Cat Food, Litter and Cat Care: AI Market Discovery Index

Tracking how AI platforms recommend cat food, litter and cat care. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

Mark Huntley, J.D.
By Mark Huntley, J.D.Growth Strategist & AI Discovery Analyst
5 minutes read

Benchmark Summary

In August 2026, Tiki Cat led the Cat Food, Litter and Cat Care benchmark with valid recommendation coverage of 63.0%, holding the top position it also held in the July 2026 baseline (60.2%). The gap to the next brand, Weruva, stood at 14.1 percentage points in August 2026, narrower than the 16.4-point gap recorded in the July 2026 baseline (Weruva at 43.8%).

August 2026 was a stable month for the category: every tracked brand's valid recommendation coverage remained within normal month-to-month variation, and none crossed the benchmark's significance threshold for a riser or decliner. Measured against the July 2026 baseline, the current data extends a pattern already visible across the two-month series: the coverage gap between Dr. Elsey's and Weruva, and between Dr. Elsey's and Smalls, has widened in each month measured, as has the gap between Pretty Litter and Weruva.

The benchmark began with 800 prompt-surface observations in each month and produced 668 qualified observations in August 2026 after qualification.

AI recommendation trend

valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Aug 2026

  • Tiki Cat+2.8%
    Jul 202660.2%
    Aug 202663.0%
  • Weruva+5.1%
    Jul 202643.8%
    Aug 202648.9%
  • Smalls+4.2%
    Jul 202642.1%
    Aug 202646.3%
  • Dr. Elsey’s-3.5%
    Jul 202631.0%
    Aug 202627.5%
  • World’s Best Cat Litter-1.7%
    Jul 202620.3%
    Aug 202618.6%
  • Pretty Litter-1.7%
    Jul 20266.8%
    Aug 20265.1%
  • Fussie Cat+0.5%
    Jul 20262.2%
    Aug 20262.7%
  • Made by Nacho+0.5%
    Jul 20261.2%
    Aug 20261.7%
  • Cat Person-0.1%
    Jul 20261.0%
    Aug 20260.9%
  • KitNipBox+0.1%
    Jul 20260.7%
    Aug 20260.8%

Current Benchmark at a Glance

Measure

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Movement

Qualified benchmark observations

681

668

Down 13

Tracked brands

10

10

No change

Qualified surface breadth

6

6

No change

Recommendation-shaped answer share

52.0%

55.7%

Up 3.7 points

Valid recommendation shortlist share

84.3%

85.8%

Up 1.5 points

Leader by valid recommendation coverage

Tiki Cat

Tiki Cat

No change

Qualified surface breadth counts the number of canonical AI surface families with at least one qualified observation. The six families are ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode.

For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Cat Food, Litter and Cat Care

Research Scope and Qualification

The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.

Research stage

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

What it represents

Source prompt-surface observations

800

800

Total prompts collected across surfaces

Unique questions

582

630

Distinct questions asked

Brand / competitor mentions

800

800

Prompts mentioning at least one brand

Relevant observations

781

781

On-topic responses retained

Irrelevant observations

19

19

Off-topic responses removed

Qualified benchmark observations

681

668

Public denominator

Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Market Discovery Methodology.

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.

Current Brand Standings

Brand

Presence rate

Valid recommendation coverage

Top-three rate

Rank-one rate

Net sentiment

Tiki Cat

71.3%

63.0%

44.2%

15.1%

1.0

Weruva

57.6%

48.9%

32.8%

3.6%

0.9

Smalls

48.0%

46.3%

36.1%

22.3%

1.0

Dr. Elsey's

31.4%

27.5%

21.9%

13.6%

0.9

World's Best Cat Litter

21.7%

18.6%

15.0%

3.1%

0.9

Pretty Litter

7.5%

5.1%

3.6%

0.6%

0.6

Fussie Cat

4.3%

2.7%

1.4%

0.4%

0.7

Made by Nacho

1.9%

1.7%

0.9%

0.6%

0.8

Cat Person

1.4%

0.9%

0.1%

0.1%

0.7

KitNipBox

0.8%

0.8%

0.6%

0.4%

1.0

How to Read the Standings

Presence rate measures the share of qualified observations where a brand appears in the AI response at all. Valid recommendation coverage measures the share of qualified observations where a brand is recommended. Top-three rate measures the share of observations where a brand appears among the top three recommendations. Rank-one rate measures the share of observations where a brand is the first recommendation. Net sentiment is the share of positive mentions minus negative mentions among total mentions for the brand.

For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.

Recommendation Coverage Movement

Brand

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Movement since baseline

Cat Person

1.0%

0.9%

Down 0.1 points

Dr. Elsey's

31.0%

27.5%

Down 3.5 points

Fussie Cat

2.2%

2.7%

Up 0.5 points

KitNipBox

0.7%

0.8%

Up 0.1 points

Made by Nacho

1.2%

1.7%

Up 0.5 points

Pretty Litter

6.8%

5.1%

Down 1.7 points

Smalls

42.1%

46.3%

Up 4.2 points

Tiki Cat

60.2%

63.0%

Up 2.8 points

Weruva

43.8%

48.9%

Up 5.1 points

World's Best Cat Litter

20.3%

18.6%

Down 1.7 points

August 2026 was a quiet month for the category. No brand moved beyond normal month-to-month variation. Weruva recorded the largest absolute gain, moving up 5.1 points, while Dr. Elsey's recorded the largest decline, moving down 3.5 points. Both moves remain within normal variation.

Category Leader: Tiki Cat

Tiki Cat remained the category leader in August 2026, with valid recommendation coverage of 63.0%, compared with 60.2% in the July 2026 baseline. The gap to Weruva, the next brand at 48.9% in August 2026 versus 43.8% in July 2026, narrowed to 14.1 percentage points from 16.4 percentage points in the baseline month.

Recommendation Placement Snapshot

Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Among the leading brands, rank-one rates reveal meaningful differences in first-position placement.

Brand

Aug 2026 top-three rate

Aug 2026 rank-one rate

Jul 2026 top-three rate

Jul 2026 rank-one rate

Tiki Cat

44.2%

15.1%

43.2%

13.2%

Smalls

36.1%

22.3%

33.6%

25.8%

Weruva

32.8%

3.6%

29.2%

2.5%

Smalls and Tiki Cat show close top-three coverage, yet Smalls holds a higher first-position rate at 22.3% in August 2026 versus Tiki Cat's 15.1% in the same month.

Buyer-Intent Distribution

All qualified observations in both months fell into the Brand Recommendation class. The current public series measures that class of discovery and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.

Buyer-intent class

Jul 2026

Aug 2026

Brand Recommendation

681

668

Pricing & Value

0

0

Multi-Brand Comparison

0

0

Total qualified observations

681

668

Historical Measurement Record

This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.

Measurement

Qualified observations

Coverage leader

Leader coverage

Largest coverage movement

Jul 2026

681

Tiki Cat

60.2%

Up 5.1 points for Weruva (Aug 2026)

Aug 2026

668

Tiki Cat

63.0%

Up 5.1 points for Weruva

Evidence and Source Layer

The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment, not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.

Scope Boundaries

This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, private or sponsored channels, or causality from a metric movement alone.

About This Benchmark

The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how brands appear in AI-generated answers across the six canonical AI surface families, measuring presence, recommendation coverage, placement, and sentiment over time.

Get a Company-Level Authority Index

The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper. The public percentage cannot identify the prompts, competitors, or sources causing the result.

Get my free AI Company Index

Want the full Authority Index

The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.