Assisted Living Facilities: AI Market Discovery Index
Tracking how AI platforms recommend assisted living facilities. This public AI Market Discovery Index is updated monthly since July 2026.

On this page
- 01Benchmark Summary
- 02Current Benchmark at a Glance
- 03Research Scope and Qualification
- 04Current Brand Standings
- 05How to Read the Standings
- 06Recommendation Coverage Movement
- 07Largest Decline: Life Care Services (LCS)
- 08Largest Decline: Sunrise Senior Living
- 09Category Leader: Brookdale Senior Living
- 10Recommendation Placement Snapshot
- 11Buyer-Intent Distribution
- 12Historical Measurement Record
Benchmark Summary
Brookdale Senior Living led the Assisted Living Facilities benchmark in September 2026 with a valid recommendation coverage of 16.7%, ahead of Sunrise Senior Living at 11.5%. Life Care Services (LCS) posted the largest cumulative decline, with valid recommendation coverage falling to 0.6% in September 2026 from 6.0% in July 2026, a drop beyond normal month-to-month variation. Sunrise Senior Living also declined on the same cumulative measure, moving to 11.5% in September 2026 from 20.1% in July 2026, also beyond normal variation. On that baseline-to-current measure, no tracked brand posted a significant coverage increase. Within the single month between August 2026 and September 2026, Belmont Village posted the largest gain among tracked brands, moving to 10.3% in September 2026 from 2.6% in August 2026, a change beyond normal month-to-month variation.
Across the full series, Life Care Services (LCS) declined in each of the two months since July 2026, and Sunrise Senior Living, while up from August 2026, remains well below its July 2026 level. The benchmark began with 403 prompt-surface observations in July 2026 and 687 in September 2026, producing 149 and 156 qualified observations respectively after qualification.
AI recommendation trend
valid recommendation coverage, Jul 2026 to Sep 2026
- Brookdale Senior Living16.7%
- Sunrise Senior Living11.5%
- Atria Senior Living10.9%
- Belmont Village10.3%
- Erickson Senior Living7.0%
- Pegasus Senior Living2.6%
- Sonida Senior Living1.3%
- Five Star Senior Living0.6%
- Holiday Retirement0.6%
- Life Care Services (LCS)0.6%
Current Benchmark at a Glance
Measure | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|
Qualified benchmark observations | 149 | 156 | Up 7 |
Tracked brands | 10 | 10 | No change |
Qualified surface breadth | 6 | 6 | No change |
Recommendation-shaped answer share | 30.9% | 19.9% | Down 11.0 points |
Valid recommendation shortlist share | 25.5% | 30.8% | Up 5.3 points |
Leader by valid recommendation coverage | Sunrise Senior Living | Brookdale Senior Living | Changed |
Qualified surface breadth refers to the number of canonical AI/search surface families with at least one qualified observation: ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode. August 2026 also held breadth at six surfaces, while observation counts dipped to 113 before recovering in September 2026.
For the strategic interpretation of this benchmark, read CiteWorks Studio's analysis of How AI Search Is Recommending Assisted Living Facilities
Research Scope and Qualification
The public benchmark is narrower than the raw collection universe by design.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Research stage | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | What it represents |
|---|---|---|---|
Source prompt-surface observations | 403 | 687 | Total prompts collected across AI/search surfaces |
Unique questions | 286 | 460 | Distinct questions after de-duplication |
Brand / competitor mentions | 403 | 687 | Prompts mentioning at least one tracked brand |
Relevant observations | 318 | 551 | Prompts relevant to assisted living facilities |
Irrelevant observations | 85 | 136 | Prompts outside the benchmark scope |
Qualified benchmark observations | 149 | 156 | Public denominator after all qualification |
Brand-level percentages use the qualified observations as the public denominator, not the raw collection. AI Market Discovery Methodology
Current Brand Standings
This table shows the current-month benchmark view for September 2026, sorted by valid recommendation coverage.
Brand | Presence rate | Valid recommendation coverage | Top-three rate | Rank-one rate | Net sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brookdale Senior Living | 64.1% | 16.7% | 12.8% | 5.8% | 0.8 |
Sunrise Senior Living | 38.5% | 11.5% | 10.9% | 4.5% | 0.5 |
Atria Senior Living | 30.1% | 10.9% | 9.0% | 3.2% | 0.5 |
Belmont Village | 15.4% | 10.3% | 8.3% | 4.5% | 0.8 |
Erickson Senior Living | 25.0% | 7.0% | 5.8% | 3.9% | 0.6 |
Pegasus Senior Living | 4.5% | 2.6% | 2.6% | 0.6% | 0.7 |
Sonida Senior Living | 3.2% | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.6 |
Five Star Senior Living | 2.6% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.2 |
Holiday Retirement | 2.6% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.2 |
Life Care Services (LCS) | 17.3% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.4 |
How to Read the Standings
- Presence rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is mentioned, regardless of recommendation status.
- Valid recommendation coverage: share of qualified observations where the brand appears in a valid recommendation shortlist.
- Top-three rate: share of qualified observations where the brand appears among the top three recommendations.
- Rank-one rate: share of qualified observations where the brand is the first recommendation.
- Net sentiment: positive minus negative mentions divided by total mentions, shown as a score from -1 to 1.
For formulas and denominator rules, see AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions.
Recommendation Coverage Movement
Brand | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 | Movement since baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
Atria Senior Living | 18.1% | 10.9% | Down 7.2 points |
Belmont Village | 8.1% | 10.3% | Up 2.2 points |
Brookdale Senior Living | 16.8% | 16.7% | Down 0.1 points |
Erickson Senior Living | 5.4% | 7.0% | Up 1.6 points |
Five Star Senior Living | 0.7% | 0.6% | Down 0.1 points |
Holiday Retirement | 0.0% | 0.6% | Up 0.6 points |
Life Care Services (LCS) | 6.0% | 0.6% | Down 5.4 points |
Pegasus Senior Living | 1.3% | 2.6% | Up 1.3 points |
Sonida Senior Living | 1.3% | 1.3% | No change |
Sunrise Senior Living | 20.1% | 11.5% | Down 8.6 points |
Belmont Village moved from 2.6% in August 2026 to 10.3% in September 2026, a rise beyond normal month-to-month variation within a single month. Atria Senior Living rose to 10.9% in September 2026 from 6.2% in August 2026, within normal variation.
Largest Decline: Life Care Services (LCS)
Life Care Services (LCS) moved from a valid recommendation coverage of 6.0% in July 2026 to 0.6% in September 2026, a drop beyond normal month-to-month variation. The brand declined in each of the two months since July 2026, reaching 1.8% in August 2026 before falling further. Top-three placement also declined, moving from 4.0% in July 2026 to 0.6% in September 2026. Presence rate moved from 20.8% to 17.3% over the same period. Net sentiment held at 0.4.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Largest Decline: Sunrise Senior Living
Sunrise Senior Living moved from a valid recommendation coverage of 20.1% in July 2026 to 11.5% in September 2026, a drop beyond normal month-to-month variation. Presence rate declined from 63.1% to 38.5% over the same period. The brand remained the benchmark leader in July 2026 and has since been overtaken. Top-three placement moved from 13.4% to 10.9%, and rank-one placement rose from 4.0% to 4.5%. Net sentiment moved from 0.6 to 0.5.
Category Leader: Brookdale Senior Living
Brookdale Senior Living led the benchmark in September 2026 with a valid recommendation coverage of 16.7%, essentially flat from 16.8% in July 2026, a move within normal month-to-month variation. The brand's presence rate was 64.1% in September 2026, the highest among all tracked brands, and its rank-one rate of 5.8% was also the highest in the category. Net sentiment moved from 0.6 in July 2026 to 0.8 in September 2026.
Recommendation Placement Snapshot
Coverage alone does not show how prominently a brand is recommended. Among the leading brands, placement patterns are broadly aligned with coverage rankings.
Brand | Sep 2026 top-three rate | Sep 2026 rank-one rate | Jul 2026 top-three rate | Jul 2026 rank-one rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Brookdale Senior Living | 12.8% | 5.8% | 13.4% | 9.4% |
Sunrise Senior Living | 10.9% | 4.5% | 13.4% | 4.0% |
Atria Senior Living | 9.0% | 3.2% | 13.4% | 3.4% |
Atria Senior Living and Brookdale Senior Living had identical top-three rates of 13.4% in July 2026, but Brookdale Senior Living converted a larger share of those placements into first-position results, holding a higher rank-one rate in both months.
Buyer-Intent Distribution
All qualified observations in both July 2026 and September 2026 fell into the Brand Recommendation class, which captures discovery and consideration queries.
Buyer-intent class | Jul 2026 | Sep 2026 |
|---|---|---|
Brand Recommendation | 149 | 156 |
Pricing & Value | 0 | 0 |
Multi-Brand Comparison | 0 | 0 |
Total qualified observations | 149 | 156 |
The current public series measures Brand Recommendation discovery only and does not yet contain qualified observations in the Pricing & Value or Multi-Brand Comparison classes.
Historical Measurement Record
This is an evergreen benchmark URL. New measurements are added to the same report.
Measurement | Qualified observations | Coverage leader | Leader coverage | Largest coverage movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 2026 | 149 | Sunrise Senior Living | 20.1% | No prior baseline |
Aug 2026 | 113 | Brookdale Senior Living | 14.2% | Sunrise Senior Living, down 12.1 points |
Sep 2026 | 156 | Brookdale Senior Living | 16.7% | Sunrise Senior Living, down 8.6 points |
Evidence and Source Layer
The benchmark is built from prompt-level observations that retain the query, AI/search surface, answer, brand outcome, recommendation placement, sentiment, and, where exposed, citations or attributable evidence sources. Source presence is evidence about the information environment. It is not automatically proof that the source caused the recommendation.
Scope Boundaries
This public benchmark does not measure market share, attributable sales, every possible AI response, organic-search ranking, social mention volume, private or sponsored channels, or causality from a metric movement alone.
About This Benchmark
The LLM Authority Index AI Market Discovery Index tracks how often brands are recommended across major AI and search surfaces. It is a neutral industry benchmark built from the six canonical AI/search surface families.
- AI Market Discovery Methodology
- AI Market Discovery Metric Definitions
- AI Market Discovery Research Standards
- Modeled AI Authority Value
Get a Company-Level Authority Index
The public industry benchmark shows category-level standings. A company-level Authority Index can go deeper.
Want the full Authority Index
The paid deep-dive adds competitor threat profiles, the gap matrix, citation failure map, platform-by-platform recovery roadmap, and client-specific economic modeling.
Keep reading
Related posts
Industry Reports
Prestige Makeup Brands: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Portable Power Stations and Off-grid Power: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
ReadIndustry Reports
Outdoor Apparel and Technical Outfits: AI Market Discovery Index
Read this blog on LLM Authority Index.
Read