Dog Gear, Collars and Outdoor Pet accessories: AI Market Discovery Index

Tracking how AI platforms recommend dog gear, collars and outdoor pet accessories. Updated monthly since July 2026.

Mark Huntley, J.D.
By Mark Huntley, J.D.Growth Strategist & AI Discovery Analyst
5 minutes read

Benchmark Summary

Tractive led valid recommendation coverage in August 2026 at 41.4%, a decline from 43.5% in July 2026. Fi followed at 40.2% in August 2026, up from 40.0% in July 2026, a gap of 1.2 points between the top two brands. The largest coverage increase was Fi, which rose by 0.2 points from 40.0% in July 2026 to 40.2% in August 2026. The largest coverage decline was Ruffwear, which fell by 4.9 points from 41.1% in July 2026 to 36.2% in August 2026. This was a quiet month with no brand moving beyond normal month-to-month variation; all four tracked brands were classified as stable.

The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 594 qualified observations after qualification in August 2026.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026

  • Tractive-2.1%
    Jul 202643.5%
    Aug 202641.4%
  • Fi+0.2%
    Jul 202640.0%
    Aug 202640.2%
  • Ruffwear-4.9%
    Jul 202641.1%
    Aug 202636.2%
  • Kurgo-3.5%
    Jul 202636.5%
    Aug 202633.0%

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Measure

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Movement

Qualified benchmark observations

628

594

Down 34

Tracked brands

4

4

No change

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

39.2%

35.7%

Down 3.5 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

76.6%

74.6%

Down 2.0 points

Leader by valid recommendation coverage

Tractive

Tractive

No change

Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All six families were represented in both months.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Dog Gear, Collars and Outdoor Pet accessories

Research Scope and Qualification

The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.

Research stage

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

What it represents

Source prompt-surface observations

800

800

Total prompts collected across AI/search surfaces

Unique questions

514

569

Distinct questions after de-duplication

Brand / competitor mentions

800

800

Prompts mentioning a tracked brand

Relevant observations

774

738

In-scope for the vertical

Irrelevant observations

26

62

Out-of-scope for the vertical

Qualified benchmark observations

628

594

Public denominator after all qualification

Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Market Discovery Methodology for full details.

Current Brand Standings

Brand

Presence rate

Valid recommendation coverage

Top-three rate

Rank-one rate

Net sentiment

Tractive

57.9%

41.4%

36.5%

27.1%

0.8

Fi

56.1%

40.2%

34.3%

7.6%

0.8

Ruffwear

44.1%

36.2%

30.5%

19.2%

0.9

Kurgo

40.7%

33.0%

21.6%

2.2%

0.9

Standings are current-month (August 2026) metrics, sorted by valid recommendation coverage.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

How to Read the Standings

  • Presence rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand was mentioned at all.
  • Valid recommendation coverage: Share of qualified observations where the brand appeared with a valid recommendation.
  • Top-three rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand was recommended in the top three positions.
  • Rank-one rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand was the first recommendation.
  • Net sentiment: Positive minus negative sentiment among mentions, on a scale from -1 to 1.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Brand

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Movement since baseline

Fi

40.0%

40.2%

Up 0.2 points

Kurgo

36.5%

33.0%

Down 3.5 points

Ruffwear

41.1%

36.2%

Down 4.9 points

Tractive

43.5%

41.4%

Down 2.1 points

All four brands fell within normal month-to-month variation. Fi was the only brand to gain coverage, and its increase was small. Ruffwear posted the steepest single-month decline, dropping 4.9 points from 41.1% in July 2026 to 36.2% in August 2026.

  • Largest Increase: Fi. Fi's valid recommendation coverage rose 0.2 points from 40.0% in July 2026 to 40.2% in August 2026. Presence rate rose 4.0 points from 52.1% to 56.1%, but this did not translate into a material coverage gain.
  • Largest Decline: Ruffwear. Ruffwear's valid recommendation coverage fell 4.9 points from 41.1% in July 2026 to 36.2% in August 2026. Presence rate also declined 2.2 points from 46.3% to 44.1%.
  • Category Leader: Tractive. Tractive led for a second consecutive month at 41.4% in August 2026, down from 43.5% in July 2026 but still ahead of the rest of the field. Its presence rate rose 2.2 points to 57.9% in August 2026, the highest among tracked brands.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Placement rates reveal how often brands appear in the top three or as the first recommendation.

Brand

Aug 2026 top-three rate

Aug 2026 rank-one rate

Jul 2026 top-three rate

Jul 2026 rank-one rate

Tractive

36.5%

27.1%

35.7%

27.4%

Ruffwear

30.5%

19.2%

31.9%

19.8%

Fi

34.3%

7.6%

31.9%

6.9%

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Fi's top-three rate (34.3% in August 2026) is close to Tractive's (36.5%), yet its rank-one rate (7.6%) is far below Tractive's 27.1%. Similar coverage can still hide very different first-position rates.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class, matching discovery and consideration intent.

Buyer-intent class

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Brand Recommendation

628

594

Pricing & Value

0

0

Multi-Brand Comparison

0

0

Total qualified observations

628

594

The current public series measures brand-recommendation discovery only and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.

Historical Measurement Record

This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.

Measurement

Qualified observations

Coverage leader

Leader coverage

Largest coverage movement

Jul 2026 (Baseline)

628

Tractive

43.5%

Aug 2026

594

Tractive

41.4%

Ruffwear Down 4.9 points

Evidence and Source Layer

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure:

  • Market share or attributable sales.
  • Every possible AI response to a given question.
  • Organic-search ranking performance.
  • Social media mention volume.
  • Private or sponsored channels and paid placements.
  • Causality from a metric movement alone; movements are recorded as observed, not explained.

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how often and how prominently brands are recommended across six canonical AI and search surface families: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. Each monthly measurement is built from prompt-level observations that are qualified through a consistent research funnel.

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper into your brand's presence, placement, and sentiment across AI surfaces.

Get my free AI Company Index

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.