Online Backup: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend online backup. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Decline: SpiderOak
- 08Largest Decline: CrashPlan
- 09Category Leader: IDrive
- 10Stable Brands
- 11Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 12Buyer-Intent Distribution
Benchmark Summary
IDrive led the Online Backup benchmark in September 2026 with a valid recommendation coverage of 77.5%, ahead of Backblaze at 70.6%. The largest coverage decline came from SpiderOak, which fell to 4.1% in September 2026 from 7.2% in August 2026. CrashPlan also declined significantly, dropping to 9.9% in September 2026 from 15.2% in July 2026. There were no significant coverage increases this month.
Positioning has diverged across the three-month series. IDrive's valid recommendation coverage rose from 75.6% in July 2026 to 77.5% in September 2026, while SpiderOak declined in each of the two months since July 2026, falling from 11.0% to 4.1%. The gap between IDrive and SpiderOak widened from 64.6 points in July 2026 to 73.4 points in September 2026.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 677 qualified observations in September 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Sep 2026
- IDrive77.5%
- Backblaze70.6%
- Acronis43.0%
- pCloud27.6%
- Carbonite24.8%
- CrashPlan9.9%
- SpiderOak4.1%
- Livedrive1.6%
- SugarSync0.0%
- Zoolz0.0%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 671 | 677 | Up 6 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 48.0% | 48.9% | Up 0.9 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 77.9% | 73.9% | Down 4.0 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | IDrive | IDrive | No change |
August 2026 sat between these two months, with 665 qualified observations. Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Online Backup
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. The funnel below shows how observations were qualified.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total collected prompt-surface pairs |
Unique questions | 433 | 487 | Distinct questions after deduplication |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts mentioning at least one brand |
Relevant observations | 778 | 781 | On-topic responses retained |
Irrelevant observations | 22 | 19 | Off-topic responses removed |
Qualified benchmark observations | 671 | 677 | Public denominator after all filters |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. Link AI Market Discovery Methodology.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDrive | 94.7% | 77.5% | 61.2% | 38.9% | 0.90 |
Backblaze | 86.9% | 70.6% | 54.5% | 17.6% | 0.88 |
Acronis | 51.3% | 43.0% | 27.9% | 3.4% | 0.87 |
pCloud | 35.9% | 27.6% | 14.8% | 2.4% | 0.90 |
Carbonite | 31.6% | 24.8% | 10.2% | 0.1% | 0.82 |
CrashPlan | 13.3% | 9.9% | 1.5% | 0.0% | 0.80 |
SpiderOak | 4.4% | 4.1% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.97 |
Livedrive | 2.1% | 1.6% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.86 |
SugarSync | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.00 |
Zoolz | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.00 |
How to Read the Standings
Presence rate is the share of qualified observations in which a brand is mentioned at all. Valid recommendation coverage is the share of qualified observations in which a brand appears in a recommendation context. Top-three rate is the share of qualified observations in which a brand appears in the first three recommended positions. Rank-one rate is the share of qualified observations in which a brand is the single top recommendation. Net sentiment is the balance of positive over negative mentions.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Acronis | 48.3% | 43.0% | Down 5.3 points |
Backblaze | 73.3% | 70.6% | Down 2.7 points |
Carbonite | 28.6% | 24.8% | Down 3.8 points |
CrashPlan | 15.2% | 9.9% | Down 5.3 points |
IDrive | 75.6% | 77.5% | Up 1.9 points |
Livedrive | 2.7% | 1.6% | Down 1.1 points |
pCloud | 29.8% | 27.6% | Down 2.2 points |
SpiderOak | 11.0% | 4.1% | Down 6.9 points |
SugarSync | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
Zoolz | 0.0% | 0.0% | No change |
CrashPlan is the category leader by a different measure: its 5.4-point slide between July and August 2026 was the largest single-month movement in the series, and its September 2026 level of 9.9% was essentially unchanged from August 2026.
Largest Decline: SpiderOak
SpiderOak's valid recommendation coverage dropped to 4.1% in September 2026 from 11.0% in July 2026, a decline beyond normal month-to-month variation that moved in every month of the series. SpiderOak declined in each of the two months since July 2026. Presence rate fell to 4.4% from 11.2%. Qualified recommendations fell from 74 in July 2026 to 28 in September 2026.
Largest Decline: CrashPlan
CrashPlan's valid recommendation coverage fell to 9.9% in September 2026 from 15.2% in July 2026, a decline beyond normal month-to-month variation. The largest single-month move came between July and August 2026, when coverage fell 5.4 points. Presence rate declined to 13.3% from 17.9%. Qualified recommendations fell from 102 in July 2026 to 67 in September 2026.
Category Leader: IDrive
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
IDrive led the category in September 2026 with a valid recommendation coverage of 77.5%, up from 75.6% in July 2026. Its presence rate rose to 94.7% from 89.0%. IDrive was the top recommendation in 38.9% of September 2026 observations.
Stable Brands
Backblaze, Acronis, pCloud, Carbonite, Livedrive, SugarSync, and Zoolz moved within normal month-to-month variation. IDrive also registered as stable on the movement test despite leading and rising modestly across the series. SugarSync and Zoolz held at 0.0% valid recommendation coverage for the third consecutive month.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. The table below shows how often the leading brands appear in the top three positions and as the single top recommendation.
Brand | Sep 2026 top-three rate | Sep 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IDrive | 61.2% | 38.9% | 62.7% | 39.2% |
Backblaze | 54.5% | 17.6% | 59.3% | 20.1% |
Acronis | 27.9% | 3.4% | 36.4% | 4.0% |
Close coverage can still hide different first-position rates. IDrive was the top recommendation in 38.9% of September 2026 observations, well ahead of Backblaze at 17.6%, despite the two brands sitting within 6.9 points on coverage.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in all three months fell into the Brand Recommendation class.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 671 | 677 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 671 | 677 |
The current public series measures brand recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 671 | IDrive | 75.6% | None |
Aug 2026 | 665 | IDrive | 75.8% | CrashPlan down 5.4 points |
Sep 2026 | 677 | IDrive | 77.5% | SpiderOak down 6.9 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, private or sponsored channels, or causality from a metric movement alone.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how often and how prominently brands appear in AI-generated recommendations across major AI and search surfaces. Canonical research links:
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Online Dating: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Online Therapy: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Online Pharmacies: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read