DNA Testing Kits: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend dna testing kits. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Decline: Living DNA
- 08Largest Decline: Nebula Genomics
- 09Category Leader: AncestryDNA
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
AncestryDNA led the DNA testing kits category in August 2026 with valid recommendation coverage of 72.3%, down from 76.9% in July 2026. The gap to the next brand, 23andMe, was 5.6 percentage points in August 2026, with 23andMe at 66.7% coverage. No brand recorded a significant increase in valid recommendation coverage this month; the closest secondary movement was FamilyTreeDNA's top-three placement rate, which rose from 24.6% in July 2026 to 26.7% in August 2026. The largest coverage decline was Living DNA, whose valid recommendation coverage fell from 21.6% in July 2026 to 14.8% in August 2026.
Movement this month was concentrated among decliners, with Living DNA and Nebula Genomics both registering coverage drops beyond normal month-to-month variation. Across the full two-month series, all ten tracked brands saw coverage decline from July to August 2026, though most moves were within normal variation. The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 594 qualified observations in July 2026 and 607 qualified observations in August 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026
- AncestryDNA-4.6%Jul 202676.9%Aug 202672.3%
- 23andMe-4.3%Jul 202671.0%Aug 202666.7%
- MyHeritage DNA-1.2%Jul 202661.8%Aug 202660.6%
- FamilyTreeDNA-5.4%Jul 202664.1%Aug 202658.7%
- Nebula Genomics-5.5% · beyond normal variationJul 202627.3%Aug 202621.8%
- Living DNA-6.8% · beyond normal variationJul 202621.6%Aug 202614.8%
- African Ancestry-0.6%Jul 20263.2%Aug 20262.6%
- tellmeGen-1.2%Jul 20262.5%Aug 20261.3%
- CRI Genetics-0.1%Jul 20260.8%Aug 20260.7%
- Health Nucleus-0.5%Jul 20260.8%Aug 20260.3%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 594 | 607 | Up 13 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 42.9% | 36.1% | Down 6.8 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 76.3% | 69.5% | Down 6.8 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | AncestryDNA | AncestryDNA | No change |
Qualified surface breadth is the number of canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. All six families were represented in both months.
Recommendation-shaped answer share fell from 42.9% in July 2026 to 36.1% in August 2026, while valid recommendation shortlist share fell from 76.3% to 69.5% over the same period.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending DNA Testing Kits
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Collection universe |
Unique questions | 399 | 448 | Distinct prompts after deduplication |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts naming at least one brand |
Relevant observations | 799 | 800 | On-topic for the category |
Irrelevant observations | 1 | 0 | Off-topic or non-responsive |
Qualified benchmark observations | 594 | 607 | Public denominator |
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. Link AI Market Discovery Methodology.
Current Brand Standings
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AncestryDNA | 99.7% | 72.3% | 68.9% | 66.4% | 0.8 |
23andMe | 96.2% | 66.7% | 59.8% | 1.5% | 0.7 |
MyHeritage DNA | 82.0% | 60.6% | 42.7% | 0.7% | 0.8 |
FamilyTreeDNA | 78.8% | 58.7% | 26.7% | 0.7% | 0.8 |
Nebula Genomics | 26.0% | 21.8% | 7.1% | 1.3% | 0.9 |
Living DNA | 23.9% | 14.8% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.7 |
African Ancestry | 4.3% | 2.6% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 0.8 |
tellmeGen | 3.6% | 1.3% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.4 |
CRI Genetics | 2.1% | 0.7% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.5 |
Health Nucleus | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 1.0 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: Share of qualified observations in which the brand is mentioned in any form.
- Valid recommendation coverage: Share of qualified observations in which the brand receives a valid recommendation.
- Top-three rate: Share of qualified observations in which the brand appears among the top three recommended options.
- Rank-one rate: Share of qualified observations in which the brand is the first-listed recommendation.
- Net sentiment: Share of positive mentions minus negative mentions, scaled to mentions overall.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
23andMe | 71.0% | 66.7% | Down 4.3 points |
African Ancestry | 3.2% | 2.6% | Down 0.6 points |
AncestryDNA | 76.9% | 72.3% | Down 4.6 points |
CRI Genetics | 0.8% | 0.7% | Down 0.1 points |
FamilyTreeDNA | 64.1% | 58.7% | Down 5.4 points |
Health Nucleus | 0.8% | 0.3% | Down 0.5 points |
Living DNA | 21.6% | 14.8% | Down 6.8 points |
MyHeritage DNA | 61.8% | 60.6% | Down 1.2 points |
Nebula Genomics | 27.3% | 21.8% | Down 5.5 points |
tellmeGen | 2.5% | 1.3% | Down 1.2 points |
Largest Decline: Living DNA
Living DNA's valid recommendation coverage fell from 21.6% in July 2026 to 14.8% in August 2026, a decline of 6.8 points beyond normal month-to-month variation. Top-three placement dropped from 4.5% to 1.1%, and rank-one placement fell from 0.7% to 0.0% over the same period. Presence rate declined from 28.3% to 23.9% in August 2026.
Largest Decline: Nebula Genomics
Nebula Genomics' valid recommendation coverage fell from 27.3% in July 2026 to 21.8% in August 2026, a decline of 5.5 points beyond normal month-to-month variation. The brand's presence rate declined from 30.3% to 26.0%, and its top-three placement rate fell from 9.8% to 7.1% in August 2026. Rank-one placement rose from 0.8% to 1.3% over the same period.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Category Leader: AncestryDNA
AncestryDNA remained the category leader for valid recommendation coverage in August 2026 at 72.3%, down from 76.9% in July 2026. The decline was within normal month-to-month variation. AncestryDNA's presence rate was 99.7% in August 2026, and its top-three placement rate fell from 75.1% to 68.9% over the period. Rank-one placement was 66.4% in August 2026, down from 69.9% in July 2026.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. AncestryDNA and 23andMe had high valid recommendation coverage in August 2026, but their first-position rates differ sharply.
Brand | Aug 2026 top-three rate | Aug 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AncestryDNA | 68.9% | 66.4% | 75.1% | 69.9% |
23andMe | 59.8% | 1.5% | 67.5% | 3.0% |
MyHeritage DNA | 42.7% | 0.7% | 43.9% | 1.4% |
Similar overall coverage can still hide very different first-position rates. AncestryDNA was the first-listed recommendation in 66.4% of qualified observations in August 2026, while 23andMe and MyHeritage DNA were first-listed in 1.5% and 0.7% respectively, despite both having coverage above 60%.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in both months fell into the brand recommendation class, representing discovery and consideration intent.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 594 | 607 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 594 | 607 |
The current public series measures brand recommendation discovery only and does not yet contain qualified observations in the pricing and value or multi-brand comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 594 | AncestryDNA | 76.9% | Baseline (no prior month) |
Aug 2026 | 607 | AncestryDNA | 72.3% | Living DNA, Down 6.8 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, private or sponsored channels, or causality from a metric movement alone. The index records the change; it does not by itself establish why the change occurred.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index is a neutral industry benchmark tracking how AI search and chat surfaces present brands across categories. New measurements are added to this same report.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper. The public percentage cannot identify the prompts, competitors, or sources causing the result.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Revenue Cycle Management: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Mental Health Treatment Centers: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
VoIP Services: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read