Hammocks and Tents: AI Market Discovery Index

Tracking how AI platforms recommend haven tents. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

Mark Huntley, J.D.
By Mark Huntley, J.D.Growth Strategist & AI Discovery Analyst
5 minutes read

Benchmark Summary

Kammok led the Haven Tents category in August 2026 with valid recommendation coverage of 52.8%, up from 52.3% in July 2026. The gap to the next brand, Hennessy Hammock at 21.7% in August 2026 (up from 21.4% in July 2026), stood at 31.1 percentage points.

Category movement was quiet in August 2026. No tracked brand moved beyond normal month-to-month variation. The largest coverage increase was Lawson Hammock, which rose to 3.1% in August 2026 from 2.1% in July 2026, while the largest coverage decline was Haven Tents, which fell to 11.5% in August 2026 from 13.0% in July 2026. Both movements remained within normal variation.

The benchmark began with 703 prompt-surface observations in August 2026 and produced 322 qualified observations after the qualification process.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026

  • Kammok+0.5%
    Jul 202652.3%
    Aug 202652.8%
  • Hennessy Hammock+0.3%
    Jul 202621.4%
    Aug 202621.7%
  • Tentsile-0.9%
    Jul 202613.3%
    Aug 202612.4%
  • Haven Tents-1.5%
    Jul 202613.0%
    Aug 202611.5%
  • Lawson Hammock+1.0%
    Jul 20262.1%
    Aug 20263.1%
  • Amok Equipment-0.6%
    Jul 20261.2%
    Aug 20260.6%
  • Sierra Madre Research-0.6%
    Jul 20260.6%
    Aug 20260.0%

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Measure

July 2026

August 2026

Movement

Qualified benchmark observations

331

322

Down 9

Tracked brands

7

7

No change

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

31.4%

32.9%

Up 1.5 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

59.5%

61.5%

Up 2.0 points

Leader by valid recommendation coverage

Kammok (52.3%)

Kammok (52.8%)

Up 0.5 points

Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. Keyword variants roll up into their parent family.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Hammocks and Tents

Research Scope and Qualification

The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. The table below shows the qualification funnel.

Research stage

July 2026

August 2026

What it represents

Source prompt-surface observations

612

703

Raw prompt-surface observations collected

Unique questions

375

470

Distinct questions after de-duplication

Brand / competitor mentions

529

607

Observations mentioning at least one brand or competitor

Relevant observations

440

477

Observations relevant to the vertical

Irrelevant observations

89

130

Observations filtered as irrelevant

Qualified benchmark observations

331

322

Public denominator for brand-level percentages

Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Market Discovery Methodology for full detail.

Current Brand Standings

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Brand

Presence rate

Valid recommendation coverage

Top-three rate

Rank-one rate

Net sentiment

Kammok

68.9%

52.8%

38.5%

16.8%

0.84

Hennessy Hammock

28.3%

21.7%

16.8%

4.0%

0.84

Tentsile

25.5%

12.4%

8.7%

4.7%

0.56

Haven Tents

16.2%

11.5%

9.3%

4.0%

0.83

Lawson Hammock

4.0%

3.1%

1.2%

0.0%

0.77

Amok Equipment

1.6%

0.6%

0.6%

0.3%

0.80

Sierra Madre Research

0.9%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.00

How to Read the Standings

  • Presence rate is the share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned at all, regardless of recommendation.
  • Valid recommendation coverage is the share of qualified observations where the brand receives a valid recommendation, the primary metric.
  • Top-three rate is the share of observations where the brand appears in a top-three recommendation list.
  • Rank-one rate is the share of observations where the brand is the first or only recommendation.
  • Net sentiment measures the tone of brand mentions, from negative (-1) to positive (+1), with neutral at 0.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Brand

July 2026

August 2026

Movement since baseline

Kammok

52.3%

52.8%

Up 0.5 points

Hennessy Hammock

21.4%

21.7%

Up 0.3 points

Tentsile

13.3%

12.4%

Down 0.9 points

Haven Tents

13.0%

11.5%

Down 1.5 points

Lawson Hammock

2.1%

3.1%

Up 1.0 points

Amok Equipment

1.2%

0.6%

Down 0.6 points

Sierra Madre Research

0.6%

0.0%

Down 0.6 points

August 2026 was a quiet month for the category. No brand's movement exceeded normal month-to-month variation. Kammok held the leadership position with a small increase, while the remaining brands moved within stable ranges. Lawson Hammock's rise to 3.1% in August 2026 from 2.1% in July 2026 was the largest absolute increase, and Haven Tents' decline to 11.5% in August 2026 from 13.0% in July 2026 was the largest absolute decrease. Both movements remain within normal variation and are not yet trends.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Placement rates reveal how often a brand appears in top-three or first position when recommended.

Brand

August 2026 top-three rate

August 2026 rank-one rate

July 2026 top-three rate

July 2026 rank-one rate

Kammok

38.5%

16.8%

39.3%

12.1%

Hennessy Hammock

16.8%

4.0%

14.8%

3.0%

Haven Tents

9.3%

4.0%

8.8%

3.6%

Kammok's rank-one rate rose to 16.8% in August 2026 from 12.1% in July 2026 even as its top-three rate dipped slightly, showing a shift toward first-position placement.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

All qualified observations in August 2026 fell into the Brand Recommendation class, which captures discovery and consideration intent.

Buyer-intent class

July 2026

August 2026

Brand Recommendation

331

322

Pricing & Value

0

0

Multi-Brand Comparison

0

0

Total qualified observations

331

322

The current public series measures Brand Recommendation discovery only. It does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.

Historical Measurement Record

Measurement

Qualified observations

Coverage leader

Leader coverage

Largest coverage movement

Baseline (Jul 2026)

331

Kammok

52.3%

Amok Equipment (1.2% baseline)

Aug 2026

322

Kammok

52.8%

Haven Tents (down 1.5 points)

Evidence and Source Layer

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure:

  • Market share or sales attribution.
  • Every possible AI response, only the sampled surface families.
  • Organic-search ranking outside the six AI/search surface families.
  • Social media mention volume or sentiment.
  • Private, sponsored, or gated AI channels.
  • Causality from any single metric movement.

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index is a neutral, recurring measurement of how brands appear and are recommended across major AI and search surfaces. Each monthly edition tracks presence, recommendation coverage, placement, and sentiment for the tracked brands in the vertical.

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper into your brand's specific presence, recommendation placement, and momentum across AI surfaces.

Get my free AI Company Index

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.