Final Expense Insurance: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend final expense insurance. This public AI Visibility Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Decline: Colonial Penn
- 08Category Leader: Ethos
- 09Additional Movement: Choice Mutual
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
Questions This Section Answers
- Which final expense insurance brand held the highest valid recommendation coverage in October 2026?
- Did any tracked brand's recommendation coverage increase beyond normal variation since the July 2026 baseline?
Ethos held the highest valid recommendation coverage in October 2026 at 32.4%, ahead of Gerber Life at 24.0%, a gap of 8.4 points. Every tracked brand's valid recommendation coverage was lower in October 2026 than in July 2026. Choice Mutual held the smallest decline since baseline, down 0.3 points from 3.4% in July 2026 to 3.1% in October 2026, within normal month-to-month variation; the largest decline was Colonial Penn, down 13.3 points, from 35.2% in July 2026 to 21.9% in October 2026, beyond normal variation.
Five brands declined beyond normal variation from July 2026 to October 2026: AARP Life Insurance from New York Life (down 11.4 points, from 34.9% to 23.5%), Aflac (down 5.2 points, from 19.3% to 14.1%), Colonial Penn (down 13.3 points, from 35.2% to 21.9%), Fidelity Life (down 7.6 points, from 28.7% to 21.1%), and Globe Life (down 4.1 points, from 7.5% to 3.4%). No brand posted a significant coverage increase since baseline. Most recently, Choice Mutual rose 2.4 points from 0.7% in September 2026 to 3.1% in October 2026, beyond normal variation, and Ethos rose 5.4 points from 27.0% to 32.4%, within normal variation.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 383 qualified observations in October 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Oct 2026
- Ethos32.4%
- Gerber Life24.0%
- AARP Life Insurance from New York Life23.5%
- Colonial Penn21.9%
- Fidelity Life21.1%
- Aflac14.1%
- Lincoln Heritage6.5%
- Globe Life3.4%
- Choice Mutual3.1%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 415 | 383 | Down 32 |
Tracked brands | 9 | 9 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 48.4% | 46.7% | Down 1.7 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 62.9% | 58.5% | Down 4.4 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Colonial Penn | Ethos | Changed |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation. The six families tracked are ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. The coverage leader changed hands twice across the four-month record, with Ethos and AARP Life Insurance from New York Life trading the top position.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Final Expense Insurance
Research Scope and Qualification
Questions This Section Answers
- How many prompt-surface observations qualified for the public benchmark in October 2026?
- Why is the qualified benchmark denominator smaller than the raw brand mention count?
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompts collected |
Unique questions | 667 | 695 | Distinct questions asked |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 799 | Prompts mentioning a brand |
Relevant observations | 495 | 540 | On-topic for the vertical |
Irrelevant observations | 305 | 259 | Off-topic or non-responsive |
Qualified benchmark observations | 415 | 383 | Public denominator |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Visibility Market Discovery Methodology
Current Brand Standings
Questions This Section Answers
- Which final expense brands lead on valid recommendation coverage, top-three placement, and rank-one recommendations?
- How do presence rate and valid recommendation coverage differ for the tracked brands?
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ethos | 64.8% | 32.4% | 22.4% | 8.6% | 0.5 |
Gerber Life | 35.5% | 24.0% | 13.8% | 3.7% | 0.7 |
AARP Life Insurance from New York Life | 25.6% | 23.5% | 17.8% | 4.4% | 0.9 |
Colonial Penn | 39.4% | 21.9% | 15.9% | 5.5% | 0.5 |
Fidelity Life | 38.9% | 21.1% | 12.0% | 1.8% | 0.6 |
Aflac | 50.9% | 14.1% | 11.8% | 2.9% | 0.3 |
Lincoln Heritage | 12.3% | 6.5% | 2.4% | 0.0% | 0.6 |
Globe Life | 9.1% | 3.4% | 2.4% | 0.8% | 0.3 |
Choice Mutual | 29.5% | 3.1% | 2.6% | 1.8% | 0.1 |
How to Read the Standings
Presence rate is the share of qualified observations where the brand was mentioned at all. Valid recommendation coverage is the share of qualified observations where the brand appeared in a recommendation that could be clearly attributed. Top-three rate is the share of observations where the brand appeared in the first three recommendation slots. Rank-one rate is the share where the brand was the single top recommendation. Net sentiment reflects the balance of positive minus negative mentions among observations where the brand appeared.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Visibility Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Questions This Section Answers
- Which brand posted the largest decline in valid recommendation coverage since the July 2026 baseline?
- Which brands' coverage moves fell outside normal month-to-month variation?
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Brand | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
AARP Life Insurance from New York Life | 34.9% | 23.5% | Down 11.4 points |
Aflac | 19.3% | 14.1% | Down 5.2 points |
Choice Mutual | 3.4% | 3.1% | Down 0.3 points |
Colonial Penn | 35.2% | 21.9% | Down 13.3 points |
Ethos | 34.9% | 32.4% | Down 2.5 points |
Fidelity Life | 28.7% | 21.1% | Down 7.6 points |
Gerber Life | 26.5% | 24.0% | Down 2.5 points |
Globe Life | 7.5% | 3.4% | Down 4.1 points |
Lincoln Heritage | 9.9% | 6.5% | Down 3.4 points |
Largest Decline: Colonial Penn
Colonial Penn posted the largest decline in valid recommendation coverage, falling 13.3 points from 35.2% in July 2026 to 21.9% in October 2026, beyond normal month-to-month variation. The largest single-month move came from July 2026 to August 2026, when the brand dropped 8.9 points. The most recent month-over-month move was within normal variation, but the cumulative loss is not.
Category Leader: Ethos
Ethos held the highest valid recommendation coverage in October 2026 at 32.4%, down 2.5 points from 34.9% in July 2026, a move within normal month-to-month variation. Its presence rate rose from 55.4% in July 2026 to 64.8% in October 2026, and its rank-one rate rose from 4.6% to 8.6%. Ethos now leads both top-three and rank-one placement, a stronger first-choice position than its coverage lead alone suggests.
Additional Movement: Choice Mutual
Choice Mutual recorded a significant prior-to-current increase, rising 2.4 points from 0.7% in September 2026 to 3.1% in October 2026. The single-month gain should not yet be treated as a trend, as the full series moved from 3.4% in July 2026 to 3.1% in October 2026, within normal variation.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Questions This Section Answers
- Which brands appear most often in the top three recommendation slots?
- Can similar coverage rates hide differences in first-position recommendation strength?
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Among the leading brands, Ethos held both the highest top-three rate and the highest rank-one rate in October 2026.
Brand | Oct 2026 top-three rate | Oct 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ethos | 22.4% | 8.6% | 17.6% | 4.6% |
AARP Life Insurance from New York Life | 17.8% | 4.4% | 27.2% | 9.4% |
Colonial Penn | 15.9% | 5.5% | 18.1% | 3.9% |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Similar top-three rates can hide very different rank-one strength. AARP Life Insurance from New York Life held a top-three rate of 17.8% in October 2026, close to Colonial Penn at 15.9%, yet both trailed Ethos at 22.4%.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
Questions This Section Answers
- Which buyer-intent classes produced qualified observations in the current public series?
- Are pricing and value or multi-brand comparison questions currently represented in the benchmark?
All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 415 | 383 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 415 | 383 |
Pricing, value, and head-to-head comparison questions have no qualified signal in this data. The current public series measures brand recommendation discovery only.
Historical Measurement Record
Questions This Section Answers
- Which brand led each monthly measurement from July through October 2026?
- What movement pattern does the leader-by-coverage record show across the four months?
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 415 | Colonial Penn | 35.2% | Colonial Penn up 0.0 points (baseline) |
Aug 2026 | 452 | Ethos | 29.9% | Colonial Penn down 8.9 points |
Sep 2026 | 423 | AARP Life Insurance from New York Life | 27.7% | Colonial Penn down 8.7 points |
Oct 2026 | 383 | Ethos | 32.4% | Colonial Penn down 13.3 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
Questions This Section Answers
- What does source presence in AI answers tell us about the information environment for final expense recommendations?
- Why is citation presence not proof that a source caused a brand recommendation?
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment, not proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, private or sponsored channels, or causality from a metric movement alone.
Top 10 Cited Domains
Questions This Section Answers
- Which domains were cited most often across AI platform responses?
- How concentrated are citations among the top domains compared with the broader citation base?
Across all AI platform responses in this measurement period, 6,366 citations were observed across 1,489 unique domains.
Rank | Domain | Citations | Share | Platforms citing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | aflac.com | 297 | 4.7% | ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
2 | google.com | 293 | 4.6% | AI Mode, AI Overviews |
3 | ethos.com | 281 | 4.4% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
4 | choicemutual.com | 254 | 4.0% | Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
5 | youtube.com | 220 | 3.5% | ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
6 | nerdwallet.com | 196 | 3.1% | ChatGPT, Copilot, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
7 | reddit.com | 178 | 2.8% | ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
8 | fidelitylife.com | 142 | 2.2% | Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
9 | colonialpenn.com | 127 | 2.0% | ChatGPT, Copilot, AI Mode, AI Overviews |
10 | gerberlife.com | 117 | 1.8% | ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
Citation share is broadly distributed: the top 10 domains account for a combined 33.1%. No single source controls the category narrative. Several tracked brands' own domains appear in the top 10, including aflac.com at rank 1, ethos.com at rank 3, choicemutual.com at rank 4, fidelitylife.com at rank 8, colonialpenn.com at rank 9, and gerberlife.com at rank 10. The mix includes official brand sites alongside third-party review and community sources such as nerdwallet.com, reddit.com, and youtube.com.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Visibility Market Discovery Index tracks how often brands appear in AI-generated answers across major AI and search surfaces. It uses a consistent, audited methodology to produce comparable month-over-month measurements.
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Visibility Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
The public percentage cannot identify the prompts, competitors, or sources causing a brand's result. Get my free AI Company Index
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Expense Management Software: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Boat Insurance: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Umbrella Insurance: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read