Final Expense Insurance: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend final expense insurance. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Decline: Colonial Penn
- 08Largest Decline: Gerber Life
- 09Category Leader: Ethos
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
Ethos led valid recommendation coverage in August 2026 at 29.9%, followed closely by AARP Life Insurance from New York Life at 29.4%, a gap of 0.5 points. The largest coverage decline was Colonial Penn, which fell from 35.2% in July 2026 to 26.3% in August 2026, a decline of 8.9 points that moved beyond normal month-to-month variation. The next largest decline was Gerber Life, dropping from 26.5% in July 2026 to 19.2% in August 2026, down 7.3 points, also beyond normal variation. No tracked brand posted a significant coverage increase this month.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 452 qualified observations in August 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026
- Ethos-5.0%Jul 202634.9%Aug 202629.9%
- AARP Life Insurance from New York Life-5.5%Jul 202634.9%Aug 202629.4%
- Colonial Penn-8.9% · beyond normal variationJul 202635.2%Aug 202626.3%
- Fidelity Life-5.3%Jul 202628.7%Aug 202623.4%
- Gerber Life-7.3% · beyond normal variationJul 202626.5%Aug 202619.2%
- Aflac-4.3%Jul 202619.3%Aug 202615.0%
- Lincoln Heritage-1.7%Jul 20269.9%Aug 20268.2%
- Choice Mutual+1.0%Jul 20263.4%Aug 20264.4%
- Globe Life-3.1%Jul 20267.5%Aug 20264.4%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 415 | 452 | Up 37 |
Tracked brands | 9 | 9 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 48.4% | 47.3% | Down 1.1 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 62.9% | 54.4% | Down 8.5 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Colonial Penn | Ethos | Changed |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation. The six families tracked are ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Final Expense Insurance
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompts collected |
Unique questions | 667 | 675 | Distinct questions asked |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts mentioning a brand |
Relevant observations | 495 | 568 | On-topic for the vertical |
Irrelevant observations | 305 | 232 | Off-topic or non-responsive |
Qualified benchmark observations | 415 | 452 | Public denominator |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Market Discovery Methodology
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ethos | 56.4% | 29.9% | 18.4% | 6.0% | 0.6 |
AARP Life Insurance from New York Life | 35.4% | 29.4% | 22.1% | 7.3% | 0.9 |
Colonial Penn | 40.5% | 26.3% | 15.5% | 5.8% | 0.7 |
Fidelity Life | 44.5% | 23.4% | 14.6% | 2.2% | 0.7 |
Gerber Life | 29.4% | 19.2% | 9.5% | 1.6% | 0.8 |
Aflac | 47.8% | 15.0% | 8.4% | 1.8% | 0.4 |
Lincoln Heritage | 19.5% | 8.2% | 2.4% | 0.0% | 0.5 |
Choice Mutual | 24.8% | 4.4% | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.2 |
Globe Life | 8.4% | 4.4% | 1.6% | 0.0% | 0.6 |
How to Read the Standings
Presence rate is the share of qualified observations where the brand was mentioned at all. Valid recommendation coverage is the share of qualified observations where the brand appeared in a recommendation that could be clearly attributed. Top-three rate is the share of observations where the brand appeared in the first three recommendation slots. Rank-one rate is the share where the brand was the single top recommendation. Net sentiment reflects the balance of positive minus negative mentions among observations where the brand appeared.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
AARP Life Insurance from New York Life | 34.9% | 29.4% | Down 5.5 points |
Aflac | 19.3% | 15.0% | Down 4.3 points |
Choice Mutual | 3.4% | 4.4% | Up 1.0 points |
Colonial Penn | 35.2% | 26.3% | Down 8.9 points |
Ethos | 34.9% | 29.9% | Down 5.0 points |
Fidelity Life | 28.7% | 23.4% | Down 5.3 points |
Gerber Life | 26.5% | 19.2% | Down 7.3 points |
Globe Life | 7.5% | 4.4% | Down 3.1 points |
Lincoln Heritage | 9.9% | 8.2% | Down 1.7 points |
Largest Decline: Colonial Penn
Colonial Penn posted the largest decline in valid recommendation coverage, falling 8.9 points from 35.2% in July 2026 to 26.3% in August 2026. This decline moved beyond normal month-to-month variation. Presence also fell from 48.9% to 40.5% in the same period. Colonial Penn maintained its position in the upper tier of the field despite the drop.
Largest Decline: Gerber Life
Gerber Life declined 7.3 points from 26.5% in July 2026 to 19.2% in August 2026, also beyond normal variation. Rank-one rate fell from 3.9% to 1.6% in the same period. The brand's presence rate declined from 34.5% to 29.4%.
Category Leader: Ethos
Ethos held the highest valid recommendation coverage in August 2026 at 29.9%. Its presence rate of 56.4% was the highest in the benchmark, and its net sentiment of 0.6 was positive. Top-three rate rose slightly from 17.6% to 18.4%.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Among the leading brands, AARP Life Insurance from New York Life posted a higher top-three rate and rank-one rate than Ethos despite slightly lower coverage.
Brand | Aug 2026 top-three rate | Aug 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ethos | 18.4% | 6.0% | 17.6% | 4.6% |
AARP Life Insurance from New York Life | 22.1% | 7.3% | 27.2% | 9.4% |
Colonial Penn | 15.5% | 5.8% | 18.1% | 3.9% |
Close coverage can still hide different first-position rates. AARP Life Insurance from New York Life held a 7.3% rank-one rate versus Ethos at 6.0% in August 2026.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 415 | 452 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 415 | 452 |
The current public series measures brand recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the pricing and value or multi-brand comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 415 | Colonial Penn | 35.2% | Colonial Penn up 0.0 points (baseline) |
Aug 2026 | 452 | Ethos | 29.9% | Colonial Penn down 8.9 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, private or sponsored channels, or causality from a metric movement alone.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how often brands appear in AI-generated answers across major AI and search surfaces. It uses a consistent, audited methodology to produce comparable month-over-month measurements.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Expense Management Software: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Boat Insurance: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Umbrella Insurance: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read