Personal Injury Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend personal injury lawyers. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Increase: Zinda Law Group
- 08Largest Decline: Morgan & Morgan
- 09Category Leader: Morgan & Morgan
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
Morgan & Morgan remains the current coverage leader in September 2026 with a valid recommendation coverage of 32.5%, down from 50.3% in July 2026. The gap to the next brand narrowed to 8.8 percentage points, as Wilshire Law Firm reached 23.7% coverage in September 2026 from 17.6% in July 2026.
The largest coverage increase came from Zinda Law Group, which rose to 1.5% in September 2026 from 0.0% in July 2026, entering the benchmark after two months with no tracked presence. The largest coverage decline came from Morgan & Morgan, falling 17.8 percentage points from 50.3% in July 2026 to 32.5% in September 2026, a movement beyond normal month-to-month variation. Four brands showed significant declines over the three-month series: Dolman Law Group, Lerner & Rowe, Morgan & Morgan, and The Barnes Firm. Wilshire Law Firm, Sokolove Law, and Zinda Law Group moved up across the series but within normal variation for Wilshire and Sokolove.
Across the series, the benchmark began with 652 prompt-surface observations in September 2026 and produced 274 qualified observations after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Sep 2026
- Morgan & Morgan32.5%
- Wilshire Law Firm23.7%
- Jacoby & Meyers17.5%
- The Barnes Firm9.8%
- Lerner & Rowe4.4%
- Dolman Law Group3.3%
- Sokolove Law1.8%
- Zinda Law Group1.5%
- Pintas & Mullins1.1%
- Goldwater Law Firm0.4%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 193 | 274 | Up 81 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 41.5% | 40.1% | Down 1.4 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 60.6% | 57.3% | Down 3.3 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Morgan & Morgan | Morgan & Morgan | No change |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All six families were represented in each month of the series. August 2026, the intermediate month, saw recommendation-shaped answer share at 43.9% and valid recommendation shortlist share at 67.1%.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Personal Injury Lawyers
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 521 | 652 | Total prompt-surface observations collected |
Unique questions | 428 | 492 | Distinct questions across surfaces |
Brand / competitor mentions | 521 | 652 | Prompts mentioning at least one tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 313 | 453 | On-topic observations retained for review |
Irrelevant observations | 208 | 199 | Off-topic observations excluded |
Qualified benchmark observations | 193 | 274 | Public denominator for brand metrics |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Market Discovery Methodology
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wilshire Law Firm | 28.8% | 23.7% | 18.6% | 6.6% | 1.0 |
Morgan & Morgan | 70.4% | 32.5% | 21.5% | 13.5% | 0.8 |
Jacoby & Meyers | 20.4% | 17.5% | 12.8% | 5.1% | 0.9 |
The Barnes Firm | 14.2% | 9.8% | 7.7% | 3.3% | 0.9 |
Lerner & Rowe | 5.1% | 4.4% | 3.6% | 1.5% | 0.9 |
Dolman Law Group | 4.4% | 3.3% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.8 |
Sokolove Law | 2.9% | 1.8% | 1.1% | 0.4% | 0.6 |
Zinda Law Group | 2.2% | 1.5% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.7 |
Pintas & Mullins | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 1.0 |
Goldwater Law Firm | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 1.0 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate is the share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the AI answer in any form, whether recommended, listed, or mentioned neutrally.
- Valid recommendation coverage is the share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a genuine recommendation context rather than a general mention.
- Top-three rate is the share of qualified observations where the brand appears among the first three recommended options.
- Rank-one rate is the share of qualified observations where the brand is the first and primary recommendation.
- Net sentiment is the balance of positive versus negative brand mentions in AI answers.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Dolman Law Group | 12.4% | 3.3% | Down 9.1 points |
Goldwater Law Firm | 0.0% | 0.4% | Up 0.4 points |
Jacoby & Meyers | 20.7% | 17.5% | Down 3.2 points |
Lerner & Rowe | 11.4% | 4.4% | Down 7.0 points |
Morgan & Morgan | 50.3% | 32.5% | Down 17.8 points |
Pintas & Mullins | 0.0% | 1.1% | Up 1.1 points |
Sokolove Law | 0.5% | 1.8% | Up 1.3 points |
The Barnes Firm | 21.2% | 9.8% | Down 11.4 points |
Wilshire Law Firm | 17.6% | 23.7% | Up 6.1 points |
Zinda Law Group | 0.0% | 1.5% | Up 1.5 points |
Largest Increase: Zinda Law Group
Zinda Law Group entered the recommendation landscape in September 2026 with a valid recommendation coverage of 1.5%, up from 0.0% in July 2026. This is the brand's first tracked presence across the three-month series. The brand appeared in 6 qualified observations with a presence rate of 2.2%. The move exceeded normal month-to-month variation.
Largest Decline: Morgan & Morgan
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Morgan & Morgan declined in every measured dimension across the series. Valid recommendation coverage fell to 32.5% in September 2026 from 50.3% in July 2026, a drop of 17.8 percentage points beyond normal variation. Presence rate declined to 70.4% from 82.9%, and top-three rate fell to 21.5% from 44.6% over the same period. The brand declined in each of the three months in the series.
Category Leader: Morgan & Morgan
Despite the decline, Morgan & Morgan holds the top position with 32.5% valid recommendation coverage in September 2026, ahead of Wilshire Law Firm at 23.7% and Jacoby & Meyers at 17.5%.
Wilshire Law Firm's rise of 6.1 points to 23.7% and Jacoby & Meyers's small decline to 17.5% both remain within normal month-to-month variation. The Barnes Firm's decline to 9.8%, Dolman Law Group's decline to 3.3%, and Lerner & Rowe's decline to 4.4% each exceeded normal variation in the series.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Placement within the recommendation list matters for visibility and choice.
Brand | Sep 2026 top-three rate | Sep 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Morgan & Morgan | 21.5% | 13.5% | 44.6% | 36.3% |
Wilshire Law Firm | 18.6% | 6.6% | 12.4% | 3.1% |
Jacoby & Meyers | 12.8% | 5.1% | 14.5% | 1.6% |
Morgan & Morgan still leads on first-position placement in September 2026, but its rank-one rate fell to 13.5% from 36.3% in July 2026. Similar coverage levels can still hide very different first-position rates, as seen in the divergence between Wilshire Law Firm's strong top-three showing and its lower first-position rate relative to Morgan & Morgan.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in the series fell into the brand recommendation class, reflecting discovery and consideration intent.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 193 | 274 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 193 | 274 |
The current public series does not yet contain qualified observations in the pricing and value or multi-brand comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 193 | Morgan & Morgan | 50.3% | — (baseline month) |
Aug 2026 | 255 | Morgan & Morgan | 39.6% | Morgan & Morgan, down 10.7 points |
Sep 2026 | 274 | Morgan & Morgan | 32.5% | Morgan & Morgan, down 7.1 points vs prior |
Evidence and Source Layer
This benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure:
- Market share or actual client intake
- Attributable sales or conversions from AI recommendations
- Every possible AI response across all model versions and configurations
- Organic-search ranking performance
- Social media mention volume or sentiment
- Private or sponsored AI distribution channels
- Causality from a metric movement alone
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how AI search and assistant surfaces recommend and mention brands across industries. It measures presence, recommendation coverage, placement, and sentiment to show how brands appear in AI-generated discovery paths.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Birth Injury Lawyers: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Personal Insurance: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Personal Insurance: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read