Equipment Financing: AI Market Discovery Index

Tracking how AI platforms recommend equipment financing. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

Mark Huntley, J.D.
By Mark Huntley, J.D.Growth Strategist & AI Discovery Analyst
6 minutes read

Benchmark Summary

Crest Capital led the Equipment Financing benchmark in September 2026 with 44.9% valid recommendation coverage, 0.8 points ahead of National Funding at 44.1%. The largest coverage decline of the month was also recorded by National Funding, whose valid recommendation coverage fell to 44.1% in September 2026 from 64.0% in August 2026, a decline of 19.9 points beyond normal month-to-month variation. Crest Capital posted the second-largest decline, moving down 15.8 points from 60.7% in August 2026 to 44.9% in September 2026, also beyond normal variation. No brand recorded a significant coverage increase this month; Balboa Capital posted the largest rise, up 3.0 points from 16.7% in August 2026 to 19.7% in September 2026, within normal month-to-month variation.

Three brands declined beyond normal variation across the full July-to-September series. National Funding fell in each of the two months since July 2026, dropping 22.6 points from 66.7% in July 2026 to 44.1% in September 2026. eLease also declined in each of the two months since July 2026, falling 16.1 points from 21.6% in July 2026 to 5.5% in September 2026. Crest Capital declined 13.8 points from 58.7% in July 2026 to 44.9% in September 2026, with most of that movement occurring in September. The benchmark produced 127 qualified observations in September 2026, down from 213 in July 2026, after qualification from 800 prompt-surface observations collected in each month.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Sep 2026

0%20%40%60%80%Jul 2026Aug 2026Sep 2026
  • Crest Capital44.9%
  • National Funding44.1%
  • Balboa Capital19.7%
  • Taycor Financial17.3%
  • Beacon Funding9.4%
  • Smarter Finance USA7.1%
  • eLease5.5%
  • Ascentium Capital3.9%
  • Currency1.6%
  • Bankers Capital0.0%

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Measure

Jul 2026

Sep 2026

Movement

Qualified benchmark observations

213

127

Down 86

Tracked brands

10

10

No change

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

51.6%

48.0%

Down 3.6 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

75.6%

56.7%

Down 18.9 points

Leader by valid recommendation coverage

National Funding

Crest Capital

Changed

Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. August 2026 sat between the baseline and current months, with 150 qualified observations and National Funding in the lead at 64.0% coverage.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Equipment Financing

Research Scope and Qualification

The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design. Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection.

Research stage

Jul 2026

Sep 2026

What it represents

Source prompt-surface observations

800

800

Total prompts collected

Unique questions

597

603

Distinct questions asked

Brand / competitor mentions

800

800

Prompts mentioning a brand

Relevant observations

215

132

On-topic responses

Irrelevant observations

585

668

Off-topic responses

Qualified benchmark observations

213

127

Public denominator

For details on how the public benchmark is constructed, see AI Market Discovery Methodology.

Current Brand Standings

Brand

Presence rate

Valid recommendation coverage

Top-three rate

Rank-one rate

Net sentiment

Crest Capital

70.1%

44.9%

42.5%

30.7%

0.9

National Funding

75.6%

44.1%

35.4%

7.1%

0.9

Balboa Capital

29.1%

19.7%

14.2%

3.9%

0.9

Taycor Financial

20.5%

17.3%

9.4%

2.4%

0.9

Beacon Funding

15.8%

9.4%

7.9%

2.4%

0.9

Smarter Finance USA

11.8%

7.1%

4.7%

0.0%

0.7

eLease

7.1%

5.5%

4.7%

2.4%

0.8

Ascentium Capital

4.7%

3.9%

3.1%

2.4%

1.0

Currency

3.1%

1.6%

1.6%

0.8%

0.8

Bankers Capital

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0

How to Read the Standings

  • Presence rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned in the AI response.
  • Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations where the brand appears as a valid recommendation in the response.
  • Top-three rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in the top three recommended positions.
  • Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is the first recommendation.
  • Net sentiment: positive mentions minus negative mentions divided by total mentions; ranges from 0 to 1.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Brand

Jul 2026

Sep 2026

Movement since baseline

Ascentium Capital

1.4%

3.9%

Up 2.5 points

Balboa Capital

12.7%

19.7%

Up 7.0 points

Bankers Capital

0.0%

0.0%

No change

Beacon Funding

10.3%

9.4%

Down 0.9 points

Crest Capital

58.7%

44.9%

Down 13.8 points

Currency

0.9%

1.6%

Up 0.7 points

eLease

21.6%

5.5%

Down 16.1 points

National Funding

66.7%

44.1%

Down 22.6 points

Smarter Finance USA

4.2%

7.1%

Up 2.9 points

Taycor Financial

21.1%

17.3%

Down 3.8 points

Largest Decline: National Funding

National Funding's valid recommendation coverage declined to 44.1% in September 2026 from 66.7% in July 2026, a drop of 22.6 points beyond normal month-to-month variation. The brand declined in each of the two months since July 2026: coverage fell to 64.0% in August 2026, then to 44.1% in September 2026. Rank-one rate fell 11.7 points from 18.8% in July 2026 to 7.1% in September 2026, also beyond normal variation. Raw mention presence eased to 75.6% in September 2026 from 80.3% in July 2026, within normal variation.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Largest Decline: eLease

eLease's valid recommendation coverage declined to 5.5% in September 2026 from 21.6% in July 2026, a drop of 16.1 points beyond normal month-to-month variation. The brand declined in each of the two months since July 2026: coverage fell to 10.7% in August 2026, then to 5.5% in September 2026. Raw mention presence fell 18.7 points from 25.8% in July 2026 to 7.1% in September 2026, and top-three rate declined 5.6 points from 10.3% to 4.7% over the same span, both beyond normal variation.

Largest Decline: Crest Capital

Crest Capital's valid recommendation coverage declined to 44.9% in September 2026, down 15.8 points from 60.7% in August 2026, a move beyond normal month-to-month variation and the largest single-month change for the brand. Across the full series, coverage fell 13.8 points from 58.7% in July 2026. Despite the lower coverage, Crest Capital's rank-one rate increased to 30.7% in September 2026 from 21.6% in July 2026, within normal variation.

Category Leader: Crest Capital

Crest Capital became the category leader in September 2026 with 44.9% valid recommendation coverage, 0.8 points ahead of National Funding at 44.1%. Its rank-one rate of 30.7% in September 2026 was the highest of any tracked brand. National Funding held the lead in both prior months, at 66.7% in July 2026 and 64.0% in August 2026.

Most other tracked brands moved within normal month-to-month variation. Balboa Capital rose for the second consecutive month, reaching 19.7% coverage in September 2026 from 12.7% in July 2026. Smarter Finance USA, Ascentium Capital, and Currency also moved up over the two-month span, while Taycor Financial and Beacon Funding eased within normal variation. Bankers Capital remained at 0.0% coverage across all three months.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Two leaders with near-identical coverage rates show very different first-position rates in September 2026.

Brand

Sep 2026 top-three rate

Sep 2026 rank-one rate

Jul 2026 top-three rate

Jul 2026 rank-one rate

Crest Capital

42.5%

30.7%

40.8%

21.6%

National Funding

35.4%

7.1%

42.7%

18.8%

Crest Capital was separated from National Funding by 0.8 points of valid recommendation coverage in September 2026, yet Crest Capital was the first recommendation in 30.7% of observations versus 7.1% for National Funding. Near-equal coverage can still hide materially different first-position rates.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

The qualified observations in September 2026 all fell into the Brand Recommendation class.

Buyer-intent class

Jul 2026

Sep 2026

Brand Recommendation

213

127

Pricing & Value

0

0

Multi-Brand Comparison

0

0

Total qualified observations

213

127

The current public series measures brand-recommendation discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.

Historical Measurement Record

Measurement

Qualified observations

Coverage leader

Leader coverage

Largest coverage movement

Jul 2026

213

National Funding

66.7%

N/A (baseline month)

Aug 2026

150

National Funding

64.0%

eLease Down 10.9 points

Sep 2026

127

Crest Capital

44.9%

National Funding Down 22.6 points

Evidence and Source Layer

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, private or sponsored channels, or causality from a metric movement alone.

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how AI search and chat surfaces recommend and mention brands across industries, based on qualified prompt-level observations. It is published monthly as a neutral industry benchmark.

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper. The public percentage cannot identify the prompts, competitors, or sources causing the result.

Get my free AI Company Index

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.