Dog Gear, Collars and Outdoor Pet accessories: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend dog gear, collars and outdoor pet accessories. Updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 08Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 09Historical Measurement Record
- 10Evidence and Source Layer
- 11Scope Boundaries
- 12About This Benchmark
Benchmark Summary
Tractive led valid recommendation coverage in August 2026 at 41.4%, a decline from 43.5% in July 2026. Fi followed at 40.2% in August 2026, up from 40.0% in July 2026, a gap of 1.2 points between the top two brands. The largest coverage increase was Fi, which rose by 0.2 points from 40.0% in July 2026 to 40.2% in August 2026. The largest coverage decline was Ruffwear, which fell by 4.9 points from 41.1% in July 2026 to 36.2% in August 2026. This was a quiet month with no brand moving beyond normal month-to-month variation; all four tracked brands were classified as stable.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 594 qualified observations after qualification in August 2026.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026
- Tractive-2.1%Jul 202643.5%Aug 202641.4%
- Fi+0.2%Jul 202640.0%Aug 202640.2%
- Ruffwear-4.9%Jul 202641.1%Aug 202636.2%
- Kurgo-3.5%Jul 202636.5%Aug 202633.0%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 628 | 594 | Down 34 |
Tracked brands | 4 | 4 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 39.2% | 35.7% | Down 3.5 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 76.6% | 74.6% | Down 2.0 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Tractive | Tractive | No change |
Qualified surface breadth counts the canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All six families were represented in both months.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Dog Gear, Collars and Outdoor Pet accessories
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompts collected across AI/search surfaces |
Unique questions | 514 | 569 | Distinct questions after de-duplication |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts mentioning a tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 774 | 738 | In-scope for the vertical |
Irrelevant observations | 26 | 62 | Out-of-scope for the vertical |
Qualified benchmark observations | 628 | 594 | Public denominator after all qualification |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. See the AI Market Discovery Methodology for full details.
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tractive | 57.9% | 41.4% | 36.5% | 27.1% | 0.8 |
Fi | 56.1% | 40.2% | 34.3% | 7.6% | 0.8 |
Ruffwear | 44.1% | 36.2% | 30.5% | 19.2% | 0.9 |
Kurgo | 40.7% | 33.0% | 21.6% | 2.2% | 0.9 |
Standings are current-month (August 2026) metrics, sorted by valid recommendation coverage.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand was mentioned at all.
- Valid recommendation coverage: Share of qualified observations where the brand appeared with a valid recommendation.
- Top-three rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand was recommended in the top three positions.
- Rank-one rate: Share of qualified observations where the brand was the first recommendation.
- Net sentiment: Positive minus negative sentiment among mentions, on a scale from -1 to 1.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Fi | 40.0% | 40.2% | Up 0.2 points |
Kurgo | 36.5% | 33.0% | Down 3.5 points |
Ruffwear | 41.1% | 36.2% | Down 4.9 points |
Tractive | 43.5% | 41.4% | Down 2.1 points |
All four brands fell within normal month-to-month variation. Fi was the only brand to gain coverage, and its increase was small. Ruffwear posted the steepest single-month decline, dropping 4.9 points from 41.1% in July 2026 to 36.2% in August 2026.
- Largest Increase: Fi. Fi's valid recommendation coverage rose 0.2 points from 40.0% in July 2026 to 40.2% in August 2026. Presence rate rose 4.0 points from 52.1% to 56.1%, but this did not translate into a material coverage gain.
- Largest Decline: Ruffwear. Ruffwear's valid recommendation coverage fell 4.9 points from 41.1% in July 2026 to 36.2% in August 2026. Presence rate also declined 2.2 points from 46.3% to 44.1%.
- Category Leader: Tractive. Tractive led for a second consecutive month at 41.4% in August 2026, down from 43.5% in July 2026 but still ahead of the rest of the field. Its presence rate rose 2.2 points to 57.9% in August 2026, the highest among tracked brands.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Placement rates reveal how often brands appear in the top three or as the first recommendation.
Brand | Aug 2026 top-three rate | Aug 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Tractive | 36.5% | 27.1% | 35.7% | 27.4% |
Ruffwear | 30.5% | 19.2% | 31.9% | 19.8% |
Fi | 34.3% | 7.6% | 31.9% | 6.9% |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Fi's top-three rate (34.3% in August 2026) is close to Tractive's (36.5%), yet its rank-one rate (7.6%) is far below Tractive's 27.1%. Similar coverage can still hide very different first-position rates.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class, matching discovery and consideration intent.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 628 | 594 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 628 | 594 |
The current public series measures brand-recommendation discovery only and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 (Baseline) | 628 | Tractive | 43.5% | — |
Aug 2026 | 594 | Tractive | 41.4% | Ruffwear Down 4.9 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure:
- Market share or attributable sales.
- Every possible AI response to a given question.
- Organic-search ranking performance.
- Social media mention volume.
- Private or sponsored channels and paid placements.
- Causality from a metric movement alone; movements are recorded as observed, not explained.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how often and how prominently brands are recommended across six canonical AI and search surface families: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. Each monthly measurement is built from prompt-level observations that are qualified through a consistent research funnel.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper into your brand's presence, placement, and sentiment across AI surfaces.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
GPS Dog Collars & Smart Pet Trackers: 2026 AI Market Discovery Index
A benchmark of how six AI platforms compare and recommend GPS dog collars, smart pet trackers, and GPS pet fences across buyer prompts.
ReadIndustry Reports
Outdoor Retail & Gear Marketplaces: 2026 AI Market Discovery Index
A benchmark of how AI platforms compare and recommend outdoor retailers, gear marketplaces, and shopping destinations across outdoor buying prompts.
ReadIndustry Reports
Dog Toys and Pet Enrichment Products: AI Market Discovery Index
A benchmark of how six AI platforms compare and recommend dog toy, chew toy, enrichment, puppy, and pet-product brands in buying moments.
Read