Down 4.1 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 72.9% | 68.8% | Down 4.1 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Orijen (Champion Petfoods) at 65.7% | Orijen (Champion Petfoods) at 59.8% | Down 5.9 points |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All six families were represented in both July 2026 and September 2026.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Raw Freeze-Dried and Biologically Appropriate Pet Food
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. The following table shows how observations moved from the raw prompt-level collection to the qualified benchmark denominator.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompt-surface observations collected |
Unique questions | 562 | 565 | Distinct questions asked |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts mentioning at least one tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 694 | 704 | Observations on-topic for the vertical |
Irrelevant observations | 106 | 96 | Observations off-topic and excluded |
Qualified benchmark observations | 402 | 413 | Public denominator |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Market Discovery Methodology.
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Orijen (Champion Petfoods) | 86.0% | 59.8% | 26.6% | 17.0% | 0.8 |
Stella & Chewy's | 54.0% | 41.9% | 19.4% | 9.9% | 0.9 |
Acana (Champion Petfoods) | 61.7% | 39.5% | 14.0% | 0.5% | 0.8 |
Primal Pet Foods | 14.3% | 10.4% | 6.5% | 0.5% | 0.9 |
Instinct Pet Food | 13.6% | 9.4% | 4.8% | 0.2% | 0.8 |
Champion Petfoods | 9.9% | 1.5% | 1.2% | 0.5% | 0.7 |
Smallbatch Pets | 2.4% | 1.9% | 1.0% | 0.5% | 1.0 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: The share of qualified observations in which the brand was mentioned at all.
- Valid recommendation coverage: The share of qualified observations in which the brand received a valid recommendation.
- Top-three rate: The share of qualified observations in which the brand appeared in the first three recommended positions.
- Rank-one rate: The share of qualified observations in which the brand was the first recommendation.
- Net sentiment: A score from 0 to 1 reflecting the tone of mentions, where higher is more positive.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Acana (Champion Petfoods) | 37.3% | 39.5% | Up 2.2 points |
Champion Petfoods | 0.8% | 1.5% | Up 0.7 points |
Instinct Pet Food | 13.7% | 9.4% | Down 4.3 points |
Orijen (Champion Petfoods) | 65.7% | 59.8% | Down 5.9 points |
Primal Pet Foods | 12.4% | 10.4% | Down 2.0 points |
Smallbatch Pets | 2.2% | 1.9% | Down 0.3 points |
Stella & Chewy's | 43.0% | 41.9% | Down 1.1 points |
No tracked brand qualified as a significant riser or decliner in September 2026; all brands moved within normal month-to-month variation. Instinct Pet Food declined in each of the two months since July 2026, moving to 9.4% in September 2026 from 13.7% in July 2026. Primal Pet Foods also declined in each of the two months since July 2026, moving to 10.4% in September 2026 from 12.4% in July 2026. Orijen (Champion Petfoods) held the category lead throughout the series despite a decline in September 2026.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Category Leader: Orijen (Champion Petfoods)
Orijen (Champion Petfoods) held the top valid recommendation coverage at 59.8% in September 2026, down 5.9 points from 65.7% in July 2026. Its top-three rate was 26.6% in September 2026, down 11.0 points from 37.6% in July 2026. Its rank-one rate was 17.0% in September 2026, down 8.4 points from 25.4% in July 2026. The brand recorded 247 valid recommendations from 413 qualified observations.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The following table shows how often the leading brands appeared in the top three and first positions.
Brand | Sep 2026 top-three rate | Sep 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Orijen (Champion Petfoods) | 26.6% | 17.0% | 37.6% | 25.4% |
Stella & Chewy's | 19.4% | 9.9% | 27.9% | 12.4% |
Acana (Champion Petfoods) | 14.0% | 0.5% | 16.9% | 0.5% |
Close coverage can still hide different first-position rates. Acana (Champion Petfoods) held 39.5% valid recommendation coverage but only a 0.5% rank-one rate in September 2026, while Orijen (Champion Petfoods) translated 59.8% coverage into a 17.0% rank-one rate.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All 413 qualified observations in September 2026 fell into the Brand Recommendation class, as did all 402 qualified observations in July 2026.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 402 | 413 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 402 | 413 |
The current public series measures Brand Recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 402 | Orijen (Champion Petfoods) | 65.7% | — |
Aug 2026 | 411 | Orijen (Champion Petfoods) | 65.9% | Champion Petfoods up 2.6 points |
Sep 2026 | 413 | Orijen (Champion Petfoods) | 59.8% | Orijen (Champion Petfoods) down 6.1 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure:
- Market share or attributable sales
- Every possible AI response or surface beyond the six tracked families
- Organic-search ranking positions outside AI surfaces
- Social mention volume or sentiment beyond the analyzed responses
- Private or sponsored channels, such as paid placements or brand-managed assistants
- Causality from a metric movement alone; the benchmark records the change, not the underlying cause
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index is a neutral industry benchmark tracking how often brands appear and are recommended across major AI chat and search surfaces. It is built from a defined, reproducible research protocol applied consistently each month.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper into brand-specific visibility, recommendation placement, and sentiment across AI surfaces.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Pet Food Delivery Services: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Veterinary Pet Food and Prescription Pet Nutrition: AI Market Discovery Index
Veterinary Pet Food & Prescription Pet Nutrition: 2026 AI Discovery Index reveals which brands AI platforms recommend most often.
ReadIndustry Reports
Sustainable Pet Food and Alternative Protein: AI Market Discovery Index
A directional category benchmark of how five major AI search environments discover, compare, and recommend pet food brands across high-intent buying moments
Read