Cat Food, Litter and Cat Care: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend cat food, litter and cat care. This public AI Visibility Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Increase: World's Best Cat Litter
- 08Largest Decline: Pretty Litter
- 09Category Leader: Tiki Cat
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
Questions This Section Answers
- Which cat food and litter brand led the October 2026 benchmark?
- How wide was the gap between the leading brand and the runner-up?
- Which brands recorded the largest coverage gain and decline?
Tiki Cat led the Cat Food, Litter and Cat Care benchmark in October 2026 with valid recommendation coverage of 60.9%, up from 60.2% in the July 2026 baseline. The gap to the next brand, Weruva at 47.2% in October 2026, stood at 13.7 percentage points. World's Best Cat Litter recorded the largest coverage increase, rising to 25.0% in October 2026 from 20.3% in July 2026, a gain of 4.7 percentage points that moved beyond normal month-to-month variation and marked a second consecutive month of gains. Pretty Litter recorded the largest coverage decline, falling to 3.5% in October 2026 from 6.8% in July 2026, a drop of 3.3 percentage points, and declined in each of the three months since the baseline.
The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 665 qualified observations in October 2026 after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Oct 2026
- Tiki Cat60.9%
- Weruva47.2%
- Smalls45.3%
- Dr. Elsey’s35.6%
- World’s Best Cat Litter25.0%
- Pretty Litter3.5%
- Fussie Cat2.1%
- Cat Person1.4%
- Made by Nacho0.9%
- KitNipBox0.6%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 681 | 665 | Down 16 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 52.0% | 75.9% | Up 23.9 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 84.3% | 93.5% | Up 9.2 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Tiki Cat | Tiki Cat | No change |
Qualified surface breadth counts the number of canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation. The six families are ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. In the intermediate months, the benchmark recorded 668 qualified observations in August 2026 and 672 in September 2026.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Cat Food, Litter and Cat Care
Research Scope and Qualification
Questions This Section Answers
- How many observations made it into the public benchmark denominator?
- Why is the qualified benchmark narrower than the raw collection?
- What is the difference between source observations, relevant observations, and qualified benchmark observations?
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 800 | 800 | Total prompts collected across surfaces |
Unique questions | 582 | 614 | Distinct questions asked |
Brand / competitor mentions | 800 | 800 | Prompts mentioning at least one brand |
Relevant observations | 781 | 780 | On-topic responses retained |
Irrelevant observations | 19 | 20 | Off-topic responses removed |
Qualified benchmark observations | 681 | 665 | Public denominator |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Visibility Market Discovery Methodology.
Current Brand Standings
Questions This Section Answers
- Which brands rank highest by valid recommendation coverage?
- How do presence rate, valid recommendation coverage, and top-three rate differ?
- Which brands have the weakest coverage among those tracked?
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tiki Cat | 64.7% | 60.9% | 45.0% | 12.3% | 1.0 |
Weruva | 52.2% | 47.2% | 32.5% | 5.9% | 0.9 |
Smalls | 46.3% | 45.3% | 34.9% | 22.4% | 1.0 |
Dr. Elsey's | 37.1% | 35.6% | 29.6% | 19.1% | 1.0 |
World's Best Cat Litter | 26.5% | 25.0% | 20.2% | 2.7% | 1.0 |
Pretty Litter | 4.8% | 3.5% | 1.8% | 0.4% | 0.7 |
Fussie Cat | 2.9% | 2.1% | 1.5% | 0.9% | 0.8 |
Cat Person | 1.7% | 1.4% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 0.8 |
Made by Nacho | 1.1% | 0.9% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.9 |
KitNipBox | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.1% | 1.0 |
How to Read the Standings
Presence rate measures the share of qualified observations where a brand appears in the AI response at all. Valid recommendation coverage measures the share of qualified observations where a brand is recommended. Top-three rate measures the share of observations where a brand appears among the top three recommendations. Rank-one rate measures the share of observations where a brand is the first recommendation. Net sentiment is the share of positive mentions minus negative mentions among total mentions for the brand.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Visibility Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Questions This Section Answers
- Which brands moved beyond normal month-to-month variation?
- How has recommendation coverage shifted for each tracked brand since the July baseline?
- Which brand has declined in every month since the baseline?
Brand | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Cat Person | 1.0% | 1.4% | Up 0.4 points |
Dr. Elsey's | 31.0% | 35.6% | Up 4.6 points |
Fussie Cat | 2.2% | 2.1% | Down 0.1 points |
KitNipBox | 0.7% | 0.6% | Down 0.1 points |
Made by Nacho | 1.2% | 0.9% | Down 0.3 points |
Pretty Litter | 6.8% | 3.5% | Down 3.3 points |
Smalls | 42.1% | 45.3% | Up 3.2 points |
Tiki Cat | 60.2% | 60.9% | Up 0.7 points |
Weruva | 43.8% | 47.2% | Up 3.4 points |
World's Best Cat Litter | 20.3% | 25.0% | Up 4.7 points |
Between September 2026 and October 2026, Dr. Elsey's moved up 6.6 points, a rise beyond normal month-to-month variation, while World's Best Cat Litter rose 5.1 points, also beyond normal variation. Tiki Cat, Weruva, and Smalls moved within normal variation over the same period.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Largest Increase: World's Best Cat Litter
World's Best Cat Litter recorded the largest rise against the baseline in October 2026, up 4.7 points to 25.0% from 20.3% in July 2026. The brand gained in the two most recent months, moving from 19.9% in September 2026 to 25.0% in October 2026 and from 18.6% in August 2026 to 19.9% in September 2026, with the October movement beyond normal variation. The brand's top-three rate also rose to 20.2% in October 2026 from 17.0% in July 2026.
Largest Decline: Pretty Litter
Pretty Litter recorded the only decline beyond normal variation in the October 2026 benchmark, with valid recommendation coverage down to 3.5% in October 2026 from 6.8% in the July 2026 baseline. The brand declined in each of the three months since the baseline, moving from 6.8% in July 2026 to 5.1% in August 2026, then to 3.9% in September 2026, and then to 3.5% in October 2026. Presence rate followed the same path, down to 4.8% in October 2026 from 8.5% in the baseline.
Category Leader: Tiki Cat
Tiki Cat remained the coverage leader in October 2026 at 60.9%, matching its July 2026 baseline of 60.2%. The brand reached a series high of 63.0% in August 2026 before easing in September 2026 and recovering in October 2026. Its top-three rate moved up to 45.0% in October 2026 from 43.2% in July 2026, while its rank-one rate moved down to 12.3% from 13.2% in the baseline. The gap to the next brand widened to 13.7 points against Weruva at 47.2% in October 2026.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Questions This Section Answers
- How does rank-one placement differ among leading brands?
- Can a brand have lower top-three coverage but higher first-position placement?
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Among the leading brands, rank-one rates reveal meaningful differences in first-position placement.
Brand | Oct 2026 top-three rate | Oct 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Tiki Cat | 45.0% | 12.3% | 43.2% | 13.2% |
Smalls | 34.9% | 22.4% | 33.6% | 25.8% |
Weruva | 32.5% | 5.9% | 29.2% | 2.5% |
Smalls held a lower top-three rate than Tiki Cat in October 2026, yet its rank-one rate of 22.4% was nearly twice Tiki Cat's 12.3% in the same month. Close coverage can still hide different first-position rates.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class. The current public series does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 681 | 665 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 681 | 665 |
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 681 | Tiki Cat | 60.2% | Baseline month |
Aug 2026 | 668 | Tiki Cat | 63.0% | Weruva up 5.1 points vs. July 2026 |
Sep 2026 | 672 | Tiki Cat | 60.1% | Pretty Litter down 2.9 points vs. the July 2026 baseline (significant decliner) |
Oct 2026 | 665 | Tiki Cat | 60.9% | World's Best Cat Litter up 4.7 points vs. the July 2026 baseline (significant riser) |
Evidence and Source Layer
Questions This Section Answers
- What does the benchmark capture about sources and citations behind AI recommendations?
- Does source presence prove that a citation caused a brand recommendation?
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, private or sponsored channels, or causality from a metric movement alone.
Top 10 Cited Domains
Questions This Section Answers
- Which domains were cited most across AI platform responses?
- Are citations concentrated in a few sources or broadly distributed?
- Did any tracked brand's own domain appear among the top cited sources?
Across all AI platform responses in this measurement period, 6,950 citations were observed pointing to 1,121 unique domains.
Rank | Domain | Citations | Share | Platforms citing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | google.com | 567 | 8.2% | AI Mode, AI Overviews |
2 | cats.com | 513 | 7.4% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
3 | reddit.com | 475 | 6.8% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
4 | youtube.com | 377 | 5.4% | Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
5 | forbes.com | 265 | 3.8% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
6 | chewy.com | 245 | 3.5% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
7 | petmd.com | 182 | 2.6% | ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
8 | amazon.com | 157 | 2.3% | Copilot, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
9 | healthline.com | 136 | 2.0% | Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
10 | facebook.com | 112 | 1.6% | AI Mode, AI Overviews, Perplexity |
Citations are broadly distributed rather than concentrated in a few domains, with the top 10 accounting for less than half of all citations. No tracked brand's own domain appeared in the top 10. The list is led by general platforms (Google, YouTube, Facebook, Reddit), a category-specific review site (cats.com), a retailer (Chewy, Amazon), and editorial or health sources (Forbes, PetMD, Healthline), suggesting that product discovery in this vertical draws on a mix of community commentary, mainstream commerce, and expert editorial content.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Visibility Market Discovery Index tracks how brands appear in AI-generated answers across the six canonical AI surface families, measuring presence, recommendation coverage, placement, and sentiment over time.
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Visibility Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Visibility Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Pet Food Delivery Services: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Veterinary Pet Food and Prescription Pet Nutrition: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
Veterinary Pet Food & Prescription Pet Nutrition: 2026 AI Discovery Index reveals which brands AI platforms recommend most often.
ReadIndustry Reports
Sustainable Pet Food and Alternative Protein: AI Visibility Market Discovery Index
A directional category benchmark of how five major AI search environments discover, compare, and recommend pet food brands across high-intent buying moments
Read